Determining ecotourism strategies using A’WOT hybrid method: case study of Troia Historical National Park, Çanakkale, Turkey

References

• Akarca A. 1978. Troas’ta Aşağı Kara Menderes Ovasının çevresindeki şehirler. Belleten, XLII. 165:1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bernroider E. 2002. Factors in SWOT analysis applied to micro, small-to-medium, and large software enterprises: an Austrian Study. Eur Manage J. 20:562–573. doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00095-6
   Google Scholar
• Buultjensa J, Ratnayakeb I, Gnanapalab A, Aslam M. 2005. Tourism and its implications for management in Ruhuna National Park (Yala), Sri Lanka. Tourism Manage. 26:733–742. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2004.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çelik N, Murat G. 2008. Sayısallaştırılmış SWOT analizi ile Bartın ilinin ekonomik yapısını değerlendirme. 2. Ulusal İktisat Kongresi 20–22 Şubat. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İİBF İktisat Bölümü, İzmir, Türkiye [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jun 13]. Available from: http://www.deu.edu.tr/userweb/iibf_kongre/dosyalar/celik.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cengiz T. 2007. Tourism an ecological approach in protected areas: Karagöl-Sahara National Park Turkey. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 14:260–267. doi:10.1080/13504500709469726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cengiz T, Akbulak C, Özcan H, Baytekin H. 2013. Determination of optimal landuse in Gökçeada. J Agric Sci. 19:148–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cengiz T, Tüfekçioğlu A, İskender A. 2005. Artvin il gelişme planı turizm sektörü raporu. Artvin Valiliği.
   Google Scholar
• Chen WY, Jim CY. 2012. Contingent valuation of ecotourism development in country parks in the urban shadow. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 19:44–53. doi:10.1080/13504509.2011.588727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung LTO, Jim CY. 2013. Ecotourism service preference and management in Hong Kong. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 20:182–194. doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.775192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook JM. 1973. The Troad: an archaeolgical and topographical study. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day J, Cai L. 2012. Environmental and energy-related challenges to sustainable tourism in the United States and China. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 19:379–388. doi:10.1080/13504509.2012.675600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinçer Ö. 2004. Stratejik yönetim ve işletme politikası. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım.
   Google Scholar
• Eagles P. 2001. International trends in park tourism. Paper for federation of nature and national parks of Europe [Internet]. [cited 2014 Mar 20]. Available from: http://www.ahs.uwaterloo.ca/rec/pdf/inttrends.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan N, Tosun C. 2009. Environmental performance of tourism accommodations in the protected areas: case of Goreme Historical National Park. Int J Hospitality Manag. 28:406–414. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erol SY, Kuvan Y, Yıldırım HT. 2011. The general characteristics and main problems of national parks in Turkey. Afr J Agr Res. 6:5377–5385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerner L, Serez M. 2006. Euronatur’un troya projesi, Troia Tarihi Ulusal Parkı kuş türleri ve habitatlarını tehdit eden faktörlere karşı alınması gereken önlemler. Çanakkale: ÇOMÜ Matbaası. ISBN:975-8100-50-5.
   Google Scholar
• Ghazinoory S, Zadeh AE, Memariani A. 2007. Fuzzy SWOT analysis. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 18:99–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görmüş S. 2012. Korunan alan planlama stratejilerinin değerlendirilmesi: Kastamonu-Bartın Küre Dağları Milli Parkı örneği. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi. 14:37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hill T, Westbrook R. 1997. SWOT analysis: it’s time for a product recall. Long Range Plann. 30:46–52. doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(96)00095-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho W. 2008. Decision support integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications – a literature review. Eur J Oper Res. 186:211–228. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibret BU, Aydinozu D, Bastemur C. 2013. A geographic study on the effects of coastal tourism on sustainable development: coastal tourism in Cide. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 20:134–141. doi:10.1080/13504509.2012.743195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İnayet Z, Akbulak C. 2010. Troia Tarihi Milli Parkı’ndaki turizm potansiyelinin SWOT analizi ile değerlendirilmesi. 11. Ulusal Turizm Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 2–5 Aralık, Kuşadası; p. 203–213.
   Google Scholar
• The International Union for Conservation of Nature. 1994. Guidelines for protected area management categories. Cambridge: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Kajanus M, Kangas J, Kurttila M. 2004. The use of value focused thinking and the A’WOT hybrid method in tourism management. Tourism Manage. 25:499–506. doi:10.1016/S0261-5177(03)00120-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajanus M, Leskinen P, Kurttila M, Kangas J. 2012. Making use of MCDS methods in SWOT analysis – lessons learnt in strategic natural resources management. For Policy Econ. 20:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas J, Kurttila M, Kajanus M, Kangas A. 2003. Evaluating the management strategies of a forestland estate the SOS approach. J Environ Manage. 69:349–358. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas J, Pesonen M, Kurttila M, Kajanus M. 2001. A’WOT: integrating AHP with SWOT analysis [Internet]. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Bern; p. 189–198; [cited 2014 Mar 20]. Available from: http://isahp.org/2001Proceedings/Papers/037-P.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Korfmann M. 2001. Tarih öncesi yerleşim yeri, Hisarlık tepesi Troia düş ve gerçek. İstanbul: Homer Kitabevi ve Yayıncılık.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler P. 1988. Marketing management: analysis, planning, implementation and control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.
   Google Scholar
• Kurttila M, Pesonen M, Kangas J, Kajanus M. 2000. Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis—a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. For Policy Econ. 1:41–52. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(99)00004-0
   Google Scholar
• Leskinen LA, Leskinen P, Kurttilaa M, Kangas J, Kajanus M. 2006. Adapting modern strategic decision support tools in the participatory strategy process—a case study of a forest research station. For Policy Econ. 8:267–278. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2004.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masozera MK, Alavalapati JR, Jacobson SK, Shrestha RK. 2006. Assessing the suitability of community-based management for the Nyungwe Forest Reserve, Rwanda. For Policy Econ. 8:206–216. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2004.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaou EI, Ierapetritis D, Tsagarakis KP. 2011. An evaluation of the prospects of green entrepreneurship development using a SWOT analysis. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 18:1–16. doi:10.1080/13504509.2011.543565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer AN, Palmer MV. 1999. Origin of wind cave and its features [Internet]. National Park Service, Wind Cave National Park. [cited 2013 Jun 16]. Available from: http://www.nps.gov/wica/Origin_of_Wind _Cave.htm
   Google Scholar
• Pesonen M, Ahola J, Kurttila M, Kajanus M, Kangas J. 2000. Investment strategies of Finnish forest industry in North America: a case study using A’WOT. In: Munn I, Bullard SH, Grado SC, Grebner DL, editors. Proceedings of SOFEW ‘99. Southern forest economics workshop; Apr 18–20; Biloxi, MS; p. 43–49. Available from: http://sofew.cfr.msstate.edu/papers/0110pesonen.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pesonen M, Kurttila M, Kangas J, Kajanus M, Heinonen P. 2001. Assessing the priorities among resource management strategies at the Finnish Forest and Park Service. For Sci. 47:534–541.
   Google Scholar
• Pirselimoğlu Z, Demirel Ö. 2012. A study of an ecologically based recreation and tourism planning approach: a case study on Trabzon Çalköy high plateau in Turkey. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 19:349–360. doi:10.1080/13504509.2012.662181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinius SW, Fredman P. 2007. Protected areas as attractions. Ann Tourism Res. 34:839–854. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2007.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Şahin K, Yılmaz A. 2009. Samsun ilinde doğal kaynaklara dayalı turizm arzı ve planlanması. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2:218–231.
   Google Scholar
• Shinno H, Yoshioka H, Marpaung S, Hachiga S. 2006. Quantitative SWOT analysis on global competitiveness of machine tool industry. J Eng Des. 17:251–258. doi:10.1080/09544820500275180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha RK, Alavalapati JRR, Kalmbacher RS. 2004. Exploring the potential for silvopasture adoption in south-central Florida: an application of SWOT-AHP method. Agric Syst. 81:185–199. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2003.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart TJ. 2005. Dealing with uncertainties in MCDA. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M, editors. Multi-criteria decision analysis – state of the art annotated surveys, International series in operations research and management science. New York (NY): Springer; p. 445–470.
   Google Scholar
• Tosun C. 2001. Challenges of sustainable tourism development in the developing world: the case of Turkey. Tourism Manage. 22:289–303. doi:10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00060-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [TUIK] Turkish Statistical Institute. 2013. ADNKS 2012 yılı nüfus sayımı sonuçları [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jul 20]. Available from: http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/adnksdagitapp/adnks.zul
   Google Scholar
• Umar B. 1999. İlkçağda Türkiye Halkı. İstanbul: İnkilap Kitabevi Yayını.
   Google Scholar
• [UNESCO] United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 2013. Dünya miras listesi [Internet]. [cited 2013 Sep 22]. Available from: http://www.turkiyegezi.com/Turkiye_unesco_dunya_mirasi.htm
   Google Scholar
• Yılmaz E. 2007. A’WOT tekniği kullanarak katılımcı yaklaşımla proje değerlendirmesi. Doğu Akdeniz Ormancılık Araştırma Müdürlüğü. J DOA. 13:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Yılmaz E, Coşgun U, Koçak Z, Ay Z, Orhan KH. 2009. Prioritising and determining of ecotourism strategy with participatory approach: a case studies of the Cehennemdere Valley and Köprülü Kanyon National Park. DOA Publish No: 51. Tarsus: Eastern Mediterranean Forestry Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Yücel M, Babuş D. 2005. The history of nature conservation and developments of nature conservation in Turkey. J DOA. 111:51–175.
   Google Scholar
• Yüksel İ, Akın A. 2006. Analitik hiyerarşi proses yöntemiyle işletmelerde strateji belirleme. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi. 7:254–268.
   Google Scholar
• Yüksel İ, Dağdeviren M. 2007. Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis – a case study for a textile firm. Inf Sci. 177:3364–3382. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2007.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar