Conservation, development and stakeholder relations in Bhutanese protected area management

References

• Ball AA, Brancalion PH. 2016. Governance challenges for commercial exploitation of a non-timber forest product by marginalized rural communities. Environ Conserv. 43(03):208–220.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett NJ, Roth R, Klain SC, Chan K, Christie P, Clark DA, Cullman G, Curran D, Durbin TJ, Epstein G, et al. 2017. Conservation social science: understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biol Conserv. 205:93–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaikie P. 2006. Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana. World Dev. 34(11):1942–1957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw M, Stratford E. 2010. Qualitative research design and rigour. In: Hay I, editor. Qualitative research methods in human geography. 3rd ed. Toronto: Oxford University Press; p. 40–68.
   Google Scholar
• Brandon KE, Wells M. 1992. Planning for people and parks: design dilemmas. World Dev. 20(4):557–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Brockington D, Igoe J. 2006. Eviction for conservation: a global overview. Conserv Soc. 4(3):424–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunet S, Bauer J, De Lacey T, Tshering K. 2001. Tourism development in Bhutan: tensions between tradition and modernity. J Sustain Tourism. 9(3):243–263.
   Google Scholar
• Burns GW. 2011. Gross national happiness:
A gift from Bhutan to the world. In: Biswas-Diener R, editor. Positive psychology as social change. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 73–87.
   Google Scholar
• Calfucura E. 2018. Governance, land and distribution: A discussion on the political economy of community-based conservation. Ecol Econ. 145:18–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron J. 2010. Focusing on the focus group. In: Hay I, editor. Qualitative research methods in human geography. 3rd ed. Toronto: Oxford University Press; p. 152–172.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin J, Strauss A. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coria J, Calfucura E. 2012. Ecotourism and the development of indigenous communities: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Ecol Econ. 73:47–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. 2009. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dahal S, Nepal SK, Schuett MA. 2013. Examining marginalized communities and local conservation institutions: the case of Nepal’s annapurna conservation area. Environ Manage. 53(1):219–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg AC, Burlando C. 2009. Addressing trade-offs: experiences from conservation and development initiatives in the Mkuze Wetlands, South Africa. Ecol Soc. 14(2):37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorjee K (2012) Transhumant practices, its impact and threat to red panda habitat conservation in Sakteng Wildlife Sanctuary [Thesis]. Thimpu: College of Natural Resources, Royal University of Bhutan.
   Google Scholar
• Dorji Y 2015 January 31. A malady called rural-urban migration. Kuensel Thimphu. p. 12
   Google Scholar
• GNHC. 2013. End of programme evaluation of local governance support programme in Bhutan. Thimphu: GNHC.
   Google Scholar
• Golafshani N. 2003. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. Qual Rep. 8(4):597–606.
   Google Scholar
• Gray NJ, Gruby RL, Campbell LM. 2014. Boundary objects and global consensus: scalar narratives of marine conservation in the convention on biological diversity. Global Environ Polit. 14(3):64–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes G, Cavanagh CJ. 2016. A review of the social impacts of neoliberal conservation: formations, inequalities, contestations. Geoforum. 75:199–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howitt R, Stevens S. 2010. Cross-cultural research: ethics, methods, and relationships. In: Hay I, editor. Qualitative research methods in human geography. 3rd ed. Toronto: Oxford University Press; p. 40–68.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes R, Flintan F. 2001. Integrating conservation and development experience: a review and bibliography of ICDP literature. Biodiversity and Livelihoods, Issue 3. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Karst H, Gyeltshen N. 2016. The politics of community-based ecotourism in Sakteng Wildlife Sanctuary, Bhutan. In: Nepal S, Saarinen J, editors. Political ecology and tourism. London: Routledge; p. 68–81.
   Google Scholar
• Lenao M, Saarinen J. 2016. Political ecology of community based natural resources management. In: Nepal S, Saarinen J, editors. Political ecology and tourism. London: Routledge; p. 115–129.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood M. 2010. Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: a framework, principles and performance outcomes. J Environ Manage. 91(3):754–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McShane TO, Hirsch PD, Trung TC, Songorwa AN, Kinzig A, Monteferri B, Mutekanga D, Thang HV, Dammert JL, Pulgar-Vidal M, et al. 2011. Hard choices: making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biol Conserv. 144(3):966–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller T, Minteer B, Malan L-C. 2011. The new conservation debate: the view from practical ethics. Biol Conserv. 144(3):948–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newing H, editor. 2011. Conducting research in conservation. New York (NY): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Penjore D, Rapten P. 2004. Trends of forestry policy concerning local participation in Bhutan. In: Kazuhiro H, Martinus N, editors. Policy trend report 2004. Kanagawa: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies; p. 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Puri RK. 2011. Participant observation. In: Newing H, editors. Conducting research in conservation. New York (NY): Routledge; p. 126–152.
   Google Scholar
• Redford KH, Padoch C, Sunderland T. 2013. Fads, funding, and forgetting in three decades of conservation. Conserv Biol. 27(3):437–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid RS, Nkedianye D, Said MY, Kaelo D, Neselle M, Makui O, Onetu L, Kiruswa S, Kamuaro NO, Kristjanson P, et al. 2016. Evolution of models to support community and policy action with science: balancing pastoral livelihoods and wildlife conservation in savannas of East Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A.. 113(17):4579–4584. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900313106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RGOB. 2007. The local governments act of Bhutan, 2007. Thimphu: National Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• RGOB. 2009. The local governments act of Bhutan, 2009. Thimphu: National Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• RGOB. 2014. National biodiversity strategies and action plan. Thimphu: MOAF.
   Google Scholar
• Rinzin C, Vermeulen WJV, Glasbergen P. 2007. Ecotourism as a mechanism for sustainable development: the case of Bhutan. Environ Sci. 4(2):109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Roe D. 2008. The origins and evolution of the conservation-poverty debate: a review of key literature, events, and policy processes. Oryx. 42(4):491–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabuhoro E, Wright B, Munanura IE, Nyakabwa IN, Nibigira C. 2017. The potential of ecotourism opportunities to generate support for mountain gorilla conservation among local communities neighboring Volcanoes National Park in Rwanda. J Ecotourism. doi:10.1080/14724049.2017.1280043
   Google Scholar
• Salerno J, Borgerhoff Mulder M, Grote M, Ghiselli M, Packer C. 2016. Household livelihoods and conflict with wildlife in community-based conservation areas across northern tanzania. Oryx. 50(4):702-712. doi:10.1017/S0030605315000393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiteri A, Nepal SK. 2008. Distributing conservation incentives in the buffer zone of Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Environ Conserv. 35(01):76–86.
   Google Scholar
• Stern MJ. 2008. Coercion, voluntary compliance and protest: the role of trust and legitimacy in combating local opposition to protected areas. Environ Conserv. 35(03):200–210.
   Google Scholar
• TCB. 2009. Tourism development in Merak and Sakteng: feasibility report. Thimphu: TCB.
   Google Scholar
• TCB. 2012. Merak Sakteng impact assessment report. Thimphu: TCB.
   Google Scholar
• Turner M, Chuki S, Tshering J. 2011. Democratization by decree: the case of Bhutan. Democratization. 18(1):184–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangchuk S. 2008. Management plan for Sakteng Wildlife Sanctuary. Thimphu: MOAF.
   Google Scholar
• Wangchuk T, Rai M, Thinlay P, Nima CL. 2009. Gamri watershed management plan. Thimpu: Ministry of Agriculture and Forest.
   Google Scholar
• Wangmo S. 1990. The Brokpas: a semi-nomadic people in Eastern Bhutan. In: Rustomji NK, Ramble C, editors. Himalayan Environ and Cult. Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study; p. 141–1158.
   Google Scholar
• Wells MP, McShane TO. 2004. Integrating protected area management with local needs and aspirations. Ambio. 33(8):513–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West P, Brockington D. 2006. An anthropological perspective on some unexpected consequences of protected areas. Conserv Biol. 20(3):609–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WWF Bhutan. 2011. Roofing project cuts forest use in Sakteng Wildlife Sanctuary. [Accessed 2015 Feb 10]. http://wwfbhutan.org.bt/Roofing-project-cuts-forest-use-in-Sakteng-Wildlife-Sanctuary.
   Google Scholar
• WWF Bhutan, SWS (2011) Participatory zoning for Sakteng Wildlife Sanctuary: balancing conservation and development goals WWF and SWS. Department of Forest and Park Services, MOAF.
   Google Scholar