Sustainability performance assessment framework: a cross-industry multiple case study

References

• Ahi P, Searcy C. 2015. An analysis of metrics used to measure performance in green and sustainable supply chains. J Clean Prod. 86:360–377. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andalib Ardakani D, Soltanmohammadi A. 2019. Investigating and analysing the factors affecting the development of sustainable supply chain model in the industrial sectors. Corporate Social Responsibility Environ Manage. 26:199–212. doi:10.1002/csr.1671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beske-Janssen P, Johnson MP, Schaltegger S. 2015. 20 years of performance measurement in sustainable supply chain management – what has been achieved?. Supply Chain Manage. 20:664–680. doi:10.1108/SCM-06-2015-0216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann F, Kanie N, Kim RE. 2017. Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN sustainable development goals. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 26–27:26–31. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman A, Bell E. 2011. Business research methods. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 0199583404.
   Google Scholar
• Carter CR, Rogers DS. 2008. A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage. 38:360–387. doi:10.1108/09600030810882816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho DW, Lee YH, Ahn SH, Hwang MK. 2012. A framework for measuring the performance of service supply chain management. Comput Ind Eng. 62:801–818. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2011.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daub C-H. 2007. Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: an alternative methodological approach. J Clean Prod. 15:75–85. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.08.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durach CF, Kembro J, Wieland A. 2017. A new paradigm for systematic literature reviews in supply chain management. J Supply Chain Manage. 53:67–85. doi:10.1111/jscm.12145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, Pölkki T, Utriainen K, Kyngäs H. 2014. Qualitative content analysis: a focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open. 4:215824401452263. doi:10.1177/2158244014522633.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2016. Volkswagen light duty diesel vehicle violations for model years 2009–2016. USA: EPA; [accessed 2016 Mar 20]. www.epa.gov/vw.
   Google Scholar
• Fink A. 2014. Conducting research literature reviews: from the internet to paper. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (California): SAGE. ISBN: 9781483301037.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes. 2016. The world’s biggest public companies: 2016 ranking. USA:Forbes; [accessed 2016 May 26].
   Google Scholar
• Frey B. 2020. Reporting on the SDGs: enhance and mainstream corporate reporting on the sustainable development goals: UN global compact. [accessed 2020 Apr 20]. www.unglobalcompact.org/take-action/action-platforms/sdg-reporting.
   Google Scholar
• Fukase A. 2015. Toshiba accounting scandal draws record fine from regulators. The Wall Street Journal. [accessed 2016 Mar 20]. www.wsj.com/articles/toshiba-accounting-scandal-draws-record-fine-from-regulators-1449472485.
   Google Scholar
• Gold S, Seuring S, Beske P. 2010. The constructs of sustainable supply chain management – a content analysis based on published case studies. Prog Ind Ecol. 7:114. doi:10.1504/PIE.2010.036045.
   Google Scholar
• Gong M, Simpson A, Koh L, Tan KH. 2018. Inside out: the interrelationships of sustainable performance metrics and its effect on business decision making: theory and practice. Resourc Conserv Recycl. 128:155–166. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassini E, Surti C, Searcy C. 2012. A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. Int J Prod Econ. 140:69–82. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskins T. 2015. Reliving the Rana plaza factory collapse: a history of cities in 50 buildings, day 22. The Guardian. [accessed 2019 Jun 3]. www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/apr/23/rana-plaza-factory-collapse-history-cities-50-buildings,checked on 3/6/2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu -C-C, Choon Tan K, Hanim Mohamad Zailani S, Jayaraman V. 2013. Supply chain drivers that foster the development of green initiatives in an emerging economy. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 33(6):656–688. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-10-2011-0401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard G. 2009. Measuring organizational performance: beyond the triple bottom line. Bus Strategy Environ. 18:177–191. doi:10.1002/bse.564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokić M, Ball R. 2006. Qualität und Quantität wissenschaftlicher Veröffentlichungen: bibliometrische Aspekte der Wissenschaftskommunikation. Vol. 15. Jülich: Forschungszentrum Jülich (Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich. Reihe Bibliothek). ISBN: 1433-5557.
   Google Scholar
• Köksal D, Strähle J, Müller M, Freise M. 2017. Social sustainable supply chain management in the textile and apparel industry—a literature review. Sustainability. 9:100. doi:10.3390/su9010100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk A. 2003. Trends in sustainability reporting by the fortune global 250. Bus Strategy Environ. 12:279–291. doi:10.1002/bse.370.
   Google Scholar
• KPMG. 2011. Sustainability reporting. What you should know. KPMG; [accessed 2016 Mar 16]. www.kpmg.com/US/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/iarcs-sustainability-reporting-what-you-should-know.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• KPMG. 2015. Currents of change. The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility 2015. KPMG; [accessed 2016 Nov 30]. assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/02/kpmg-international-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Levering R, Vos B. 2018. Organizational drivers and barriers to circular supply chain operations. In: de Boer L, Houman Andersen P, editors. Operations management and sustainability: new research perspectives. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; p. 43–66.
   Google Scholar
• Lozano R, Huisingh D. 2011. Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting. J Clean Prod. 19:99–107. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Nakicenovic N, Visbeck M, Stevance A-S. 2015. Policy: five priorities for the UN sustainable development goals. Nature. 520:432–433. doi:10.1038/520432a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra NK. 2010. Marketing research: an applied orientation. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson. ISBN: 9780136085430.
   Google Scholar
• Martins CL, Pato MV. 2019. Supply chain sustainability: a tertiary literature review. J Clean Prod. 225:995–1016. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaou IE, Tsalis TA. 2013. Development of a sustainable balanced scorecard framework. Ecol Indic. 34:76–86. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisen M. 2013. How Nike solved its sweatshop problem. Business Insider. [accessed 2019 June 3]. www.businessinsider.de/how-nike-solved-its-sweatshop-problem-2013-5?r=US&IR=T.
   Google Scholar
• Portier C, Frey B, Midgley L, Rees C. 2018. Integrating the SDGs into corporate reporting: a practical guide. USA: GRI, UN Global Compact, Pwc, Shift. https://d306pr3pise04h.cloudfront.net/docs/publications%2FPractical_Guide_SDG_Reporting.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Qorri A, Mujkić Z, Kraslawski A. 2018. A conceptual framework for measuring sustainability performance of supply chains. J Clean Prod. 189:570–584. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reefke H, Trocchi M. 2013. Balanced scorecard for sustainable supply chains: design and development guidelines. Int J Prod Perform Manage. 62:805–826. doi:10.1108/IJPPM-02-2013-0029.
   Google Scholar
• Robson C. 2011. Real world research: a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings / Colin Robson. 3rd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN: 1405182407.
   Google Scholar
• Roca LC, Searcy C. 2012. An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports. J Clean Prod. 20:103–118. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero S, Ruiz S, Fernandez-Feijoo B. 2019. Sustainability reporting and stakeholder engagement in Spain: different instruments, different quality. Bus Strategy Environ. 28:221–232. doi:10.1002/bse.2251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed MA, Kersten W. 2017. Supply chain sustainability performance indicators - a content analysis based on published standards and guidelines. Logist Res. 10. doi:10.23773/2017_12.
   Google Scholar
• Saeed MA, Kersten W. 2019. Drivers of sustainable supply chain management: identification and Classification. Sustainability. 11:1137. doi:10.3390/su11041137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seuring S. 2013. A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decis Support Syst. 54:1513–1520. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seuring S, Müller M. 2008. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod. 16:1699–1710. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnayder L, van Rijnsoever FJ, Hekkert MP. 2015. Putting your money where your mouth is: why sustainability reporting based on the triple bottom line can be misleading. Plos ONE. 10:e0119036. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Székely F, Knirsch M. 2005. Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility: metrics for sustainable performance. Eur Manag J. 23:628–647. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2005.10.009.
   Google Scholar
• Tajbakhsh A, Hassini E. 2015. A data envelopment analysis approach to evaluate sustainability in supply chain networks. J Clean Prod. 105:74–85. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate WL, Ellram LM, Kirchoff JFON. 2010. Corporate social responsibility reports: a thematic analysis related to supply chain management. J Supply Chain Manage. 46:19–44. doi:10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03184.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taticchi P, Garengo P, Nudurupati SS, Tonelli F, Pasqualino R. 2015. A review of decision-support tools and performance measurement and sustainable supply chain management. Int J Prod Res. 53:6473–6494. doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.939239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teuteberg F, Wittstruck D. 2010. A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management. Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik. 2010:203.
   Google Scholar
• Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P. 2003. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br J Manage. 14:207–222. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNGC. 2015. Global goals for people and planet. UN Global Compact. [accessed 2020 Apr 20]. www.unglobalcompact.org/sdgs/about.
   Google Scholar
• Varsei M, Soosay CA, Sarkis J. 2014. Framing sustainability performance of supply chains with multidimensional indicators. Supply Chain Manage. 19:242–257. doi:10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf J. 2008. The nature of supply chain management research: insights from a content analysis of international supply chain management literature from 1990 to 2006. 1st ed. Wiesbaden: Gabler (Gabler Edition Wissenschaft: Einkauf, Logistik und Supply Chain Management). ISBN: 9783834909985.
   Google Scholar
• Yin RK. 2014. Case study research: design and methods. 5th ed. London: SAGE Publications. ISBN: 9781483302003.
   Google Scholar