Community’s forest dependency and its effects towards the forest resources and wildlife abundances in Sarawak, Malaysia

References

• Abdullah Md R, Toshikuni N, Muhammed N. 2007. Impact on Participatory Forest Management (PFM) on socio-economic development in Bangladesh: a case study in the Madhupur Sal Forest. J For Econ. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];53:46–56. Available from: http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110006238679/en.
   Google Scholar
• Adhikari B. 2002. Household characteristics and common property forest use: complementarities and contradictions. J For Livelihood. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];2:3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Adhikari B, Di FS, Lovett JC. 2004. Household characteristics and forest dependency: evidence from common property forest management in Nepal. Ecol Econ. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];48:245–257. Available from: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adlina AH, Jawan JA, Sri RI, Normala O, Mohd HM. 2013. Traditional knowledge and environmental conservation among indigenous people in Ranau, Sabah. Global J Hum Soc Sci Geography, Geo-Sciences, Environ Disaster Manag. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];13. Available from: http://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/index.
   Google Scholar
• Awang Ali BDN, Kunjappan R, Chin M, Schoneveld G, Potter L, Andriani R. 2011. The local impacts of oil palm expansion in Malaysia: an assessment based on a case study in Sabah State. Working Paper 78. Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Barsimantov J, Antezana JN. 2012. Forest cover change and land tenure change in Mexico’s avocado region: is community forestry related to reduced deforestation for high value crops? Appl Geography. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];32:844–853. Available from: www.elsevier.com/locate/apgeog.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basnet R. 2009. Carbon ownership in community managed forests. J For Livelihood. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];8. Available from: http://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JFL/article/view/1887
   Google Scholar
• Bawa KS, Joseph G, Setty S. 2007. Poverty, biodiversity and institutions in forest-agriculture ecotones in the Western Ghats and Eastern Himalaya ranges of India. Agric Ecosyst Environ. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];121:287–295. Available from: www.elsevier.com/locate/agee
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [BDO] Bau District Office. 2013. List of villages and village chiefs for Bau District Year 2013 (Senarai kampung dan ketua kaum bagi daerah Bau Tahun 2013). Bau: Repository Documents.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A. 2012. Social science research: principles, methods, and practices. USF Tampa Bay open access textbooks collection. Book 3. Tampa (FL): University of South Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell JG, Thapa D, Gyamtsho P, Singh BK, Rasul G, editors. 2006. Creating community tenure: policies and institutions for community-based management. Technical Papers Capitalisation Sharing Experiences Interaction between Forest Policies Land-use Patterns Asia: Linking People with Resources. 2:91–96.
   Google Scholar
• Chukwuone NA, Okorji CE. 2008. Willingness to pay for systematic management of community forests for conservation of non-timber forest products in Nigeria’s rainforest region: implications for poverty alleviation. In: Dellink RB, Ruijs A, editors. Economics of poverty, environmental and natural-resource use [Internet]; p. 117–137. Dordrecht: Springer; [cited 2015 Mar 23]. Available from: www.springer.com
   Google Scholar
• Colchester M, Wee AP, Wong MC, Jalong T. 2007. Land is life: land rights and oil palm development in Sarawak. Report prepared for Forest Peoples Programme, Bogor. England: Indonesia and Perkumpulan Sawit Watch.
   Google Scholar
• Coolidge FL. 2013. Statistics: a gentle introduction. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Courtney GF, Luloff AE, James CF. 2008. Where Is “Community” in community-based forestry? Soc Nat Resources: Int J. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];21:526–537. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08941920701746954#.VQ-BIVWUcn0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das N. 2011. Women’s dependence on forest and participation in forestry: a case study of joint forest management programme in West Bengal. J For Econ. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];17:67–89. Available from: www.elsevier.de/jfe
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis EJ. 2008. New promises, new possibilities? Comparing community forestry in Canada and Mexico. BC J Ecosyst Manag. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];9:11–25. Available from: http://jem.forrex.org/index.php/jem/article/view/392.
   Google Scholar
• [DBNA] Dayak Bidayuh National Association. 2015. Map of native customary rights land documentation. Kuching: Dayak Bidayuh National Association Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly GJ. 2012. Fundamentals of land ownership, land boundaries and surveying. Intergovernmental Committee on Surveying and Mapping [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23]. Available from: http://www.icsm.gov.au/index.html
   Google Scholar
• [DSM] Department of Statistics Malaysia. 2010. Population and Housing Census of Malaysia. Sarawak; [cited 2015 Mar 3]. Available from http://www.statistics.gov.my/portal/down;oad_population/files/population/05jadual_mukim_negeri/Mukim_Sarawak.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Egay K. 2007. Matter of access, not rights: indigenous peoples, external institutions and their squabbles in mid-Tinjar river, Sarawak. Working Paper No. 13. Kuching (Sarawak): Heng Sing Brothers Press. (Unpublished).
   Google Scholar
• Ellis EA, Bolland LP. 2008. Is community-based forest management more effective than protected areas? A comparison of land use/land cover change in two neighboring study areas of the Central Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. For Ecol Manage. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];256:1971–1983. Available from: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher M, Chaudhury M, McCusker B. 2010. Do forests help rural households adapt to climate variability? Evidence from Southern Malawi. World Dev. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];38:1241–1250. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X10000513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [FDS] Forest Department Sarawak. 2015. Official website of Forest Department Sarawak [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23]. Available from: www.forestry.sarawak.gov.my
   Google Scholar
• Gibson C, Williams J, Ostrom E. 2003. Social capital and the governance of forest resources. Workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Bloomington (IN): Indiana University Bloomington.
   Google Scholar
• Gill SK, Ross WH, Panya O. 2009. Moving beyond rhetoric: the need for participatory forest management with the Jakun of South-East Pahang, Malaysia. J Trop For Sci. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];21:123–138. Available from: www.frim.gov.my/v1/JTFSOnline/jtfs/v21n2/123-138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haliza AR. 2010. [Local communities participation in issues related to environment: A survey on Mah Meri ethnic in Carey Island, Kuala Langat, Selangor]. Penglibatan masyarakat peribumi dalam isu berkaitan persekitaran: Tinjauan terhadap suku Mah Meri di Pulau Carey, Kuala Langat, Selangor. Humanity. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];17: 111–134. Available from: http://www.myjurnal.my/public/article-view.php?id=14902
   Google Scholar
• [IUCN] International Union for Conservation of Nature. 2011. Understanding forest dependency for REDD+: adapting the forests-poverty toolkit to new purposes. Briefing Paper June 2011 Forest Conservation Programme. Washington (DC): International Union for Conservation of Nature.
   Google Scholar
• [IWGIA] International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs, [AIPP] Asia Indigenous Peoples’ Pact. 2011. ASEAN, climate change, REDD+ and indigenous peoples. [Article]. [cited 2015 Mar 23]. Chiang Mai (Thailand): AIPP Printing Press Co., Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Jaggi S. 2003. Descriptive statistics and exploratory data analysis. Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute. [Internet]. 1–18. [cited 2015 Mar 23]. Available from: http://www.iasri.res.in/ebook/EB_SMAR/e-book_pdf%20files/Manual%20II/1-Descriptive%20Statistics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Janowski M, Langub J. 2011. Footprints and marks in the forest: the Penan and the Kelabit of Borneo, in why cultivate? Anthropological and archaeological approaches to foraging–farming transitions in Southeast Asia. Barker G, Janowski M. editors. McDonald Institute Monographs Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; p. 121–132.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasooria D. 2008 Aug–Sep. Forest based communities and their struggles for survival in modern Malaysia. [Article]. Asia Views, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Kamaruzaman J, Dahlan T. 2008. Managing sustainable mangrove forests in Peninsular Malaysia. J Sustain Dev. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];1:88–96. Available from: www.ccsenet.org/journal.html
   Google Scholar
• Kusel J. 2001. Assessing well-being in forest dependent communities. J Sustain For. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];13:359–384. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J091v13n01_10?journalCode=wjsf20#.VQ-wOVWUcn0
   Google Scholar
• Laerhoven FV. 2010. Governing community forests and the challenge of solving two-level collective action dilemmas – a large-N perspective. Global Environ Change. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];20:539–546. Available from: www.elsevier.com./locate/gloenvcha
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepetu J, Alavalapati J, Nair PK. 2009. Forest dependency and its implication for protected areas management: a case study from Kasane Forest Reserve, Botswana. Int J Environ Res. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];3:525–536. Available from: http://www.ijer.ir/article_68_3.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maibaze IJ. 2008. Stakeholder’s perceptions about their educational contributions of Gorongosa National Park in Mozambique. Dissertation for Degree Magister Educationis in Environmental Education. Faculty of Education and Nursing, University of Johannesburg, Gauteng (South Africa).
   Google Scholar
• Mekbeb ET, Lilieholm RJ, Blahna DJ, Kruger LE. 2009. Resource use, dependence and vulnerability: community-resource linkages on Alaska’s Tongass National Forest. Ecosyst Sustain Develop. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];VII:263. Available from: http://www.witpress.com/elibrary/wit-transactions-on-ecology-and-the-environment/122/20378
   Google Scholar
• Meyers LS, Gamst G, Guarino AJ. 2012. Multiple regression: statistical methods using IBM SPSS. In: Applied multivariate research: design and interpretation. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; p. 1104.
   Google Scholar
• [MLGCD] Ministry Local Government and Community Development. [Internet]. 2014. Official website of Ministry Local Government and Community Development. [cited 2015 Mar 23]. Available from: http://www.kktpk.sarawak.gov.my/modules/web/page.php?id=68&menu_id=0&sub_id=113
   Google Scholar
• MNRE [Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment]. 2006. Biodiversity in Malaysia. Booklet published for the multilateral environmental agreements: capacity building and implementation project (MEA) project at the Conservation and Environmental Management Division (CEMD). Putrajaya: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment in collaboration with the Danish International Development Assistance (Danida): ISBN 983-42860-1-1.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammad BU, Sharif AM. 2007. Improving forest dependent livelihoods through NTFPs and home gardens: a case study from Satchari National Park. In: Fox J, Bushley BR, Dutt S, Quazi SA, editors. Making conservation work: linking rural livelihoods and protected area management in Bangladesh. Honolulu (HI): East-West Center; Dhaka: Nishorgo Program of the Bangladesh Forest Department.
   Google Scholar
• Muhammed N, Koike M, Mohammad SHC, Farhana H. 2011. The profitability of Strip Plantations. a case study on 2 Social Forest Divisions in Bangladesh. J Sustain For. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];30:224–246. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10549811.2011.530568#.VQ-yOFWUcn0.
   Google Scholar
• Muhammed N, Oesten G, Von Detten R, Masum MFH, Chakma S. 2010. Livelihood pattern and forest dependence of the major tribes in Rangamati, Bangladesh. Japan: Shinsu University International Symposium 2010, Sustainable Agriculture and Environment: Asian Network II; p. 45–58.
   Google Scholar
• Nath TK, Nasim A, Inoue M. 2015. Contribution of homestead forests to rural economy and climate change mitigation: a study from the ecologically critical area of Cox’s Bazar – Teknaf Peninsula, Bangladesh. Small-scale For. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];14:1–18. Available from: www.springer.com
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngidang D. 2005. Deconstruction and reconstruction of native customary land tenure in Sarawak. Southeast Asian Stud. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];43:47–75. Available from: kyoto-seas.org/pdf/43/1/430103
   Google Scholar
• Ngidang D, Abdul Rashid A, Noweg GT. 2003. Land use and farming systems at the periphery of the crocker range National Park Sabah [Internet]. Malaysia: ASEAN Review of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation (ARBEC); [cited Jan–Mar 2003].
   Google Scholar
• Oxford. 2014. Oxford dictionaries: language matters [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23]. Available from: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/
   Google Scholar
• Pandit R, Bevilacqua E. 2011. Forest users and environmental impacts of community forestry in the hills of Nepal. J For Policy Econ. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];13:345–352. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934111000281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachagan SS. 2009. Sustainable forest management in Malaysia – guidelines for conflict resolution. Background Document. 5:66–96.
   Google Scholar
• Rijal A, Smith-Hall C, Helles F. 2011. Non-timber forest product dependency in the Central Himalayan foot hills. Environ Dev Sustain. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];13:121–140. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10668-010-9252-x
   Google Scholar
• Sanggin SE, Mersat NI. 2012. Indigenous people’s participation in land development project in selected areas in Sarawak. J Sustain Dev. [Internet]. Ontario International Development Agency; [cited 2015 Mar 23];3:67–80. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2047854
   Google Scholar
• Sapkota IP, Oden PC. 2008. Household characteristics and dependency on community forests in Terai of Nepal. Int J Soc For (IJSF). [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];1:123–144. Available from: www.ijsf.org/dat/art/vol01/ijsf_vol1_no2_02_sapkota_oden_nepal
   Google Scholar
• Setyawan AD. 2010. Review: biodiversity conservation strategy in a native perspective; Case study of shifting cultivation at the Dayaks of Kalimantan. J Biosci. [cited 2015 Mar 23];2:97–108.
   Google Scholar
• Setyawati T. 2009. Who is the owner of forest in Asia? An introduction towards a transition in forest empowerment in Asia, 2002–2008 (Siapa Pemilik Hutan di Asia? Sebuah Pendahuluan Menuju Transisi Penguasaan Hutan di Asia, 2002–2008). Initiative of Rights and Resources. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23]. Available from: www.rightsandresources.org/documents/…/doc_1342
   Google Scholar
• [SPU] State Planning Unit. 2012. Sarawak: facts and figures 2012. Kuching (Sarawak): Chief Minister’s Department.
   Google Scholar
• Vaz J. 2012. An analysis of international law, national legislation, judgments and institutions as they interrelate with territories and areas covered by indigenous people and local communities. Report No. 15, Malaysia. Natural Justice in Bangalore and Kalpavriksh in Pune and Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Vedeld P, Angelsen A, Bojo J, Sjaastas E, Kobugabe G. 2007. Forest environmental incomes and the rural poor. For Policy Econ. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];9:869–879. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkel G, Kaphengst T, Herbert S, Robaey Z, Rosenkranz L, Sotirov M. 2009. EU policy options for the protection of European forests against harmful impacts. Final Report for Implementation of the EU Forestry Strategy: “How to protect EU Forests against harmful impacts?”. ENV.B.1/ETU/2008/0049: OJ 2008/S 112-149606, September 2009. Berlin: University of Freiburg.
   Google Scholar
• Yamane T, Israel GD. 1992. Determining sample size. Program evaluation and organizational development, Florida cooperative extension service. Gainesville (FL): Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Youn Y-C. 2009. Use of forest resources, traditional forest-related knowledge and livelihood of forest dependent communities: cases in South Korea. For Ecol Manage. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 23];257:2027–2034. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112709000073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar