Governance rescaling and the neoliberalization of nature: the case of biodiversity conservation in four EU countries

References

• Apostolopoulou E, Adams WM. 2014. Neoliberal capitalism and conservation in the post-crisis era: the dialectics of ‘green’ and ‘un-green’ grabbing in Greece and the UK. Antipode. doi:10.1111/anti.12102
   Google Scholar
• Apostolopoulou E, Paloniemi R. 2012. Frames of scale challenges in Finnish and Greek biodiversity conservation. Ecol Soc. 17:9.
   Google Scholar
• Apostolopoulou E, Pantis JD. 2010. Development plans versus conservation: explanation of emergent conflicts and state political handling. Environ Plann A. 42:982–1000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker K. 2010. The limits of ‘neoliberal natures’: debating green neoliberalism. Prog Hum Geogr. 34:715–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botetzagias A, Boudourides MA. 2004. Environmental organisations in Greece. STAGE, Discussion Paper 8. Patras: University of Patras.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner N. 2009. Open questions on state rescaling. Camb J Regions Econ Soc. 2:123–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge G, Perreault T. 2009. Environmental governance. In: Castree N, Demeritt D, Liverman D, Rhoads B, editors. A companion to environmental geography. Oxford (UK): Blackwell; p. 475–497.
   Google Scholar
• Brockington D, Duffy R. 2010. Capitalism and conservation: the production and reproduction of biodiversity conservation. Antipode. 42:469–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher B, Sullivan S, Neves K, Igoe J, Brockington D. 2012. Towards a synthesized critique of neoliberal biodiversity conservation. Cap Nat Social. 23:4–30.
   Google Scholar
• Castree N. 2008a. Neoliberalising nature: the logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environ Plann A. 40:131–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castree N. 2008b. Neoliberalising nature: processes, effects, and evaluations. Environ Plann A. 40:153–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cent J, Mertens C, Niedziałkowski K. 2013. Roles and impacts of non-governmental organizations in Natura 2000 implementation in Hungary and Poland. Environ Conserv. 40:119–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corson C. 2010. Shifting environmental governance in a neoliberal world: USAID for conservation. Antipode. 42:576–602.
   Google Scholar
• Corson C, MacDonald KI, Neimark B. 2013. Grabbing ‘green’: markets, environmental governance and the materialization of natural capital. Human Geogr. 6:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Cupples J, Glynn K. 2014. The mediation and remediation of disaster: Hurricanes Katrina and Felix in/and the new media environment. Antipode. 46:359–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies J. 2013. Rethinking urban power and the local state: hegemony, domination and resistance in neoliberal cities. Urban Stud. 51:3215–3232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defra. 2011. The natural choice: securing the value of nature [Internet]. Available from: http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/natural/whitepaper/
   Google Scholar
• Defra Ecosystems Evidence Team. 2013. Overview of payments for ecosystem services projects, November 2013 [Internet]. Available from: http://ecosystemsknowledge.net/sites/default/files/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/EKN_PESpilots_listing_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2011. Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the economic and social committee and the committee of the regions, COM (2011) 244 Final, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Eräsaari L. 2006. New public management on julkista koskevien vääryyksien isä. In: Helne T, Laatu M, editors. Vääryyskirja. Helsinki: Kelan tutkimusosasto; p. 87–202.
   Google Scholar
• Evans D. 1997. A history of nature conservation in Britain. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone D, Ince A, Mackinnon D, Strauss K, Cumbers A. 2012. Progressive localism and the construction of political alternatives. T I Brit Geogr. 37:177–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felli R, Castree N. 2012. Neoliberalising adaptation to environmental change: foresight or foreclosure? Environ Plann A. 44:1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferranti F, Turnhout E, Beunen R, Behagel JH. 2013. Shifting nature conservation approaches in Natura 2000 and the implications for the roles of stakeholders. J Environ Plann Manag. 57:1642–1657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramsci A. 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks. Hoare Q, Nowell-Smith G, editors and translators. New York (NY): International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey D. 1989. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geogr Ann B. 71:3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey D. 1995. Globalization in question. Rethink Marx. 8:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey D. 2005a. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey D. 2005b. Spaces of neoliberalization: towards a theory of uneven geographical development. Hettner-Lecture 2004 with David Harvey, Hettner-Lectures Vol. 8, Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey D. 2010. The enigma of capital and the crises of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey D. 2011. Roepke lecture in economic geography – crises, geographic disruptions and the uneven development of political responses. Econ Geogr. 87:1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton G, Allmendinger P, Oosterlynck S. 2013. Spaces of neoliberal experimentation: soft spaces, postpolitics, and neoliberal governmentality. Environ Plann A. 45:217–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heynen N, Robbins P. 2005. The neoliberalization of nature: governance, privatization, enclosure and valuation. Cap Nat Social. 16:5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge ID, Adams WM. 2012. Neoliberalisation, rural land trusts and institutional blending. Geoforum. 43:472–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman L, Dehart M, Collier SJ. 2006. Notes on the anthropology of neoliberalism. Anthropol News. 47:9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Igoe J, Brockington D. 2007. Neoliberal conservation: a brief introduction. Conservat Soc. 5:432–449.
   Google Scholar
• Igoe J, Neves K, Brockington D. 2010. A spectacular eco-tour around the historic bloc: theorising the convergence of biodiversity conservation and capitalist expansion. Antipode. 42:486–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaspal R, Nerlich B, Lemańczyk S. 2014. Fracking in the Polish press: geopolitics and national identity. Energ Policy. 74:253–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop B. 2002. The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge (UK): Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas AEG, Gibbs D, While A. 2011. The new urban politics as a politics of carbon control. Urban Stud. 48:2537–2554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz C. 1998. Whose nature, whose culture?: private productions of space and the ‘preservation’ of nature. In: Braun B, Castree N, editors. Remaking reality: nature at the millennium. New York (NY): Routledge; p. 46–63.
   Google Scholar
• Łopata J. 2013. Land issues and land struggles in Poland. In: Franco J, Borras SM, editors. Land concentration, land grabbing and people’s struggles in Europe. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute (TNI) for European Coordination Via Campesina and Hands off the Land Network.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald K, Corson C. 2012. TEEB begins now: a virtual moment in the production of natural capital. Dev Change. 43:159–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald KI. 2010. The devil is in the (bio)diversity: private sector ‘Engagement’ and the restructuring of biodiversity conservation. Antipode. 42:513–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin D, McCann E, Purcell M. 2003. Space, scale, governance, and representation: contemporary geographical perspectives on urban politics and policy. J Urban Aff. 25:113–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx K, Engels F. 1970. The German ideology. Vol. 1. New York (NY): International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Massey D. 2013. Vocabularies of the economy. Soundings. 54:9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Materka E. 2012. In northern Poland, villagers are struggling against shale gas exploration that threatens to transform their lands and livelihoods [Internet]. LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog [cited 2012 Oct 12] Blog Entry. Available from: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/50025/
   Google Scholar
• McAfee K. 1999. Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism. Environ Plann D. 17:133–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy J. 2004. Privatizing conditions of production: trade agreements as neoliberal environmental governance. Geoforum. 35:327–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy J, Prudham S. 2004. Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism. Geoforum. 35:275–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick J. 1991. British politics and the environment. London: EarthScan.
   Google Scholar
• MoE (Ministry of the Environment). 2012. Saving nature for people. National action plan for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in Finland 2013–2020. Available from: http://www.ym.fi/download/noname/%7BEA60AA4E-861F-414D-9EFE-E8B967313381%7D/96885
   Google Scholar
• Newell P. 2011. The elephant in the room: capitalism and global environmental change. Global Environ Chang. 21:4–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedziałkowski K, Paavola J, Jędrzejewska B. 2012. Participation and protected areas governance: the impact of changing influence of local authorities on the conservation of the Bialowieza primeval forest, Poland. Ecol Soc. 17:2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paloniemi R, Vilja V. 2009. Changing ecological and cultural states and preferences of nature conservation policy: the case of nature values trade in South-Western Finland. J Rural Stud. 25:87–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck J, Theodore N, Brenner N. 2012. Neoliberalism resurgent? Market rule after the great recession. S Atl Quart. 111:265–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peet R. 2013. Comparative policy analysis: introduction. Human Geogr. 6:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Pellizzoni L, Ylönen M. 2012. Neoliberalism and technoscience: critical assessments. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Perreault T. 2005. State restructuring and the scale politics of rural water governance in Bolivia. Environ Plann A. 37:263–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raco M. 2012. A growth agenda without growth: English spatial policy, sustainable communities, and the death of the neo-liberal project? GeoJournal. 77:153–165.
   Google Scholar
• Raitio K. 2008. You can’t please everyone – conflict management practices, frames and institutions in Finnish state forests. Publications in social sciences: 86. Joensuu: University of Joensuu.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson M. 2012. Measurement and alienation: making a world of ecosystem services. T I Brit Geogr. 37:386–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rytteri T, Puhakka R. 2012. The art of neoliberalizing park management: commodification, politics and hotel construction in Pallas-Yllästunturi National Park, Finland. Geogr Ann B. 94:255–268.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkki S, Rönkä AR. 2012. Neoliberalisations in Finnish forestry. Forest Policy Econ. 15:152–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields S. 2012. Opposing neoliberalism? Poland’s renewed populism and post-communist transition. Third World Q. 33:359–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith N. 2008. Comment: neo-liberalism: dominant but dead. Focaal. 2008:155–157.
   Google Scholar
• Smith N. 2010. Uneven development. 3rd ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Suarez D, Corson C. 2013. Seizing center stage: ecosystem services, live, at the convention on biological diversity!. Human Geogr. 6:64–79.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan S. 2013. After the green rush? Biodiversity offsets, uranium power and the ‘calculus of casualties’ in greening growth. Human Geogr. 6:80–101.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan S. 2014. The natural capital myth; or will accounting save the world? Preliminary thoughts on nature, finance and values. LCSV working paper series No. 3. Available from: http://thestudyofvalue.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/WP3-Sullivan-2014-Natural-Capital-Myth.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw E. 2000. Authoritarian governance, power, and the politics of rescaling. Environ Plann D. 18:63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw E. 2004. Globalisation or ‘Glocalisation’? Networks, territories and rescaling. Camb Rev Int Aff. 17:25–48.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw E. 2005. Governance innovation and the citizen: the Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Stud. 42:1991–2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas P. 2006. Modernity as ‘passive revolution’: Gramsci and the fundamental concepts of historical materialism. J Can Hist Assoc. 17:61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas PD. 2009. The Gramscian moment: philosophy, hegemony and Marxism. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). 2014. Recent developments in Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) [Internet]. Issues Note IIA(1). Available from: http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/webdiaepcb2013d3_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNEP/CBD/COP. 2012. Report of the eleventh meeting of the conference of the parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity [Internet]. Available from: http://www.cbd.int/doc/?meeting=cop-11
   Google Scholar