Sustainable development indicators assessment for the city of Anchieta-ES Brazil at different times of the local economy

References

• Batalhão ACS, Teixeira D, de Godoi EL, Prates GA. 2018. Exploring the local sustainability approach using indicators. J Manage Sustainability. 8(4):39–53. doi:10.5539/jms.v8n4p39.
   Google Scholar
• BEN: Empresa de Pesquisa Energética [Energy Research Company]. 2019. Balanço Energético Nacional 2019. Portuguese; [accessed 2019 Nov 18]. http://www.epe.gov.br.
   Google Scholar
• Cazzola A, Pasquini L, Angeli A. 2016. The relationship between unemployment and fertility in Italy: A time-series analysis. Demogr Res. 34:1–38. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2016.34.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DATASUS: Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde [Department of Informatics of the Unified Health System]. 2019. Portuguese; [accessed 2019 Oct 13]. http://www.datasus.saude.gov.br.
   Google Scholar
• Essex B, Koop SHA, Van Leeuwen CJ. 2020. Proposal for a national blueprint framework to monitor progress on water-related sustainable development goals in Europe. Environ Manage. 65:1–18. doi:10.1007/s00267-019-01231-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission, Eurostat. 2019. EU SDG indicator set 2019: result of the review in preparation of the 2019 edition of the EU SDG monitoring report. Luxembourg: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Transparency Portal [Portal da Transparência Federal]. 2019. Portuguese; [accessed 2019 Sep 23]. http://www.portaltransparencia.gov.br.
   Google Scholar
• Howard G, Bartram J. 2003. Domestic water quantity, service level and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• [IBGE] Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística [Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics]. 2004. Indicadores de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Brasil 2004. Portuguese; [accessed 2019 Oct 23]. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br
   Google Scholar
• [IBGE] Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística [Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics]. 2015. Indicadores de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Brasil 2015. Portuguese; [accessed 2020 Jan 23]. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br.
   Google Scholar
• [IJSN] Instituto Jones dos Santos Neves [Jones dos Santos Neves Institute]. 2019. Portuguese; [accessed 2019 Oct 23]. http://www.ijsn.es.gov.br.
   Google Scholar
• [INEP] Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira [National Institute for Educational Studies and Research Anísio Teixeira]. 2019. Portuguese; [accessed 2019 Oct 23]. http://www.portal.inep.gov.br.
   Google Scholar
• [IPEA] Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada [Institute of Applied Economic Research]. 2019. Portuguese; [accessed 2019 Oct 23]. http://www.ipea.gov.br.
   Google Scholar
• [IBGE] Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística [Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics]. 2019a. Sistema IBGE de Recuperação Automática. Portuguese; [accessed 2019 Oct 23]. http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br.
   Google Scholar
• [IBGE] Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística [Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics]. 2019b. Cidades-Anchieta. Portuguese; [accessed 2019 Oct 23]. http://www.cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/es/anchieta/panorama.
   Google Scholar
• Huang L, Yan L, Wu J. 2016. Assessing urban sustainability of Chinese megacities: 35 years after the economic reform and open-door policy. Landscape Urban Plan. 145:57–70. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemerich PDC, Ritter LG, de Borba WF. 2014. Indicadores de sustentabilidade ambiental: métodos e aplicações. Revista Monografias Ambientais. 13(4):3718–3722.
   Google Scholar
• Leadership Council of the Sustainable Development Solutions Network. 2015. Indicators and a monitoring framework for the sustainable development goals: launching a data revolution for the SDGs. Sustainable Development Solutions Network, Secretary-General of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Leal Filho W, Azeiteiro U, Alves F, Pace P, Mifsud M, Brandli L, Caeiro SS, Disterheft A. 2018. Reinvigorating the sustainable development research agenda: the role of the sustainable development goals (SDG). Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 25(2):131–142. doi:10.1080/13504509.2017.1342103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Zhang P, Jiang X, Lo K. 2013. Measuring sustainable urbanization in China: a case study of the coastal Liaoning area. Sustainability Sci. 8(4):585–594. doi:10.1007/s11625-012-0193-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucena AD, Cavalcante JN, Cândido GA. 2011. Sustainability of the municipality of João Pessoa: an application of the barometer of sustainability. Brazilian J Reg Manage Dev. 7(1):19–49.
   Google Scholar
• Macêdo NMMN, Cândido GA. 2011. Index of local sustainable development and its influences in public politics: an exploratory study of the municipal politics of Alagoa Grande. Gestão E Produção. 18(3):619–632. doi:10.1590/S0104-530X2011000300013.
   Google Scholar
• Maggino F, Zumbo BD. 2012. Chapter 26, measuring the quality of life and the construction of social indicators. In: Land KC, Michalos AC, Sirgy MJ, editors. Handbook of social indicators and quality-of-life research. Dordrecht (Netherland): Springer Publishers; p. 201–238.
   Google Scholar
• Mapar M, Jafari MJ, Mansouri N, Arjmandi R, Azizinejad R, Ramos TB. 2017. Sustainability indicators for municipalities of megacities: integrating health, safety and environmental performance. Ecol Indic. 83:271–291. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins MF, Cândido GA. 2008. Índice de Desenvolvimento Sustentável – IDS dos Estados brasileiros e dos municípios da Paraíba. João Pessoa: SEBRAE.
