Challenges and opportunities for operationalizing the safe and just operating space concept at regional scale

References

• Arnold R.DWade J.P. 2015. A definition of systems thinking: a systems approach. Procedia Computer Science. 44:669–678.
   Google Scholar
• Balvanera P, Daw TM, Gardner TA, Martín-López B, Norström AV, Speranza CI, Spierenburg EM, Bennett M, Farfan M, Hamann JN, et al. 2017. Key features for more successful place-based sustainability research on social-ecological systems: a Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS) perspective. Ecol. Soc. 22(1):14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett CB, Constas MA 2014. Toward a theory of resilience for international development applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 111:14625–14630. doi:10.1073/pnas.1320880111
   Google Scholar
• Berkes F. 2011. Restoring unity: the concept of social-ecological systems. In: Ommer RE, Perry RI, Cochrane K, Cury P, editors. World fisheries: a social- ecological analysis. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; p. 9–28.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs R, Schlüter M, Biggs D, Bohensky EL, BurnSilver S, Cundill G, Dakos V, Daw TM, Evans LS, Kotschy K, et al. 2012. Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 37:421–448. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkhofer K, Diehl E, Andersson J, Ekroos J, Früh-Müller A, Machnikowski F, Mader VL, Nilsson L, Sasaki K, Maj R, et al. 2015. Ecosystem services—current challenges and opportunities for ecological research. Front Ecol Evol. 2:87. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2014.00087.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop RC. 1978. Endangered species and uncertainty: the economics of a safe minimum standard. Am J Agric Econ. 61:10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Boerlijst MC, Oudman T, de Roos AM. 2013. Catastrophic collapse can occur without early warning: examples of silent catastrophes in structured ecological models. PLoS One. 8(4):e62033. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boillat S, Gerber JD, Oberlack C, Zaehringer J, Speranza CI, Rist S. 2018. Distant interactions, power, and environmental justice in protected area governance: a telecoupling perspective. Sustainability. 10(11):3954. doi:10.3390/su10113954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borshchev A, Filippov A 2004. From system dynamics and discrete event to practical agent based modeling: reasons, techniques, tools. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference of the system dynamics society, Oxford, England.
   Google Scholar
• Brink BT 2006. A long-term biodiversity, ecosystem and awareness research network. ALTER-Net. [accessed 2019 Aug 8]. https://www.lter-europe.net/lter-europe/about/documentarchive/publications/LTER%20public%20communication%20strategy%20-%20V1-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter SR, Bennett EM. 2011. Reconsideration of the planetary boundary for phosphorus. Environ Res Lett. 6(1):014009. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/6/1/014009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter SR, Brock WA, Folke C, Nes EHV, Scheffer M. 2015. Allowing variance may enlarge the safe operating space for exploited ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 112(46):14384–14389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O. 2006. Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol. Soc. 11:2. doi:10.5751/es-01759-110208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash DW, Moser SC 1998. Cross-scale interactions in assessments, information systems, and decision-making. In: Critical Evaluation of Global Environmental Assessments, Global Environmental Assessment Project. Harvard University, Cambridge (MA).
   Google Scholar
• Chen S, Francois F, Johannes J, Stephan K 2013. Towards a post-2015 framework that counts: development national statistical capacity. Paris21. Discussion Paper No. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Ciriacy-Wantrup SV. 1952. Resource conservation: economics and policies. Berkeley (California, USA): University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole MJ, Bailey RM, New MG. 2014. Tracking sustainable development with a national barometer for South Africa using a downscaled “Safe and just space” framework. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 111(42):E4399–E4408. doi:10.1073/pnas.1400985111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper GS, Dearing JA. 2018. Modelling future safe and just operating spaces in regional social-ecological systems. Sci Total Environ. 651:2105–2117. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowards T. 1998. Safe minimum standards: costs and opportunities. Ecol Econ. 25:303–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily GC, Ehrlich PR. 1992. Population, sustainability, and Earth’s carrying capacity. Bioscience. 42:761–771. doi:10.2307/1311995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dakos V, Nes EHV, D’odorico P, Scheffer M. 2012. Robustness of variance and autocorrelation as indicators of critical slowing down. Ecology. 93(2):264–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dao H, Peduzzi P, Friot D. 2018. National environmental limits and footprints based on the planetary boundaries framework: the case of Switzerland. Global Environ Change. 52:49–57. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearing J.A, Wang R, Zhang K, Dyke J.G, Haberl H, Hossain M.S, Langdon P.G, Lenton T.M, Raworth K, Brown S, et.al. 2014. Safe and just operating spaces for regional social-ecological systems. Global Environmental Change. 28:227–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing AS, Bhowmik A, Collste D, Cornell SE, Donges J, Fetzer I, Häyhä T, Hinton J, Lade S, Mooij WM. 2019. Matching scope, purpose and uses of planetary boundaries science. Environ Res Lett. 14:7. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab22c9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgendi M. 2017. Scientists need data visualization training. Nat Biotechnol. 35:990–991. doi:10.1038/nbt.3986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filatova T, Verburg PH, Parker DC, Stannard CA. 2013. Spatial agent-based models for socio-ecological systems: challenges and prospects. Environ Modell Software. 45:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galli A, Wiedmann T, Ercin E, Knoblauch D, Ewing B, Giljum S. 2012. Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a “Footprint Family” of indicators: definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecol Indic. 16:100–112. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gari SR, Newton A, Icely JD. 2015. A review of the application and evolution of the DPSIR framework with an emphasis on coastal social-ecological systems. Ocean Coast Manag. 103:63–77. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groot RD, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complexity. 7(3):260–272. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings A, Wysham DB. 2010. Regime shifts in ecological systems can occur with no warning. Ecol Lett. 13:464–472. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01439.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häyhä T, Lucas PL, Vuuren DP, Cornell SE, Hoff H. 2016. From planetary boundaries to national fair shares of the global safe operating space — how can the scales be bridged? Global Environ Change. 40:60–72. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck V, Hoff H, Wirsenius S, Meyer C, Kreft H. 2018. Land use options for staying within the planetary boundaries – synergies and trade-offs between global and local sustainability goals. Global Environ Change. 49:73–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hieronymi A. 2013. Understanding systems science: a visual and integrative approach. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 30(5):580–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornik K, Cutts B, Greenlee A. 2016. Community Theories of Change: linking environmental justice to sustainability through stakeholder perceptions in Milwaukee (WI, USA). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 13:10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosonuma N, Herold M, Sy VD, Fries RS, Brockhaus M, Verchot L, Romijn E. 2012. An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries. Environ Res Lett. 7(4):044009. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MS, Szabo S. 2017. Understanding the socio-ecological system of wetlands. In: Prusty BA, Chandra R, Azeez PA, editors. Wetlands science: perspective from South Asia, 285-300. Berlin: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain MS, Dearing JA, Eigenbrod F, Johnson FA. 2017. Operationalizing safe operating space for regional social-ecological systems. Sci Total Environ. 584–585:673–682. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MS, Dearing JA, Rahman MM, Salehin M. 2016. Recent changes in ecosystem services and human well-being in the Bangladesh coastal zone. Reg Environ Change. 16(2):429–443. doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0748-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MS, Johnson FA, Dearing JA, Eigenbrod F. 2015. Recent trends of human wellbeing in the Bangladesh delta. Environ Dev. doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang GH, Xia J. 2001. Barriers to sustainable water-quality management. J Environ Manage. 61:1–23. doi:10.1006/jema.2000.0394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2001. Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Third Assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg1/377.htm.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007—impacts, adaptation and vulnerability; Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Keppner B, Hoff H, Kahlenborn W 2017. Making the planetary boundaries concept work. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit (BMUB)
   Google Scholar
• Kuemmerle T, Erb K, Meyfroidt P, Müller D, Verburg PH, Estel S, Haberl H, Hostert P, Jepsen MR, Kastner T, et al. 2013. Challenges and opportunities in mapping land use intensity globally. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 5:484–493. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leenhardt P, Teneva L, Kininmonth S, Darling E, Cooley S, Claudet J. 2015. Challenges, insights and perspectives associated with using social-ecological science for marine conservation. Ocean Coast Manag. 115:49–60. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ, Barreteau O, Borsuk ME, ElSawah S, Hamilton SH, Henriksen HJ, Kuikka S, Maier HR, Rizzoli AE, et al. 2013. Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management. Environ Modell Software. 47:159–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis SL. 2012. We must set planetary boundaries wisely. Nature. 485(7399):417. doi:10.1038/485417a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace GM, Baillie JE. 2007. The 2010 biodiversity indicators: challenges for science and policy. Conserv Biol. 21(6):1406–1413. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00830.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace GM, Reyers B, Alkemade R, Biggs R, Chapin FS, Cornell SE, Woodward G. 2014. Approaches to defining a planetary boundary for biodiversity. Global Environ Change. 28:289–297. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin JF. 2018. Safe operating space for humanity at a regional scale. Ecol. Soc. 23(2):43. doi:10.5751/ES-10171-230243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW. 1972. The limits to growth. Chelsea. 205:205. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1972.tb05230.x
   Google Scholar
• Moldan B, Dahl AL. 2007. Challenges to Sustainability Indicators. In: Hák T, Moldan B, Dahl AL, editors. Sustainability indicators. a scientific assessment. Washington (Covelo, London), 1-26: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moran DD, Wackernagel M, Kitzes JA, Goldfinger SH, Boutaud A. 2008. Measuring sustainable development—nation by nation. Ecol Econ. 64(3):470–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndzabandzaba C. 2015. Data sharing for sustainable development in less developed and developing countries. Brief for GSDR 2015. [accessed 2018 Dec 11]. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/615860-Ndzabandzaba-Data%20sharing%20for%20sd%20in%20less%20developed%20and%20developing%20countries.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ness B, Anderberg S, Olsson L. 2010. Structuring problems in sustainability science: the multi-level DPSIR framework. Geoforum. 41(3):479–488. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordhaus T, Shellenberger BL. 2012. The planetary boundary hypothesis: a review of the evidence. Oakland (CA): Breakthrough Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nykvist B, Persson Å, Moberg F, Persson L, Cornell S, Rockström J 2013. National environmental performance on planetary boundaries. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Report 6576, Stockholm
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill DW, Fanning AL, Lamb WF, Steinberger JK. 2018. A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nat Sustainability. 1(2):88–95. doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill RV, Hunsaker CT, Timmins SP, Jackson BL, Jones KB, Riitters KH, Wickham JD. 1996. Scale problems in reporting landscape pattern at the regional scale. Landsc Ecol. 11(3):169–180. doi:10.1007/bf02447515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes N. 2003. The role of quantitative models in science. Canham CD, JJ C, Lauenroth WK editors. Modelsin ecosystem science, 13–31. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pasgaard M, Dawson N. 2019. Looking beyond justice as universal basic needs is essential to progress towards ‘safe and just operating spaces.’. Earth Syst Governance. 100030. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2019.100030
   Google Scholar
• Phol C, Hadorn GH. 2007. Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. Switzerland: Oekom.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon N, Fischhoff B. 2011. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nat Clim Chang. 1(1):35–41. doi:10.1038/nclimate1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl C, Rist S, Zimmermann A, Fry P, Gurung GS, Schneider F, Chinwe CIS, Boniface K, Boillat S, Serrano E, et al. 2010. Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-productionexperience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Sci Public Policy. 37(4):267–281. doi:10.3152/030234210X496628. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffensperger C, Tickner W. editors. 1999. Protecting public health and the environment: implementing the precautionary principle. Washington (D.C., USA): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raworth K. 2012. A safe and just space for humanity: can we live within the doughnut? Oxfam Discussion Paper. Oxford (UK): Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Rees WE. 1992. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urban. 4:121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Reis S, Bekunda M, Howard CM, Karanja N, Winiwarter W, Yan X, Bleeker A, Sutton MA. 2016. Synthesis and review: tackling the nitrogen management challenge: from global to local scales. Environ Res Lett. 11(12):120205. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/120205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rekolainen S, Kamari J, Hiltunen M. 2003. A conceptual framework for identifying the need and role of models in the implementation of the water framework directive. Int J River Basin Manag. 1(4):347–352.
   Google Scholar
• Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin E, Foley J. 2009b. Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol. Soc. 14:2. doi:10.5751/es-03180-140232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin FS, Lambin FE, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, et al. 2009a. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature. 461:472–475. doi:10.1038/461472apmid:19779433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy A, Pramanick K. 2019. Analysing progress of sustainable development goal 6 in India: past, present, and future. J Environ Manage. 232:1049–1065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Running SW. 2012. A measurable planetary boundary for the biosphere. Science. 337(6101):1458–1459. doi:10.1126/science.1227620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarvajayakesavalu S. 2015. Addressing challenges of developing countries in implementing five priorities for sustainable development goals. Ecosyst Health Sustainability. 1(7):24.
   Google Scholar
• Schauberger B, Archontoulis S, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Elliott J, Folberth C, Khabarov N, Müller C, et al. 2017. Consistent negative response of US crops to high temperatures in observations and crop models. Nat Commun. 8(1). doi:10.1038/ncomms13931.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scheffer M. 2009. Critical transitions in nature and society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlüter M, Müller B, Frank K 2012. MORE-MOdeling for resilience thinking and ecosystem stewardship. Working Paper. [accessed 2012 Apr 10]. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.462.3622&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schreinemachers P, Berger T. 2011. An agent-based simulation model of human environment interactions in agricultural systems. Environ Model Software. 26:845–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SDSN. 2014. Assessing gaps in indicator availability and coverage. USA:Sustainable Development Network (SDSN).
   Google Scholar
• Sikor T, Auld G, Bebbington AJ, Benjaminsen TA, Gentry BS, Hunsberger C, Upton C. 2013. Global land governance: from territory to flow? Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 5(5):522–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell S, Fetzer I, Bennett E, Biggs R, Carpenter S 2015. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet Science 347 1259855. doi: 10.1126/science.1259855.
   Google Scholar
• Szabo S, Hossain MS, Renaud F, Traore D, Hussain A, Matczak P, Ahmad S, Singh DR, Neumann B, Matthews Z. 2018. Accelerating progress toward the zero hunger goal in cross-boundary climate change hotspots. Environ: Sci Policy Sustainable Dev. 60(3):18–27. doi:10.1080/00139157.2018.1449530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teah H, Akiyama T, Carlos RS, Rayo O, Khew Y, Zhao S, Zheng L, Onuki M. 2016. Assessment of downscaling planetary boundaries to semi-arid ecosystems with a local perception: a case study in the middle reaches of Heihe River. Sustainability. 8(12):1233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Secretary General’s High-level Panel on Global Sustainability. 2012. Resilient people, resilient planet: A future worth choosing. New York: United Nations. http://www.un.org/gsp/sites/default/files/attachments/GSP_Report_web_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Verburg PH, Dearing JA, Dyke JG, van der Leeuw S, Seitzinger S, Stefan W, Syvitski J. 2015. Methods and approaches to modelling the anthropocene. Global Environ Change. 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.007.
   Google Scholar
• Verburg PH, Neumann K, Nol L. 2011. Challenges in using land use and land cover data for global change studies. Glob Chang Biol. 17(2):974–989. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02307.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voinov A, Cerco C. 2010. Model integration and the role of data. Environ Model Software. 25(8):965e969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voinov A, Shugart HH. 2013. ‘Integronsters’, integral and integrated modeling. Environ Modell Software. 39:149–158. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vries WD, Kros J, Kroeze C, Seitzinger SP. 2013. Assessing planetary and regional nitrogen boundaries related to food security and adverse environmental impacts. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 5(3–4):392–402. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wackernagel M 1994. Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: a tool for planning toward sustainability. WWW document. http://circle.ubc.ca/handle/2429/7132.
   Google Scholar
• Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Schulz N, Erb K, Haberl HKrausmann F. 2004. Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series: resolving conceptual challenges. Land Use Policy. 21(3):271-278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahaj R, Maraux F, Munoz G 2007. Actual crop water use in project countries: A synthesis at the regional level. Policy Research Working paper 4288. The World Bank Washington, DC USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wang R, Dearing JA, Langdon PG, Zhang E, Yang X, Dakos V, Scheffer M. 2012. Flickering gives early warning signals of a critical transition to a eutrophic lake state. Nature. 492:419–422. doi:10.1038/nature11655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WBGU. 1998. World in transition: strategies for managing global environmental risks/German advisory council on global change. Berlin; Heidelberg; New York; Barcelona; Hong Kong; London; Milan; Paris; Singapore; Tokyo: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• WBGU. 2006. The future oceans –warming up, rising high,turning sour. special report. Berlin:German Advisory Council on Global Change.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbanks TJ. 2007. Scale and sustainability. Climate Policy. 7(4):278–287. doi:10.1080/14693062.2007.9685656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcock S, Hossain MS, Poppy G. 2016. Managing complex systems to enhance sustainability. In: Solan M, Whiteley N, editors. Stressors in the marine environment:: physiological and ecological responses. Societal Implications, Oxford University Press; p. 301–312. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198718826.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Wong B. 2012. Visualizing biological data. Nat Methods. 9(12):1131. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J. 2017. Influencing policymakers. Nat Clim Chang. 7:pages 173–174. doi:10.1038/nclimate3215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar