What affects perceptions of local residents toward protected areas? A case study from Kure Mountains National Park, Turkey

References

• Alkan H, Korkmaz M. 2009. Korunan Alanların Yönetiminde Yaşanan Sosyo-Ekonomik Odaklı Sorunlara İlişkin Bir Değerlendirme [Experienced in the management of protected areas with a focus on socio-economic assessment of the problems II]. Socio-economic Issues in Forestry Congress, Proceedings Book. Isparta (Turkey). ISBN 978-9944-452-28-1.
   Google Scholar
• Allendorf TD. 1999. Local residents’ perceptions of protected areas in Nepal: beyond conflicts and economics [PhD thesis]; The University of Minnesota, St. Paul. pp. 1,47.
   Google Scholar
• Allendorf TD, Swe KK, Oo T, Htut Y, Aung M, Aung M, Allendorf K, Hayek L, Leimgruber P, Wemmer C. 2006. Community attitudes toward three protected areas in Upper Myanmar (Burma). Environ Conserv. 33:344–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade GSM, Rhodes JRP. 2012. Protected areas and local communities: an inevitable partnership toward successful conservation strategies? Ecol Soc. [Internet]. [cited 2014 May 25.] 17, 14. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05216-170414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony B. 2007. The dual nature of parks: attitudes of neighbouring communities towards Kruger National Park, South Africa. Environ Conserv. [Internet]. [cited 2014 May 30]. 34:236–245. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892907004018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arjunan M, Holmes C, Puyravaud J-P, Davidar P. 2006. Do developmental initiatives influence local attitudes toward conservation? A case study from the Kalakad–Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, India. Environ Manage. 79:188–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydinli S. 1992. Mimarlıkta görsel analiz [ Visual analysis in architecture]. Istanbul (Turkey): Istanbul Technical University Faculty of Architecture Press room.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes F. 2007. Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 104:15188–15193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon K, Gorenflo L, Rodrigues A, Waller R. 2005. Reconciling biodiversity conservation, people, protected areas, and agricultural suitability in Mexico RID A-5914-2009. World Dev. 33:1403–1418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon K, Redford K, Sanderson S, editors. 1998. Parks in Peril: people, politics, and protected areas. Covelo, CA: Island Press; p. 415–440.
   Google Scholar
• [Cbc] Community-based conservation. 2015. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jan 20]. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community-based_conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Doliska F, McDaniel J, Shannon D, Jolly C. 2009. A multilevel analysis of the determinants of forest conservation behavior among farmers in Haiti. Soc Nat Resour. 22:433–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dung VN, Trinh LN, Hoang XT, Nguyen DT. 2007. Community behaviors towards nature conservation: a theoretical analysis for practical approaches. PanNature–People and Nature Conciliation; p. 1–15. [Internet]. [cited 2015 May 12]. Available from: http://nature.org.vn/en/wp-content/uploads/docs/CommunityBehavioursTowardsNatureConservation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fox J. 1997. Applied regression analysis, linear models, and related methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Genc A, Sipahioglu A. 1990. Sanatta yaratıcı süreç [ Creative process in visual perceptions arts]. İzmir (Turkey): Izmir Exhibition Publications.
   Google Scholar
• George D, Mallery P. 2003. SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference 11.0 update. 4th ed. Boston (MA): Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Gunes G. 2011. Korunan Alanların Yönetiminde Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Katılımcı Yönetim Planları [ The new approach on protected area management: participatory management plans]. Ebd. 3:1309–8020.
   Google Scholar
• Hackel JD. 1999. Community conservation and the future of Africa’s wildlife. Conserv Biol. 13:726–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton A, Cunningham A, Byarugaba D, Kayanja F. 2000. Conservation in a region of political instability: Bwindi impenetrable forest. Uganda Conserv Biol. 14:1722–1725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infield M, Namara A. 2001. Community attitudes and behavior towards conservation: an assessment of a community conservation program around Lake Mburo National Park. Uganda Oryx. 35:48–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [IUCN] International Union for Conservation of Nature. 1994. Guidelines for protected area management categories. Gland (Switzerland): IUCN; p. 22.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson LRM, Xiong N. 2003. Perception management: an emerging concept for information fusion. Inf Fusion. 4:231–234.
   Google Scholar
• Jones N, Panagiotidou K, Spilanis I, Evangelinos KI, Dimitrakopoulos PG. 2011. Visitors perceptions on the management of an important nesting site for loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta L.): the case of Rethymno coastal area in Greece. Ocean Coast. Manage. 54:577–584.
   Google Scholar
• Kettunen M, Brink P. 2013. Social and economic benefits of protected areas, an assessment guide. Tonbridge (Kent): Green Gate Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Kideghesho JR, Røskaft E, Kaltenborn BP. 2007. Factors influencing conservation attitudes of local people in Western Serengeti, Tanzania. Biodivers Conserv. 16:2213–2230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [KMNP] Kure Mountains National Park. 2015. About Kure Mountains National Park. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jun 9]. Available from: http://www.kdmp.gov.tr/alt_detay-en.asp?id=10
   Google Scholar
• [KMNP Buffer] Kure Mountains National Park and Buffer Zone Rapid Field Assessment. 2010. Kure Dağları Milli Parkı ve tampon zonu hızlı alan değerlendirmesi sonuç raporu. [ Kure Mountains National Park and buffer zone rapid field assessment, final report]. Ançeo Ltd., GEF-supported “Enhancing Forest Protected Areas Management Project” Ministry of Environment and Forestry. Ankara (Turkey): UNDP Turkey and WWF Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• [KMNP Ecosystem] Kure Mountains National Park ecosystem-based forest management functional plan preparation project. 2011. Kure Dağları Milli Parkı ekosistem tabanlı fonksiyonel orman amenajman planı hazırlama projesi [ Kure Mountains National Park ecosystem-based forest management functional plan preparation project]. Ankara (Turkey): TR Ministry of Forestry and Water Management, GEF and UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• [KMNP Long Term] Kure Mountains National Park long term development plan planning report. 2012. Kure Dağları Milli Parkı uzun devreli gelişme planı raporu. [ Kure Mountains National Park long term development plan planning report]. Ankara (Turkey): TR Ministry of Forestry and Water Management, General Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks.
   Google Scholar
• Lane MB. 2001. Affirming new directions in planning theory: co management of protected areas. Soc Nat Resour. 14:657–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepp A, Holland S. 2006. A comparison of attitudes toward state-led conservation and community-based conservation in the village of Bigodi, Uganda. Soc Nat Resour. 19:609–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta JN, Heinen JT. 2001. Does community-based conservation shape favorable attitudes among locals? An empirical study from Nepal. Environ Manage. 28:165–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta JN, Kellert SR. 1998. Local attitudes toward community-based conservation policy and programmes in Nepal: a case study in the Makalu-Barun Conservation Area. Environ Conserv. 25:320–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyhus PJ, Tilson S, Tilson R. 2003. Wildlife knowledge among migrants in southern Sumatra, Indonesia: implications for conservation. Environ Conserv. 30:192–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdamar K. 2002. Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi II [ Package statistical data analysis and programs II]. Eskişehir (Turkey): Kaan Press; p. 673.
   Google Scholar
• Petrosillo I, Zurlini G, Corliano ME, Zaccarelli N, Dadamo M. 2007. Tourist perception of recreational environment and management in a marine protected area. Landsc Urban Plan. 79:29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan PS. 2007. Traditional forest knowledge and sustainable forestry: a north-east India perspective. For Ecol Manage. 249:91–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyman S. 2014. Assessment of the main factors impacting community members attitudes towards tourism and protected areas in six southern African countries’, Koedoe. [Internet]. [cited 2014 May 31]. 56: Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v56i2.1139
   Google Scholar
• Snyman SL. 2012. The role of tourism employment in poverty reduction and community perceptions of conservation and tourism in southern Africa. J Sustainable Tour. 20: 395–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suckall N, Fraser EDG, Cooper T, Quinn C. 2009. Visitor perceptions of rural landscapes: a case study in the Peak District National Park, England. Environ Manage. 90:1195–1203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szell AB. 2012. Attitudes and perceptions of local residents and tourists toward the protected area of Retezat National Park, Romania [ Master’s Thesis]; Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, pp. 59.
   Google Scholar
• Szell AB, Hallett LF. 2013. Attitudes and perceptions of local residents and tourists toward the protected area of Retezat National Park, Romania. Int J Human Soc Sci Res. 3:4.
   Google Scholar
• [Tabprs Bartin] Turkish Address Based Population Registration System Bartin. 2015. Turkish address based population registration system datas for Bartin. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jun 3]. Available from: http://www.bartin.gov.tr/nufus-ve-idari-durum
   Google Scholar
• [Tabprs Kastamonu] Turkish Address Based Population Registration System Kastamonu. 2015. Turkish address based population registration system datas for Kastamonu. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jun 3]. Available from: http://kastamonu.gov.tr/nufus.asp
   Google Scholar
• Vodouhé F, Coulibaly O, Adégbidi A, Sinsin B. 2010. Community perception of biodiversity conservation within protected areas in Benin. For Policy Econ. 12:505–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weladji R, Moe S, Vedeld P. 2003. Stakeholder attitudes towards wildlife policy and the Bénoué Wildlife Conservation Area, North Cameroon. Environ Conserv. 30:334–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willimon WH. 2000 May/Jun. Your message here, Trusteeship magazine, Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges; p. 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Yazıcıoğlu Y, Erdoğan S. 2004. SPSS uygulamalı bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [ SPSS applied research methods]. Ankara (Turkey): Detail Publishing.
   Google Scholar