The multifunctionality of the natural environment through the basic ecosystem services in the Florina region, Greece

References

• Andrew ME, Wulder MA, Nelson TA, Coops NC. 2015. Spatial data, analysis approaches, and information needs for spatial ecosystem service assessments: a review. GIScience & Remote Sensing. 52:344–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman IJ, Mace GM, Fezzi C, Atkinson G, Turner K. 2011. Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environ Resource Econ. 48:177–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergen SD, Bolton SM, Fridley JL. 2001. Design principles for ecological engineering. Ecol Eng. 18:201–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biasi R, Brunori E, Ferrara C, Salvati L. 2017. Towards sustainable rural landscapes? a multivariate analysis of the structure of traditional tree cropping systems along a human pressure gradient in a mediterranean region. Agroforestry Syst. 91:1199–1217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham G, Bishop R, Brody M, Bromley D, Clark E (Toby), Cooper W, Costanza R, Hale T, Hayden G, Kellert S, et al. 1995. Issues in ecosystem valuation: improving information for decision making. Ecological Econ. 14:73–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukvareva EN, Grunewald K, Bobylev SN, Zamolodchikov DG, Zimenko AV, Bastian O. 2015. The current state of knowledge of ecosystems and ecosystem services in Russia: A status report. Ambio. 44:491–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, Defries RS, Diaz S, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Oteng-Yeboah A, Pereira HM, et al. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium ecosystem assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
   Google Scholar
• Chan KMA, Satterfield T, Goldstein J. 2012. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Econ. 74:8–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, D’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, et al. 1998. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387:253–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, de Groot R, Braat L, Kubiszewski I, Fioramonti L, Sutton P, Farber S, Grasso M. 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services [Internet]. 28:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, Kubiszewski I. 2012. The authorship structure of “ecosystem services” as a transdisciplinary field of scholarship. Ecosystem Services [Internet]. 1:16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowling RM, Egoh B, Knight AT, O’Farrell PJ, Reyers B, Rouget M, Roux DJ, Welz A, Wilhelm-Rechman A 2008. An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 105:9483–9488.
   Google Scholar
• Crossman ND, Burkhard B, Nedkov S, Willemen L, Petz K, Palomo I, Drakou EG, Martín-Lopez B, McPhearson T, Boyanova K, et al. 2013. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosystem Serv. 4:4–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R. 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ. 7:21–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot RS. 1992. Functions of nature : evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision making. [Internet]. Groningen:Wolters-Noordhoff BV. Available from: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19931980587.
   Google Scholar
• de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity [Internet]. 7:260–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depellegrin D, Pereira P, Misiunė I, Egarter-Vigl L. 2016. Mapping ecosystem services potential in Lithuania. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol [Internet]. 23:441–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doré T, Makowski D, Malézieux E, Munier-Jolain N, Tchamitchian M, Tittonell P. 2011. Facing up to the paradigm of ecological intensification in agronomy: revisiting methods, concepts and knowledge. European Journal of Agronomy. 34:197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutilleul P, Clifford P, Richardson S, Hemon D. 1993. Modifying the T test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes published by: International Biometric Society Stable. Biometrics [Internet]. 49:305–314. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2532625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagle AJ, Rude J, Boxall PC. 2015. Agricultural support policy in Canada : what are the environmental consequences? Environ Rev. 23:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis JB. 2013. Sustainable surface water management and green infrastructure in UK urban catchment planning. J Environ Plann Manag. 56:24–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union. 2013. Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services. Luxembourg: Publications office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Farber S, Costanza R, Childers DL, Erickson J, Gross K, Grove M, Hopkinson CS, Kahn J, Pincetl S, Troy A, et al. 2006. Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. BioScience [Internet]. 56:121–134. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/56/2/121-133/273901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics. 68:643–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn KM, Traver RG. 2013. Green infrastructure life cycle assessment: A bio-infiltration case study. Ecological Engineering [Internet]. 55:9–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill SE, Handley JF, Ennos AR, Pauleit S. 2007. Adapting cities for climate change: the role of the green infrastructure. Built Environment [Internet]. 33:115–133. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33947262651&doi=10.2148%2Fbenv.33.1.115&partnerID=40&md5=c2b55c022191c37ed562b9c917d1bd40
   Google Scholar
• Gret-Regamey A, Bebi P, Bishop ID, Schmid WA. 2008. Linking GIS-based models to value ecosystem services in an Alpine region. J Environ Manag [Internet]. [cited 2017 May 16]; 89: 197–208. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479707002381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gret-Regamey A, Brunner SH, Altwegg J, Bebi P. 2013. Facing uncertainty in ecosystem services-based resource management. J Environ Manage. 127:145–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grêt-Regamey A, Weibel B, Kienast F, Rabe S-E, Zulian G. 2015. A tiered approach for mapping ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services [Internet]. 13:16–27. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041614001247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen K, Malmaeus M. 2016. Ecosystem services in Swedish forests. Scand J For Res [Internet]. 7581:1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain MS, Eigenbrod F, Amoako Johnson F, Dearing JA. 2017. Unravelling the interrelationships between ecosystem services and human wellbeing in the Bangladesh delta. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol [Internet]. 24:120–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MS, Pogue SJ, Trenchard L, Van Oudenhoven APE, Washbourne CL, Muiruri EW, Tomczyk AM, García-Llorente M, Hale R, Hevia V, et al. 2018. Identifying future research directions for biodiversity, ecosystem services and sustainability: perspectives from early-career researchers. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol [Internet]. 25:249–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IGME. 1987. Geological map of Greece, scale 1:50000. IGME I of G and ME, editor. Athens: IGME, Institute of Geology and Mineral Exploration.
   Google Scholar
• Iliopoulou P. 2015. Geographical Analysis [Internet]. Athens:HEALINK, Kallipos Publications (in Greek). Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11419/2059.
   Google Scholar
• Kalfas D, Zagkas D, Raptis D, Georgiadis L, Zagkas T 2017. Ecosystem services in the prefecture of Florina, a first approach. In: Hellenic Forestry Society, editor. 18th National Forestry Congress. Edessa - Greece, 2017 Oct 8–11. (in Greek): Hellenic Forestry Society. p. 593–604. ISBN: 978-960-89478-7-0.
   Google Scholar
• Kalfas DG, Tyrselis XS, Grigoriadis NS, Matsinos YG. 2013. Sustainable management of local resources regarding mountainous regions. the case of Nymfaio in Florina, Greece. J Environ Prot Ecol [Internet]. 14:655–663. https://docs.google.com/a/jepe-journal.info/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=amVwZS1qb3VybmFsLmluZm98amVwZS1qb3VybmFsfGd4OjM5MDk0MTQ2ZGUxNDI3ODc
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalogirou S. 2015. Spatial Analysis [Internet]. Athens:HEALINK, Kallipos Publications (in Greek). Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11419/5029.
   Google Scholar
• Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Polasky S. 2011. Natural capital: Theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services: Theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services (p. 876). Oxford: Oxford University Press..
   Google Scholar
• Kay S, Crous-Duran J, Ferreiro-Domínguez N, García De Jalón S, Graves A, Moreno G, Mosquera-Losada MR, Palma JHN, Roces-Díaz JV, Santiago-Freijanes JJ, et al. 2017. Spatial similarities between European agroforestry systems and ecosystem services at the landscape scale. Agroforestry Syst. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0132-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukkala AS, Moilanen A. 2017. Ecosystem services and connectivity in spatial conservation prioritization. Landsc Ecol. 32:5–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laterra P, Orúe ME, Booman GC. 2012. Spatial complexity and ecosystem services in rural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment [Internet]. 154:56–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavorel S, Bayer A, Bondeau A, Lautenbach S, Ruiz-Frau A, Schulp N, Seppelt R, Verburg P, Teeffelen A, Van Vannier C, et al. 2017. Pathways to bridge the biophysical realism gap in ecosystem services mapping approaches. Ecological Indicators [Internet]. 74:241–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton JH, Daily GC, Ed. 1997. Nature’s services. Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington (DC): Island Press. p. 392. ISBN 1-55963-475-8 (hbk), 1 55963 476 6 (soft cover). 1998. Animal Conservation
   Google Scholar
• Legendre P. 1993. Spatial autocorrelation : trouble or New Paradigm? Ecology by the Ecological Society of America [Internet]. 74:1659–1673. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1939924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Calder CA, Cressie N. 2007. Beyond Moran’s I: testing for spatial dependence based on the spatial autoregressive model. Geogr Anal. 39:357–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limburg KE, Folke C. 1999. The ecology of ecosystem services: introduction to the special issue. Ecological Econ. 29:179–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liquete C, Kleeschulte S, Dige G, Maes J, Grizzetti B, Olah B, Zulian G. 2015. Mapping green infrastructure based on ecosystem services and ecological networks: A Pan-European case study. Environ Sci Policy [Internet]. 54:268–280. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901115300356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Costanza R, Farber S, Troy A. 2010. Valuing ecosystem services. Theory, practice, and the need for a transdisciplinary synthesis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences; p. 54–78. Blackwell Publishing Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05167.x.
   Google Scholar
• Liu X-S, Li F, Zhao D, Wang -B-B. 2009. Evaluation of resource exploitation value and ecosystem service loss in Mentougou District of Beijing City. Chin J Appl Ecol [Internet]. 20:1431–1437. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-69549083336&partnerID=40&md5=3172b1c14c51dc898907ada1d037a657
   Google Scholar
• M.A. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington (DC): Island Press. Available from. http://www.who.int/entity/globalchange/ecosystems/ecosys.pdf%5Cnhttp://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0512/2005013229.html
   Google Scholar
• Maes J, Egoh B, Willemen L, Liquete C, Vihervaara P, Schägner JP, Grizzetti B, Drakou EG, Notte A, La, Zulian G, et al. 2012. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Serv. 1:31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes J, Teller A, Erhard M, Murphy P, Paracchini M, José B, Grizzetti B. 2014. Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services: Indicators for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 [Internet]. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, (February), 81. [accessed 2018 Apr 23]. https://doi.org/10.2779/75203.
   Google Scholar
• Mancinelli R, Di Felice V, Karkalis K, Bari S, Radicetti E, Campiglia E. 2018. Assessment of the state of agroecosystem sustainability using landscape indicators: a comparative study of three rural areas in Greece. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol [Internet]. 25:35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Harms MJ, Balvanera P. 2012. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. Int J Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Serv Manag. 8:17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Harms MJ, Bryan BA, Balvanera P, Law EA, Rhodes JR, Possingham HP, Wilson KA. 2015. Making decisions for managing ecosystem services. Biological Conservation [Internet]. 184:229–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marull J, Otero I, Stefanescu C, Tello E, Miralles M, Coll F, Pons M, Diana GL. 2015. Exploring the links between forest transition and landscape changes in the Mediterranean. Does forest recovery really lead to better landscape quality? Agroforestry Systems. 89:705–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger MJ, Rounsevell MDA, Acosta-Michlik L, Leemans R, Schröter D. 2006. The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 114:69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsch WJ. 2012. What is ecological engineering? Ecological Engineering [Internet]. 45:5–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron D, Chan K, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ. 7:4–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngwenya SJ, Torquebiau E, Ferguson JWH 2018. Mountains as a critical source of ecosystem services: the case of the Drakensberg, South Africa. Environment, Development and Sustainability [Internet]. [accessed 2018 Apr 23]. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-017-0071-1
   Google Scholar
• Nor ANM, Corstanje R, Harris JA, Brewer T 2017. Impact of rapid urban expansion on green space structure. Ecological Indicators [Internet]. 81(274–284). doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.031
   Google Scholar
• Norgaard RB. 2010. Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics [Internet]. 69:1219–1227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odgaard MV, Turner KG, Bøcher PK, Svenning J-C, Dalgaard T. 2017. A multi-criteria, ecosystem-service value method used to assess catchment suitability for potential wetland reconstruction in Denmark. Ecological Indicators [Internet]. 77:151–165. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1470160X1630694X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne JW. 2015. What is Rotating in Exploratory Factor Analysis? Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation [Internet]. 20. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=20&n=2
   Google Scholar
• Outeiro L, Häussermann V, Viddi F, Hucke-Gaete R, Försterra G, Oyarzo H, Kosiel K, Villasante S. 2015. Using ecosystem services mapping for marine spatial planning in southern Chile under scenario assessment. Ecosystem Services [Internet]. 16:341–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer MA, Filoso S, Fanelli RM. 2014. From ecosystems to ecosystem services: stream restoration as ecological engineering. Ecological Engineering [Internet]. 65:62–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pártl A, Vačkář D, Loučková B, Lorencová EK. 2017. A spatial analysis of integrated risk: vulnerability of ecosystem services provisioning to different hazards in the Czech Republic. Nat Hazards. 89:1185–1204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petridis D. 2015. Analysis of multivariate techniques [Internet]. Athens:HEALINK, Kallipos Publications (in Greek). Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11419/2126.
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel D, Wilson C, McCullum C, Huang R, Dwen P, Flack J, Tran Q, Saltman T, Cliff B. 1997. Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversity. BioScience. 47:11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh TAM, MacKenzie AR, Whyatt JD, Hewitt CN. 2012. Effectiveness of green infrastructure for improvement of air quality in urban street canyons. Environ Sci Technol [Internet]. 46:7692–7699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qgis. 2017. PyQGIS developer cookbook Release 2.14. QGIS, editor. QGIS Development Team. Available from: http://www.qgis.org.
   Google Scholar
• Raje S, Kertesz R, Maccarone K, Seltzer K, Siminari M, Simms P, Wood B. 2013. Green infrastructure design for pavement systems subject to rainfall-runoff loadings. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2358:79–87.
   Google Scholar
• Rangel T, Jose AD-F, Bini LM. 2010. SAM: A comprehensive application for spatial analysis in macroecology. Ecography. 33:46–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schägner JP, Brander L, Maes J, Hartje V. 2013. Mapping ecosystem services’ values: current practice and future prospects. Ecosystem Serv. 4:33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppelt R, Fath B, Burkhard B, Fisher JL, Grêt-Regamey A, Lautenbach S, Pert P, Hotes S, Spangenberg J, Verburg PH. 2012. Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies. Ecol Indic. 21:145–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soussana J-F, Fereres E, Long SP, Mohren FG, Pandya-Lorch R, Peltonen-Sainio P, Porter JR, Rosswall T, Von Braun J. 2012. A European science plan to sustainably increase food security under climate change. Global Change Biology [Internet]. 18:3269–3271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szewrański S, Kazak J, Sylla M, Świąder M. 2017. Spatial data analysis with the use of ArcGIS and tableau systems. In: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography (pp. 337–349). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45123-7_24
   Google Scholar
• Tallis H, Polasky S. 2009. Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural resource management. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1162:265–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner KG, Odgaard MV, Bøcher PK, Dalgaard T, Svenning J-C-C. 2014. Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning [Internet]. [cited 2017 Feb 27]; 125. 89–104. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umbanhowar C, Camill P, Edlund M, Geiss C, Durham W, Kreger D, Molano W, Raskob C, Stocker M, Tvera A, et al. 2013. Contrasting changes in surface waters and barrens over the past 60 years for a subarctic forest–tundra site in northern Manitoba based on remote sensing imagery. Can J Earth Sci [Internet]. 50:967–977. http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/10.1139/cjes-2012-0162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USGS. 2017. Product guide: Landsat Surface Reflectance-Derived Spectral Indices. USGS [Internet]. Version 3.6 :1–31. Available from: https://landsat.usgs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/si_product_guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• USGS. 2018. Product guide Landsat 8 surface reflectance code (LASRC) product. Department of the Interior US Geological Survey [Internet]. Version 4.3:1–40. Available from: https://landsat.usgs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/lasrc_product_guide.pdf [accessed 23 April 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Von Haaren C, Albert C. 2011. Integrating ecosystem services and environmental planning: limitations and synergies. Int J Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Serv Manag. 7:150–167.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson MA, Carpenter SR. 1999. Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971–1997. Ecological Applications. 9:772–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagkas D 2016. Evaluation of management methods in Abies borisii regis forest ecosystems. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (in Greek). Phd thesis [Internet]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/39179
   Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Zhou Y, Liu X, Lu Z. 2017. Ecological landscape regulation approaches in Xilingol, Inner Mongolia: an urban ecosystem services perspective. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol [Internet]. 24:401–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Li J, Wang X, Chen W, Sladen W, Dyke L, Dredge L, Poitevin J, McLennan D, Stewart H, et al. 2012. Modelling and mapping permafrost at high spatial resolution in Wapusk National Park, Hudson Bay Lowlands 1, 2 1 This article is one of a series of papers published in this CJES Special Issue on the theme of Fundamental. Can J Earth Sci [Internet]. 49:925–937. http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/e2012-031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Peng C, Li W, Fang X, Zhang T, Zhu Q, Chen H, Zhao P. 2013. Monitoring and estimating drought-induced impacts on forest. Environ Rev. 21:103–115.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Fu B, Feng X. 2016. GIS-based analysis for hotspot identification of tradeoff between ecosystem services: A case study in Yanhe Basin, China. Chin Geographical Sci [Internet]. 26:466–477. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11769-016-0816-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar