Voluntary participation for sustainability transition: experiences from the ‘Commitment to Sustainable Development 2050’

References

• BSAG. 2017. Baltic sea action group. [accessed 2018 Mar 5]. http://www.bsag.fi/Index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB. 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 100:8086–8091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang R-D, Zuo J, Zhao Z-Y, Soebarto V, Zillante G, Gan X-L. 2017. Approaches for transitions towards sustainable development: status quo and challenges. Sustain Dev. 25:359–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COM. 2015. Closing the loop - an EU action plan for the circular economy. Communication from the Commission COM(2015) 614/2. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Cultural Environment Strategy. 2014. Cultural environment strategy 2014–2020. Government Resolution 20 March 2014. Helsinki: Ministry of Education and Culture & Ministry of the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Dahle K. 2007. When do transformative initiatives really transform? A typology of different paths for transition to a sustainable society. Futures. 39:487–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon B. 2016. SDGs, Agenda 2030 and the prospects for transformative social policy and social development. J Int Comp Soc Pol. 32:79–82.
   Google Scholar
• Diesendorf M. 2014. A genuine ‘Green’ economy must be ecologically sustainable and socially just. In: Schroeder SK, Chester L. (eds.) Challenging the orthodoxy. Berlin: Springer; p. 223-241.
   Google Scholar
• EPSD. 2016. Five spearheads for sustainable development’ Expert Panel on Sustainable Development (EPSD). [accessed 2018 Mar 5]. https://www.sitra.fi/en/publications/five-spearheads-sustainable-development/.
   Google Scholar
• Figueres C, Schellnhuber HJ, Whiteman G, Rockström J, Hobley A, Rahmstorf S. 2017. Three years to safeguard our climate. Nature. 456:593–595.
   Google Scholar
• FNCSD. 2016. The Finland we want by 2050 ─ Society’s Commitment to Sustainable Development. Adopted at the meeting of the Commission on Sustainable Development held on 20 April 2016. Helsinki: Finnish National Commission on Sustainable Development.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler A, Biekart K. 2017. Multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainable development goals: the importance of interlocutors. Public Admin Devel. 37:81–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels F, Raven R. 2006. Non-linearity and expectations in niche-development trajectories: ups and downs in Dutch Biogas Development (1973–2003). Tehcnol Anal Strat Manage. 18:375–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy. 31:1257–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW. 2014. Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theor Cult Soc. 31:21–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW, Sovacool BK, Schwanen T, Sorrell S. 2017. The socio-technical dynamics of low-carbon transitions. Joule. 1:463–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GGKP. 2017. Green growth knowledge platform. [accessed 2018 Mar 5]. http://www.greengrowthknowledge.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer M, Nilsson M, Raworth K, Bakker P, Berkhout F, de Boer Y, Rockström J, Ludwig K, Kok M. 2015. Beyond cockpit-ism: four insights to enhance the transformative potential of the sustainable development goals. Sustainability. 7:1651–1660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrichs H. 2011. Participation: empowerment for sustainable development. In: Godemann J, Michelsen G. (eds.) Sustainability communication: interdisciplinary perspectives and theoretical foundation. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; p. 187–198.
   Google Scholar
• Hildén M. 2009. Time horizons in evaluating environmental policies. New Dir Evaluat. 2009:9–18.
   Google Scholar
• HINKU. 2017. The Carbon Neutral Municipalities project (HINKU). [accessed 2018 Mar 5]. http://www.hinku-foorumi.fi/en-US
   Google Scholar
• ICSU. 2017. A guide to SDG interactions: from science to implementation. Paris: International Council for Science (ICSU).
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen U. 2012. Mapping and navigating transitions—the multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development. Res Policy. 41:996–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaaronen R. 2016. Scientific support for sustainable development policies: a typology of science-policy interfaces with case studies Sitra studies 118. Helsinki: SITRA.
   Google Scholar
• Kaljonen M, Lyytimäki J. 2016. Kestävän ruokavalion edistäminen lounasruokailussa: Ilmastovalintamerkintä testissä. Suomen ympäristökeskuksen raportteja 5/2016. Helsinki: Suomen ympäristökeskus.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp R, Loorbach D, Rotmans J. 2007. Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 14:78–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowlton N. 2017. Doom and gloom won’t save the world. Nature. 544:271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K. 2004. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhmonen T, Ahokas I, Ahvenainen M, Pohjolainen P, Panula-Ontto J, Kirveennummi A, Auffermann B, Kinnunen V. 2017. Suomen proteiinijärjestelmän vaihtoehtoiset tulevaisuudet. Turku: Turun yliopisto, Tulevaisuuden tutkimuskeskus. TUTU-julkaisuja 1/2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarevic D, Valve H. 2017. Narrating expectations for the circular economy: towards a common and contested European transition. Energy Res Soc Sci. 31:60–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal Filho W, Azeiteiro U, Alves F, Pace P, Mifsud M, Brandli L, Caeiro SS, Disterheft A. 2018. Reinvigorating the sustainable development research agenda: the role of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 25:131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach D, Van Der Brugge R, Taanman M. 2008. Governance in the energy transition: practice of transition management in the Netherlands. Int J Environ Techol Manage. 9:294–315.
   Google Scholar
• Luederitz C, Abson DJ, Audet R, Lang DJ. 2017. Many pathways toward sustainability: not conflict but co-learning between transition narratives. Sustain Sci. 12:393–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyytimäki J. 2014. Communicating sustainability under increasing public budget constraints. Latin Am J Manage Sustain Dev. 1:137–145. doi:10.1504/LAJMSD.2014.065476
   Google Scholar
• Lyytimäki J, Gudmundsson H, Sørensen CH. 2014. Russian dolls and chinese whispers: two perspectives on the unintended effects of sustainability indicator communication. Sustain Dev. 22:84–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyytimäki J, Lähteenoja S, Reinikainen T, Schmidt-Thomé K, Sokero M, Vikström S. 2017. Kestävän kehityksen toimenpidesitoumustyökalu: kokonaisarvio ja kehittämismahdollisuudet. Helsinki: Valtioneuvoston kanslia. Valtioneuvoston selvitys- ja tutkimustoiminnan julkaisusarja 67/2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lyytimäki J, Lähteenoja S, Sokero M, Korhonen S, Furman E. 2016. Agenda 2030 in Finland: key questions and indicators of sustainable development. Helsinki: Prime Minister’s Office. Publications of the Government´s analysis, assessment and research activities 32/2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lyytimäki J, Tapio P, Varho V, Söderman T. 2013. The use, non-use and misuse of indicators in sustainability assessment and communication. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 20:385–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik AS. 2014. Economics for a sustainable planet. In: Chen W-Y, Suzuki T, Lackner M. (eds.) Handbook of climate change mitigation and adaptation. New York (NY): Springer New York; p. 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Markard J, Raven R, Truffer B. 2012. Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Res Policy. 41:955–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoE. 1998. Finnish government programme for sustainable development. Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment. Council of State Decision-in-Principle on the Promotion of Ecological Sustainability, The Finnish Environment 254.
   Google Scholar
• Myllyviita T, Antikainen R, Leskinen P. 2017. Sustainability assessment tools – their comprehensiveness and utilisation in company-level sustainability assessments in Finland. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 24:236–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig J, Schulz D, Fischer D, Hetze K, Laws N, Lüdecke G, Rieckmann M. 2013. Communication regarding sustainability: conceptual perspectives and exploration of societal subsystems. Sustainability. 5:2976–2990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Griggs D, Visbeck M. 2016. Map the interactions between sustainable development goals. Nature. 534:320–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parris TM, Kates RW. 2003. Characterizing a sustainability transition: goals, targets, trends, and driving forces. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 100:8068–8073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patosaari P. 2003. Kestävän kehityksen kansallinen kokonaisarvio. Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment. The Finnish Environment 623.
   Google Scholar
• Pattberg P, Widerberg O. 2016. Transnational multistakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: conditions for success. Ambio. 45:42–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters GP, Minx JC, Weber CL, Edenhofer O. 2011. Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 108:8903–8908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PMO. 2006. Towards sustainable choices. A nationally and globally sustainable Finland. Helsinki: Prime Minister’s Office. The national strategy for sustainable development Prime Minister’s Office Publications 7/2006.
   Google Scholar
• PMO. 2017. Government report on the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Helsinki: Prime Minister’s Office. Prime Minister’s Office Publications 11/2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ramboll. 2009. Kansallinen kestävän kehityksen arviointi 2009. Helsinki: Ramboll Consulting Management & Ympäristöministeriö.
   Google Scholar
• Rouhinen S. 2014. Matkalla mallimaaksi? Kestävän kehityksen juurtuminen Suomessa. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland. Publications of the University of Eastern Finland Dissertations in Social Sciences and Business Studies, No 88.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs J, Schmidt-Traub G, Kroll C, Durand-Delacre D, Teksoz K. 2016. SDG index and dashboards - global report. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
   Google Scholar
• Sethi SP, Schepers DH. 2014. United Nations global compact: the promise–performance gap. J Bus Enthics. 122:193–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman D. 2001. Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• SPI. 2017. Social progress index 2017. [accessed 2018 Mar 5]. http://www.socialprogressimperative.org/the-2017-social-progress-index-is-live/.
   Google Scholar
• SSI. 2016. Sustainable society index 2016. [accessed 2018 Mar 5]. http://www.ssfindex.com/results/main-results-2016.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, de Vries W, de Wit CA, et al. 2015. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science. 347:1259855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations A/RES/70/1. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. [accessed 2018 Mar 5]. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2016. Global sustainable development report 2016. New York: United Nations (UN), Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis AM, Kelly AR, Graymore MLM. 2010. Assessing sustainability: a technical fix or a means of social learning? Int J Sust Dev World Ecol. 17:67–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar