Managed citizenship: global forest governance and democracy in Russian communities

References

• Auld G, Gulbrandsen L, McDermott C. 2008. Certification schemes and the impacts on forests and forestry. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 33:187–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auld G, Gulbrandsen LH. 2010. Transparency in nonstate certification: consequences for accountability and legitimacy. Global Environ Politics. 10:97–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avant D, Finnemore M, Sell SK. 2010. Who governs the globe? New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck U. 1999. World risk society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck U. 2005. Power in the global age: a new global political economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boström M, Gartsen C. 2008. Organizing transnational accountability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Boström M, Hallström KT. 2010. NGO power in global social and environmental standard-setting NGO power in global social and environmental standard-setting. Global Environ Politics. 10:36–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashore B, Auld G, Newsom D. 2004. Governing through markets: regulating forestry through non-state environmental governance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan S, Pattberg P. 2008. Private rule-making and the politics of accountability: analyzing global forest governance. Global Environ Politics. 8:103–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauvergne P, Lister J. 2012. Big brand sustainability: governance prospects and environmental limits. Global Environ Change. 22:36–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen L. 2010. Transnational environmental governance: the emergence and effects of the certification of forest and fisheries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hale T, Held D, editors. 2011. Handbook of transnational governance: institutions and innovations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall R, Biersteker T, Thomas J, editors. 2002. Emergence of private authority in global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haufler V. 2009. Transnational actors and global environmental governance. In: Magali Delmas, Oran A. Young, editors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 119–143.
   Google Scholar
• Henry L. 2010a. Between transnationalism and state power: the development of Russia’s post-soviet environmental movement. Env Polit. Sep. 19:756–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry L. 2010b. Red to green: environmental activism in post-soviet Russia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kortelainen J, Tysiachniouk M, Kotilainen J. 2010. Transnatsional’nye Seti Upravleniya v Lesnom Sektore: Yadra Global’nogo Dizaĭna, Forumy Peregovorov, Mesta Ryealizatsii. Zhurnal Sotsiologii i Sotsial’noĭ Antropologii. 13:10–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lemos MC, Agrawal A. 2009. Environmental governance and political science. In: Delmas M, Young OA, editors. Governance for the environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipschutz R, Fogel C. 2002. Regulation for the rest of us? Global civil society and the privatization of transnational regulation. In: Hall RB, Thomas TJ, editors. Emergence of private authority in global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 115–140.
   Google Scholar
• Malets O. 2013. The translation of transnational voluntary standards into practices: civil society and the Forest Stewardship Council in Russia. J Civil Soc. Sep. 9:300–324.
   Google Scholar
• Malets O. 2014. When transnational standards hit the ground: domestic regulations, compliance assessment and forest certification in Russia. J Environ Policy Plann. 17:1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Marx A, Cuypers D. 2010. Forest certification as a global environmental governance tool: what is the macro-effectiveness of the Forest Stewardship Council? Regul Governance. 4:408–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meidinger E. 2003. Forest certification as environmental law making. In: Meidinger E, Elliott C, Oesten G, editors. Social and political dimensions of forest certification. Remagen-Oberwinter: Forstbuch Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Meidinger E. 2010. Forest certification and democracy. Eur J For Res. 130:407–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsom D, Hewitt D. 2005. The global impacts of smartwood certification. TREES Program, Rainforest Alliance, Jun 9.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke D. 2003. Outsourcing regulation: analyzing nongovernmental systems of labor standards and monitoring. Policy Stud J. 31:1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattberg P. 2005. The institutionalization of private governance: how business and nonprofit organizations agree on transnational rules. Governance. 18:589–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto L, McDermott C. 2013. Equity and forest certification – a case study in Brazil. For Policy Econ. 30:23–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pipponen M. 1999. Household and living conditions in the forest village of Matorsy, Russian Karelia. Working Paper no. 99. Joensuu: Joensuu yliopisto, Marsatieteellinen tiedekunta.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen S. 2003. The participation of states and citizens in global governance. Ind J Global Legal Stud. 10:5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen S. 2008. Territory, authority, rights: from medieval to global assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Surkov V. 2008. Russian political culture: the view from Utopia. Russian Politics Law. Sep.–Oct.;46:10–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tollefson C, Gale F, Haley D. 2008. Setting the standard: certification, governance, and the Forest Stewardship Council. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tulaeva S, Tysiachniouk M. 2008. Transformatsiya Korporativnoĭ Sotsial’noĭ Otvetstvennosti Krupnogo Biznesa Pod Vliyaniem Global’nykh Praktik. Sotsial’naya Politika I Sotsiologiya. 4:104–116.
   Google Scholar
• Tysiachniouk M. 2006a. Forest certification in Russia. In: Cashore B, Gale F, Meidinger E, Newsom D, editors. Confronting sustainability: forest certification in developing and transitioning countries. New Haven: Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies; p. 261–295.
   Google Scholar
• Tysiachniouk M. 2006b. NGO Mezhdu Globalizatsiyeĭ i Lokalizatsiyeĭ: Rol’ Global’nykh Protsessov v Mobilizatsii Obshchestvennogo Uchastiya v Lesnykh Poselkakh. Zhurnal Sotsiologii i Sotsial’noĭ Antropologii. 9:113–158.
   Google Scholar
• Tysiachniouk M. 2008a. Adaptatsiya Biznesa Transnatsional’nykh Korporatsiĭ k Rossiĭskomu Kontekstu: na Primere Kompanii “Stora Enso.” Ekonomicheskaya Cotsiologiya. 9:56–72.
   Google Scholar
• Tysiachniouk M. 2008b. Razvitie Demokraticheskikh form Prinyatiya Reshenii v Protsessii Postroeniya Modeli Ustoĭchivogo Lesopol’zovaniya v Priluz’e. In: Nauchnye doklady MONF (Rol’ Grazhdanskogo Obshchestva v Stimulirovanii Korporativnoĭ Sotsial’noĭ Otvetstvennosti). Moskva: MONF.
   Google Scholar
• Tysiachniouk M. 2010a. Institutsional’nye Izmeneniya v Rossiĭskikh Lokal’nostyakh pod Vliyaniem Transnatsional’nykh Aktorov v Protsesse Lesnoĭ Sertifikatsii. Zhurnal Sotsiologii i Sotsial’noĭ Antropologii. 13:203–295.
   Google Scholar
• Tysiachniouk M. 2010b. Preventing and overcoming lack of trust in the process of FSC certification: designation of social value Forests around the village Tunguda. Sustainable For Manag. 1:44–50.
   Google Scholar
• Tysiachniouk M. 2010c. Rol’ NPO kak Strategicheskikh Partnerov Biznesa v Postroenii Modelyeĭ Ustoĭchivogo Lesopol’zovaniya. Zhurnal Sotsiologii i Sotsial’noĭ Antropologii. 13:154–185.
   Google Scholar
• Tysiachniouk M. 2012a. Transnational governance through private authority: the case of the Forest Stewardship Council certification in Russia. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tysiachniouk M. 2012b. Fostering FSC forest certification in Russia: interplay of state and non-state actors. Russian Anal Dig. 114:8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Tysiachniouk M. 2013. Fostering transparency in the transnational supply chain: from Russian forest producers to consumers in Europe and the USA. Forest Policy Econ. 31:3–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tysiachniouk M, Meidinger E. 2007. Using forest certifications to strengthen rural communities: cases from northwest Russia. In: Usha A, editor. Endangered species and forests. Hyderabad: The ICFAI University Press; p. 159–182.
   Google Scholar
• Yin KR. 1994. Case study research: design and methods. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Young OR. 2002. The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis N. 1999. The ‘multi-layered citizen’: citizenship in the age of glocalization. Intl J of Feminist Polit. 1:119–136.
   Google Scholar