Ecological landscape regulation approaches in Xilingol, Inner Mongolia: an urban ecosystem services perspective

References

• Bastian O, Haase D, Grunewald K. 2012. Ecosystem properties, potentials and services – the EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example. Ecol Indic. 21:7–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolund P, Hunhammar S. 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol Econ. 29:293–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd J, Banzhaf S. 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ. 63:616–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuste J, Qureshi S. 2011. Urban sustainability, urban ecology and the Society for Urban Ecology (SURE). Urban Ecosyst. 14:313–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R. 2008. Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biol Conserv. 141:350–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, d’Arge R, De Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, et al. 1998. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol Econ. 25:3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, De Groot R, Sutton P, Van Der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environ Chang. 26:152–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernstson H, Sörlin S. 2013. Ecosystem services as technology of globalization: on articulating values in urban nature. Ecol Econ. 86:274–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ. 68:643–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao L, Kinnucan HW, Zhang Y, Qiao G. 2016. The effects of a subsidy for grassland protection on livestock numbers, grazing intensity, and herders’ income in inner Mongolia. Land Use Policy. 54:302–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb H, Hochuli DF. 2002. Habitat fragmentation in an urban environment: large and small fragments support different arthropod assemblages. Biol Conserv. 106:91–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Baggethun E, Barton DN. 2013. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol Econ. 86:235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson Å. 2013. Reaching for a sustainable, resilient urban future using the lens of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ. 86:285–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll F, Müller F, Haase D, Fohrer N. 2012. Rural–urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy. 29:521–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakes T, Kim H-O. 2012. The urban environmental indicator “Biotope Area Ratio”—an enhanced approach to assess and manage the urban ecosystem services using high resolution remote-sensing. Ecol Indic. 13:93–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larondelle N, Haase D. 2013. Urban ecosystem services assessment along a rural–urban gradient: a cross-analysis of European cities. Ecol Indic. 29:179–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Wang R, Paulussen J, Liu X. 2005. Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: a case study in Beijing, China. Landscape Urban. Plan.72:325–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long H, Liu Y, Hou X, Li T, Li Y. 2014. Effects of land use transitions due to rapid urbanization on ecosystem services: implications for urban planning in the new developing area of China. Habitat Int. 44:536–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma M, Lu Z, Sun Y. 2008. Population growth, urban sprawl and landscape integrity of Beijing City. Int J Sust Dev World. 15:326–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musacchio LR, Coulson RN. 2001. Landscape ecological planning process for wetland, waterfowl, and farmland conservation. Landscape Urban Plan. 56:125–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauleit S, Duhme F. 2000. Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning. Landscape Urban Plan. 52:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML. 2006. Advancing urban ecological studies: frameworks, concepts, and results from the Baltimore Ecosystem Study. Austral. Ecol.31:114–125.
   Google Scholar
• Piwowarczyk J, Kronenberg J, Dereniowska MA. 2013. Marine ecosystem services in urban areas: do the strategic documents of Polish coastal municipalities reflect their importance?. Landscape Urban Plan. 109:85–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty T. 2003. Decision-making with the AHP: why is the principal eigenvector necessary. Eur J Oper Res. 145:85–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams CC, Millington AC. 2004. The diverse and contested meanings of sustainable development. Geogr J. 170:99–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J. 2014. Urban ecology and sustainability: the state-of-the-science and future directions. Landscape Urban Plan. 125:209–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Lu Z. 2014. Assessment of ecosystem services change in china three major economic rims: a hierarchical framework based on GIS. Int J Earth Sci Eng. 7:2374–2379.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Lu Z, He X, Zhang X, Zhang H, Gu G, Wu J. 2015. Assessing ecological sustainability of Chinas three major economic rims by ecological footprint. Int J Earth Sci Eng. 8:2817–2822.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Tan F, Lu Z. 2014. Resource-based cities (RBC): a road to sustainability. Int J Sust Dev World. 21:465–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Liu X, Dong R, Shao G. 2016. Landsenses ecology and ecological planning toward sustainable development. Int J Sust Dev World. 23:293–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Xiao L, Tang L, Shi L, Su X, Wang H, Song Y, Shao G. 2014. Effects of spatial form on urban commute for major cities in China. Int J Sust Dev World. 21:361–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar