References
- Andrew ME, Wulder MA, Nelson TA, Coops NC. 2015. Spatial data, analysis approaches, and information needs for spatial ecosystem service assessments: a review. GIsci Remote Sens. 52:344–373.
- Bastian O, Haase D, Grunewald K. 2012. Ecosystem properties, potentials and services - The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example. Ecol Indic [Internet]. 21:7–16. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.014.
- Bernath K, Roschewitz A. 2008. Recreational benefits of urban forests: explaining visitors’ willingness to pay in the context of the theory of planned behavior. J Environ Manage [Internet]. 89:155–166. [accessed 2018 Dec 10]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479707002411.
- Blaschke T. 2006. The role of the spatial dimension within the framework of sustainable landscapes and natural capital. Landsc Urban Plan. 75:198–226.
- Borger T. 2013. Keeping up appearances: motivations for socially desirable responding in contingent valuation interviews. Ecol Econ [Internet]. 87:155–165. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.019.
- Boyd J, Banzhaf S. 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ [Internet]. 63:616–626. [accessed 2018 Dec 16]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800907000341.
- Chaudhary S, McGregor A, Houston D, Chettri N. 2015. The evolution of ecosystem services: A time series and discourse-centered analysis. Environ Sci Policy [Internet]. 54:25–34. [accessed 2018 Dec 17]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901115001239.
- Chen B, Qi X. 2018. Protest response and contingent valuation of an urban forest park in Fuzhou City, China. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 29:68–76. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.005.
- Chen Z, Cai J, Gao B, Xu B, Dai S, He B, Xie X. 2017. Detecting the causality influence of individual meteorological factors on local PM 2.5 concentration in the Jing-Jin-Ji region. Sci Rep [Internet]. 7:1–11. doi:10.1038/srep40735.
- Christopoulou O, Polyzos S, Minetos D. 2007. Peri-urban and urban forests in Greece: obstacle or advantage to urban development? Manage Environ Qual Int J. 18:382–395.
- Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill R, Paruelo J, et al. 1998. Pricing the invaluable: the value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol Econ. 25:25–27.
- Crossman ND, Burkhard B, Nedkov S, Willemen L, Petz K, Palomo I, Drakou EG, Martín-Lopez B, McPhearson T, Boyanova K, et al. 2013. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv. 4:4–14.
- Cummins SK, Jackson RJ. 2001. The built environment and children’s health. Pediatr Clin North Am [Internet]. 48:1241–1252. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031395505703722
- Davies C, Lafortezza R, Hansen R, Rall E, Pauleit S. 2017. Urban green infrastructure in Europe: is greenspace planning and policy compliant? Land Use Policy. 69:93–101.
- de Falco S, Angelidou M, Addie JPD. 2018. From the “smart city” to the “smart metropolis”? Building resilience in the urban periphery. Eur Urban Reg Stud. 1–19.
- Di Felice V, Mancinelli R, Proulx R, Campiglia E. 2012. A multivariate analysis for evaluating the environmental and economical aspects of agroecosystem sustainability in central Italy. J Environ Manage [Internet]. 98:119–126. [accessed 2018 Dec 16]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479711004464.
- Donald B. 2001. Economic competitiveness and quality of life in city regions: compatible concepts? Can J Urban Res [Internet]. 10:259–274. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44320670
- Escobedo FJ, Kroeger T, Wagner JE. 2011. Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environ Pollut [Internet]. 159:2078–2087. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749111000327
- Fazal S, Banu N, Sultana S. 2015. Expanding cities, contested land: role of actors in the context of peri-urban interface. Current Urban Stud [Internet]. 03:187–198. http://www.scirp.org/journal/doi.aspx?DOI=10.4236/cus.2015.33016
- Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ. 68:643–653.
- Frumkin H. 2003. Healthy places: exploring the evidence. Am J Public Health [Internet]. 93:1451–1456. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1451.
- Fuller RA, Gaston KJ. 2009. The scaling of green space coverage in European cities. Biol Lett. 5:352–355.
- Geneletti D, La Rosa D, Spyra M, Cortinovis C. 2017. A review of approaches and challenges for sustainable planning in urban peripheries. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 165:231–243. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.013.
- Giannakopoulou S, Xypolitakou E, Damigos D, Kaliampakos D. 2017. How visitors value traditional built environment? Evidence from a contingent valuation survey. J Cult Herit [Internet]. 24:157–164. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1296207416303727
- Groenewegen PP, Van den Berg AE, De Vries S, Verheij RA. 2006. Vitamin G: effects of green space on health, well-being, and social safety. BMC Public Health. 6:149.
- Hatzistathis A, Zagas T, Trakolis D, Ganatsas P, Malamidis G. 1999. Report on the state of art of Greece. In: Forrest M, Konijendijk CC, Randrup TB, editors. Research and development in Urban Forestry in Europe Report of COST Action E12 “Urban forests and trees on the state of art of urban forestry research and development in Europe” [Internet]. [place unknown]: European Communities; 142–156. https://www.cost.eu/publications/.
- Hesse M, Siedentop S. 2018. Suburbanisation and Suburbanisms – making Sense of Continental European Developments. Raumforschung und Raumordnung. Spatial Res Plann [Internet]. 76:97–108. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13147-018-0526-3
- Hossain MS, Eigenbrod F, Amoako Johnson F, Dearing JA. 2017. Unravelling the interrelationships between ecosystem services and human wellbeing in the Bangladesh delta. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol [Internet]. 24:120–134.
- Hossain MS, Pogue SJ, Trenchard L, Van Oudenhoven APE, Washbourne CL, Muiruri EW, Tomczyk AM, García-Llorente M, Hale R, Hevia V, et al. 2018. Identifying future research directions for biodiversity, ecosystem services and sustainability: perspectives from early-career researchers. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 25: 249–261. [Internet].
- Jim CY, Chen WY. 2009. Ecosystem services and valuation of urban forests in China. Cities [Internet]. 26:187–194. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2009.03.003.
- Juntti M, Lundy L. 2017. A mixed methods approach to urban ecosystem services: experienced environmental quality and its role in ecosystem assessment within an inner-city estate. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 161:10–21. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016920461730004X
- Kalfas DG. 2019. The contribution of urban and suburban green areas and the sustainable development in the town of Florina. Doctoral thesis (in Greek). [place unknown]: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Environment. Department of Forestry and Natural Environment. Sector of Forest Production, Protection and the Natural Environment. Laboratory of Silviculture. [Internet]. http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/45951.
- Kalfas DG, Tyrselis XS 2009. Factors determining the sustainable management of local resources of growth regarding mountainous regions; the case of Nymfaio Florinas. In: Blanas G, editor. 4th MIBES (Management of Internationl Business & Economc Systems) International Conference [Internet]; 18-20 Sepτεmber; Florina: Dept. of Business Administration T.E.I. of Larissa, Greece, Epikendro S.A. Publications, ISBN 978-960-98411-5-3. p. 153–168. http://mibes.teilar.gr/proceedings/2009/ORAL/Kalfas-Tyrselis.pdf
- Kalfas DG, Tyrselis XS, Grigoriadis NS, Matsinos YG. 2013. Sustainable management of local resources regarding mountainous regions. the case of Nymfaio in Florina, Greece. J Environ Prot Ecol [Internet]. 14:655–663. https://docs.google.com/a/jepe-journal.info/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=amVwZS1qb3VybmFsLmluZm98amVwZS1qb3VybmFsfGd4OjM5MDk0MTQ2ZGUxNDI3ODc
- Kalfas DG, Zagkas DT, Raptis DI, Zagkas TD. 2019. The multifunctionality of the natural environment through the basic ecosystem services in the Florina region, Greece. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol [Internet]. 26:57–68. doi:10.1080/13504509.2018.1489910.
- Kates WR, Parris MT, Leiserowitz AA. 2005. What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environ Sci Policy Sustainable Dev. 47:8–21.
- Kirchhoff T, Trepl L, Vicenzotti V. 2013. What is Landscape Ecology? An Analysis and Evaluation of Six Different Conceptions. Landscape Res [Internet]. 38:33–51. doi:10.1080/01426397.2011.640751.
- Kontogianni A, Tsitsoni T, Goudelis G. 2011. An index based on silvicultural knowledge for tree stability assessment and improved ecological function in urban ecosystems. Ecol Eng [Internet]. 37:914–919. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.01.015.
- Lakes T, Kim H-O. 2012. The urban environmental indicator “Biotope Area Ratio”—An enhanced approach to assess and manage the urban ecosystem services using high resolution remote-sensing. Ecol Indic [Internet]. 13:93–103. [accessed 2018 Dec 16]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X11001531.
- Lennon M. 2015. Green infrastructure and planning policy: a critical assessment. Local Environ [Internet]. 20:957–980. doi:10.1080/13549839.2014.880411.
- Liu W, Holst J, Yu Z. 2014. Thresholds of landscape change: A new tool to manage green infrastructure and social-economic development. Landsc Ecol. 29:729–743.
- Lo AY, Jim CY. 2015. Protest response and willingness to pay for culturally significant urban trees: implications for contingent valuation method. Ecol Econ [Internet]. 114:58–66. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.012.
- Lo AYH, Jim CY. 2012. Citizen attitude and expectation towards greenspace provision in compact urban milieu. Land Use Policy [Internet]. 29:577–586. [accessed 2018 Dec 10]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837711001116.
- López-Goyburu P, García-Montero LG. 2018. The urban-rural interface as an area with characteristics of its own in urban planning: A review. Sustainable Cities Soc [Internet]. 43:157–165. [accessed 2018 Dec 16]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670717316256?via%3Dihub.
- Lovell ST, Taylor JR. 2013. Supplying urban ecosystem services through multifunctional green infrastructure in the United States. Landsc Ecol. 28:1447–1463.
- Maes MJA, Jones KE, Toledano MB, Milligan B. 2019. Mapping synergies and trade-offs between urban ecosystems and the sustainable development goals. Environ Sci Policy [Internet]. 93:181–188. [accessed 2019 Jan 26]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901118305197?dgcid=rss_sd_all&showall=true&via=ihub.
- Mancinelli R, Di Felice V, Karkalis K, Bari S, Radicetti E, Campiglia E. 2018. Assessment of the state of agroecosystem sustainability using landscape indicators: a comparative study of three rural areas in Greece. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol [Internet]. 25:35–46. doi:10.1080/13504509.2016.1277377.
- Mander Ü, Kull A, Uuemaa E, Mõisja K, Külvik M, Kikas T, Raet J, Tournebize J, Sepp K. 2018. Green and brown infrastructures support a landscape-level implementation of ecological engineering. Ecol Eng [Internet]. 120:23–35. [accessed 2018 Nov 17]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857418301745?via%3Dihub.
- McIntyre NE, Knowles-Yánez K, Hope D. 2008. Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: differences in the use of “urban” between the social and natural sciences. In: Marzluff JM, et al., editor. Urban ecology. Boston (MA): Springer; p. 49–65.
- Mitchell R, Popham F. 2008. Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet [Internet]. 372:1655–1660. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61689-X.
- Musacchio L, Ozdenerol E, Bryant M, Evans T. 2005. Changing landscapes, changing disciplines: seeking to understand interdisciplinarity in landscape ecological change research. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 73:326–338. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204604001203
- Niemelä J. 2000. Biodiversity monitoring for decision-making. Ann Zool Fennici [Internet]. 37:307–317. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23735723
- Nikolaidou C, Votsi N-E, Sgardelis S, Halley J, Pantis J, Tsiafouli M. 2017. Ecosystem Service capacity is higher in areas of multiple designation types. One Ecosyst [Internet]. 2:1–17. https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=13718
- Nitoslawski SA, Duinker PN, Bush PG. 2016. A review of drivers of tree diversity in suburban areas: research needs for North American cities. Environ Rev [Internet]. 24:471–483. http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/10.1139/er-2016-0027
- Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC. 2006. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 4:115–123. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866706000173
- Nowak DJ, McHale PJ, Ibarra M, Crane D, Stevens JC, Luley CJ. 1998. Modeling the effects of urban vegetation on air pollution. In: Air pollution modeling and its application XII. [place unknown]: Springer; p. 399–407.
- Paraschou P, Nikolaou K. 2010. Management, conservation and revelation of suburban forests. The case of the suburban forest of the hill “Ag. Panteleimonas” of Florina. J Environ Prot Ecol [Internet]. 11:693–700. http://www.jepe-journal.info/vol-11-no-2
- Rillig MC, Kiessling W, Borsch T, Gessler A, Greenwood AD, Hofer H, Joshi J, Schröder B, Thonicke K, Tockner K, et al. 2015. Biodiversity research: data without theory—theory without data. Front Ecol Evol. [Internet]. 3:20. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2015.00020.
- Rogerson RJ. 1999. Quality of life and city competitiveness. Urban Stud [Internet]. 36:969–985. doi:10.1080/0042098993303.
- Samara T, Tsitsoni T. 2014. Selection of forest species for use in urban environment in relation to their potential capture to heavy metals. Global Nest J. 16:966–974.
- Sarvilinna A, Lehtoranta V, Hjerppe T. 2017. Are urban stream restoration plans worth implementing? Environ Manage [Internet]. 59:10–20. doi:10.1007/s00267-016-0778-z.
- Sassen S. 2005. The global city: introducing a concept. Brown J World Affairs. 11:27–40.
- Schafran A. 2013. Discourse and dystopia, American style. City [Internet]. 17:130–148. doi:10.1080/13604813.2013.765125.
- Song X, Lv X, Li C. 2015. Willingness and motivation of residents to pay for conservation of urban green spaces in Jinan, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica [Internet]. 35:89–94. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1872203215000293
- Tang H, Liu W, Yun W. 2018. Spatiotemporal dynamics of green spaces in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region in the past 20 years. Sustainability [Internet]. 10:1–15. http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2949
- Turner KG, Odgaard MV, Bøcher PK, Dalgaard T, Svenning J-C-C. 2014. . Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 125;89–104; [accessed 2017 Feb 27]. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.007.
- van Hardeveld HA, Driessen PPJ, de Jong H, Nefs M, Schot PP, Wassen MJ. 2018. How valuing cultural ecosystem services can advance participatory resource management: the case of the Dutch peatlands. Ecosyst Serv [Internet]. 34:113–125. [accessed 2018 Dec 17]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041617307829.
- Vandermeulen V, Verspecht A, Vermeire B, Van Huylenbroeck G, Gellynck X. 2011. The use of economic valuation to create public support for green infrastructure investments in urban areas. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 103:198–206. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.010.
- Vecchiato D, Tempesta T. 2013. Valuing the benefits of an afforestation project in a peri-urban area with choice experiments. For Policy Econ [Internet]. 26:111–120. [accessed 2018 Dec 2]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934112002262.
- Venn SJ, Kotze DJ, Niemelä J. 2003. Urbanization effects on carabid diversity in boreal forests. Eur J Entomol. 100:73–80.
- Venn SJ, Niemela JK. 2004. Ecology in a multidisciplinary study of urban green space: the URGE project. Boreal Environ Res. 9:479–489.
- Wheeler SM. 2015. Built landscapes of metropolitan regions: an international typology. J Am Plann Assoc [Internet]. 81:167–190. doi:10.1080/01944363.2015.1081567.
- Williams DR. 2014. Making sense of “place”: reflections on pluralism and positionality in place research. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 131:74–82. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.002.
- Wolch JR, Byrne J, Newell JP. 2014. Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: the challenge of making cities “just green enough.”. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 125:234–244. cited 2018 Sep 2. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017.
- Xu M, He C, Liu Z, Dou Y, Ukkusuri S. 2016. How did urban land expand in China between 1992 and 2015? A multi-scale landscape analysis. PLoS One. 11:e0154839.
- Zhang H, Chen B, Sun Z, Bao Z. 2013. Landscape perception and recreation needs in urban green space in Fuyang, Hangzhou, China. Urban For Urban Green [Internet]. 12:44–52. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2012.11.001.
- Zhang M, Zhou Y, Liu X, Lu Z. 2017. Ecological landscape regulation approaches in Xilingol, Inner Mongolia: an urban ecosystem services perspective. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol [Internet]. 24:401–407. doi:10.1080/13504509.2016.1273263.
- Zhang Y, Li J, Wang X, Chen W, Sladen W, Dyke L, Dredge L, Poitevin J, McLennan D, Stewart H, et al. 2012. Modelling and mapping permafrost at high spatial resolution in Wapusk National Park, Hudson Bay Lowlands. Can J Earth Sci. [Internet]. 49:925–937. http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/e2012-031.