479
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Applying contingent valuation to measure the economic value of forest services: a case study in Northern Jordan

Pages 242-250 | Received 01 Oct 2014, Accepted 30 Dec 2014, Published online: 03 Feb 2015

References

  • Adekunle MF, Agbaje BM. 2012. Public willingness to pay for ecosystem service functions of a Peri-urban forest near Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. J Dev Agric Econ. 4:45–50. doi:10.5897/JDAE11.085
  • Adekunle MF, Momoh S, Agbaje BM. 2008. Valuing Urban forests: application of contingent valuation methods. Ethiopian J Environ Stud. 1:61–67.
  • Al-assaf A. 2014. Differences in perceptions, attitudes and use of ecosystem services among diverse communities in an arid region: a case study from the south of Jordan. J Hum Ecol. 45:157–165.
  • Al-assaf A, Nawash O, Omari M. 2014. Identifying forest ecosystem services through socio-ecological bundles: a case study from northern Jordan. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 21:314–321. doi:10.1080/13504509.2014.919968
  • Al-eisawi A. 2012. Conservation of natural ecosystems in Jordan. Pak J Bot. 44:95–99. Special Issue May 2012.
  • Awad I, Holländer R. 2010. Applying contingent valuation method to measure the total economic value of domestic water services: a case study in Ramallah governorate, palestine. Eur J Economics, Finance Administrative Sci. 20:76–93.
  • Baral H, Keenan RJ, Fox JC, Stork NE, Kasel S. 2013. Spatial assessment of ecosystem goods and services in complex production landscapes: a case study from south-eastern Australia. Ecol Complex. 13:35–45.
  • Baral N, Stern MJ, Bhattarai R. 2008. Contingent valuation of ecotourism in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal: implications for sustainable park finance and local development. Ecol Econ. 66:218–227. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.004
  • Baranzini A, Fausta A, Huberman D. 2010. Tropical forest conservation: attitudes and preferences. For Policy Econ. 12:370–376. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.02.008
  • Bateman IJ, Langford IH, Nishikawa N, Lake I. 2000. The Axford debate revisited: a case study illustrating different approaches to the aggregation of benefits data. J Environ Plan Manag. 43:291–302. doi:10.1080/09640560010720
  • Bernard F, Groot RS, Campos JJ. 2009. Valuation of tropical forest services and mechanisms to finance their conservation and sustainable use: a case study of Tapantí National Park, Costa Rica. MINAE For Policy Econ. 11:174–183. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2009.02.005
  • Boström M. 2012. The problematic social dimension of sustainable development: the case of the forest stewardship council. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 19:3–15. doi:10.1080/13504509.2011.582891
  • Campbell D. 2007. Willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements: combining mixed logit and random-effects models. J Agric Econ. 58:467–483. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00117.x
  • Cheung LTO, Jim CY. 2013. Ecotourism service preference and management in Hong Kong. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 20:182–194. doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.775192
  • Cranford M, Mourato S. 2011. Community conservation and a two-stage approach to payments for ecosystem services. Ecol Econ. 71:89–98. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.007
  • Farber SC, Costanza R, Wilson MA. 2002. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. In special issue: the dynamics and value of ecosystem services: integrating economic and ecological perspectives. Ecol Econ. 41:375–392. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00088-5.
  • Ferraro P, Lawlory K, Mullanz KL, Pattanayak SK. 2012. Forest figures: ecosystem services valuation and policy evaluation in developing countries. Rev Environ Econ Policy. 6:20–44. doi:10.1093/reep/rer019
  • [FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization. 2010. State of Mediterranean forests. Rome: FAO.
  • Gürlük S. 2006. The estimation of ecosystem services’ value in the region of Misi rural development project: results from a contingent valuation survey. For Policy Econ. 9:209–218. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2005.07.007
  • Haab TC, McConnell KE. 2002. Valuing environmental and natural resources. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  • Hanemann MW. 1984. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. J Am Agric. 66:331–341.
  • Kosoy N, Corbera E. 2010. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecol Econ. 69:1228–1236. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.002
  • Loomis J, Kent P, Strange L, Fausch K, Covich A. 2000. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecol Econ. 33:103–117. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00131-7
  • Maes J, Paracchini MP, Zulian G, Alkemade R. 2012. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol Conserv. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.016.
  • Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Casado-Arzuaga I, Amo DGD, Gómez-Baggethun E, Oteros- Rozas E, Palacios-Agundez I, Willaarts B, et al. 2012. Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS ONE. 7: e38970. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038970
  • Martín-López B, Montes C, Benayas J. 2007. The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv. 139:67–82. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.06.005
  • [MEA] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Washington (DC): Island Press.
  • MOA. 2011. Forests, rangelands and climate change in Jordan near east region country reports, 2011 Amman Jordan FAO, publication [Internet]. [cited 2014 Jun 16]. http://www.fao.org/forestry/29158-028090f42581f7f86b3b340f51659d6d6.pdf
  • Nawash O, Al-Assaf A, El-Oqlah A, Omari A. 2014. Floristic features, distribution, and ethnobotany of plants gathered and used by local people from the Mediterranean forest in Northern Jordan. Ethnobotany Res Appl. 12:385–396.
  • Negi VS, Maikhuri RK, Rawat LS. 2013. Ecological assessment and energy budget of fodder consumption in Govind Wildlife Sanctuary, India. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 20:75–82. doi:10.1080/13504509.2012.747993
  • Pan J, Zeng W, Zhang W. 2012. The willingness to pay for the ecological compensation of min river basin–based on the survey of Chengdu 282 households. Environ Pollut. 1:14–20. doi:10.5539/ep.v1n2p14
  • Plummer ML. 2009. Assessing benefit transfer for the valuation of ecosystem services. Front Ecol Environ. 7:38–45. doi:10.1890/080091
  • Raunikar R, Buongiorno J. 2006. Willingness to pay for forest amenities: the case of non-industrial owners in the south central United States. Ecological Economic. 56:132–143.
  • Rosenberger RS, Needham MD, Morzillo AT, Moehrke C. 2012. Attitudes, willingness to pay, and stated values for recreation use fees at an urban proximate forest. J For Econ. 18:271–281.
  • Schaafsma M, Brouwer R, Rose J. 2012. Directional heterogeneity in WTP models for environmental valuation. Ecol Econ. 79:21–31. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.013
  • Sodhi NS, Lee TM, Sekercioglu CH, Webb EL, Prawiradilaga DM, Lohman DJ, Pierce NE, Diesmos AC, Rao M, Ehrlich PR. 2010. Local people value environmental services provided by forested parks. Biodivers Conserv. 19:1175–1188. doi:10.1007/s10531-009-9745-9
  • Stenger A, Harou P, Navrud S. 2009. Valuing environmental goods and services derived from the forests. J For Econ. 15:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2008.03.001
  • Thondhlana G, Vedeld P, Shackleton S. 2012. Natural resource use, income and dependence among San and Mier communities bordering Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, southern Kalahari, South Africa. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 19:460–470.
  • Turner RK, Morse-Jones S, Fisher B. 2010. Ecosystem valuation: a sequential decision support system and quality assessment issues. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1185:79–101.
  • Turner WR, Brandon T, Brooks M, Costanza R, Da Fonseca GAB, Portela R. 2007. Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bioscience. 57:868–873. doi:10.1641/B571009
  • Wang Y, Gao J, Wang J, Wu Y, Zou C, Tian M, Zheng H. 2014. Evaluating losses in ecosystem services in nature reserves in Sichuan, China. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 21:290–301. doi:10.1080/13504509.2014.914983
  • Xu J, Lü Y, Chen L, Liu Y. 2009. Contribution of tourism development to protected area management: local stakeholder perspectives. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 16:30–36. doi:10.1080/13504500902757189
  • Yao RT, Scarpa R, Turner JA, Barnard TD, Rose JM, Palma J, Harrison DR. 2014. Valuing biodiversity enhancement in New Zealand’s planted forests: socioeconomic and spatial determinants of willingness-to-pay. Ecol Econ. 98:90–101. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.009
  • Zbinden S, Lee D. 2005. Paying for environmental services: an analysis of participation in Costa Rica’s PSA program. World Dev. 33:255–272. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.012

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.