Impacts of home shopping on vehicle operations and greenhouse gas emissions: multi-year regional study

References

• Abukhader S, Jönson G. 2003. The environmental implications of electronic commerce: a critical review and framework for future investigation. Manag Environ Quality: Int J. 14:460–476.
   Google Scholar
• Agatz N, Fleischmann M, Van Nunen J. 2008. E-fulfillment and multi-channel distribution – a review. Eur J Oper Res. 187:339–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar A, Misra S, Rao H. 2000. On risk, convenience, and Internet shopping behavior. Commun ACM. 43:98–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns S. 2005. Delivering supermarket shopping: more or less traffic? Transport Rev. 25:51–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry R. 2008. Catalog: the illustrated history of mail order shopping. New York (NY): Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cullinane S, Edwards J, McKinnon A. 2008. Clicks versus bricks on campus: assessing the environmental impact of online food shopping. Supply chain innovations: people, practice and performance. Proceedings of the Logistics Research Network Annual Conference; Aug; Northhampton: The Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Cvetek T. 2001. Home shopping effects on transportation, a regional study. Newark(DE): University of delaware.
   Google Scholar
• DeNale R, Liu X, Weidenhamer W. 2015. Quarterly retail e-commerce sales 2nd quarter 2015. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• Erdmann L, Hilty L, Goodman J, Arnfalk P. 2004. The future impact of ICTs on environmental sustainability. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies; [cited 2013 Feb 2]. Available from:http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/eur21384en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Farag S, Dijst M, Lanzendorf M. 2003. Exploring the use of e-shopping and its impact on personal travel behavior in the Netherlands. Transport Res Rec: J Transport Res Board. 1858:47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Fichter K. 2002. E-commerce: sorting out the environmental consequences. J Ind Ecol. 6:25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Gillham B. 2008. Developing a questionnaire. Continuum: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Gould J, Golob T. 1997. Shopping without travel or travel without shopping? An investigation of electronic home shopping. Transport Rev. 17:355–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant A, Guthrie K, Ball-Rokeach S. 1991. Television shopping: A media system dependency perspective. Communic Res. 18:773–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse M. 2002. Shipping news: the implications of electronic commerce for logistics and freight transport. Resour Conserv Recycl. 36:211–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyanam K, McIntyre S. 2002. The e-marketing mix: a contribution of the e-tailing wars. J Acad Marketing Sci. 30:487–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly K. 2005. We are the web. Wired Mag. 13:113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Kim S, Eastin M. 2011. Hedonic tendencies and the online consumer: an investigation of the online shopping process. J Internet Commerce. 10:68–90.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchstetter T, Harley R, Kreisberg N, Stolzenburg M, Hering S. 1999. On-road measurement of fine particle and nitrogen oxide emissions from light- and heavy-duty motor vehicles. Atmos Environ. 33:2955–2968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Whang S. 2001. Winning the last mile of e-commerce. MIT Sloan Manag Rev. 42:54–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M. 2011. Modeling network-wide impacts of traffic bottleneck mitigation strategies under stochastic capacity conditions. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Li M, Zhou X, Rouphail N. 2011a. Planning-level methodology for evaluating traveler information provision strategies under stochastic capacity conditions. Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting (No. 11-3002); Jan 23–27; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Li M, Zhou X, Rouphail N. 2011b. Quantifying benefits of traffic information provision under stochastic demand and capacity conditions. Intelligent transportation systems (ITSC). 14th international IEEE conference; May 10–Jul 10; Washington (DC): IEEE; p. 2118–2123.
   Google Scholar
• Limayem M, Khalifa M, Frini A. 2000. What makes consumers buy from Internet? A longitudinal study of online shopping. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A: Syst Humans. 30:421–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd A, Cackette T. 2001. Diesel engines: environmental impact and control. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 51:809–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis B. 1996 Jan. Digital Commerce: the Future of Retailing. Arizona: Direct Marketing.
   Google Scholar
• Masanet E, Matthews H. 2010. Exploring environmental applications and benefits of information and communication technology. J Ind Ecol. 14:687–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayers K, Koomey J, Hall R, Bauer M, France C, Webb A. 2015. The carbon footprint of games distribution. J Ind. 19:402–415.
   Google Scholar
• Miller J. 2004. Mainstream Marketing Services, et al. v. Federal Trade Commission: resources and legal analysis. Available from: ReclaimDemocracy.org.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtarian P. 2002. Telecommunications and travel: the case for complementarity. J Ind Ecol. 6:43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtarian P. 2004. A conceptual analysis of the transportation impacts of B2C e-commerce. Transportation (Amst). 31:257–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen Company. 2008. Global online shopping report. [cited 2010 Feb 15]. Available from: http://at.nielsen.com/site/documents/GlobalOnlineShoppingReportFeb08.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• RAC Foundation. 2006. Motoring towards 2050: Shopping and Transport Policy. London: RAC Foundation. Available from: http://www.fcrn.org.uk/sites/default/files/Motoring_Towards_2050-Dec06.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rotem-Mindali O, Weltevreden J. 2013. Transport effects of e-commerce: what can be learned after years of research? Transportation (Amst). 40:867–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer R, Harley R, Cadle S, Norbeck J, Slott R, Bravo H. 2000. Mobile sources critical review: 1998 NARSTO assessment. Atmos Environ. 34:2161–2181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaupp L, Bélanger F. 2005. A conjoint analysis of online consumer satisfaction. J Electron Commerce Res. 6:95–111.
   Google Scholar
• Siikavirta H, Punakivi M, Kärkkäinen M, Linnanen L. 2002. Effects of E-commerce on greenhouse gas emissions: a case study of grocery home delivery in Finland. J Ind Ecol. 6:83–97.
   Google Scholar
• Sivaraman D, Pacca S, Mueller K, Lin J. 2007. Comparative energy, environmental, and economic analysis of traditional and e-commerce DVD rental networks. J Ind Ecol. 11:77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui D, Rejeski D. 2002. Environmental impacts of the emerging digital economy: the e-for-environment e-commerce? Environ Manage. 29:155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber C, Koomey J, Matthews H. 2010. The energy and climate change implications of different music delivery methods. J Ind Ecol. 14:754–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams E, Tagami T. 2003. Energy use in sales and distribution via e-commerce and conventional retail. J Ind Ecol. 6:99–114.
   Google Scholar
• Wygonik E, Goodchild A. 2012. Evaluating the efficacy of shared-use vehicles for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a US case study of grocery delivery. J Transport Res Forum. 51:111–126.
   Google Scholar
• Yi L, Thomas H. 2007. A review of research on the environmental impact of e-business and ICT. Environ Int. 33:841–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanni AM, Bristow AL. 2010. Emissions of CO 2 from road freight transport in London: trends and policies for long run reductions. Energ Policy. 38:1774–1786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Rouphail N, Li M. 2011. Analytical models for quantifying travel time variability based on stochastic capacity and demand distributions. Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, No. 11-3603; Jan 23–27; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar