Hybrid process-criterion benchmarking methodology framework to support sustainability performance assessment and reporting

References

• Ajelabi I, Tang Y. 2010. The adoption of benchmarking principles for project management performance improvement. Int J Managing Public Sect Inf Commun Technol. 1:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development [Internet]. 2015. Oil sands information portal. Edmonton: Government of Alberta; [cited 2015 Jul 12]. Available from: http://osip.alberta.ca/map/.
   Google Scholar
• Attiany MS. 2014. Competitive advantage through benchmarking: field study of industrial companies listed in Amman stock exchange. J Bus Stud Q. 5:41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Babović J, Raičević V, Carić M. 2012. Benchmarking as a function of competitiveness and efficiency in business. Econ Agric. 59:115–126.
   Google Scholar
• Building Research Establishment. 2008. A discussion document comparing international environmental assessment methods for buildings. Glasgow (UK): Building Research Establishment.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Business Practice. 1996. Benchmarking action plans & legal issues. New York (NY): Bureau of Business Practice.
   Google Scholar
• [CAPP] Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers [Internet]. 2015. Energy, economy & environment. Calgary: Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers; [cited 2015 Jun 22]. Available from: http://www.oilsandstoday.ca/EnergyEconEnviron/Pages/Environment.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Energy Research Institute [Internet]. 2014. Canadian economic impacts of new and existing oil sands development in Alberta (2014-2038). Calgary: Canadian Energy Research Institute; [cited 2015 Jul 14]. Available from: http://www.ceri.ca/images/stories/CDN_Economic_Impacts_of_New_and_Existing_Oil_Sands_Development_in_Alberta_-_November_2014_-_Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Conte E, Monno V. 2012. Beyond the building centric approach: a vision for an integrated evaluation of sustainable buildings. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 34:31–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COSIA [Internet]. 2015. About COSIA. Calgary: Canada’s Oil Sands Innovation Alliance; [cited 2015 Jul 27]. Available from: http://www.cosia.ca/about-cosia.
   Google Scholar
• Ekins P, Vanner R. 2007. Sectoral sustainability and sustainability assessment methodologies: a review of methodology in light of collaboration with the UK oil and gas sector. J Environ Plann Manage. 50:87–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmuti D, Kathawala Y. 1997. An overview of benchmarking process: a tool for continuous improvement and competitive advantage. Benchmarking Qual Manage Technol. 4:229–243.
   Google Scholar
• Environment Canada [Internet]. 2013. Backgrounder: joint Canada-Alberta oil sands monitoring data portal. Gatineau: Government of Canada; [cited 2015 Jul 2]. Available from: https://www.ec.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=757CF272-1&news=F88B8904-4245-4538-8587-3FB3ADEF88DF.
   Google Scholar
• Global Reporting Initiative [Internet]. Date unknown. GRI and sustainability reporting. Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative; [cited 2015 Jun 10]. Available from: https://www.globalreporting.org/information/sustainability-reporting/Pages/gri-standards.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Gosselin P, Hrudey SE, Naeth MA, Plourde A, Therrien R, Van Der Kraak G, Xu Z. 2010. The Royal Society of Canada expert panel: environmental and health impact of Canada’s oil sands industry. The Royal Society of Canada: Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Haapio A, Viitaniemi P. 2008. A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 28:469–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honarvar A, Rozhon J, Millington D, Walden T, Murillo CA. 2011a. Economic impacts of new oil sands projects in Alberta (2010-2035). Study No. 124. Calgary: Canadian Energy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Honarvar A, Rozhon J, Millington D, Walden T, Murillo CA. 2011b. Economic impact of staged development of oil sands projects in Alberta (2010-2035). Study No. 125 – Section I. Calgary: Canadian Energy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly E, Schindler D, Hodson P, Short J, Radmanovich R, Nielsen C. 2010. Oil sands development contributes elements toxic at low concentrations to the Athabasca River and its tributaries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:16178–16183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurek J, Kirk J, Muir D, Wang X, Evans M, Smol J. 2013. Legacy of a half century of Athabasca oil sands development recorded by lake ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 110:1761–1766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luu VT, Kim S-Y, Huynh T-A. 2008. Improving project management performance of large contractors using benchmarking approach. Int J Project Manage. 26:758–769.
   Google Scholar
• Marković L, Dutina V, Kovačević M. 2011. Application of benchmarking method in the construction companies. Archit Civ Eng. 9:301–314.
   Google Scholar
• Mateus R, Braganca L 2011. Sustainability assessment and rating of buildings: Developing the methodology SBToolPT–H. Build Environ. 46:1962–1971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade PH. 1998. A guide to benchmarking. Dunedin (NZ): University of Otago.
   Google Scholar
• Mellat-Parast M, Adams S. 2012. Corporate social responsibility, benchmarking, and organizational performance in the petroleum industry: a quality management perspective. Int J Prod Econ. 139:447–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L. 2007. Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ. 60:498–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omachonu VK, Ross JR. 1994. Principles of total quality. Delray Beach (US): St. Lucie Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parajulee A, Wania F. 2014. Evaluating officially reported polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emissions in the Athabasca oil sands region with a multimedia fate model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 111:3344–3349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poveda C, Lipsett M. 2011a. A review of sustainability assessment and sustainability/environmental rating systems and credit weighting tools. J Sustain Dev. 4:36–55.
   Google Scholar
• Poveda C, Lipsett M. 2011b. A rating system for sustainability of industrial projects with application in oil sands and heavy oil projects: origins and fundamentals. J Sustain Dev. 4:59–71.
   Google Scholar
• Poveda C, Lipsett M. 2011c. A rating system for sustainability of industrial projects with application in oil sands and heavy oil projects: areas of excellence, sub-divisions, and management interaction. J Sustain Dev. 4:3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Poveda C, Lipsett M. 2013a. Weighting sustainable development indicators (SDIs) for surface mining operations using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Int J Analytic Hierarchy. 5:200–222.
   Google Scholar
• Poveda C, Lipsett M 2013b. Design of performance improvement factors (PIFs) for sustainable development indicators (SDIs) metrics for oil sands projects with application to surface mining operations based on continual performance improvement (CPI). J Sustain Dev. 6:52–70.
   Google Scholar
• Poveda C, Lipsett M 2013c. The Canadian Oil sands: environmental, economic, social, health, and other impacts. In: Brebbia CA, editor. Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on Sustainable Development and Planning. WIT Press: Southampton and Boston; p. 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Poveda C, Lipsett M. 2014a. An integrated approach for sustainability assessment: The Wa-Pa-Su project sustainability rating system. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 21:85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poveda C, Lipsett M. 2014b. Surface mining operations in oil sands: establishing sustainable development indicators (SDIs). Southampton (UK) & Boston (US): WIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poveda C, Lipsett M. 2014c. The Wa-Pa-Su project sustainability rating system: a simulated case study of implementation and sustainability assessment. Environ Manage Sustain Dev. 3:1–24
   Google Scholar
• Poveda C, Young R. 2015. Potential benefits of developing and implementing environmental and sustainability rating systems: making the case for the need of diversification. Int J Sustain Built Environ. 4:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Reed R, Wilkinson S, Bilos A, Schulte KWA [Internet]. 2011. Comparison of international sustainable building tools – an update. The 17th Annual Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Gold Coast; 2011 Jan 16–19. [cited 2015 Jul 23]. Available from: http://deakin.academia.edu/SaraWilkinson/Papers/931324/A_Comparison_of_International_Sustainable_Building_Tools_An_Update
   Google Scholar
• Rowland S, West C, Jones D, Scarlett A, Frank R, Hewitt L. 2011. Steroidal aromatic ‘Naphthenic Acids’ in oil sands process-affected water: structural comparisons with environmental estrogens. Environ Sci Technol. 45:9806–9815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekhar SC. 2010. Benchmarking. Afr J Bus Manage. 4:882–885.
   Google Scholar
• Shen L, Ochoa JJ, Shah MN, Zhang X 2011. The application of urban sustainability indicators – a comparison between various practices. Habitat Int. 35:17–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK 2012. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Indic. 9:189–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szěkely F, Knirsck M. 2005. Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility: metrics for sustainable performance. Eur Manage J. 23:628–647.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations [Internet]. 1987. Report of the world commission on environment and development. General Assembly Resolution 42/187, 11 December 1987. Oslo: United Nations; [cited 2015 Jul 28]. Available from: http://www.un-documents.net/k-001303.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson A, Pitman L. 2000. Best practice handbook for Australian university libraries. Canberra (AU): Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Higher Education Division, Evaluations and Investigations Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson A, Pitman L, Trahn I. 2000. Guidelines for the application of best practice in Australian university libraries: Intranational and international benchmarks. Canberra (AU): Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Higher Education Division, Evaluations and Investigations Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Yergeau E, Lawrence J, Sanschagrin S, Waiser M, Korber D, Greer C. 2012. Next-generation sequencing of microbial communities in the Athabasca River and its tributaries in relation to oil sands mining activities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 78:7626–7637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yudelson J. 2008. The green building revolution. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zairi M. 1996. Effective benchmarking: learning from the best. London (UK): Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Zairi M, Leonard P. 1994. Practical benchmarking: the complete guide. London (UK): Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar