Measuring the effectiveness of San Francisco’s planning standard for pedestrian wind comfort

References

• American Society of Civil Engineers. 2004. Outdoor human comfort and its assessment: state of the art. Reston (VA): American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers. 2010. ANSI/ASHRAE standard 55-2010. Atlanta (GA): American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Arens E. 1981. Designing for an acceptable wind environment. Transport Eng J. 107:127–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arens E, Ballanti D, Bennett C, Guldman S, White B. 1989. Developing the San Francisco wind ordinance and its guidelines for compliance. Build Environ. 24:297–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arens E, Bosselmann P. 1989. Wind, sun and temperature: predicting the thermal comfort of people in outdoor spaces. Build Environ. 24:315–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aultman-Hall L, Lane D, Lambert R. 2009. Assessing impact of weather and season on pedestrian traffic volumes. Trans Res Rec. 2140:35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Böcker L, Dijist M, Prillwitz J. 2013. Impact of everyday weather on individual daily travel behaviours in perspective: a literature review. Transp Rev. 33:71–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosselmann P. 1998. Representation of places: reality and realism in city design. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bosselmann P, Arens E, Dunker K, Wright R. 1990. Sun, wind, and pedestrian comfort: a study of Toronto’s central area. Berkeley (CA): Center for Environmental Design Research, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Bosselmann P, Arens E, Dunker K, Wright R. 1995. Urban form and climate: case study, Toronto. J Am Plann Assoc. 61:226–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosselmann P, Dake K, Fountain M, Kraus L, Lin KT, Harris A. 1988. Sun, wind, and comfort: a field study of thermal comfort in San Francisco (No. CEDR-06-88). Berkeley (CA): Center for Environmental Design Research, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Brown GZ, DeKay M. 2001. Sun, wind, and light: architectural design strategies. 2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chan CB, Ryan DA. 2009. Assessing the effects of weather conditions on physical activity participation using objective measures. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 6:2639–2654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Ng E. 2012. Outdoor thermal comfort and outdoor activities: a review of research in the past decade. Cities. 29:118–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng V, Ng E, Chan C, Givoni B. 2012. Outdoor thermal comfort study in a sub-tropical climate: a longitudinal study based in Hong Kong. Int J Biometeorol. 56:43–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City and County of San Francisco. 1985. San Francisco General Plan: Downtown Area Plan. Available from: http://www.sf-planning.org/ftp/General_Plan/Downtown.htm
   Google Scholar
• Clarke AF, Scott DM, Yiannakoulias N. 2014. Examining the relationship between active travel, weather, and the built environment: a multilevel approach using a GPS-enhanced dataset. Transportation. 41:325–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creemers L, Wets G, Cools M. 2015. Meteorological variation in daily travel behaviour: evidence from revealed preference data from the Netherlands. Theor Appl Climatol. 120:183–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crewe K, Brazel A, Middel A. Forthcoming. Desert New Urbanism: testing for comfort in downtown Tempe, Arizona. J Urban Des.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport AG. 1972. An Approach to Human Comfort Criteria for Environmental Wind Conditions. Stockholm (Sweden): Colloquium on building climatology.
   Google Scholar
• de Montigny L, Ling R, Zacharias J. 2012. The effects of weather on walking rates in nine cities. Environ Behav. 44:821–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMaris A. 2004. Regression with social data: modeling continuous and limited response variables. Hoboken (NJ): John Wily and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Donn M. 2011. Criteria for wind comfort and safety in cities: pragmatic application in wellington for 25 years. Wellington (New Zealand): Victoria University of Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson I, Knez I, Westerberg U, Thorsson S, Lindberg F. 2007. Climate and behaviour in a Nordic city. Landscape Urban Plan. 82:72–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanger PO. 1972. Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering. New York (NY): McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl J. 2010. Cities for people. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl J, Svarre B. 2013. How to study public life. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall SJ, Learned J, Ruddell B, Larson KL, Cavender-Bares J, Bettez N, Morse JL. 2016. Convergence of microclimate in residential landscapes across diverse cities in the United States. Landscape Ecol. 31:101–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman CW. 2002. City for sale: the transformation of San Francisco. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Höppe P. 1999. The physiological equivalent temperature - a universal index for the biometeorological assessment of the thermal environment. Int J Biometeorol. 43:71–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt JCR, Poulton EC, Mumford JC. 1976. The effects of wind on people: new criteria based on wind tunnel experiments. Build Environ. 11:15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang RL, Lin TP, Matzarakis A. 2011. Seasonal effects of urban street shading on long-term outdoor thermal comfort. Build Environ. 46:863–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson PS. 1978. The evaluation of windy environments. Build Environ. 13:251–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating WD, Krumholz N. 1991. Downtown plans of the 1980s: the case for more equity in the 1990s. J Am Plann Assoc. 57:136–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Macdonald E. 2016. Does wind discourage sustainable transportation mode choice? Findings from San Francisco, California, USA. Sustainability. 8:257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Macdonald E. Forthcoming. Wind and the city: an evaluation of San Francisco’s planning approach since 1985. Environ Plann B.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson T. 1978. The wind content of the built environment. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 3:93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzholzer S, van der Wulp NY. 2010. Thermal experience and perception of the built environment in dutch urban squares. J Urban Des. 15:375–401.
   Google Scholar
• Lin T. 2009. Thermal perception, adaptation and attendance in a public square in hot and humid regions. Build Environ. 44:2017–2026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Susilo YO, Karlström A. 2014. Examining the impact of weather variability on non-commuters’ daily activity–travel patterns in different regions of Sweden. J Transp Geogr. 39:36–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Zhang Y, Deng Q. 2016. The effects of urban microclimate on outdoor thermal sensation and neutral temperature in hot-summer and cold-winter climate. Energy Build. 128:190–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loukaitou-Sideris A, Banerjee T. 1993. The negotiated plaza: design and development of corporate open space in downtown Los Angeles and San Francisco. J Plan Educ Res. 13:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus CC, Francis C. 1998. People places: design guidelines for urban open space. New York (NY): Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Matzarakis A, Rutz F, Mayer H. 2007. Modelling radiation fluxes in simple and complex environments—application of the RayMan model. Int J Biometeorol. 51:323–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matzarakis A, Rutz F, Mayer H. 2010. Modelling radiation fluxes in simple and complex environments: basics of the RayMan model. Int J Biometeorol. 54:131–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer H, Höppe P. 1987. Thermal comfort of man in different urban environments. Theor Appl Climatol. 38:43–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melbourne WH. 1978. Criteria for environmental wind conditions. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 3:241–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middel A, Selover N, Hagen B, Chhetri N. Forthcoming. Impact of shade on outdoor thermal comfort – a seasonal field study in Tempe, Arizona. Int J Biometeorol.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulou M, Baker N, Steemers K. 2001. Thermal comfort in outdoor urban spaces: understanding the human parameter. Sol Energy. 70:227–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulou M, Lykoudis S. 2007. Use of outdoor spaces and microclimate in a mediterranean urban area. Build Environ. 42:3691–3707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil AH, Lee S, Yan A, Voorhees CC. 2013. Association between weather and physical activity in baltimore teens. Environ Behav. 45:138–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantavou K, Theoharatos G, Santamouris M, Asimakopoulos D. 2013. Outdoor thermal sensation of pedestrians in a Mediterranean climate and a comparison with UTCI. Build Environ. 66:82–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearlmutter D, Jiao D, Garb Y. 2014. The relationship between bioclimatic thermal stress and subjective thermal sensation in pedestrian spaces. Int J Biometeorol. 58:2111–2127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penwarden AD. 1973. Acceptable wind speeds in towns. Build Sci. 8:259–267.
   Google Scholar
• Penwarden AD, Wise AFE. 1975. Building research establishment digest. Bracknell: Department of the Environment, Her Majesty’s Stationary Office. Wind Environment around Buildings. p.1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Saneinejad S, Roorda MJ, Kennedy C. 2012. Modelling the impact of weather conditions on active transportation travel behavior. Transp Res D Transp Environ. 17:129–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spagnolo J, de Dear R. 2003. A field study of thermal comfort in outdoor and semi-outdoor environments in subtropical Sydney Australia. Build Environ. 38:721–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stathopoulos T, Blocken B. 2016. Pedestrian wind environment around tall buildings. In: Tamura Y, Yoshie R, editors. Advanced environmental wind engineering. Tokyo (Japan): Springer Japan; p. 101–127.
   Google Scholar
• Taleghani M, Sailor D, Ban-Weiss GA. 2016. Micrometeorological simulations to predict the impacts of heat mitigation strategies on pedestrian thermal comfort in a Los Angeles neighborhood. Environ Res Lett. 11:024003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsson S, Honjo T, Lindberg F, Eliasson I, Lim EM. 2007. Thermal comfort and outdoor activity in Japanese urban public places. Environ Behav. 39:660–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsson S, Lindqvist M, Lindqvist S. 2004. Thermal bioclimatic conditions and patterns of behaviour in an urban park in Göteborg, Sweden. Int J Biometeorol. 48:149–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker P, Gilliland J. 2007. The effect of season and weather on physical activity: a systematic review. Public Health. 121:909–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung CH, Chen CP, Tsai KT, Kántor N, Hwang RL, Matzarakis A, Lin TP. 2014. Outdoor thermal comfort characteristics in the hot and humid region from a gender perspective. Int J Biometeorol. 58:1927–1939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vettel SL. 1985. San Francisco’s downtown plan: environmental and urban design values in central business district regulation. Ecol Law Quart. 12:511–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villadiego K, Velay-Dabat MA. 2014. Outdoor thermal comfort in a hot and humid climate of Colombia: a field study in Barranquilla. Build Environ. 75:142–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacharias J, Stathopoulos T, Wu H. 2004. Spatial behavior in San Francisco’s plazas: the effects of microclimate, other people, and environmental design. Environ Behav. 36:638–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng C, Li Y, Wu Y. 2016. Pedestrian-level wind environment on outdoor platforms of a thousand-meter-scale megatall building: sub-configuration experiment and wind comfort assessment. Build Environ. 106:313–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng S, Xiong X, Vause J, Liu J. 2013. Real-time measurement of wind environment comfort in urban areas by environmental internet of things. Int J Sust Dev World. 20:254–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar