Theorising pathways to sustainability

References

• Baker S. 2012. Climate change, the common good and the promotion of sustainable development. In: Meadowcroft J, Langhelle O, Ruud A, editors. Government, democracy and sustainable development: moving beyond the impasse. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 249–270.
   Google Scholar
• Baker S. 2015. Sustainable development: a new perspective. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker S, Durance I. forthcoming. Resilience and adaptation in coupled natural-social systems: a place based perspective. In: Marsden T, editor. Handbook of nature. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beland Lindahl K. 2008. Frame analysis, place perceptions and the politics of natural resource management: exploring a forest policy controversy in Sweden (dissertation). Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Beland Lindahl K, Baker S, Waldenström C. 2013. Place perceptions and controversies over forest management: exploring a Swedish example. J Environ Policy Plann. 15:201–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann F. 2013. Curtain down and nothing settled: global sustainability governance after the ‘Rio+20’ Earth Summit. Environ Plann C Gov Policy. 31:1099–1114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruff G, Wood A. 2000. Making sense of sustainable development: politicians, professionals, policies local planning. Environ Plann C Gov Policy. 18:593–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley H, Jordan A, Perkins R, Selin H. 2013. Governing sustainability: Rio+20 and the road beyond. Environ Plann C Gov Policy. 31:958–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng AS, Daniels SE. 2003. Examining the interaction between geographic scale and ways of knowing in ecosystem management: a case study of place-based collaborative planning. For Sci. 49:841–854.
   Google Scholar
• Demeritt D. 2011. Pathways to sustainability: perspectives and provocations. Environ Plann A. 43:1226–1237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson A. 2011. STEPS – norms, complexity, deliberation. Environ Plann A. 43:1226–1237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkheim E. 1897/1951. Suicide: a study in sociology. Spaulding JA, Simpson G, translator. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim E. 1925/1961. Moral education: a study in the theory and application of the sociology of education. Wilson EK, Schnurer H, translator. New York (NY): Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim E. 1912/1995. The elementary forms of religious life. Fields KE, translator. New York (NY): Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ely A, Smith A, Stirling A, Leach M, Scoones I. 2013. Innovation politics post-Rio+20: hybrid pathways to sustainability? Environ Plann C Gov Policy. 31:1063–1081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely A, Van Zwanenberg P, Stirling A. 2014. Broadening out and opening up technology assessment: approaches to enhance international development, co-ordination and democratisation. Res Policy. 43:505–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman E. 1974. Frame analysis: an essay on the organisation of experience. Boston (MA): Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold T. 2000. The perception of the environment: essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs M. 1995. Justice and sustainability. In: Lovenduski J, Stanyer J, editors. Contemporary political studies. Proceedings of the Political Studies Association of the UK. Belfast: Political Studies Association. Vol. 3; p. 1470–1485.
   Google Scholar
• Lafferty WM. 1995. The implementation of sustainable development in the European Union. In: Lovenduski J, Stanyer J, editors. Contemporary political studies. Proceedings of the Political Studies Association of the UK. Belfast: Political Studies Association. Vol. 1; p. 223–232.
   Google Scholar
• Leach M. 2008. Pathways to sustainability in the forest? Misunderstood dynamics and the negotiation of knowledge, power and policy. Environ Plann A. 40:1783–1795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach M, Bloom G, Ely A, Nightingale P, Scoones I, Shah E, Smith A. 2007b. Understanding governance: pathways to sustainability. STEPS Working Paper 2. Brighton: STEPS Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Leach M, Scoones I, Stirling A. 2007a. Pathways to sustainability: an overview of the STEPS centre approach. STEPS Approach Paper. Brighton: STEPS Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Leach M, Scoones I, Stirling A. 2010a. Dynamic sustainabilities: technology, environment, social justice. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Leach M, Scoones I, Stirling A. 2010b. Governing epidemics in an age of complexity: narratives, politics and pathways to sustainability. Global Environ Change. 20:369–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach M, Stirling A. 2011. Dynamic sustainabilities: a response. Environ Plann A. 43:1235–1237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li TM. 2011. Pathways to sustainability: perspectives and provocations: connections and disconnect. Environ Plann. 43:1232–1234.
   Google Scholar
• Massey D. 1995. The conceptualisation of place. In: Massey D, Jess P, editors. A place in the world: places, cultures and globalisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 46–79.
   Google Scholar
• Massey D. 1997. A global sense of place. In: Barnes T, Gergory D, editors. Reading human geography: the poetics and politics and inquiry. London: Arnold; p. 315–323.
   Google Scholar
• Massey D, Jess P. 1995. A place in the world: places, cultures and globalisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft J. 2007. Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. Environ Policy Plann. 9:193–212.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft J. 2013. Reaching the limits? Developed country engagement with sustainable development in a challenging conjuncture. Environ Plann C Gov Policy. 31:988–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller TR. 2013. Constructing sustainability science: emerging perspectives and research trajectories. Sustain Sci. 8:279–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communication. 2013. Sweden’s minerals strategy for sustainable use of Sweden’s mineral resources that creates growth throughout the country. Stockholm: Government Offices of Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Muller-Mahn D, Rettberg S, Getachew G. 2010. Pathways and dead ends of pastoral development among the Afar and Karrayu in Ethiopia. Eur J Dev Res. 22:660–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Riordan T. 1985. What does sustainability really man? Theory and development of concepts of sustainability. In: Sustainable development in an industrial economy. Proceedings of a conference held at Queens’ College; Jun 23–25; Cambridge. Cambridge (UK): Centre for Economic and Environmental Development.
   Google Scholar
• Perri 6. 2002. What is there to feel? A neo-Durkheimian theory of the emotions. Eur J Psychother Counsel. 5:263–290.
   Google Scholar
• Perri 6. 2005. What’s in a frame? Social organization, risk perception and the sociology of knowledge. J Risk Res. 8:91–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randhawa P, Marshall F. 2014. Policy transformations and translations: lessons for sustainable water management in peri-urban Delhi, India. Environ Plann C Gov Policy. 32:93–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relph E. 1976. Place and placelessness. London: Pion Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Rickards L, Ison R, Fünfgeld H, Wiseman J. 2013. Opening and closing the future: climate change adaptation, and scenario planning. Environ Plann C Gov Policy. 31:587–602.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez I, Sletto B, Bilbau B, Leal A. 2013. “Opening up” fire conflicts: reflexive governance and transformative knowledge networks in culturally fragile indigenous landscapes. STEPS Working Paper 54. Brighton: STEPS Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Roe E. 1994. Narrative policy analysis: theory and practice. Durham (NC): Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose G. 1995. Place and identity: a sense of place. In: Massey D, Jess P, editors. A place in the world: places, cultures and globalisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 87–132.
   Google Scholar
• Schön D. 1984. The reflexive practitioner: how practitioners think in action. New York (NY): Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schön D, Rein M. 1994. Frame reflection: towards the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York (NY): Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shields R. 1991. Places on the margin: alternative geographies of modernity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling A. 2008. “Opening up” and “closing down”: power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Sci Technol Human Values. 33:262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling A, Leach M, Mehta L, Scoones I, Smith I, Stagl S, Thompson J. 2007. Empowering designs: towards more progressive appraisal of sustainability. STEPS Working Paper 3. Brighton: STEPS Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Thapa S, Marshal F, Stagl S. 2010. Understanding peri-urban sustainability: the role of the resilience approach. STEPS Working Paper 38. Brighton: STEPS Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Tuan YF. 1974. Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes and values. New York (NY): Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gorp B. 2007. The constructionist approach to framing: bringing culture back. J Commun. 57:60–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss JP, Kemp R, Bauknecht D. 2006. Reflexive governance: a view on an emerging path. In: Voss JP, Bauknecht D, Kemp R, editors. Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 419–437.
   Google Scholar
• [WCED] World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar