Assessment of corporate sustainability: study of hybrid relations using Hybrid Bottom Line model

References

• Adams CA, McNicholas P. 2007. Making a difference: sustainability reporting, accountability and organisational change. Accounting, Auditing Account J. 20:382–402. doi:10.1108/09513570710748553
   Google Scholar
• Angelo MJ, Brunstein J. 2014. Social learning for sustainability: supporting sustainable business in Brazil regarding multiple social actors, relationships and interests. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 21:273–289. doi:10.1080/13504509.2014.902868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal P, Bertels S, Ewart T, MacConnachie P, O’Brien J. 2012. Bridging the research-practice gap. Acad Manag Perspect. 26:73–92. doi:10.5465/amp.2011.0140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner RJ, Ebner D. 2010. Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and maturity levels. Sustainable Dev. 18:76–89. doi:10.1002/sd.447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie V, Thomson SJ. 2007. Lifting the lid on the use of content analysis to investigate intellectual capital disclosures. Accounting Forum. 31:129–163. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2007.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Branco M, Rodrigues L. 2008. Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by portuguese companies. J Bus Ethics. 83:685–701. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9658-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burritt RL, Schaltegger S. 2010. Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend? Accounting, Auditing Account J. 23:829–846. doi:10.1108/09513571011080144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll AB, Shabana KM. 2010. The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice. Int J Manag Rev. 12:85–105. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter CR, Rogers DS. 2008. A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. Int J Phys Distribution Logistics Manag. 38:360–387. doi:10.1108/09600030810882816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa GA, Oliveira LC, Rodrigues LL, Craig R. 2013. Factors associated with the publication of a CEO letter. Corporate Communications: Int J. 18:432–450. doi:10.1108/CCIJ-07-2012-0045
   Google Scholar
• Daub C-H. 2007. Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: an alternative methodological approach. J Clean Prod. 15:75–85. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickerson A, Green F. 2012. Fears and realisations of employment insecurity. Labour Econ. 19:198–210. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EASHW. 2014. European agency for safety and health at work [Internet]. Healthy Workplaces Manage Stress, EU-OSHA, 7. [cited 2014 Nov 12]. Available from: https://www.healthy-workplaces.eu/en
   Google Scholar
• Elkington J. 1994. Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif Manage Rev. 36:90–100. doi:10.2307/41165746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkington J. 1997. Cannibals with forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st century business. Stoney Creek: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Elkington J. 2004. Enter the Triple Bottom Line. In: Henriques A, Richardson J, editors. The Triple Bottom Line: does it all add up? London: Earthscan; p. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Figge F, Hahn T. 2005. The cost of sustainability capital and the creation of sustainable value by companies. J Ind Ecol. 9:47–58. doi:10.1162/108819805775247936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figge F, Hahn T, Schaltegger S, Wagner M. 2002. The sustainability balanced scorecard – linking sustainability management to business strategy. Bus Strat Environ. 11:269–284. doi:10.1002/bse.339
   Google Scholar
• Filho WL. 2000. Dealing with misconceptions on the concept of sustainability. Int J Sustainability Higher Educ. 1:9–19. doi:10.1108/1467630010307066
   Google Scholar
• Fischer J, Manning AD, Steffen W, Rose DB, Daniell K, Felton A, Garnett S, Gilna B, Heinsohn R, Lindenmayer DB, et al. 2007. Mind the sustainability gap. Trends Ecol Evol. 22:621–624. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Smith M, Sykes O. 2013. Can less sometimes be more? Integrating land use and transport planning on Merseyside (1965–2008). Urban, Plann Transport Res. 1:1–27. doi:10.1080/21650020.2013.866876
   Google Scholar
• Gallego I. 2006. The use of economic, social and environmental indicators as a measure of sustainable development in Spain. Corporate Soc Responsibility Environ Manag. 13:78–97. doi:10.1002/csr.94
   Google Scholar
• Gibson RB, Holtz S, Tansey J, Whitelaw G, Hassan S. 2005. Sustainability assessment: criteria and processes. London: Earthscan; p. 180–188.
   Google Scholar
• GRI. 2011. Sustainability reporting guidelines Version 3.1. Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• GRI. 2012. GRI reports list [Internet]. [cited 2014 Jan 10]. Available from: http://wwwglobalreportingorg/GRIReports/GRIReportsList/
   Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Kumar V. 2013. Sustainability as corporate culture of a brand for superior performance. J World Bus. 48:311–320. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2012.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkurinen P, Bonnedahl KJ. 2013. Corporate responsibility for sustainable development: a review and conceptual comparison of market- and stakeholder-oriented strategies. J Clean Prod. 43:191–198. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holder-Webb L, Cohen J, Nath L, Wood D. 2009. The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among U.S. firms. J Bus Ethics. 84:497–527. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9721-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerónimo Silvestre W, Antunes P, Filho WL. 2014. Hybrid Bottom Line: another perspective on the sustainability of organizations. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 21:456–464. doi:10.1080/13504509.2014.959580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi M, Ubha DS, Sidhu J 2010. Reporting intellectual capital in annual reports from Australian S/W & I/T companies. 11:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Levy DL, Szejnwald Brown H, De Jong M. 2010. The contested politics of corporate governance: the case of the global reporting initiative. Business Soc. 49:88–115. doi:10.1177/0007650309345420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenluecke MK, Griffiths A. 2010. Corporate sustainability and organizational culture. J World Bus. 45:357–366. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo S-F. 2010. Performance evaluation for sustainable business: a profitability and marketability framework. Corporate Soc Responsibility Environ Manag. 17:311–319. doi:10.1002/csr.214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano R. 2008. Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally. J Clean Prod. 16:1838–1846. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano R, Huisingh D. 2011. Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting. J Clean Prod. 19:99–107. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahadeo JD, Oogarah-Hanuman V, Soobaroyen T. 2011. Changes in social and environmental reporting practices in an emerging economy (2004–2007): exploring the relevance of stakeholder and legitimacy theories. Accounting Forum. 35:158–175. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2011.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Matten D, Moon J. 2008. “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev. 33:404–424. doi:10.5465/amr.2008.31193458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelon G, Boesso G, Kumar K. 2013. Examining the link between strategic corporate social responsibility and company performance: an analysis of the best corporate citizens. Corporate Soc Responsibility Environ Manag. 20:81–94. doi:10.1002/csr.1278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moneva JM, Archel P, Correa C. 2006. GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. Accounting Forum. 30:121–137. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2006.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Montiel I. 2008. Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability: separate pasts, common futures. Organ Environ. 21:245–269. doi:10.1177/1086026608321329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrini F, Tencati A. 2006. Sustainability and stakeholder management: the need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems. Bus Strat Environ. 15:296–308. doi:10.1002/bse.538
   Google Scholar
• Plambeck EL. 2007. The greening of wal-mart’s supply chain. Supply Chain Manag Rev. 11:18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Kramer MR. 2006. Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev. 84:78–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Kramer MR. 2011. Creating shared value - how to reinvent capitalism and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harv Buss Rev. January–February: 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Pullman ME, Maloni MJ, Carter CR. 2009. Food for thought: social versus environmental sustainability practices and performances and outcomes. J Supply Chain Manag. 45:38–54. doi:10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03175.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roca LC, Searcy C. 2012. An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports. J Clean Prod. 20:103–118. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert R, Blasch J. 2010. Sustainability standards for bioenergy—A means to reduce climate change risks? Energ Policy. 38:2797–2805. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestre WJ, Amaro A. 2014. Sustentabilidade corporativa: avaliação híbrida do Triple Bottom Line. Revista Portuguesa E Brasileira De Gestão. 13:19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Statsoft. 2013. Statsoft Inc 2013 STATISTICA (data analysis software system), Version 12. www.statsoft.com.
   Google Scholar
• Steurer R, Langer M, Konrad A, Martinuzzi A. 2005. Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: a theoretical exploration of business–society relations. J Bus Ethics. 61:263–281. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-7054-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Székely F, Knirsch M. 2005. Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility: metrics for sustainable performance. Eur Manag J. 23:628–647. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2005.10.009
   Google Scholar
• Tajima R, Fischer TB. 2013. Should different impact assessment instruments be integrated? Evidence from English spatial planning. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 41:29–37. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tratolixo. 2014. Relatórios GRI [Internet]. [cited 2014 Jan 10]. Available from: http://www.tratolixo.pt/Comunicacao/Paginas/Relatorios.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Valentinov V. 2013. Corporate social responsibility and sustainability: insights from Boulding and Luhmann. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 20:317–324. doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.808282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiengarten F, Pagell M, Fynes B. 2013. ISO 14000 certification and investments in environmental supply chain management practices: identifying differences in motivation and adoption levels between Western European and North American companies. J Clean Prod. 56:18–28. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood DJ. 2010. Measuring corporate social performance: a review. Int J Manag Rev. 12:50–84. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00274.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar