Sustainable transport project evaluation and decision support: indicators and planning criteria for sustainable development

References

• Banister D. 2008. The sustainable mobility paradigm. Trans Pol. 15:73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barfod MB, Salling KB. 2015. A new composite decision support framework for strategic and sustainable transport appraisals. Trans Res A. 72:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai J, Lootsma FA. 1997. Power relations and group aggregation in the multiplicative AHP and SMART. J Multi-Crit Dec Anal. 6:155–165.
   Google Scholar
• Belton V, Stewart T. 2010. Problem structuring and multiple criteria decision analysis. In: Ehrgott M, Figueira LR, Greco S, editors. Trends in multiple criteria decision analysis. Vol. 142. New York (NY): Springer; p. 209–239.
   Google Scholar
• Beukers E, Bertolini L, Te Brӧmmelstroet M. 2012. Why cost benefit analysis is perceived as a problematic tool for assessment of transport plans: a process perspective. Trans Res A. 46:68–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DMT. 2015. Manual for socio-economic analyses: a guideline report on methods and use within the transport sector. Denmark (Danish): Ministry of Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards W, Barron FH. 1994. SMARTS and SMARTER: improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Org Beh Hum Dec Proc. 60:306–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards W, Miles RF, Von Winterfeldt D. 2007. Advances in decision analysis: from foundations to applications. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B, Skamris MK, Buhl SL. 2003. How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects? Trans Rev. 23:71–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson R. 2006. Beyond the pillars: sustainability assessment as a framework for effective integration of social, economic and ecological considerations in significant decision-making. J Env Assess Pol Man. 8:259–280.
   Google Scholar
• Joubert AR, Leiman A, De Klerk HM, Katua S, Aggenbach JC. 1997. Fynbos (fine bush) vegetation and the supply of water: a comparison of multi-criteria decision analysis and cost-benefit analysis. Ecol Econ. 22:123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joumard R, Nicolas J-P. 2010. Transport project assessment methodology within the framework of sustainable development. Ecol Indic. 10:136–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 47:263–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lootsma FA. 1999. Multi-criteria decision analysis via ratio and difference judgment. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Macharis C, Bernardini A. 2015. Reviewing the use of multi-criteria decision analysis for the evaluation of transport projects: time for a multi-actor approach. Trans Pol. 37:177–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharis C, Turcksin L, Lebeau K. 2012. Multi actor multi criteria analysis (MAMCA) as a tool to support sustainable decisions: state of use. Dec Sup Sys. 54:610–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie PJ, Fowkes AS, Wardman M, Whelan G, Nellthorp J. 2003. Value of travel time savings in the UK – Summary report. Leeds (UK): University of Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• Mackinder IE, Evans SE. 1981. The predictive accuracy of British transport studies in urban areas. Berkshire (UK): Transport and Road Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaisen MS. 2012. Forecasts: facts or fiction? [ PhD dissertation]. Aalborg: Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Owens S. 1995. From ‘predict and provide’ to ‘predict and prevent’?: pricing and planning in transport policy. Trans Pol. 2:43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips LD, Bana e Costa C. 2005. Transparent prioritisation, budgeting and resource allocation with multi-criteria decision analysis and decision conferencing. Working paper (LSEOR 05.75). London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Pryn MR. 2013. Sustainable decision support: a contextual analysis of the importance of planning criteria using MCDA [ Master thesis]. Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Pryn MR, Cornet Y, Salling KB. 2015. Applying sustainability theory to transport infrastructure assessment using a multiplicative AHP decision support model. Transport. 30.
   Google Scholar
• Road Directorate. 2010. New connection across Roskilde fjord in Frederikssund. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report. Denmark (Danish).
   Google Scholar
• Roberts R, Goodwin P. 2002. Weight approximations in multi-attribute decision models. J Multi-Crit Dec Anal. 11:291–303.
   Google Scholar
• Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, III, Lambin E, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber H. et al. 2009. Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Eco Soc. 14:32–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 2001. Decision making for leaders: the analytical hierarchy process for decision in a complex world. The analytical hierarchy process series. Pittsburg (PA): University of Pittsburg.
   Google Scholar
• Salling KB. 2008. Assessment of transport projects: risk analysis and decision support [ PhD dissertation]. Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Salling KB, Banister D. 2009. Assessment of large infrastructure projects: the CBA-DK model. Trans Res A. 43:800–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salling KB, Leleur S. 2015. Accounting for the inaccuracies in demand forecasts and construction cost estimations in transport project evaluation. Trans Pol. 38:8–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen CH. 2001. Can the ministry of transport handle the environment? Integration of environmental considerations in transport policy and institutional potentials and barriers. Denmark (Danish): Jurist- og Økonomforbundets forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sund & Baelt 2011. A new connection across the Fjord in Frederikssund. Technical report. Denmark (Danish): Sund & Bælt.
   Google Scholar
• Tsamboulas DA. 2007. A tool for prioritizing multinational transport infrastructure investments. Trans Pol. 14:11–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WCED. 1987. Our common future. World commission on environment and development. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar