Accessibility and trust: the two dimensions of consumers’ perception on sustainable purchase intention

References

• Aaker JL. 1997. Dimensions of brand personality. J Marketing Res. 34:347–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auger P, Burke P, Devinney TM, Louviere JJ. 2003. What will consumers pay for social product features?. J Business Ethics. 42:281–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Burnkrant RE. 1979. Attitude organization and the attitude-behavior relationship. J Pers Soc Psychol. 37:913–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker MJ. 2002. Sampling. Marketing Rev. 3:103–120.
   Google Scholar
• Bezençon V, Blili S. 2010. Ethical products and consumer involvement: what’s new?. Eur J Mark. 44:1305–1321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen KA. 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York (NY): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Boström M, Klintman M. 2008. Eco-Standards, Product Labelling and Green Consumerism. Basingstoke (UK): Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bredahl L. 2001. Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified food–results of a cross-national survey. Journal of Consumer Policy. 24:23–61.
   Google Scholar
• Calomarde JV. 2000. Marketing Ecológico. Madrid (ES): Pirámide.
   Google Scholar
• Castaldo S, Perrini F, Misani N, Tencati A. 2009. The missing link between corporate social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. J Business Ethics. 84:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell RB. 1966. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res. 1:245–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase D. 1991. The green revolution: P&G gets top marks in AA survey. Advert Age. 62:8–10.
   Google Scholar
• De Ruyter K, Scholl N. 1998. Positioning qualitative market research: reflections from theory and practice. Qual Market Research: Int J. 1:7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos A. 2005. The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing: a comment. Int J Res Marketing. 22:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Souza C, Taghian M, Lamb P. 2006. An empirical study on the influence of environmental labels on consumers. Corporate Commun Int J. 11:162–173.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Chaiken S. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. New York (NY): Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Bagozzi RP. 2000. On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychol Methods. 5:155–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkes VS, Kamins MA. 1999. Effects of information about firms’ ethical and unethical actions on consumers’ attitudes. J Consumer Psychol. 8:243–259.
   Google Scholar
• Fraj E, Martinez E. 2006. Environmental values and lifestyles as determining factors of ecological consumer behaviour: an empirical analysis. J Consumer Marketing. 23:133–144.
   Google Scholar
• Gilg A, Barr S, Ford N. 2005. Green consumption or sustainable lifestyles? Identifying the sustainable consumer. Futures. 37:481–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glavič P, Lukman R. 2007. Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. J Clean Prod. 15:1875–1885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hu L-T, Bentler PM. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: Multidisciplinary J. 6:1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson T, Michaelis L. 2003. Sustainable Consumption & Production, Economic, Regeneration. London: Sustainable Development Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF. 1960. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 20:141–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter RM. 2008. Transforming giants. Harv Bus Rev. 86:43–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey R, Kennett-Hensel PA. 2010. Longitudinal effects of corporate social responsibility on customer relationships. J Business Ethics. 97:581–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K. 2008. Opportunities for green marketing: Young consumers. Marketing Intelligence Planning. 26:573–586.
   Google Scholar
• Maignan I, Ferrell OC. 2004. Corporate social responsibility and marketing: an integrative framework. J Acad Marketing Sci. 32:3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra NK, Hall J, Shaw M, Oppenheim P. 2004. Essentials of Marketing Research: an Applied Orientation. Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Mandese J. 1991. New study finds green confusion. Advert Age. 62:1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Marin L, Ruiz S, Rubio A. 2009. The role of identity salience in the effects of corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. J Business Ethics. 84:65–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEachern MG, Warnaby G, Carrigan M, Szmigin I. 2010. Thinking locally, acting locally? Conscious consumers and farmers’ markets. J Marketing Manag. 26:395–412.
   Google Scholar
• Moisander J, Pesonen S. 2002. Narratives of sustainable ways of living: Constructing the self and the other as a green consumer. Manag Decis. 40:329–342.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney MP, Ward MP. 1973. Ecology: let’s hear from the people: an objective scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. Am Psychol. 28:583–586.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom TM. 1969. The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude. J Exp Soc Psychol. 5:12–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottman JA. 1994. Green marketing: challenges and opportunities. Lincolnwood (IL): NTC Business Books.
   Google Scholar
• Peattie K. 1995. Environmental Marketing Management: Meeting the Green Challenge. London (UK): Pitman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Placet M, Anderson R, Fowler KM. 2005. Strategies for sustainability. Research-Technology Manag. 48:32–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogutz S, Micale V. 2011. Sustainable consumption and production. Soc Econ. 33:29–50.
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter JR. 2002. The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. Int J Res Marketing. 19:305–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado Beltrán L, Lafuente AMG. 2005. Models for analyzing purchase decision in consumers of ecologic products. Fuzzy Econ Rev. 10:47–61.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. 1996. A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. 288:144.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Vredenburg H. 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Manag J. 19:729–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spears N, Singh SN. 2004. Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. J Curr Issues Res Advertising. 26:53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th ed. New York (NY): Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Valor C. 2005. Corporate social responsibility and corporate citizenship: Towards corporate accountability. Business Soc Rev. 110:191–212.
   Google Scholar
• Vermillion LJ, Peart J. 2010. Green marketing: Making sense of the situation. Proc Acad Marketing Stud. 15:68–72.
   Google Scholar
• Wheaton B, Muthen B, Alwin DF, Summers GF. 1977. Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In: Heise DR, editor. Sociological Methodology. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; p. 84–136.
   Google Scholar