Organizational adoption of sustainable manufacturing practices in India: integrating institutional theory and corporate environmental responsibility

References

• Anderson SW, Daly JD, Johnson MF. 1999. Why firms seek ISO 9000 certification: regulatory compliance or competitive advantage? Prod Oper Manag. 8:28–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Van Wassenhove LN, Sarvary M. 2009. Efficient take‐back legislation. Prod Oper Manag. 18:243–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal P. 2005. Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Manage J. 26:197–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal P, Roth K. 2000. Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Acad Manage J. 43:717–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingeman K, Berkes F, Gardner JS. 2004. Institutional responses to development pressures: resilience of social-ecological systems in Himachal Pradesh, India. Int J SustDev World. 11:99–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns J Jr. 2006. Designing for nature and sustainability. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 13:77–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell JL. 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manage Rev. 32:946–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell SR, Joshi AW. 2013. Corporate ecological responsiveness: antecedent effects of institutional pressure and top management commitment and their impact on organizational performance. Bus Strat Environ. 22:73–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darnall N, Sides S. 2008. Assessing the performance of voluntary environmental programs: does certification matter? Policy Stud J. 36:95–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson WN, Worrell DL. 2001. Regulatory pressure and environmental management infrastructure and practices. Bus Soc. 40:315–342.
   Google Scholar
• Delmas M, Toffel MW. 2004. Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. Bus Strat Environ. 13:209–222.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Powell WW. 1983. The iron cage revisited: collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. Am Socio Rev. 48:147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobers P, Halme M. 2009. Corporate social responsibility and developing countries. Corp Soc Resp Env Ma. 16:237–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res. 18:39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeazzo A, Klassen RD. 2015. Organizational context and the implementation of environmental and social practices: what are the linkages to manufacturing strategy? J Clean Prod. 108:158–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran A, Spalanzani A. 2012. Sustainability of manufacturing and services: investigations for research and applications. Int J Prod Econ. 140:35–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. 2006. Multivariate data analysis: vol. 6. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Henriques I, Sadorsky P. 1999. The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Acad Manage J. 42:87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettige H, Huq M, Pargal S, Wheeler D. 1996. Determinants of pollution abatement in developing countries: evidence from South and Southeast Asia. World Dev. 24:1891–1904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman AJ. 1999. Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Acad Manage J. 42:351–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA). 2014. World energy outlook 2014. IEA/Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Paris (France). Available from: http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA). 2015. World energy outlook 2015. IEA/Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Paris (France). Available from: http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. 1996. PRELIS 2 user’s reference guide: a program for multivariate data screening and data summarization: a preprocessor for LISREL. Illinois: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Keldmann T, Olesen J. 1994. Conditions for handling the environmental issue as a business issue in product development. J Environ Cons Des Manuf. 3:35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Palepu K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harv Bus Rev. 75:41–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen RD. 2001. Plant‐level environmental management orientation: the influence of management views and plant characteristics. Prod Oper Manag. 10:257–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Whitney DJ. 2001. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J Appl Psychol. 86:114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madu CN, Kuei C, Madu IE. 2002. A hierarchic metric approach for integration of green issues in manufacturing: a paper recycling application. J Environ Manag. 64:261–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra MK, Grover V. 1998. An assessment of survey research in POM: from constructs to theory. J Oper Manag. 16:407–425.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Patil A. 2006. Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Manage Sci. 52:1865–1883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani M, Madan J, Lee JH, Lyons KW, Gupta SK. 2014. Sustainability characterisation for manufacturing processes. Int J Prod Res. 52:5895–5912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar HH, Russell SN. 2011. The adoption of sustainable manufacturing practices in the Caribbean. Bus Strat Environ. 20:512–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakashima K, Arimitsu H, Nose T, Kuriyama S. 2002. Analysis of a product recovery system. Int J Prod Res. 40:3849–3856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash A, Potoski M. 2006. Racing to the bottom? Trade, environmental governance, and ISO 14001. Am J Polit Sci. 50:350–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi GY, Zeng SX, Tam CM, Yin HT, Wu JF, Dai ZH. 2011. Diffusion of ISO 14001 environmental management systems in China: rethinking on stakeholders’ roles. J Clean Prod. 19:1250–1256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose CM, 2000. Design for environment: a method for formulating product end-of-life strategies [Doctoral dissertation]. Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Sangle S. 2010. Empirical analysis of determinants of adoption of proactive environmental strategies in India. Bus Strat Environ. 19:51–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkis J. 2001. Manufacturing’s role in corporate environmental sustainability-concerns for the new millennium. Int J Oper Prod Manag. 21:666–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkis J, Cordeiro JJ. 2001. An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice. Eur J Oper Res. 135:102–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkis J, Gonzalez-Torre P, Adenso-Diaz B. 2010. Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: the mediating effect of training. J Oper Manag. 28:163–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott WR. 2001. Institutions and organizations: ideas, interests, and identities. California (USA): Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma S. 2000. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Acad Manage J. 43:681–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Henriques I. 2005. Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strat Manag J. 26:159–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrivastava P. 1995. Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strat Manag J. 16:183–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somsuk N, Laosirihongthong T. 2016. Prioritization of applicable drivers for green supply chain management implementation toward sustainability in Thailand. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. [Internet]. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2016.1187210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate WL, Dooley KJ, Ellram LM. 2011. Transaction cost and institutional drivers of supplier adoption of environmental practices. J Bus Logist. 32:6–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2012. Environmental Management Systems and Federal Electronics Stewardship; [cited 2012 June 28]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/ems_connection.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Voss CA, Åhlström P, Blackmon K. 1997. Benchmarking and operational performance: some empirical results. Int J Oper Prod Manag. 17:1046–1058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Gulati R, Shortell SM. 1997. Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Admin Sci Quart. 42:366–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu GC, Ding JH, Chen PS. 2012. The effects of GSCM drivers and institutional pressures on GSCM practices in Taiwan’s textile and apparel industry. Int J Prod Econ. 135:618–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng S, Sun C, Qi Y, Kahn ME. 2014. The evolving geography of China’s industrial production: implications for pollution dynamics and urban quality of life. J Econ Surv. 28:709–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, Sarkis J. 2004. Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. J Oper Manag. 22:265–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar