Scales of integration for sustainable development governance

References

• Abbott KW, Bernstein S. 2015. The high level political forum on sustainable development: orchestration by default and design. Global Policy. 6:222–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott KW, Genschel P, Snidal D, Zangl B. 2015. International organizations as orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage D, Marschke M, Plummer R. 2008. Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environ Change. 18:86–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardach E. 1998. Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes F. 2009. Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Env Management. 90:1692–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein S, Cashore B. 2012. Complex global governance and domestic policies: four pathways of influence. Int Aff. 88:585–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann F. 2007. ‘Earth system governance’ as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Global Environ Change. 17:326–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boas I, Biermann F, Kanie N. 2016. Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: towards a nexus approach. Int Environ Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 16:449–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O. 2006. Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol and Soc. 11:8–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chasek PS, Wagner LM. 2016. Breaking the mold: a new type of multilateral sustainable development negotiation. Int Environ Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 16: 397–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, Wainger L, Folke C, Mäler, K-G. 1993. Modeling complex ecological economic systems: toward an evolutionary, dynamic understanding of people and nature. In: Samson FB, Knopf FL, editors. Ecosystem Management. New York: Springer; p. 148–163.
   Google Scholar
• Dooge JCI, Goodman GT, Jwm LR, Marton-Lefévre J, O’Riordan T, Praderie F, Brennan M. (editors). 1992. An agenda of science for environment and development into the 21st century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckerberg K, Nilsson M, editors. 2013. Environmental policy integration in practice: shaping institutions for learning. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Florida R. 1995. Toward the learning region. Futures. 27:527–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson CC, Ostrom E, Ahn T-K. 2000. The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecol Econ. 32:217–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griggs D, Stafford-Smith M, Gaffney O, Rockstrom J, Ohman MC, Shyamsundar P, Steffen W, Glaser G, Kanie N, Noble I. 2013. Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature. 495:304–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta J, Vegelin C. 2016. Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. Int Environ Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 16:433–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen EG, Grosse-Dunker F, Reichwald R. 2009. Sustainability innovation cube—a framework to evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations. Int J of Innovation Management. 13:683–713.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton G, Counsell D. 2004. Regions and sustainable development: regional planning matters. Geog J. 170:135–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy A, Morgan K. 2012. Spaces of innovation: learning, proximity and the ecological turn. Reg Stud. 46:1041–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch PD, Adams WM, Brosius JP, Zia A, Bariola N, Dammert JL. 2010. Acknowledging conservation trade-offs and embracing complexity. Conserv Bio. 25:259–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe L, Marks G. 2001. Multi-level governance and European integration. Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jahiel AR. 2015. Between the local and the global in the age of the anthropocene: the case for the “regional” in environmental studies and sciences. J of Environ Studies and Sci. 5:224–230.
   Google Scholar
• Jinnah S. 2014. Post-treaty politics: secretariat influence in global environmental governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jinnah S, Morgera E. 2013. Environmental provisions in American and EU free trade agreements: a preliminary comparison and research agenda. Reciel. 22:324–339.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi DK, Hughes BB, Sisk TD. 2015. Improving governance for the post-2015 sustainable development goals: scenario forecasting the next 50years. World Dev. 70:286–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp R, Parto S, Gibson RB. 2005. Governance for sustainable development: moving from theory to practice. Int J of Sus Dev. 8:12–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kim RE. 2013. The emergent network structure of the multilateral environmental agreement system. Global Environ Change. 23:980–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim RE, Mackey B. 2014. International environmental law as a complex adaptive system. Int Environ Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 14:5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois EV, Campbell K, A-H P-R, Karesh WB, Daszak P. 2012. Towards a better integration of global health and biodiversity in the new sustainable development goals beyond Rio+ 20. EcoHealth. 9:381–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Blanc D. 2015. Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sus Dev. 23:176–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KN. 1993. Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin K, Cashore B, Bernstein S, Auld G. 2012. Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sci. 45:123–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Mooney HA, Hull V, Davis SJ, Gaskell J, Hertel T, Lubchenco J, Seto KC, Gleick P, Kremen C, et al. 2015. Systems integration for global sustainability. Science. 347:963–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubchenco J, Barner AK, Cerny-Chipman EB, Reimer JN. 2015. Sustainability rooted in science. Nat Geosci. 8:741–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW. 1972. The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Lucas P, Yoshida T. 2013. Towards an integrated framework for SDGs: ultimate and enabling goals for the case of energy. Sustainability. 5:4124–4151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberthür S, Stokke OS. 2011. Managing institutional complexity: regime interplay and global environmental change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 1986. An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice. 48:3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulver S, VanDeveer SD. 2009. “Thinking about tomorrows”: scenarios, global environmental politics, and social science scholarship. Global Environ Politics. 9:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quay R. 2010. Anticipatory governance: a tool for climate change adaptation. J Am Plann Assoc. 76:496–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggie JG. 1975. Organized social complexity: challenges to politics and policy. In: La Porte TR, editor. Complexity, planning, and public order. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 110–150.
   Google Scholar
• Scott JW. 1999. European and North American contexts for cross-border regionalism. Reg Stud. 33:605–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter A-M. 2004. A new world order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spangenberg JH. 2002. Environmental space and the prism of sustainability: frameworks for indicators measuring sustainable development. Ecolog Indicators. 2:295–309.
   Google Scholar
• Speth JG. 2004. International environmental law: can it deal with the big issues. Vt Law Rev. 28:779–796.
   Google Scholar
• Swart RJ, Raskin P, Robinson J. 2004. The problem of the future: sustainability science and scenario analysis. Global Environ Change. 14:137–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas CW. 2003. Bureaucratic landscapes: interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Conference on Environment & Development. 1992. Agenda 21. Rio de Janeiro.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2012.  The future we want. Rio de Janeiro.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Environment Programme. 2013. Breaking down the silos: integrating environmental sustainability in the post-2015 Agenda. New York: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vuuren DP, Kok MT, Girod B, Lucas PL, De Vries B. 2012. Scenarios in global environmental assessments: key characteristics and lessons for future use. Global Environ Change. 22:884–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitz N, Nilsson M, Davis M. 2014. A nexus approach to the post-2015 agenda: formulating integrated water, energy, and food SDGs. SAIS Rev of Int Aff. 34:37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson MC, Wu J. 2016. The problems of weak sustainability and associated indicators. Int J of Sust Dev & World Ecol. 24:44–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future: report of the world commission on environment and development. New York: WCED.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt RG. 1980. Complexity: policymakers’ divider and possible conqueror. Enivron Plann B. 7:265–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young OR. 2002. The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young OR. 2010. Institutional dynamics: emergent patterns in international environmental governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young OR, Underdal A, Kanie N, Andresen S, Bernstein S, Biermann F, Gupta J, Haas PM, Iguchi M, Kok MT, et al. 2014. Earth system challenges and a multi-layered approach for the sustainable development goals. Tokyo: UNU-IAS.
   Google Scholar