A framework based on fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS for prioritizing solutions to overcome the barriers in the implementation of ecodesign practices in SMEs

References

• Ángel Del Brío J, Junquera B, Ordiz M. 2008. Human resources in advanced environmental approaches–a case analysis. Int J Prod Res. 46:6029–6053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu NH, Kean Huat K, Mansor MF 2018. Implementation of green new product development among SMEs: barriers and critical success factors. Aljunid SA, Mohd Salleh MAA, Rashidi CBM, Soh PJ, Ku Azir KNF, editors. Penang (Malaysia): MATEC Web of Conferences. 150:05038.
   Google Scholar
• Araujo CSD jr, Technical University of Denmark, Department of Mechanical Engineering, DTU. 2001. Acquisition of product development tools in industry: a theoretical contribution. Lyngby (Denmark): DTU.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker. 1995. Environmental information for industrial designers [PhD Thesis]. Delft: Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Bakshi BR, Fiksel J. 2003. The quest for sustainability: challenges for process systems engineering. AIChE J. 49:1350–1358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann H, Boons F, Bragd A. 2002. Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives. J Clean Prod. 10:409–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bey N, Hauschild MZ, McAloone TC. 2013. Drivers and barriers for implementation of environmental strategies in manufacturing companies. CIRP Ann. 62:43–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biondi V, Iraldo F, Meredith S. 2002. Achieving sustainability through environmental innovation: the role of SMEs. Int J Technol Manage. 24:612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boks C. 2006. The soft side of ecodesign. J Clean Prod. 14:1346–1356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boks C, Stevels A. 2003. Theory and practice of environmental benchmarking in a major consumer electronics company. Benchmarking Int J. 10:120–135.
   Google Scholar
• Boks C, Stevels A. 2007. Essential perspectives for design for environment. Experiences from the electronics industry. Int J Prod Res. 45:4021–4039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonn I, Fisher J. 2011. Sustainability: the missing ingredient in strategy. J Bus Strategy. 32:5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bovea MD, Pérez-Belis V. 2012. A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process. J Clean Prod. 20:61–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan FTS, Kumar N, Tiwari MK, Lau HCW, Choy KL. 2008. Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach. Int J Prod Res. 46:3825–3857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang D. 1992. Extent analysis and synthetic decision. Optim Tech Appl. 1:352–365.
   Google Scholar
• Charter M, Tischner U. 2001. Sustainable solutions: developing products and services for the future. Sheffield (UK): Greenleaf Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary D, Shankar R. 2012. An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: a case study from India. Energy. 42:510–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collado-Ruiz D, Ostad-Ahmad-Ghorabi H. 2010. Influence of environmental information on creativity. Des Stud. 31:479–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crul MRM, Diehl JC. 2005. Design for sustainability: a practical approach for developing economies. Delft (Netherlands): Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Dangelico RM, Pujari D. 2010. Mainstreaming green product innovation: why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. J Bus Ethics. 95:471–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Brío JÁ, Junquera B. 2003. A review of the literature on environmental innovation management in SMEs: implications for public policies. Technovation. 23:939–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmas M, Toffel MW. 2004. Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. Bus Strategy Environ. 13:209–222.
   Google Scholar
• Dermody J, Hanmer-Lloyd S. 1995. Developing environmental responsible new products: the challenge for the 1990s. In: Bruce M, Biemans WG, editors. Product development: meeting the challenge of the design –marketing interface. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; p. 289–324.
   Google Scholar
• Domingo L, Buckingham M, Dekoninck E, Cornwell H. 2015. The importance of understanding the business context when planning eco-design activities. J Ind Prod Eng. 32:3–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frei M. 1998. Eco-effective product design: the contribution of environmental management in designing sustainable products. J Sustainable Prod Des. 7:16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gadenne DL, Kennedy J, McKeiver C. 2009. An empirical study of environmental awareness and practices in SMEs. J Bus Ethics. 84:45–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng Y, Doberstein B. 2008. Greening government procurement in developing countries: building capacity in China. J Environ Manage. 88:932–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstenfeld A, Roberts H. 2000. Size matters: barriers and prospects for environmental management in small and medium-sized enterprises. In: Hillary R, editor. Small and medium-sized enterprises and the environment: business imperatives. [Internet]. Sheffield (UK): Greenleaf Publishing Limited; [cited 2019 Feb 16]; p. 106–118. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/10.9774/GLEAF.978-1-909493-11-7_10.
   Google Scholar
• Ghazilla RAR, Sakundarini N, Abdul-Rashid SH, Ayub NS, Olugu EU, Musa SN. 2015. Drivers and barriers analysis for green manufacturing practices in Malaysian SMEs: a preliminary findings. Procedia CIRP. 26:658–663.
   Google Scholar
• Hadjimanolis A, Dickson K. 2000. Innovation strategies of SMEs in cyprus, a small developing country. Int Small Bus J. 18:62–79.
   Google Scholar
• Hallstedt S, Ny H, Robèrt K-H, Broman G. 2010. An approach to assessing sustainability integration in strategic decision systems for product development. J Clean Prod. 18:703–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillary R. 2004. Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise. J Clean Prod. 12:561–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Yoon K. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making. Berlin (Heidelberg [usw.]): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ilgin MA, Gupta SM. 2010. Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): A review of the state of the art. J Environ Manage. 91:563–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO I. 2011. Environmental management systems - guidelines for incorporating ecodesign. ISO 14006. ISO, Geneva (Switzerland). [accessed 2019 Feb 16]. https://www.iso.org/standard/43241.html.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson G. 2006. Incorporating environmental concern in product development: a study of project characteristics. Manage Environ Qual Int J. 17:421–436.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson M 1997. Green concurrent engineering - assuring environmental performance in product development [Licentiate thesis]. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya T, Kahraman C. 2010. Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul. Energy. 35:2517–2527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keldmann T, Olesen J. 1994. Conditions for handling the environmental issue as a business issue in product development. J Environmentally Conscious Des Manuf. 3:35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Knight P, Jenkins JO. 2009. Adopting and applying eco-design techniques: a practitioners perspective. J Clean Prod. 17:549–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozemjakin Da Silva M, Guyot E, Remy S, Reyes T. 2013. A product model to capture and reuse ecodesign knowledge. In: Bernard A, Rivest L, Dutta D, editors. Product lifecycle management for society. Vol. 409. Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer Berlin Heidelberg; p.220–228. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-41501-2_22.
   Google Scholar
• Le Pochat S, Bertoluci G, Froelich D. 2007. Integrating ecodesign by conducting changes in SMEs. J Clean Prod. 15:671–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S. 2008. Drivers for the participation of small and medium‐sized suppliers in green supply chain initiatives. Supply Chain Manage Int J. 13:185–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee-Mortimer A, Short T. 2009. The product development process roadblock that is restricting the widespread adoption of design for sustainability. In: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 3, Design Organization and Management; Aug 24–27; Palo Alto, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Luttropp C, Lagerstedt J. 2006. EcoDesign and the ten golden rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. J Clean Prod. 14:1396–1408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marimon F, Llach J, Bernardo M. 2011. Comparative analysis of diffusion of the ISO 14001 standard by sector of activity. J Clean Prod. 19:1734–1744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAloone T, Bey N, Danmark M. 2009. Environmental improvement through product development: a guide. [place unknown]: Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• McAloone T, Evans S 1996. Integrating environmental decisions into design encouraging a move towards sustainable product development. In: Proceedings of the Greening of Industry Network-Global Restructuring: A Place for Ecology? Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• McAloone T, Holloway L 1996. From product designer to environmentally conscious product designer. In: Proceedings of Applied Concurrent Engineering Conference. Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• McKeiver C, Gadenne D. 2005. Environmental management systems in small and medium businesses. Int Small Bus J. 23:513–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelin F, Vallet F, Reyes T, Eynard B, Duong VL. 2014. Integration of environmental criteria in the co-design process: case study of the client/supplier relationship in the French mechanical industry. In: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2014, 13th International Design Conference; Dubrovnik-Croatia; p. 1591–1600.
   Google Scholar
• Millet D, Bistagnino L, Lanzavecchia C, Camous R, Poldma T. 2007. Does the potential of the use of LCA match the design team needs? J Clean Prod. 15:335–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mougenot C, Bouchard C, Aoussat A, Westerman S. 2008. Inspiration, images and design: an investigation of designers’ information gathering strategies. J Des Res. 7:331.
   Google Scholar
• Naghadehi MZ, Mikaeil R, Ataei M. 2009. The application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to selection of optimum underground mining method for Jajarm Bauxite Mine, Iran. Expert Syst Appl. 36:8218–8226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noci G, Verganti R. 1999. Managing “green” product innovation in small firms. R and D Manage. 29:3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual O, Stevels A 2004. Ecodesign in industry is not an environmetal issue. In: Proceedings of Electronic Goes Green. Berlin; p. 855–859.
   Google Scholar
• Patil SK, Kant R. 2014. A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for ranking the solutions of knowledge management adoption in supply chain to overcome its barriers. Expert Syst Appl. 41:679–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perron GM, Côté RP, Duffy JF. 2006. Improving environmental awareness training in business. J Clean Prod. 14:551–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigosso DCA, McAloone TC, Rozenfeld H. 2014. Systematization of best practices for ecodesign implementation. In: Design organization and management. Proceedings of the DESIGN 2014, 13th International Design Conference; Dubrovnik-Croatia; p. 1651–1662.
   Google Scholar
• Pigosso DCA, Rozenfeld H, McAloone TC. 2013. Ecodesign maturity model: a management framework to support ecodesign implementation into manufacturing companies. J Clean Prod. 59:160–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash C, Barua MK. 2015. Integration of AHP-TOPSIS method for prioritizing the solutions of reverse logistics adoption to overcome its barriers under fuzzy environment. J Manuf Syst. 37:599–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendeville S, O’Connor F, Palmer L 2011. Barriers and benefits to ecodesign: a case study of tool use in an SME. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology . Chicago (IL, USA): IEEE; [accessed 2019 Feb 16]; p. 1–6. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5936850/.
   Google Scholar
• Pujari D, Wright G. 1999. Management of environmental new product development. In: Charter M, Polonsky MJ, editors. Greener marketing: a global perspective on greener marketing practice. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing; p. 109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Rampasso IS, Siqueira RG, Anholon R, Silva D, Quelhas OLG, Leal Filho W, Brandli LL. 2019. Some of the challenges in implementing education for sustainable development: perspectives from Brazilian engineering students. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. :1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Redmond J, Walker E. 2009. Environmental education in small business: the owner-manager’s perspective. Aust J Environ Educ. 25:117–128.
   Google Scholar
• Revell A, Rutherfoord R. 2003. UK environmental policy and the small firm: broadening the focus. Bus Strategy Environ. 12:26–35.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes T, Millet D. 2013. An exploratory study for the long-term integration of ecodesign in SMEs: the environmental Trojan horse strategy. Prog Ind Ecol Int J. 8:67.
   Google Scholar
• Rio M, Reyes T, Roucoules L. 2013. Toward proactive (eco)design process: modeling information transformations among designers activities. J Clean Prod. 39:105–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritzén S 2000. Akademisk avhandling som, med tillstånd av Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan i Stockholm, framläggs till offentlig granskning för avläggande av Teknologie doktorsexamen, tisdagen den 21 mars 2000, klockan 10.00 i sal M3, Brinellvägen 64, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan.:67.
   Google Scholar
• Rochlin S, Bliss R, Jordan S, Kiser CY 2015. Project ROI - Report Defining the Competitive and Financial Advantages of Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability. Babson College.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi M, Germani M, Zamagni A. 2016. Review of ecodesign methods and tools. Barriers and strategies for an effective implementation in industrial companies. J Clean Prod. 129:361–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Senthil S, Srirangacharyulu B, Ramesh A. 2014. A robust hybrid multi-criteria decision making methodology for contractor evaluation and selection in third-party reverse logistics. Expert Syst Appl. 41:50–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton RD 1995. Organizing for successful DFE: lessons from winners and losers. In: Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment ISEE (Cat No95CH35718). Orlando (FL, USA): IEEE; [accessed 2019 Feb 16]; p. 1–4. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/514938/.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson M, Taylor N, Barker K. 2004. Environmental responsibility in SMEs: does it deliver competitive advantage? Bus Strategy Environ. 13:156–171.
   Google Scholar
• Somsuk N, Laosirihongthong T. 2017. Prioritization of applicable drivers for green supply chain management implementation toward sustainability in Thailand. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 24:175–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart R, Bey N, Boks C. 2016. Exploration of the barriers to implementing different types of sustainability approaches. Procedia CIRP. 48:22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Syal S 2015. Role of MSMEs in the Growth of Indian Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Tischner U, Schmincke E, Rubik F, Prasler M. 2000. How to do ecodesign? A guide for environmentally and economically sound design. Dessau-Roßlau: German Federal Environmental Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Tyl B. 2011. L’apport de la créativité dans les processus d’éco-innovation - Proposition de l’outil EcoASIT pour favoriser l’éco-idéation de systèmes durables. Bordeaux I: Universite Sciences et Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• van Hemel C, Cramer J. 2002. Barriers and stimuli for ecodesign in SMEs. J Clean Prod. 10:439–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente-Agustín C-B, Monterde-Díaz R, Víctor-Andrés C-B, Torres-Sibille ADC. 2008. Environmental education for small- and medium-sized enterprises: methodology and e-learning experience in the Valencian region. J Environ Manage. 87:507–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Chu J, Wu J. 2007. Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ. 107:151–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson D, Lynch-Wood G, Ramsay J. 2006. Drivers of environmental behaviour in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. J Bus Ethics. 67:317–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf J. 2013. Improving the sustainable development of firms: the role of employees: the role of employees. Bus Strategy Environ. 22:92–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang CJ, Chen JL. 2012. Forecasting the design of eco-products by integrating TRIZ evolution patterns with CBR and Simple LCA methods. Expert Syst Appl. 39:2884–2892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Bi J, Liu B. 2009. Drivers and barriers to engage enterprises in environmental management initiatives in Suzhou Industrial Park, China. Front Environ Sci Eng China. 3:210–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Rio M, Allais R, Zwolinski P, Carrillo TR, Roucoules L, Mercier-Laurent E, Buclet N. 2013. Toward an systemic navigation framework to integrate sustainable development into the company. J Clean Prod. 54:199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, Geng Y. 2013. Drivers and barriers of extended supply chain practices for energy saving and emission reduction among Chinese manufacturers. J Clean Prod. 40:6–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar