References
- Andersson K, Eklund E, Lehtola M. 2009. Farmers, businessmen or green entrepreneurs? producers of new rural goods and services in rural areas under urban pressure. J Environ Policy Plan. 11:29–43. [accessed 2019 Feb 12]. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15239080902774960.
- Ares G, Varela P. 2018. Methods in consumer research. Volume 1, New approaches to classic methods. Southampton (UK): WIT Press.
- Brooks AM, Ottley KM, Arbuthnott KD, Sevigny P. 2017. Nature-related mood effects: season and type of nature contact. J Environ Psychol. 54 91–102 [accessed 2018 Feb 5] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494417301160.
- Brown JP, Goetz SJ, Fleming DA. 2012. Multifunctional agriculture and farm viability in the United States [Internet]. accessed 2019 May 5 https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/126929
- Bryman A. 2012. Social research methods. New York (USA): Oxford University Press.
- Burton M, Riddell L, Worsley A. 2018. Food consumers’ views of essential food knowledge and skills for all consumers. Health Educ. 118: 277–288. [accessed 2018 Jun 29] http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/HE-10-2017–0047.
- Burton M, Wang WC, Worsley A. 2015. Demographic and psychographic associations of consumer intentions to purchase healthier food products. Prev Med Reports. 2: [accessed 2018 Jun 11] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335514000199#f0010.
- Cooks L. 2009. You are what you (don’t) eat? food, identity, and resistance. Text Perform Q. 29:94–110. [accessed 2019 Jun 17] http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10462930802514388.
- Devine-Wright P, Clayton S. 2010. Introduction to the special issue: place, identity and environmental behaviour. J Environ Psychol. 30:267–270. [accessed 2019 Jun 11] https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0272494410000782.
- Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD, Mertig AG, Jones RE. 2000. New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised nep scale. J Soc Issues. 56:425–442. [accessed 2018 Mar 22]. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/0022-4537.00176.
- Fatima JK, Khan HZ, Goh E. 2016. Environmental knowledge and behavioural outcomes of tourism students in Australia: towards testing a range of mediation and moderated mediation effects. Environ Educ Res. 22:747–764. [accessed 2018 Sep 11] http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504622.2015.1050356.
- Ferguson P. 2006. Accounting for taste: The triumph of french cuisine. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Feucht Y, Zander K. 2018. Consumers’ preferences for carbon labels and the underlying reasoning. A mixed methods approach in 6 European countries. J Clean Prod. 178:740–748. [accessed 2018 Nov 15] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652617332304.
- Fritsche I, Häfner K. 2012. The malicious effects of existential threat on motivation to protect the natural environment and the role of environmental identity as a moderator. Environ Behav. 44:570–590. [accessed 2019 Jun 11] http://journals.sagepub.com.
- Garner B, Ayala C. 2019. Regional tourism at the farmers’ market: consumers’ preferences for local food products. Int J Cult Tour Hosp Res. 13:37–54. [accessed 2019 Jun 17] https://www.emeraldinsight.com
- Gilli M, Nicolli F, Farinelli P. 2018. Behavioural attitudes towards waste prevention and recycling. Ecol Econ. 154:294–305. [accessed 2018 Nov 16] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800917312922.
- Gkargkavouzi A, Paraskevopoulos S, Matsiori S. 2018a. Assessing the structure and correlations of connectedness to nature, environmental concerns and environmental behavior in a Greek context. Curr Psychol. accessed 2019 Jun 12 http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12144-018-9912–9.
- Gkargkavouzi A, Paraskevopoulos S, Matsiori S. 2018b. Who cares about the environment. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 28:746–757. [accessed 2019 Jun 12] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10911359.2018.1458679.
- González-García S, Esteve-Llorens X, Moreira MT, Feijoo G. 2018. Carbon footprint and nutritional quality of different human dietary choices. Sci Total Environ. 644:77–94. [accessed 2018 Nov 15] https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S004896971832415X.
