236
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Distribution pattern of traditional ecological knowledge on plant utilization among major minority peoples in Guizhou, China

, , &
Pages 37-44 | Received 05 Mar 2018, Accepted 10 Apr 2018, Published online: 16 Apr 2018

References

  • Begossi A. 1996. Use of ecological methods in ethnobotany: diversity indices. Econ Bot. 50(3):280–289.
  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl. 10(5):1251–1262.
  • Callaway E. 2017. Neanderthal tooth plaque hints at meals-and kisses. Nature. 543(7644):163.
  • de Albuquerque UP, De Sousa Araújo TA, Ramos MA, do Nascimento VT, de Lucena RFP, Monteiro JM, Alencar NL, de Lima AE. 2008. How ethnobotany can aid biodiversity conservation: reflections on investigations in the semi-arid region of NE Brazil. Biodivers Conserv. 18(1):127–150.
  • Dovie DB, Witkowski E, Shackleton CM. 2008. Knowledge of plant resource use based on location, gender and generation. Appl Geogr. 28(4):311–322.
  • Dzerefos CM, Witkowski ET, Kremer-Köhne S. 2017. Aiming for the biodiversity target with the social welfare arrow: medicinal and other useful plants from a critically endangered grassland ecosystem in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Int J Sust Dev World. 24(1):52–64.
  • Figueiredo GM, Leitão-Filho HF, Begossi A. 1993. Ethnobotany of Atlantic Forest coastal communities: diversity of plant uses in Gamboa (Itacuruçá island, Brazil). Hum Ecol. 21(4):419–430.
  • Gómez-Baggethun E, Reyes-García V. 2013. Reinterpreting change in traditional ecological knowledge. Hum Ecol. 41(4):643–647.
  • Hanazaki N, Tamashiro JY, Leitao HF, Begossi A. 2000. Diversity of plant uses in two Caicara communities from the Atlantic Forest coast, Brazil. Biodivers Conserv. 9(5):597–615.
  • Huai H, Pei S, Xu J. 2000. A comparison of some commonly used medicinal plants between the Lahu people in Thailand and China. Ethnobotany. 12:8–11. ( Chinese).
  • Huang W, Tu Y. 1983. Vegetation regionalization in Guizhou. J Guizhou Norm U (Nat Sci). 1:26–47.
  • Mao S, Shen Y, Deng H. 2017. Progress in biocultural diversity research. Acta Ecol Sin. 37(24):8179–8186.
  • Mao S, Shen Y, Deng H. 2018. Multipurpose plant utilization in ethnic areas of Guizhou, southwest China. Ecol Indic. 90:547–553.
  • McNeely JA 2000. Cultural factors in conserving biodiversity. Links between Cultures and Biodiversity Proceedings of the Cultures and Biodiversity Congress; Yunnan.
  • Meke GS, Mumba RFE, Bwanali RJ, Williams VL. 2017. The trade and marketing of traditional medicines in southern and central Malawi. Int J Sust Dev World. 24(1):73–87.
  • Melian A, Rucabado T, Sarabia JF, Botella MA, Asencio AD, Pretel MT. 2017. Cultural importance of wild or traditionally collected plants in the Sierra de Grazalema (Southern Spain). Econ Bot. 71(2):160–174.
  • Natcher D, Kalagnanam V, Rawal R, Johnston M, Mamun AA. 2018. Non-timber forest products and village livelihoods in Rajasthan, India: adaptation in a changing environment. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 25(1):47–55.
  • Osemeobo GJ. 2001. Wild plants in everyday use: conservation towards sustainable livelihoods in Nigeria. Int J Sust Dev World. 8(4):369–379.
  • Pareto V. 1964. Cours d’économie politique. Vol. 1. Genève: Librairie Droz.
  • Pei S, Huai H. 2007. Ethnobotany. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers.
  • Phillips O, Gentry AH. 1993. The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical hypotheses tests with new quantitative technique. Econ Bot. 47(1):15–32.
  • Pielou EC. 1975. Ecological diversity. New York: Wiley.
  • Rahman MM, Mahmud MAA, Shahidullah M. 2017. Socioeconomics of biodiversity conservation in the protected areas: a case study in Bangladesh. Int J Sust Dev World. 24(1):65–72.
  • Reyes-García V, Luz AC, Gueze M, Paneque-Gálvez J, Macía MJ, Orta-Martínez M, Pino J, Team TBS. 2013. Secular trends on traditional ecological knowledge: an analysis of changes in different domains of knowledge among Tsimane’men. Learn Individ Differ. 27:206–212.
  • Tardio J, Pardo-De-Santayana M. 2008. Cultural importance indices: a comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of southern Cantabria (northern Spain). Econ Bot. 62(1):24–39.
  • Thomas E. 2012. The impact of traditional lifestyle, provenance and contact history on plant use knowledge and management: a cross-cultural comparison of two small-scale societies from the Bolivian Amazon. Hum Ecol. 40(3):355–368.
  • Zent S, Maffi L. 2010. Methodology for developing a vitality index of traditional environmental knowledge (VITEK) for the project. British Columbia: Terralingua

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.