Global governance in forestry: a cross-national analysis

References

• Abood SA, Lee JSH, Burivalova Z, Garcia‐Ulloa J, Koh LP. 2015. Relative contributions of the logging, fiber, oil palm, and mining industries to forest loss in Indonesia. Conserv Lett. 8(1):58–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam S. 2015. Trade and the environment: perspectives from the Global South. Chapter 14. In: Alam S, Atapattu S, Gonzalez CG, Razzaque J editors. International environmental law and the global south. Cambridge‎, England: Cambridge University Press; p. 297–318.
   Google Scholar
• Alam S, Atapattu S, Gonzalez CG, Razzaque J, Eds. 2015. International environmental law and the global south. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allison PD. 1999. Multiple regression: a primer. Newbury Park, CA: Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atapattu S, Gonzalez CG. 2015. Introduction: the North-South Divide in international enviornmental law: framing the issues. In: Alam S, Atapattu S, Gonzalez CG, Razzaque J editors. International environmental law and the Global South. Cambridge‎, England: Cambridge University Press; p. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Austin KF. 2010. Soybean exports and deforestation from a world-systems perspective: a cross-national investigation of comparative disadvantage. Social Q. 51(3):511–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum CF. 2006. An introduction to modern econometrics using stata. College Station, TX: Stata press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg J. 2018. Norway fulfills 1 billion dollar commitment to Brazil in recognition. Ministry of Climate and Environment; [accessed 2018 Jan 9]. https://www.regjeringen.no/en/aktuelt/norway-fulfils-commitment-to-brazil/id2439969/
   Google Scholar
• Biermann F. 2002. Strengthening green global governance in a disparate world society. Int Environ Agreements. 2:297–315.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann F. 2006. Global governance and the environment. In: Betsill MM, Hochstetler K, Stevis D, editors. Palgrave advances in international environmental politics(pp. London: Palgrave Macmillan; p. 237–261.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann F. 2017. A world environment organization: solution or threat for effective international environmental governance?. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann F, Pattberg P, Van Asselt H, Zelli F. 2009. The fragmentation of global governance architectures: a framework for analysis. Global Environ Politics. 9(4):14–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boer B. 1997. Commentary: developments in international environmental law relating to forests. Environ Plann Law J. 14:378.
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Maldonado D. 2015. International law, cultural diversity, and the environment: the case of the general forestry law in Colombia. Int Law. 131(27):65–107.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd W. 2010. Ways of seeing in environmental law: how deforestation became an object of climate governance. Ecol Law Q. 37(3):843. Canadian Council on Inter- national Law (ed.), Global Forests and International Environmental Law (Kluwer Law International, 1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockhaus M, Obidzinski K, Dermawan A, Laumonier Y, Luttrell C. 2012. An overview of forest and land allocation policies in Indonesia: is the current framework sufficient to meet the needs of REDD+?. Forest Policy Econ. 18:30–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant RL, Bailey S. 1997. Third world political ecology Routledge. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Canan P, Reichman N. 2002. Ozone connections: expert networks in global environment governance. Sheffield (UK): Greenleaf.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport DS, Wood P. 2006. Finding the way forward for the international arrangement on forests: UNFF-5, -6, -7. Rev Eur Commun Int Environ Law. 15(3):316.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz TR, Frey S, Kalof L. 1987. Estimation with cross-national data: robust and nonparametric methods. American Sociological Review. 52(3):380–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott L. 2017. Introduction. In:  Kirton, Trebilcok, editors. Hard choices, soft law: voluntary standards in global trade, environment and social governance. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein LS. 1995. What is global governance. Global Governance. 1:367.
   Google Scholar
• Glück P, Tarasoffsky RG, Byron RN, Tikkanen I. 2008. Options for strengthening the international legal regime for forests (Euro- pean Forest Institute, 1997); K. Kunzmann, ‘The non-legally binding instrument on sustainable management of all types of forests – towards a legal regime for sustainable forest management. Ger Law Rev. 9(8):981.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez MA. 2013. The global chase: seeking recognition and enforcement of Lago Agrio judgement outside of Ecuador. Stanf J Complex Litig. 27:65–108.,
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez CG. 2015. Food justice: an environmental justice critique of the global food system. Chapter 19. In: Alam S, Atapattu S, Gonzalez CG, Razzaque J editors. International environmental law and the Global South. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas PM. 2002. UN conferences and constructivist governance of the environment. Global Governance. 8:73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas PM. 2004. Addressing the global governance deficit. Global Environmental Politics. 4(4):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway V, Giandomenico E. 2009. The History of REDD Policy. https://redd.unfccc.int/uploads/2_164_redd_20091216_carbon_planet_the_history_of_redd_carbon_planet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ikea. 2018. Forests and Wood. https://www.ikea.com/ms/en_AU/about_ikea/our_responsibility/forestry_and_wood/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Jorgenson AK, Burns TJ. 2007. Effects of rural and urban population dynamics and national development on deforestation in less‐developed countries, 1990–2000. Sociological Inquiry. 77(3):460–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karns M, Karen M. 2004. The politics and processes of global governance. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kirton JJ, Trebilcock MJ. 2017. Hard choices, soft law: voluntary standards in global trade, environment and social governance. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lanly JP. 1992. Forestry issues at the united nations conference on environment and development. Unasylva. 43(171):61.
   Google Scholar
• Li Q, Reuveny R. 2006. Democracy and environmental degradation. International Studies Quarterly. 50(4):935–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipschutz RD. 2001. Why is there no international forestry law? An examination of international forestry regulation, both public and private. UCLA J Environ Mental Law Policy. 19(1):153.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie CP. 2012. Future prospects for international forest law. International Forestry Review. 14(2):249–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer C. 2001. The extent and causes of illegal logging: an analysis of a major cause of tropical deforestation in Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer G. 1992. The earth summit: what went wrong at rio? Washington Univ Law Q. 70(4):1005.
   Google Scholar
• Park J, Conca K, Finger M, Eds. 2008. The crisis of global environmental governance: towards a new political economy of sustainability. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Payne RA. 1995. Freedom and the environment. Journal of Democracy. 6(3):41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peet R. 2003. The unholy trinity: the international monetary fund, world bank, and world trade organization. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Peluso NL. 1992. Rich forests, poor people: resource control and resistance in java. Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson BJ. 2015. International environmental law and sovereign wealth funds. Chapter 17. In: Alam S, Atapattu S, Gonzalez CG, Razzaque J editors. International environmental law and the Global South. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 356–379.
   Google Scholar
• Rose G, (Ed.). 2014. Following the proceeds of environmental crime: fish, forests and Filthy Lucre. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rudel TK. 2017. The dynamics of deforestation in the wet and dry tropics: a comparison with policy implications. Forests. 8:108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudel TK, Schneider L, Uriarte M, Turner BL, DeFries R, Lawrence D, … Birkenholtz T. 2009. Agricultural intensification and changes in cultivated areas, 1970–2005. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 106(49):20675–20680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudel TK, Sloan S, Chazdon R, et al. 2016. The drivers of tree cover expansion: global, temperate, and tropical zone analyses. Land Use Policy. 58:502–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruis BM. 2001. No forest convention but ten tree treaties. Unasylva. 52(206):3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Schally H. 1993. Forests: toward an international legal regime. Yearbook Int Environ Tal Law. 4:30.
   Google Scholar
• Schama S. 1995. Landscape and memory. London: Harper Collins Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schofer E and Hironaka A. 2005. The effects of world society on environmental protection outcomes. Social Forces. 84(1):25–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott J. 1998. Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shandra JM. 2007. Economic dependency, repression, and deforestation: a quantitative, cross‐national analysis. Sociological Inquiry. 77(4):543–571.
   Google Scholar
• Shandra JM, Rademacher H, Coburn C. 2016. The world bank and organized hypocrisy? A cross-national analysis of structural adjustment and forest loss. Environmental Sociology. 2(2):192–207.
   Google Scholar
• Shandra JM, Shandra CL, London B. 2008. Women, non-governmental organizations, and deforestation: a cross-national Study. Population and Environment. 30(1–2):48–72.
   Google Scholar
• Skala-Kuhmann A. 1996. Legal instruments to enhance the conservation and sustainable management of forest resources at the international level. German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development and GTZ, 1996. Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Sommer JM. 2017. Grand and petty corruption: a cross-national analysis of forest loss in low-and middle-income nations. Environmental Sociology. 3(4):414–426.
   Google Scholar
• Sommer JM. 2018. State spending and governance: a cross‐national analysis of forest loss in developing nations. Sociological Inquiry. 88(4):696–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava N. 2011. Changing dynamics of forest regulation: coming full circle? Rev Eur Commun Int Environ Law. 20(2):113.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner M. 2001. After a decade of global forest negotiations, where are we now? Rev Eur Commun Int Environ Law. 10(1):98.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner M. 2002. The journey from rio to johannesburg: ten years of forest Ne“gotiations, ten years of success and failures. Golden Gate Univ Law Rev. 32(4):629.
   Google Scholar
• Tacconi, Luca, Boscolo M, Brack D. 2003. Illegal Logging. http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/events/Illegal-logging.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tarasofsky RG. 1999. The international forests regime: legal and policy issues (IUCN/WWF, 1995). In: Tarasofsky RG, editor. Assessing the International Forest Regime (IUCN, 1999). Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhanen T. 2014. Global inequality as a consequence of human diversity. London, UK: Ulster Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Virtanen P, Palmujoki E. 2002. Sustainable Forest Management Through Multilateral Environmental Agreements and Market-based Mechanisms: Final Report of a Study on International Efforts to Promote the Sustainable Management of Tropical Forests in Developing Countries. Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Department for International Development Cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2015. World development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Young OR, Ed. 1997. Global governance: drawing insights from the environmental experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar