References
- Boström M. 2012. The problematic social dimension of sustainable development: the case of the forest stewardship council. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 19:3–15. doi:10.1080/13504509.2011.582891
- Chou F. 2003. On comprehensive evaluation of county sustainable development. Econ Geogr. 23:319–326 (in Chinese).
- Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. 2013. Dublin core metadata element set, Version 1.1 [Internet]. [cited 2013 Apr 5]. Available from: Dublincore.org
- He Y. 2003. Brief talk on the sustainable development of Diqing district. Yunnan Environ Sci. 22:23–26 (in Chinese).
- Li F, Liu X, Hu D, Wang R, Yang W, Li D, Zhao D. 2009. Measurement indicators and an evaluation approach for assessing urban sustainable development: a case study for China’s Jining City. Landsc Urban Plan. 90:134–142. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.022
- Long J, Chen S, Liu G. 2010. Metadata representation and management in the scientific assessment system. Comput Technol Dev. 20:12–15 (in Chinese).
- Lyytimäki J, Tapio P, Varho V, Söderman T. 2013. The use, non-use and misuse of indicators in sustainability assessment and communication. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 20:385–393. doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.834524
- Qi Z, Cheng S, Shen L. 2000. A Shangri-La strategy for sustainable development and its practice in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Resour Sci. 22:83–85 (in Chinese).
- Wang H, Zhang T, Quan Y, Dong R. 2013. Research on the framework of the environmental internet of things. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 20:199–204. doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.783517
- Zhao J, Zheng X, Dong R, Shao G. 2013. The planning, construction, and management toward sustainable cities in china needs the environmental internet of things. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 20:195–198. doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.784882