- Grebitus C, Steiner B, Veeman M. 2015. The roles of human values and generalized trust on stated preferences when food is labeled with environmental footprints: insights from Germany. Food Policy. 52:84–91. [accessed 2018 Nov 16] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919214001973.
- Gullino P, Battisti L, Larcher F. 2018. Linking multifunctionality and sustainability for valuing peri-urban farming: a case study in the turin metropolitan area (Italy). Sustainability. 10:1625. [accessed 2018 Dec 13] http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1625.
- Hansen T, Sørensen MI, Eriksen M-LR. 2018. How the interplay between consumer motivations and values influences organic food identity and behavior. Food Policy. 74:39–52. [accessed 2018 Oct 23] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919217303433?via%3Dihub.
- Heringa PW, Van Der Heide CM, Heijman WJM. 2013. The economic impact of multifunctional agriculture in Dutch regions: an input-output model. NJAS - Wageningen J Life Sci. 64:59–66. [accessed 2017 Oct 9] http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1573521413000043.
- Hoflund AB, Jones JC, Pautz MC, Jones JC, Pautz MC.2017.The Intersection of Food and Public Health.Hoflund AB, Jones JC, Pautz MC711 Third.Avenue (New York, NY 10017):Routledge. [accessed 2019 Feb 26] https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315153094.
- Hrabák J, Konečný O. 2018. Multifunctional agriculture as an integral part of rural development: spatial concentration and distribution in Czechia. Nor Geogr Tidsskr - Nor J Geogr. 72:257–272 [accessed 2019 Feb 12] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00291951.2018.1532967.
- Huang J, Tichit M, Poulot M, Darly S, Li S, Petit C, Aubry C. 2015. Comparative review of multifunctionality and ecosystem services in sustainable agriculture. J Environ Manage. 149:138–147. [accessed 2018 Jul 1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479714005106.
- Janßen D, Langen N. 2017. The bunch of sustainability labels – do consumers differentiate. J Clean Prod. 143:1233–1245. [accessed 2018 Nov 16] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652616320339.
- Kizos T, Marin-Guirao J, Georgiadi M-E, Dimoula S, Karatsolis E, Mpartzas A, Mpelali A, Papaioannou S. 2011. Survival strategies of farm households and multifunctional farms in Greece. Geogr J. 177:335–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2011.00403.x.
- Kress G. 1987. Market-segmentation using demographics, psychographics and other segmentation techniques to uncover and exploit new markets. Public Relat Rev. 13(70). accessed 2018 Jun 29 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0363811187801157
- Kumar A, Smith S. 2018. Understanding local food consumers: theory of planned behavior and segmentation approach. J Food Prod Mark. 24:196–215. [accessed 2018 Jun 29] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10454446.2017.1266553.
- Laureti T, Benedetti I. 2018. Exploring pro-environmental food purchasing behaviour: an empirical analysis of Italian consumers. J Clean Prod. 172: 3367–3378. [accessed 2018 Nov 15] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652617327464.
- Lea E, Worsley T. 2005. Australians’ organic food beliefs, demographics and values. Br Food J. 107:855–869. [accessed 2018 Nov 13] https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/00070700510629797.
- Loring PA, Hinzman MS. 2018. They’re all really important, but … ”: unpacking how people prioritize values for the marine environment in haida gwaii, British Columbia. Ecol Econ. 152:367–377. [accessed 2018 Nov 15] https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0921800917316981.
- Luo X, Xu X, Chen H, Bai R, Yan Z, Hou X, Zhang F, Yong Z, Sharma M, Zeng H, et al. 2019. Food safety related knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among the students from nursing, education and medical college in Chongqing, China. Food Control. 95:181–188. [accessed 2018 Nov 15] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713518303797.
- Manson SM, Jordan NR, Nelson KC, Brummel RF. 2016. Modeling the effect of social networks on adoption of multifunctional agriculture. Environ Model Softw. 75: 388–401. [accessed 2017 May 7] http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815214002795.
- Marzban S, Allahyari MS, Damalas CA. 2016. Exploring farmers??? orientation towards multifunctional agriculture: insights from northern Iran. Land Use Policy. 59:121–129. [accessed 2017 Oct 9] http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837716304331#fig0005.
- Maslow AH. 1943. A theory of Human Motivation. Psychol Rev. 50:370–396. doi:10.1037/h0054346
- Moon W. 2015. Conceptualising multifunctional agriculture from a global perspective: implications for governing agricultural trade in the post-Doha Round era. Land Use Policy. 49:252–263. [accessed 2018 Jun 30] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837715002355#fig0005.
- Morgan SL, Marsden T, Miele MMorley A. 2010. Agricultural multifunctionality and farmers’ entrepreneurial skills: a study of tuscan and welsh farmers. J Rural Stud. https://ac.els-cdn.com/S0743016709000552/1-s2.0-S0743016709000552-main.pdf?_tid=19d4a36a-af25-11e7-87e4-00000aab0f27&acdnat=1507796134_27df5e53450ff8ff5fcc0a480270177a
- Nakagawa Y. 2018. EscapeScape: simulating ecopedagogy for the tourist. J Environ Educ. 49:164–176. [accessed 2018 Oct 17] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00958964.2017.1417221.
- Ohe Y.2006.Evaluating jointness of multifunctional agriculture: the educational function of dairy farming in Japan.Environmental Economics and Investment Assessment Vol. 1..Southampton (UK):WIT Press; 337–346. accessed 2018 Jun 11 http://library.witpress.com/viewpaper.asp?pcode=EEIA06-033–1.
- Oostindie H. 2017. Unpacking Dutch multifunctional agrarian pathways as processes of peasantisation and agrarianisation. J Rural Stud.accessed 2018 Mar 22 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016717308033.
- Ortega-Egea JM, García-de-Frutos N, Antolín-López R, Pidgeon N, Biel A, George L.2014.Why do some people do “more” to mitigate climate change than others? exploring heterogeneity in psycho-social associations.Russell BD. editor. PLoS One. 9:e106645. [accessed 2017 Oct 29] http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106645.
- Parliament Greek. 2014. Multifunctional Farm. Article 52. Chapter B. N 4235/2014.
- Peschel AO, Grebitus C, Steiner B, Veeman M. 2016. How does consumer knowledge affect environmentally sustainable choices? Evidence from a cross-country latent class analysis of food labels. Appetite. 106:78–91 [accessed 2018 Nov 15] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666316300903.
- Pitman SD, Daniels CB.2016.Quantifying ecological literacy in an adult western community: the development and application of a new assessment tool and community standard. Dalby AR editor, PLoS One. 11:e0150648. [accessed 2018 Nov 15] https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150648.
- Pitman SD, Daniels CB, Sutton PC. 2018a. Ecological literacy and psychographics: lifestyle contributors to ecological knowledge and understanding. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 25:117–130. [accessed 2018 Jun 11] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504509.2017.1333047.
- Pitman SD, Daniels CB, Sutton PC. 2018b. Ecological literacy and socio-demographics: who are the most eco-literate in our community, and why? Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 25:9–22. [accessed 2018 Nov 15] p.]. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504509.2016.1263689.
- Pitman SD, Daniels CB, Sutton PC. 2018c. Ecological literacy and psychographics: lifestyle contributors to ecological knowledge and understanding. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 25:117–130. [accessed 2018 Nov 15] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504509.2017.1333047.
- Plog SC. 1974. Why destination areas rise and fall in popularity. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly. 14(4):55–58. doi:10.1177/001088047401400409.
- Prati G, Albanesi C, Pietrantoni L. 2017. The interplay among environmental attitudes, pro-environmental behavior, social identity, and pro-environmental institutional climate. A Longitudinal Study Environ Educ Res. 23:176–191. [accessed 2017 Oct 23] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504622.2015.1118752.
- Prévot A. C, Clayton S, Mathevet R. 2018. The relationship of childhood upbringing and university degree program to environmental identity: experience in nature matters. Environ Educ Res. 24 263–279. [accessed 2019 Feb 26]. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504622.2016.1249456.
- Prévot AC, Clayton SMathevet R. 2018. The relationship of childhood upbringing and university degree program to environmental identity: Exp Nat MattEnviron Educ Res. 24(2):263–279. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1249456.
- Qian C, Yu K, Gao J. 2019. Understanding environmental attitude and willingness to pay with an objective measure of attitude strength. Environ Behav. accessed 2019 Jun 23 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0013916519855140.
- Ragkos A, Theodoridis A, Batzios C. 2015. Public awareness concerning the multifunctionality of cypriot agriculture. Agric Agric Sci Procedia. 4:147–157. [accessed 2019 Feb 13] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210784315000819.
- Renting H, Rossing WAH, Groot JCJ, Van der Ploeg JD, Laurent C, Perraud D, Stobbelaar DJ, Van Ittersum MK. 2009. Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. J Environ Manage. 90:S112–S123. [accessed 2017 Aug 14] http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301479708003484.
- Ricci EC, Banterle A, Stranieri S. 2018. Trust to Go Green: an exploration of consumer intentions for eco-friendly convenience food. Ecol Econ. 148:54–65. [accessed 2018 Nov 15] https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0921800917310650.
- Riya S. 2018. Food & identity: Food studies, cultural & personal identity. JIntI Cult Stud. 8:1–7. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.26973.05608
- Ro H, Olson ED, Choi Y. 2017. An exploratory study of gay travelers: socio-demographic analysis. Tour Rev. 72:15–27. [accessed 2018 Mar 22] http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/TR-05-2016–0011.
- Robinson P. 1975. Life Style and Psychographics. JMR J Mark Res. 12:1986–2400. [cited 2018 Jun 29] https://search.proquest.com/docview/208740725?pq-origsite=gscholar.
- Rodríguez-Ortega T, Bernués A, Alfnes F. 2016a. Psychographic profile affects willingness to pay for ecosystem services provided by Mediterranean high nature value farmland. Ecol Econ. 128:232–245. [accessed 2017 Oct 29] http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800915301269.
- Rodríguez-Ortega T, Bernués A, Alfnes F. 2016b. Psychographic profile affects willingness to pay for ecosystem services provided by Mediterranean high nature value farmland. Ecol Econ. 128:232–245. [accessed 2019 Feb 22] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800915301269.
- Román S, Sánchez-Siles LM, Siegrist M. 2017. The importance of food naturalness for consumers: results of a systematic review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 67:44–57. [accessed 2018 Nov 30] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092422441730122X.
- Rovai M, Andreoli M. 2016. Combining multifunctionality and ecosystem services into a win-win solution. the case study of the serchio river basin (Tuscany—italy). Agriculture. 6:49. [accessed 2018 Jun 30] http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/6/4/49.
- Sama C, Crespo-Cebada E, Díaz-Caro C, Escribano M, Mesías FJ. 2018. Consumer preferences for foodstuffs produced in a socio-environmentally responsible manner: a threat to fair trade producers? Ecol Econ. 150:290–296. [accessed 2018 Nov 15] https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0921800917315938.
- Sangkapitux C, Suebpongsang P, Punyawadee V, Pimpaoud N, Konsurin J, Neef A. 2017. Eliciting citizen preferences for multifunctional agriculture in the watershed areas of northern Thailand through choice experiment and latent class models. Land Use Policy. 67:38–47. [accessed 2018 Jun 30] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837715300880.
- Shin YH, Moon H, Jung SE, Severt K. 2017. The effect of environmental values and attitudes on consumer willingness to pay more for organic menus: A value-attitude-behavior approach. J Hosp Tour Manag. 33:113–121. [accessed 2018 Feb 8] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1447677017301201.
- Sidali KL, Kastenholz E, Bianchi R. 2015. Food tourism, niche markets and products in rural tourism: combining the intimacy model and the experience economy as a rural development strategy. J Sustain Tour. 23:1179–1197. [accessed 2019 May 25] http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09669582.2013.836210.
- Steiner BE, Peschel AO, Grebitus C. 2017. Multi-product category choices labeled for ecological footprints: exploring psychographics and evolved psychological biases for characterizing latent consumer classes. Ecol Econ. 140:251–264. [accessed 2018 Mar 22] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800916313994.
- Stranieri S, Ricci EC, Banterle A. 2017. Convenience food with environmentally-sustainable attributes: A consumer perspective. Appetite. 116:11–20. [accessed 2018 Nov 16] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666317305780.
- Thomashow M. 1995. Ecological identity : becoming a reflective environmentalist. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press. accessed 2019 Feb 26. https://www.worldcat.org/title/ecological-identity-becoming-a-reflective-environmentalist/oclc/44956422.
- van Heezik Y, Freeman C, Buttery Y, Waters DL.2018.Factors affecting the extent and quality of nature engagement of older adults living in a range of home types. Environ Behav. accessed 2019 May 27 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0013916518821148.
- Van Loo EJ, Caputo V, Nayga RM, Seo H-S, Zhang B, Verbeke W. 2015. Sustainability labels on coffee: consumer preferences, willingness-to-pay and visual attention to attributes. Ecol Econ. 118 :215–225. [accessed 2018 Nov 16] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092180091500302X.
- Varela-Losada M, Vega-Marcote P, Pérez-Rodríguez U, Álvarez-Lires M. 2016. Going to action? A literature review on educational proposals in formal Environmental Education. Environ Educ Res. 22:390–421. [accessed 2017 Oct 23] http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504622.2015.1101751.
- Vecchio R, Annunziata A. 2015. Willingness-to-pay for sustainability-labelled chocolate: an experimental auction approach. J Clean Prod. 86:335–342. [accessed 2018 Nov 15] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652614008282.
- Walton TN, Jones RE. 2018. Ecological identity: the development and assessment of a measurement scale. Environ Behav. 50:657–689. [accessed 2019 Jun 11] http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0013916517710310.
- Wang J, Geng L, Schultz PW, Zhou K. 2019. Mindfulness increases the belief in climate change: the mediating role of connectedness with nature. Environ Behav. 51:3–23. [cited 2019 May 27] http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0013916517738036.
- Wang O, Somogyi S. 2018. Chinese consumers and shellfish: associations between perception, quality, attitude and consumption. Food Qual Prefer. 66:52–63. [accessed 2018 Nov 28] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329318300090.
- Weaver DB. 2012. Psychographic insights from a South Carolina protected area. Tour Manag. 33:371–379. [accessed 2018 Mar 22] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517711001002#bib39.
- Wells WD. 1975. Psychographics: a critical review. J Mark Res. 12:196 [accessed 2018 Jun 29] https://www.jstor.org/stable/3150443?origin=crossref.
- Williams CC, Chawla L. 2016. Environmental identity formation in nonformal environmental education programs. Environ Educ Res. 22:978–1001. [accessed 2017 Nov 1] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504622.2015.1055553.
- Wilson GA, Burton RJF. 2015. Neo-productivist’ agriculture: spatio-temporal versus structuralist perspectives. J Rural Stud. 38:52–64. [accessed 2018 Jul 1]https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016715000182.
- Yazdanpanah M, Forouzani M, Hojjati M. 2015. Willingness of iranian young adults to eat organic foods: application of the health belief model. Food Qual Prefer. 41:75–83. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.11.012