The potential of current legal structures to support Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander interests in the Australian bush food industry

References

• Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner (ATSISJC). 2008. Native title report. Canberra: Australian Human Rights Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner (ATSISJC). 2009. Native title report. Canberra: Australian Human Rights Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander M, et al. 2004. The role of registers in the protection of traditional knowledge: from concept to practice. Tokyo: United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 2014. Closing the gap: Prime Minister’s report. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 2015. Closing the gap: prime Minister’s report. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Macadamia Society (AMS). 2015. Market report. Lismore: Australian Macadamia Society.
   Google Scholar
• Australian National Botanic Gardens (ANBG). 2013. Biodiversity Conservation Policy [Internet]. Australian Government. [cited 2015 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.anbg.gov.au/gardens/about/management/conservation.html
   Google Scholar
• Bamba J. 2010. Indigenous peoples self-determined development and lessons from Kalimantan Credit Union movement. International Expert Group Meeting; New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Bavikatte K, Jonas H, editors. 2009. Bio-cultural community protocols: a community approach to ensuring the integrity of environmental law and policy. Geneva: UNEP.
   Google Scholar
• Brann M, 2015. Catering company adding Kakadu plum to improve shelf-life and nutrition of meals sold into Indigenous communities [Internet]. ABC Rural. [cited 2015 Oct 10]. Available from: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-10-06/kakadu-plum-added-to-meals-to-improve-shelf-life-and-nutrition/6810928
   Google Scholar
• Bryceson K. 2008. Value chain analysis of bush tomato and wattle seed products. Alice Springs: CRC-REP.
   Google Scholar
• Bush Food Sensations. 2015. Grower and suppliers. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Oct 10].Available form: http://bushfoodsensations.net/suppliers/#all
   Google Scholar
• CBD. 2000. Sustaining life on earth: how the Convention on Biological Diversity promotes nature and human well-being. Montreal: CBD.
   Google Scholar
• Cherikoff V, Isaacs J. 1991. The bush food handbook: how to gather, grow, process and cook Australian wild foods. Sydney: Ti Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark M. 2012. Australian Native Food Industry stocktake. Canberra: RIRDC.
   Google Scholar
• Cleary J. 2009. Perspectives on developing new cooperative arrangements for bush-harvested bush tomatoes from desert Australia. Alice Springs: DKCRC.
   Google Scholar
• Cleary J. 2012. Business exchanges in the Australian desert: it’s about more than the money. J Rural Community Dev. 7:1.
   Google Scholar
• Cleary J, Grey-Gardner R, Josif P. 2009. Hands across the desert: linking desert Aboriginal Australians to each other and to the bush foods industry. Alice Springs: DKCRC.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth. 1992. Intergovernmental Agreement on the Environment. Canberra: CoAG.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth. 1992a. National strategy for ecologically sustainable development. Canberra: CoAG.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth. 2009. National Indigenous Reform Agreement. Canberra: CoAG.
   Google Scholar
• Cooney R, Edwards M. 2009. Indigenous wildlife enterprise development: the Regulation and policy context and challenges. Darwin: NAILSMA.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham A, Garnett S, Gorman J. 2009. Policy lessons from practice: Australian bush products for commercial markets. GeoJournal. 74:429–440.
   Google Scholar
• Daleys. n.d. Finger lime (Microcitrus australasica) [Internet]. [cited 2015 May 20]. Available from: http://www.daleysfruit.com.au/bushfood/fingerlime.htm
   Google Scholar
• Department of Aboriginal Affairs (DAA). 2005. Overcoming Indigenous disadvantage in Western Australia. Perth: Government of Western Australian.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Environment and Heritage (DEH). 2004. Threatened Australian plants. Canberra: Australia Government.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (DEHP). 2015. Threats to wildlife [Internet]. Queensland Government. [cited 2015 Oct 10]. Available from: http://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/wildlife/threats/
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Environment (DOE). 2010. Working on Country: evaluation report. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Environment (DOE). 2012. Assessment of the social outcomes of the Working on Country program. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Environment (DOE). 2015. Working on Country [Internet]. Australian Government. [cited 2015 May 20]. Available from: http://www.environment.gov.au/indigenous/workingoncountry/
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Environment (DOH). 2012. About Indigenous Protected Areas [Internet]. Australian Government. [cited 2015 May 20]. Available from: http://www.environment.gov.au/indigenous/ipa/background.html
   Google Scholar
• Dodson V. 2009. Arnpernirrentye: relationships between bush foods, people, country and all things. Online video. Alice Springs: Arrernte People of Central Australia and DKCRC.
   Google Scholar
• Merne Altyerre-ipenhe (Food from the Creation time) Reference Group, Douglas J, Walsh F. 2011. Aboriginal people, bush foods knowledge and products from central Australia: ethical guidelines for commercial bush food research, industry and enterprises. DKCRC: Alice Springs.
   Google Scholar
• Drahos P. 2000. Indigenous knowledge, intellectual property and biopiracy: is a global bio-collection society the answer? Eur Intellect Prop Rev. 22:245.
   Google Scholar
• Drahos P. 2011. When cosmology meets property: indigenous people’s innovation and intellectual property. Prometheus. 29:233–252.
   Google Scholar
• Evans L, Scott H, Muir K, Briscoe J. 2009. Effective intellectual property protection of traditional knowledge of plants and their uses: an example from Australia. GeoJournal. 74:391–401.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO). 2012. The benefit-sharing fund: crop diversity for food security. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth M. 2012. Do you want it gift wrapped? Protecting traditional knowledge in the Pacific Island countries. In: Drahos P, Frankel S, editors. Indigenous people’s innovation: intellectual property pathways to development. Canberra: ANU E Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner-Garden J. 2013. Closing the gap. [Internet]. Canberra: Australian Government. [cited 2015 May 20]. Available from: http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/BriefingBook44p/ClosingGap
   Google Scholar
• Geoscience Australia. 1994. Deserts [Internet]. Australian Government. [cited 2015 May 20]. Available from: http://www.ga.gov.au/scientific-topics/geographic-information/landforms/deserts
   Google Scholar
• Gorman J, Whitehead P. 2006. Small-scale commercial plant harvests by Indigenous communities. Canberra: RIRDC.
   Google Scholar
• Holcombe S, Yates P, Walsh F. 2011. Reinforcing alternative economies: self-motivated work by central Anmatyerr people to sell Katyerr (Desert raisin, Bush tomato) in central Australia. Rangeland J. 33:255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Representatives Committee on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs (HRC). 2012. Inquiry into language learning in Indigenous communities. Canberra: Australia Government.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Consultation Committee (HRCC). 2009. National human rights consultation report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt J. 2013. Engaging with Indigenous Australia: exploring the conditions for effective relationships with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. Canberra: Closing the Gap Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• [IGC] Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore. 2013. The protection of traditional knowledge: draft articles. Geneva: IGC. [14 May 2013]. 24th session. WIPO/GRTKF/IC/24/FACILITATORS DOCUMENT REV. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Indigenous Stock Exchange (ISX). 2014. Supporting people with dreams [Internet]. [cited 2015 May 20]. Available from: http://www.isx.org.au/about
   Google Scholar
• IP Australia. 2004. Hybrid Finger Lime (Citrus hybrid) [Internet]. [cited 2015 May 20]. Available from: http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/
   Google Scholar
• IP Australia. 2012. Have your say on Indigenous knowledge [Internet]. [cited 2015 Oct 10]. Available at: http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/about-us/public-consultations/Indigenous_Knowledge_Consultation/Have_your_say_on_Indigenous_Knowledge/
   Google Scholar
• IP Iustitia. 2014. Can you own a recipe? When food meets intellectual property law [Internet]. [cited 2015 May 20]. Available from: http://www.ipiustitia.com/2014/09/can-you-own-recipe-when-food-meets.html
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs J. 1987. Bush food: Aboriginal food and herbal medicine. Sydney: Weldons.
   Google Scholar
• Janke T. 1998. Our culture our future: a report on Australian Indigenous cultural and intellectual property rights. Canberra: AIATSIS.
   Google Scholar
• Janke T. 2009. Indigenous ecological knowledge and natural resources in the Northern Territory: report on the current status of Indigenous intellectual property. Darwin: NRMB.
   Google Scholar
• Kuruk P. 2007. Role of customary law under sui generis frameworks of intellectual property rights in traditional and Indigenous knowledge. Indiana Int Comp Law Rev. 17:67–118.
   Google Scholar
• Lee LS. 2012. Horticultural development of bush food plants and rights of Indigenous traditional custodians: the Australian Bush Tomato (Solanum centrale) case study. Rangeland J. 34:359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard K. 2012. The impact of the law on consultation practices and purposes: a case study of Aboriginal cultural heritage consultation in NSW. Int J Rural Law and Policy. 1:32 ( Occasional Paper Series).
   Google Scholar
• Macklin J. 2009. Statement on the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples. Canberra: Minister for Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Maiden JH. 1889. The useful native plants of Australia (including Tasmania). Sydney: Technological Museum of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Martin P, Jeffrey M. 2007. Using a legally enforceable knowledge trust doctrine to fulfil the moral obligation to protect indigenous secrets. NZ J Environ Law. 11:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Miers G. 2004. Cultivation and sustainable wild harvest of bushfoods by Aboriginal Communities in Central Australia. Barton: RIRDC.
   Google Scholar
• Morse J. 2005. Bush resources: opportunities for Aboriginal enterprise in central Australia. Alice Springs: DKCRC and CLC.
   Google Scholar
• Morse J. 2010. Know your rights to your Aboriginal plant knowledge: a guide for Aboriginal knowledge holders on recording and commercialising Aboriginal plant knowledge. Darwin: Aboriginal Bush Traders.
   Google Scholar
• National Native Title Tribunal (NNTT). 2015. Indigenous land use agreements [Internet]. [cited 2015 May 20]. Available from: http://www.nntt.gov.au/Maps/ILUAs_map.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Native Title Tribunal (NNTT). 2015a. Determinations of Native Title and claimant applications [Internet]. [cited 2015 May 20]. Available from: http://www.nntt.gov.au/Maps/Schedule_and_Determinations_map.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council (NRMMC). 2002. Nationally consistent approach for access to and the utilisation of Australia’s native genetic and biochemical resources. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council (NRMMC). 2010. Australia’s biodiversity conservation strategy 2010 –2030. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Environment and Hertaige (OEH). 2013. Sustainable management plan − protected whole plants 2013–2017. Sydney: NSW Government.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Northern Territory Coordinator-General for Remote Services (ONTC). 2012. Report. Darwin: Northern Territory Government.
   Google Scholar
• OseiTutu J. 2011. A sui generis regime for traditional knowledge: the cultural divide in intellectual property law. Marquette Intellect Prop Law Rev. 15:147.
   Google Scholar
• Reconciliation Australia (RA). 2013. United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples. Canberra: Reconciliation Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Rimmer M. 2003. Blame it on rio: biodiscovery, native title, and traditional knowledge. South Cross Univ Law Rev. 7:1.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson D. 2010. Traditional knowledge and biological product derivative patents: benefit-sharing and patent issues relating to Camu Camu, Kakadu Plum and Açaí Plant extracts. Traditional Knowledge Bulletin. Tokyo: United Nations University.
   Google Scholar
• Rose DB. 1996. Nourishing terrains: australian Aboriginal views of landscape and wilderness. Canberra: Australian Heritage Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Sand S. 2003. Sui generis laws for the protection of Indigenous expressions of culture and traditional knowledge. Univ Queensland Law J. 22:188–198.
   Google Scholar
• Smallacombe S, Davis M, Quiggin R. 2007. Scoping project on Aboriginal traditional knowledge. Alice Springs: DKCRC.
   Google Scholar
• Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision (SCRGSP). 2014. Overcoming Indigenous disadvantage: key indicators 2014. Canberra: Productivity Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart K, Percival B. 1997. Bush foods of New South Wales: a botanic record and an Aboriginal oral history. Sydney: Royal Botanic Gardens.
   Google Scholar
• Stoianoff N. 2009. The recognition of traditional knowledge under Australian biodiscovery regimes: why bother with intellectual property rights? In: Antons C, editor. Traditional knowledge, traditional cultural expressions and intellectual property law in the Asia-Pacific region. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Swiderska K. 2006. Protecting traditional knowledge: a framework based on customary laws and bio-cultural heritage. Paper presented at the International Conference on Endogenous Development and Bio-Cultural Diversity; 2006 Oct 3–5; Geneva: International Institute for Environment and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Tauri J, Webb R. 2011. The Waitangi Tribunal and the regulation of Maori protest. NZ Sociol. 26:21–41.
   Google Scholar
• Verma SK. 2004. Protecting traditional knowledge: is a sui generis system an answer? J World Intellect Prop. 7:765–805.
   Google Scholar
• Voumard J. 2000. Access to biological resources in Commonwealth areas. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Waitangi Tribunal. 2011. Ko AoteAroA tēnei: a report into claims concerning New Zealand law and policy affecting Māori culture and identity. Wellington: Waitangi Tribunal.
   Google Scholar
• Waitangi Tribunal. 2011a. Wai 262: Ko Aotearoa Tēnei: report on the Wai 262 claim released. Wellington: Waitangi Tribunal.
   Google Scholar
• Ward T. 2011. The right to free, prior, and informed consent: indigenous peoples’ participation rights within international law. Northwest J Int Hum Rights. 10:54–84.
   Google Scholar
• Wells K. 2013. Australian weather and seasons: a variety of climates [Internet]. Australian Government. [cited 2015 May 20]. Available from: http://www.australia.gov.au/about-australia/australian-story/austn-weather-and-the-seasons
   Google Scholar
• Wells K. 2013a. Australian flora [Internet]. Australian Government. [cited 2015 May 20]. Available from: http://www.australia.gov.au/about-australia/australian-story/austn-flora
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead P, et al. 2006. Feasibility of small-scale commercial native plant harvests by Indigenous communities. Canberra: RIRDC.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe ET. 2009. Country pasture/forage resource profiles: Australia. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO). 2012. The World Intellectual Property Organization traditional knowledge documentation toolkit (draft). Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO). 2015. What is a trade secret? [Internet]. [cited 2015 May 20]. Available from: http://www.wipo.int/sme/en/ip_business/trade_secrets/trade_secrets.htm
   Google Scholar