Knowledge-based decision-making model for the management of transit system alternative fuel infrastructures

References

• Alam A, Hatzopoulou M. 2014. Reducing transit bus emissions: alternative fuels or traffic operations? Atmos Environ. 89:129–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Public Transportation Association. 2008. Changing the way America moves: creating a more robust economy, a smaller carbon footprint, and energy independence. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Arimah B, Ebohon O. 2000. Energy transition and its implications for environmentally sustainable development in Africa. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 7:201–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastani P, Heywood J, Hope C. 2012. Fuel use and CO2 emissions under uncertainty from light-duty vehicles in the US to 2050. J Energy. 134:042202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero R, Sullivan C. 2011. Green TODs: marrying transit-oriented development and green urbanism. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 18:210–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui S, Niu H, Wang W, Zhang G, Gao L, Lin J. 2010. Carbon footprint analysis of the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system: a case study of Xiamen City. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 17:329–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Korany A, Rafea A, Baraka H, Eid S. 2000. A structured testing methodology for knowledge-based systems. International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications; London: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; p. 427–436.
   Google Scholar
• Ercan T, Zhao Y, Tatari O, Pazour J. 2015. Optimization of transit bus fleet’s life cycle assessment impacts with alternative fuel options. Energy. 93:323–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exsys Inc. 2010. Exsys Corvid knowledge automation expert systems software developer’s guide. Albuquerque, NM: Exsys Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Faghri A. 1989. Computerization of heuristic-based decision-making problems in transportation engineering [ Doctoral Dissertation]. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Fan R, Zhu B, Huang C, Sheng Z, Mao L, Li M. 2015. Different modes of synergistic toxicities between metam/copper (II) and metam/zinc (II) in HepG2 cells: apoptosis vs. necrosis. Environ Toxicol. 31:12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey R, Faghri A, Li M. 2014. Development of an expert system for effective countermeasure identification at rural unsignalized intersections. Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting; Washington, DC; TRB.
   Google Scholar
• Hackbarth A, Madlener R. 2013. Consumer preferences for alternative fuel vehicles: a discrete choice analysis. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 25:5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamad K, Faghri A, Li M. 2015. Forecasting model for vehicular demand: an alternative methodology in the context of developing countries. J Developing Areas. 49:125–143.
   Google Scholar
• Horne R, Grant T, Verghese K. 2009. Life cycle assessment: principles, practice, and prospects. Clayton South (VIC): Csiro Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ibbotson S, Kara S. 2013. LCA case study. Part 1: cradle-to-grave environmental footprint analysis of composites and stainless steel I-beams. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 18:208–217.
   Google Scholar
• Laghaei J, Faghri A, Li M. 2015. Impacts of home shopping on vehicle operations and greenhouse gas emissions: multi-year regional study. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 23:381–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Faghri A. 2014. Cost-benefit analysis of added cycling facilities. Transp Res Rec. 2468:55–63.
   Google Scholar
• Li M, Faghri A. 2016. Applying problem-oriented and project-based learning in a transportation engineering course. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract. 142:04016002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Faghri A, Ozden A, Yue Y. 2017a. Economic feasibility study for pavement monitoring using synthetic aperture radar-based satellite remote sensing: cost–benefit analysis. Transp Res Rec. 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Rouphail N, Mahmoudi M, Liu J, Zhou X. 2017b. Multi-scenario optimization approach for assessing the impacts of advanced traffic information under realistic stochastic capacity distributions. Transp Res Part C Emerging Technol. 77:113–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Zhou X, Rouphail N. 2017c. Quantifying travel time variability at a single bottleneck based on stochastic capacity and demand distributions. J Intell Transp Syst Technol Plann Oper. 21:79–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malça J, Freire F. 2006. Renewability and life-cycle energy efficiency of bioethanol and bio-ethyl tertiary butyl ether (bioETBE): assessing the implications of allocation. Energy. 31:3362–3380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw J, Shull S, Miknaitis G. 2010. The Route to Carbon and Energy Savings: Transit Efficiency in 2030 and 2050. Chicago, IL and San Francisco, CA: Center for Neighborhood Technology.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie E, Durango-Cohen P. 2012. Environmental life-cycle assessment of transit buses with alternative fuel technology. Transp Res Part D. 17:39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Ozden A, Faghri A, Li M. 2016a. Using knowledge-automation expert systems to enhance the use and understanding of traffic monitoring data in state DOTs. Procedia Eng. 145:980–986.
   Google Scholar
• Ozden A, Faghri A, Li M, Tabrizi K. 2016b. Evaluation of synthetic aperture radar satellite remote sensing for pavement and infrastructure monitoring. Procedia Eng. 145:752–759.
   Google Scholar
• Patil A, Herder P, Brown K. 2010. Investment decision making for alternative fuel public transport buses: the case of Brisbane transport. J Publ Transp. 13:115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Roche M, Mourato S, Fischedick M, Pietzner K, Viebahn P. 2010. Public attitudes towards and demand for hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles: a review of the evidence and methodological implications. Energy Policy. 38:5301–5310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan F, Caulfield B. 2010. Examining the benefits of using bio-CNG in urban bus operations. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 15:362–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salling K, Pryn M. 2015. Sustainable transport project evaluation and decision support: indicators and planning criteria for sustainable development. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 22:346–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schipper L. 1976. Raising the productivity of energy utilization. Annu Rev Energy. 1:455–517.
   Google Scholar
• Scott M, Kelly C, Collins E, Lewis J, Faghri A, Li M. 2017. Research of viable attributes and potential to integrate curbside intercity buses. Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting. No. 17-06609; Washington, DC; TRB.
   Google Scholar
• Taromi R, DuRoss M, Chen B, Faghri A, Li M, DeLiberty T. 2015. A multi-objective land development optimization model: the case of New Castle County, Delaware. Transportation Plann Technol. 38:277–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan M, Faghri A, Li M. 2017. An interactive expert system based decision making model for the management of transit system alternate fuel vehicle assets. Intell Inf Manag. 9:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wahed M, Faghri A, Li M. 2017. An innovative simulation model for the operations of a multipurpose seaport: a case study from port of Wilmington, USA. Int J Simulation Modelling. 12:151.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Gbologah F, Lee D, Liu H, Rodgers M, Guensler R. 2015. Assessment of alternative fuel and powertrain transit bus options using real-world operations data: life-cycle fuel and emissions modeling. Appl Energy. 154:143–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu C, Kim J. 2010. Building pathology, investigation of sick buildings—VOC emissions. Indoor Built Environ. 19:30–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Xu W, Li M. 2009. Co-evolution of transportation and land use: modeling historical dependencies in land use and transportation decision-making. No. OTREC-RR-09-08. Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar