References
- Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 50(2):179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
- Appadurai A, editor. 1986. The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge (U.K.): Cambridge University Press.
- Arnocky S, Milfont TL, Nicol JR. 2014. Time perspective and sustainable behavior: evidence for the distinction between consideration of immediate and future consequences. Environ Behav. 46(5):556–582. doi:10.1177/0013916512474987.
- Bai R, Sutanto M. 2002. The practice and challenges of solid waste management in Singapore. Waste Manag. 22(5):557–567. doi:10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00014-4.
- Barr S. 2007. Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: A U.K. case study of household waste management. Environ Behav. 39(4):435–473. doi:10.1177/0013916505283421.
- Barr S, Shaw G, Coles T. 2011. Sustainable lifestyles: sites, practices, and policy. Environ Plan A. 43(12):3011–3029. doi:10.1068/a43529.
- Blake J. 1999. Overcoming the ‘value‐action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environ. 4(3):257–278. doi:10.1080/13549839908725599.
- Bulkeley H, Gregson N. 2009. Crossing the threshold: municipal waste policy and household waste generation. Environ Plan A. 41(4):929–945. doi:10.1068/a40261.
- Carmi N, Arnon S. 2014. The role of future orientation in environmental behavior: analyzing the relationship on the individual and cultural levels. Soc Nat Resour. 27(12):1304–1320. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.928393.
- Corral-Verdugo V, Caso-Niebla J, Tapia-Fonllem C, Frías-Armenta M. 2017. Consideration of immediate and future consequences in accepting and responding to anthropogenic climate change. Psychology. 08:1519. doi:10.4236/psych.2017.810101
- Data.Gov.Sg. 2018. Total land area of Singapore. [accessed 2018 Mar 1]. https://data.gov.sg/dataset/total-land-area-of-singapore?view_id=e6e37f25-01ef-4c23-a7cb-5682ab5edb75&resource_id=f4bbfac9-c3ed-4f71-9b9a-238517b214ef
- Department of Statistics Singapore. 2018a. Population Trends 2017.
- Department of Statistics Singapore. 2018b. Key Household Income Trends, 2017.
- Derksen L, Gartrell J. 1993. The social context of recycling. Am Sociol Rev. 58(3):434–442. doi:10.2307/2095910.
- Dunlap RE, Liere KDV, Mertig AG, Jones RE. 2000. New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. J Soc Issues. 56(3):425–442. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176.
- European Commission. 2016. Directive 2008/98/EC on waste (Waste Framework Directive).
- Evans D, Abrahamse W. 2009. Beyond rhetoric: the possibilities of and for ‘sustainable lifestyles.’. Env Polit. 18(4):486–502. doi:10.1080/09644010903007369.
- Foo TS. 1997. Recycling of domestic waste: early experiences in Singapore. Habitat Int. 21(3):277–289. doi:10.1016/S0197-3975(97)00060-X.
- Gatersleben B, Murtagh N, Abrahamse W. 2014. Values, identity and pro-environmental behaviour. Contemp Soc Sci. 9(4):374–392. doi:10.1080/21582041.2012.682086.
- Gibson C, Head L, Gill N, Waitt G. 2011. Climate change and household dynamics: beyond consumption, unbounding sustainability. Trans Inst Br Geogr. 36(1):3–8. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00403.x.
- Gregson N, Metcalfe A, Crewe L. 2006. Moving things along: the conduits and practices of divestment in consumption. Trans Inst Br Geogr. 32(2):187–200. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00253.x.
- Gregson N, Metcalfe A, Crewe L. 2007. Identity, mobility, and the throwaway society. Environ Plan D. 25(4):682–700. doi:10.1068/d418t.
- Head L, Farbotko C, Gibson C, Gill N, Waitt G. 2013. Zones of friction, zones of traction: the connected household in climate change and sustainability policy. Australas J Env Man. 20(4):351–362. doi:10.1080/14486563.2013.835286.
- Hetherington K. 2004. Secondhandedness: consumption, disposal, and absent presence. Environ Plan D. 22(1):157–173. doi:10.1068/d315t.
- Jesson JK, Pocock RL, Stone I 2014. Barriers to recycling at home - evidence review. Birmingham (U.K.): M-E-L Research. [accessed 2019 May 6]]. http://www.wrap.org.uk/content/barriers-recycling-home-evidence-review.
- Joireman JA, Van Lange PAM, Van Vugt M. 2004. Who cares about the environmental impact of cars?: those with an eye toward the future. Environ Behav. 36(2):187–206. doi:10.1177/0013916503251476.
- Kaza S, Yao LC, Bhada-Tata P, Van Woerden F 2018. What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. Washington D.C.: World Bank Urban Development. [accessed 2019 May 6]. http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/infographic/2018/09/20/what-a-waste-20-a-global-snapshot-of-solid-waste-management-to-2050.
- Knowledge Hub SDG. 2019. UN Urges Tackling Waste Management on World Habitat Day.
- Lane R, Horne R, Bicknell J. 2009. Routes of reuse of second-hand goods in Melbourne households. Aust Geogr. 40(2):151–168. doi:10.1080/00049180902964918.
- Ministry of Environment. 1973. Towards a clean and healthy environment. Singapore:Ministry of Environment.
- Ministry of Environment. 2013. Household recycling study. [accessed 2017 Mar 1]. https://www.mewr.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-library/grab-our-research/mewr_rc_report.pdf
- Ministry of Environment. 2019. Managing Our Waste: Landfill. Singapore: Ministry of Environment. [accessed 2019 May 1]. https://www.mewr.gov.sg/topic/landfill
- National Environment Agency. 2018. Waste management: Waste Statistics and Overall Recycling. [accessed 2018 Oct 2]. https://www.nea.gov.sg/docs/default-source/our-services/waste-management/wastestats-2003-20164197a3fd04d34770bafba09393d0fdf0.pdf
- Neo H. 2010. The potential of large-scale urban waste recycling: a case study of the national recycling programme in Singapore. Soc Nat Resour. 23(9):872–887. doi:10.1080/08941920802438618.
- Oates CJ, McDonald S. 2006. Recycling and the domestic division of labour: is green pink or blue? Sociology. 40(3):417–433. doi:10.1177/0038038506063667.
- Organo V, Head L, Waitt G. 2013. Who does the work in sustainable households? A time and gender analysis in New South Wales, Australia. Gend Place Cult. 20(5):559–577. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2012.716401.
- Rahmasary AN, Robert S, Chang I-S, Jing W, Park J, Bluemling B, Koop S, van Leeuwen K. 2019. Overcoming the challenges of water, waste and climate change in Asian cities. Environ Manage. 63(4):520–535. doi:10.1007/s00267-019-01137-y.
- Savage VR, Kong L. 1993. Urban constraints, political imperatives: environmental ‘design’ in Singapore. Landsc Urban Plan. 25(1):37–52. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(93)90121-S.
- Schwartz S. 2012. An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. ORPC. 2(1). doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116.
- Schwartz SH. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: Zanna MP, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 25. Orlando (FL): Academic Press; 1–65. [accessed 2019 May 6. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065260108602816
- Stanes E, Klocker N, Gibson C. 2015. Young adult households and domestic sustainabilities. Geoforum. 65:46–58. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.007
- Stets JE, Biga CF. 2003. Bringing identity theory into environmental sociology. Soc Theory. 21(4):398–423. doi:10.1046/j.1467-9558.2003.00196.x.
- Stets JE, Burke P. 2000. Identity theory and social identity theory. Soc Psychol Q. 63(3):224–237. doi:10.2307/2695870.
- Strathman A, Gleicher F, Boninger D, Edwards C. 1994. The consideration of future consequences. J Pers Soc Psychol. 66(4):742–752. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742.
- Strathman, A, Gleicher, F, Boninger, D. S. & Edwards, C. S. (2013). Considerations of future consequences (CFC Scale). Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science; [accessed 2017 Jun 18]. http://www.midss.org.
- Tan A 2015 March 26. Domestic recycling rate dips to 19%, despite ‘Go green’ push. The Straits Times. [accessed 2018 May 6]. http://www.asiaone.com/singapore/domestic-recycling-rate-dips-19-cent-despite-go-green-push.
- Tan A 2018 Feb 28. Parliament: national recycling effort collected 2 per cent of total domestic waste in 2016. The Straits Times. [accessed 2018 May 6]. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/environment/parliament-national-recycling-effort-collected-2-per-cent-of-total-domestic.
- Tonglet M, Phillips PS, Read AD. 2004. Using the theory of planned behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: a case study from Brixworth, UK. Resour Conserv Recycl. 41(3):191–214. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2003.11.001.
- United Nations. 2019. About the sustainable development goals. United nations sustainable development. [accessed 2019 May 6]. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
- Wheeler K, Glucksmann M. 2015. ‘It’s kind of saving them a job isn’t it?’ The consumption work of household recycling. Sociol Rev. 63(3):551–569. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12199.
- Xiao JX, Siu KWM. 2018. Challenges in food waste recycling in high-rise buildings and public design for sustainability: a case in Hong Kong. Resour Conserv Recycl. 131:172–180. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.007
- Yau Y. 2012. Stakeholder engagement in waste recycling in a high-rise setting. Sustain Dev. 20(2):115–127. doi:10.1002/sd.468.
- Zero Waste Singapore. 2015. Singapore waste statistics 2014. [accessed 2018 May 6]. http://www.zerowastesg.com/2015/03/18/singapore-waste-statistics-2014/sffa
- Zhang D, Keat TS, Gersberg RM. 2010. A comparison of municipal solid waste management in Berlin and Singapore. Waste Manag. 30(5):921–933. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.11.017.