   Google Scholar
• [MDIC] Ministério da Indústria, Comércio Exterior e Serviços [Ministry of Industry, Foreign Trade and Services]. 2019. Portuguese; [accessed 2019 Oct 23]. http://www.mdic.gov.br.
   Google Scholar
• Mazziotta M, Pareto A. 2018. Measuring well-being over time: the adjusted Mazziotta–Pareto index versus other non-compensatory indices. Soc Indic Res. 136(3):967–976. doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1577-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munda G, Saisana M. 2011. Methodological considerations on regional sustainability assessment based on multicriteria and sensitivity analysis. Reg Stud. 45(2):261–276. doi:10.1080/00343401003713316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh TH, Pang SY, Chua SC. 2010. Energy policy and alternative energy in Malaysia: issues and challenges for sustainable growth. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 14(4):1241–1252. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira GM, Archer AB. 2015. Ambiente e desenvolvimento sustentável: educação para a ética e cidadania. Sensos. 5(2):185–200.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira GM, Vidal DG, Ferraz MP, Cabeda JM, Pontes M, Maia RL, Calheiros JM, Barreira E. 2019. Measuring health vulnerability: an interdisciplinary indicator applied to mainland Portugal. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(21):4121. doi:10.3390/ijerph16214121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira GM, Vidal DG, Maia RL. 2020. Monitoring Portuguese living conditions at local scale: a case study based on sustainable development indicators. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 27(2):140–152. doi:10.1080/13504509.2019.1678204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira RDS, Gomes SC, Cabral ER. 2012. Da condição de município “Marrom” a município “Verde”: o caso de Paragominas–PA. Revista De Administração E Negócios Da Amazônia. 4(2):122–139.
   Google Scholar
• Rego NAM, Rocha TALCG, Reis LMM. 2017. Avaliação da sustentabilidade do município de Ipanguaçu-RN sob a ótica do Índice de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Municipal (IDSM). Colóquio. 14(2):31–47. doi:10.26767/coloquio.v14i2.716.
   Google Scholar
• Rezende GBM, Fagundes EAA. 2017. Sustainable development index of Primavera do Leste-MT, based on Martins and Cândido’s model (2008). Revista Estudos E Pesquisas Em Administração. 1(1):91–107. doi:10.30781/repad.v1i1.5806.
   Google Scholar
• Ruá MJ, Huedo P, Civera V, Agost-Felip R. 2019. A simplified model to assess vulnerable areas for urban regeneration. Sustain Cities Soc. 46:101440. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad W, Taleb A. 2018. The causal relationship between renewable energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from Europe. Clean Technol Envir Policy. 20(1):127–136. doi:10.1007/s10098-017-1463-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samarco. 2014. Relatório Anual de Sustentabilidade 2014. [accessed 2019 Oct 23]. http://www.samarco.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/2014-Relatorio-Anual-de-Sustentabilidade.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Samarco. 2016. Relatório Bienal 2015–2016. [accessed 2019 Oct 23]. http://www.samarco.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Samarco_Relatorio-Bienal-2015_16-08092017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Samarco. 2019. Samarco e a economia. [accessed 2019 Oct 23]. http://www.samarco.com/samarco-e-a-economia.
   Google Scholar
• Sepúlveda S. 2005. Desenvolvimento microrregional sustentável: métodos para planejamento local. Brasília: IICA.
   Google Scholar
• Shang C, Wu T, Huang G, Wu J. 2019. Weak sustainability is not sustainable: socioeconomic and environmental assessment of Inner Mongolia for the past three decades. Resour Conserv Recycl. 141:243–252. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen LY, Ochoa JJ, Shah MN, Zhang X. 2011. The application of urban sustainability indicators–A comparison between various practices. Habitat Int. 35(1):17–29. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [SNIS] Sistema Nacional de Informações sobre Saneamento [National Sanitation Information System]. 2019. Portuguese; [accessed 2019 Sep 10]. http://www.snis.gov.br.
   Google Scholar
• [TCE] Tribunal de Contas do Estado do Espírito Santo [Espírito Santo Court of Auditors]. 2019. Portuguese; [accessed 2019 Oct 13]. http://www.tce.es.gov.br.
   Google Scholar
• Shi L, Vause J, Gao L, Li Q, Tang L. 2011. Temporal changes in sustainable development level for Lijiang City: 2003–2008. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 18(6):474–479. doi:10.1080/13504509.2011.601470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development. 1992. Agenda 21: United Nations Conference on Environment & Development (UNCED). Rio de Janeiro: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. 2000. United nations millennium declaration. Resolution adopted by the general assembly on 8 September 2000. New York: United Nations Organization (ONU). A/RES/55/2.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. New York: United Nations Organization (ONU). A/RES/70/1.
   Google Scholar
• Waquil PD, Schneider S, Filippi EE, Conterato MA, Specht S. 2006. Avaliação de desenvolvimento territorial em quatro territórios rurais no Brasil. Porto Alegre: UFRGS.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng B, Bedra KB. 2018. Recent sustainability performance in China: strength-weakness analysis and ranking of provincial cities. Sustainability. 10(9):3063. doi:10.3390/su10093063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar