Social-ecological system approaches for water resources management

References

• Accastello C, Blanc S, Brun F, Accastello C, Blanc S, Brun F. 2019. A framework for the integration of nature-based solutions into environmental risk management strategies. Sustainability. 11:489. doi:10.3390/su11020489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht TR, Crootof A, Scott CA. 2018. The water-energy-food Nexus: A systematic review of methods for nexus assessment. Environmental Research Letters. 13(4):043002. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Saidi M. 2017. Conflicts and security in integrated water resources management. Environmental Science & Policy. 73:38–44. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubert AH, Bauer R, Lienert J. 2018. A review of water-related serious games to specify use in environmental multi-criteria decision analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software. 105:64–78. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.03.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson D, Gain AK, Giupponi C. 2020. Moving beyond water centricity? Conceptualizing integrated water resources management for implementing sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science. 15:671–681. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00733-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson D, Gain AK, Rouillard JJ. 2015. Water governance in a comparative perspective: from IWRM to a ‘Nexus’ Approach? Water Alternatives. 8(1):756–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson D, Jordan A. 2008. Understanding task allocation in the European Union: exploring the value of federal theory. Journal of European Public Policy. 15(1):78–97. doi:10.1080/13501760701702215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson D, Jordan A, Cook H, Smith L. 2013. Collaborative environmental governance: are watershed partnerships swimming or are they sinking? Land Use Policy. 30(1):748–757. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes F, Folke C. 1998. Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blair P, Buytaert W. 2016. Socio-hydrological modelling: a review asking “why, what and how?”. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 20(1):443–478. doi:10.5194/hess-20-443-2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton C, Cutter Susan L. 2008. Levee failures and social vulnerability in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Area, California. Natural Hazards Review. 9(3):136–149. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2008)9:3(136).
   Google Scholar
• Busscher T, van den Brink M, Verweij S. 2019. Strategies for integrating water management and spatial planning: organising for spatial quality in the Dutch “Room for the River” program. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 12(1):e12448. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O. 2006. Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society. 11(2). doi:10.5751/ES-01759-110208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Shacham E, Walters G, Janzen C, Maginnis S. editors. 2016. Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Cook C, Bakker K. 2012. Water security: debating an emerging paradigm. Global Environmental Change. 22(1):94–102. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosens BA, Gunderson L, Chaffin BC. 2018. Introduction to the special feature practicing panarchy: assessing legal flexibility, ecological resilience, and adaptive governance in regional water systems experiencing rapid environmental change. Ecology and Society. 23(1). doi:10.5751/ES-09524-230104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craven J, Angarita H, Corzo Perez GA, Vasquez D. 2017. Development and testing of a river basin management simulation game for integrated management of the Magdalena-Cauca river basin. Environmental Modelling & Software. 90:78–88. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Baldassarre G, Martinez F, Kalantari Z, Viglione A. 2017. Drought and flood in the Anthropocene: feedback mechanisms in reservoir operation. Earth Syst Dynam. 8(1):225–233. doi:10.5194/esd-8-225-2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Baldassarre G, Viglione A, Carr G, Kuil L, Salinas JL, Blöschl G. 2013. Socio-hydrology: conceptualising human-flood interactions. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 17(8):3295–3303. doi:10.5194/hess-17-3295-2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Baldassarre G, Viglione A, Carr G, Kuil L, Yan K, Brandimarte L, Blöschl G. 2015. Debates—perspectives on socio-hydrology: capturing feedbacks between physical and social processes. Water Resources Research. 51(6):4770–4781. doi:10.1002/2014WR016416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Baldassarre G, Wanders N, AghaKouchak A, Kuil L, Rangecroft S, Veldkamp TIE, Garcia M, van Oel PR, Breinl K, Van Loon AF. 2018. Water shortages worsened by reservoir effects. Nature Sustainability. 1(11):617–622. doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0159-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshafei Y, Tonts M, Sivapalan M, Hipsey M. 2016. Sensitivity of emergent sociohydrologic dynamics to internal system properties and external sociopolitical factors: implications for water management. Water Resources Research 52(6):4944-4966.doi:10.1002/2015WR017944.
   Google Scholar
• Fernald A, Guldan S, Boykin K, Cibils A, Gonzales M, Hurd B, Lopez S, Ochoa C, Ortiz M, Rivera J, et al. 2015. Linked hydrologic and social systems that support resilience of traditional irrigation communities. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 19(1):293–307. doi:10.5194/hess-19-293-2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuillette S, Levrel H, Boeuf B, Blanquart S, Gorin O, Monaco G, Penisson B, Robichon S. 2016. The use of cost–benefit analysis in environmental policies: some issues raised by the Water Framework Directive implementation in France. Environmental Science & Policy. 57:79–85. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filatova T, Verburg PH, Parker DC, Stannard CA. 2013. Spatial agent-based models for socio-ecological systems: challenges and prospects. Environmental Modelling & Software. 45:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.03.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floress K, Prokopy LS, Allred SB. 2011. It’s who you know: social capital, social networks, and watershed groups. Society & Natural Resources. 24(9):871–886. doi:10.1080/08941920903493926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J. 2010. Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society. 15(4). doi:10.5751/ES-03610-150420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch O, Adelle C, Benson D. 2017. The EU water initiative at 15: origins, processes and assessment. Water International. 42(4):425–442. doi:10.1080/02508060.2017.1330816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch O, Benson D. 2013. Integrating the principles of integrated water resources management? River basin planning in England and Wales. International Journal of Water Governance. 1(2):265–284. doi:10.7564/13-IJWG7.
   Google Scholar
• Fu ZH, Zhao HJ, Wang H, Lu WT, Wang J, Guo HC. 2017. Integrated planning for regional development planning and water resources management under uncertainty: A case study of Xining, China. Journal of Hydrology. 554:623–634. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.08.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gain AK, Ashik-Ur-Rahman M, Vafeidis N. 2019a. Exploring human-nature interaction on the coastal floodplain in the Ganges-Brahmaputra delta through the lens of Ostrom’s social-ecological systems framework. Environmental Research Communications. 1(5):051003. doi:10.1088/2515-7620/ab2407.
   Google Scholar
• Gain AK, Ashik-Ur-Rahman M, Benson D. 2019b. Exploring institutional structures for Tidal River Management in the Ganges-Brahmaputra Delta in Bangladesh. Die Erde. 150(3):184–195. doi:10.12854/erde-2019-434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giupponi C, Gain AK. 2017. Integrated water resources management (IWRM) for climate change adaptation. Regional Environmental Change. 17:1865–1867. doi:10.1007/s10113-017-1173-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani M, Li Y, Castelletti A, Gandolfi C. 2016. A coupled human-natural systems analysis of irrigated agriculture under changing climate. Water Resources Research. 52(9):6928–6947. doi:10.1002/2016WR019363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grantham HS, McLeod E, Brooks A, Jupiter SD, Hardcastle J, Richardson AJ, Poloczanska ES, Hills T, Mieszkowska N, Klein CJ, et al. 2011. Ecosystem-based adaptation in marine ecosystems of tropical Oceania in response to climate change. Pacific Conservation Biology. 17(3):241–258. doi:10.1071/PC110241.
   Google Scholar
• Gunda T, Turner BL, Tidwell VC. 2018. The influential role of sociocultural feedbacks on community-managed irrigation system behaviors during times of water stress. Water Resources Research. 54(4):2697–2714. doi:10.1002/2017WR021223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GWP. 2017. The need for an integrated approach. Stockholm:Global Water partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Halbe J, Pahl-Wostl C, Sendzimir J, Adamowski J. 2013. Towards adaptive and integrated management paradigms to meet the challenges of water governance. Water Science and Technology. 67(11):2651–2660. doi:10.2166/wst.2013.146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holling CS. 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems. 4(5):390–405. doi:10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MS, Hein L, Rip FI, Dearing JA. 2015. Integrating ecosystem services and climate change responses in coastal wetlands development plans for Bangladesh. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 20(2):241–261. doi:10.1007/s11027-013-9489-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MS, Ifejika Speranza C. 2020. Challenges and opportunities for operationalizing the safe and just operating space concept at regional scale. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 27(1):40–54. doi:10.1080/13504509.2019.1683645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MS, Ramirez J, Szabo S, Eigenbrod F, Johnson FA, Ifejika Speranza C. Dearing JA. 2020. Participatory modelling for conceptualizing social-ecological system dynamics in the Bangladesh delta. Regional Environmental Change. 20:28. doi:10.1007/s10113-020-01599-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüesker F, Moss T. 2015. The politics of multi-scalar action in river basin management: implementing the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD). Land Use Policy. 42:38–47. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huitema D, Meijerink S. editors. 2014. The politics of river basin organisations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Huq N. 2016. Institutional adaptive capacities to promote ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) to flooding in England. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management. 8(2):212–235. doi:10.1108/IJCCSM-02-2015-0013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussien W, Memon FA, Savic DA. 2017. An integrated model to evaluate water-energy-food nexus at a household scale. Environmental Modelling & Software. 93:366–380. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.03.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jager WN, Challies E, Kochskämper E, Newig J, Benson D, Blackstock K, Collins K, Ernst A, Evers M, Feichtinger J, et al. 2016. Transforming European water governance? Participation and river basin management under the EU Water Framework Directive in 13 member states. Water. 8(4). doi:10.3390/w8040156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones HP, Hole DG, Zavaleta ES. 2012. Harnessing nature to help people adapt to climate change. Nature Climate Change. 2:504. doi:10.1038/nclimate1463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaddoura S, El Khatib S. 2017. Review of water-energy-food Nexus tools to improve the Nexus modelling approach for integrated policy making. Environmental Science & Policy. 77:114–121. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 47(2):263–291. doi:10.2307/1914185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasprzyk JR, Smith RM, Stillwell AS, Madani K, Ford D, McKinney D, Sorooshian S. 2018. Defining the role of water resources systems analysis in a changing future. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 144(12):01818003. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay JJ, Regier HA, Boyle M, Francis G. 1999. An ecosystem approach for sustainability: addressing the challenge of complexity. Futures. 31(7):721–742. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00029-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly RA, Jakeman AJ, Barreteau O, Borsuk ME, ElSawah S, Hamilton SH, Henriksen HJ, Kuikka S, Maier HR, Rizzoli AE, et al. 2013. Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management. Environmental Modelling & Software. 47:159–181. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Tian F, Lin M, Sivapalan M. 2015. A conceptual socio-hydrological model of the co-evolution of humans and water: case study of the Tarim River basin, western China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 19(2):1035–1054. doi:10.5194/hess-19-1035-2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Mooney H, Hull V, Davis SJ, Gaskell J, Hertel T, Lubchenco J, Seto KC, Gleick P, Kremen C, et al. 2015. Systems integration for global sustainability. Science. 347(6225). doi:10.1126/science.1258832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell M, Robins G, Wang P. 2014. Network structure and institutional complexity in an ecology of water management games. Ecology and Society. 19(4). doi:10.5751/ES-06880-190423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludy J, Kondolf GM. 2012. Flood risk perception in lands “protected” by 100-year levees. Natural Hazards. 61(2):829–842. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-0072-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston L, Konar M. 2017. Drought impacts to water footprints and virtual water transfers of the central valley of California. Water Resources Research. 53(7):5756–5773. doi:10.1002/2016WR020251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin R, Schlüter M. 2015. Combining system dynamics and agent-based modeling to analyze social-ecological interactions—an example from modeling restoration of a shallow lake. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 3:66. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2015.00066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrane SJ, Acuto M, Artioli F, Chen P-Y, Comber R, Cottee J, Farr-Wharton G, Green N, Helfgott A, Larcom S, et al. 2018. Scaling the nexus: towards integrated frameworks for analysing water, energy and food. The Geographical Journal, 185(4):419-431. doi:10.1111/geoj.12256
   Google Scholar
• McNeill J. 2016. Scale implications of integrated water resource management politics: lessons from New Zealand. Environmental Policy and Governance. 26(4):306–319. doi:10.1002/eet.1719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostert E. 2018. An alternative approach for socio-hydrology: case study research. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 22(1):317–329. doi:10.5194/hess-22-317-2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson G. 2013. Water, energy and food interactions—challenges and opportunities. Front Environ Sci Eng. 7(5):787–793. English. doi:10.1007/s11783-013-0526-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science. 325(5939):419. doi:10.1126/science.1172133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl C, Jeffrey P, Isendahl N, Brugnach M. 2011. Maturing the new water management paradigm: progressing from aspiration to practice. Water Resources Management. 25(3):837–856. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9729-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl C, Sendzimir J, Jeffrey P, Aerts J, Berkamp G,KC. 2007. Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecology and Society. 12(2):30. doi:10.5751/ES-02147-120230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partelow S. 2018. A review of the social-ecological systems framework: applications, methods, modifications, and challenges. Ecology and Society. 23(4). doi:10.5751/ES-10594-230436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preiser R, Biggs R, De Vos A, Folke C. 2018. Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: organizing principles for advancing research methods and approaches. Ecology and Society. 23(4). doi:10.5751/ES-10558-230446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renaud FG, Sudmeier-Rieux K, Estrella M. 2013. The role of ecosystems in disaster risk reduction. United Nations University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reyers B, Folke C, Moore M, Biggs R, Galaz V. 2018. Social-ecological systems insights for navigating the dynamics of the anthropocene. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 43(1):267–289. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085349.
   Google Scholar
• Reyers B, Selomane O. 2018. Social-ecological systems approaches: revealing and navigating the complex trade-offs of sustainable development. In: Schreckenberg K, Mace G, Poudyal M, editors. Ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: trade-offs and governance. London, UK: Routledge; p. 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Rijke J, Herk S, Zevenbergen C, Ashley R. 2012. Room for the river: delivering integrated river basin management in the Netherlands. Vol. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Salmoral G, Yan X. 2018. Food-energy-water nexus: A life cycle analysis on virtual water and embodied energy in food consumption in the Tamar catchment, UK. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 133:320–330. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayles JS, Baggio JA. 2017. Social–ecological network analysis of scale mismatches in estuary watershed restoration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114(10):E1776. doi:10.1073/pnas.1604405114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoeman J, Allan C, Finlayson CM. 2014. A new paradigm for water? A comparative review of integrated, adaptive and ecosystem-based water management in the Anthropocene. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 30(3):377–390. doi:10.1080/07900627.2014.907087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivapalan M, Savenije HHG, Blöschl G. 2012. Socio-hydrology: A new science of people and water. Hydrological Processes. 26(8):1270–1276. doi:10.1002/hyp.8426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellman B, Bausch JC, Eakin H, Anderies JM, Mazari-Hiriart M, Manuel-Navarrete D, Redman CL. 2018. Adaptive pathways and coupled infrastructure: seven centuries of adaptation to water risk and the production of vulnerability in Mexico City. Ecology and Society. 23(1). doi:10.5751/ES-09712-230101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzi S, Torresan S, Schneiderbauer S, Critto A, Zebisch M, Marcomini A. 2019. Multi-risk assessment in mountain regions: A review of modelling approaches for climate change adaptation. Journal of Environmental Management. 232:759–771. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troy TJ, Pavao-Zuckerman M, Evans TP. 2015. Debates—perspectives on socio-hydrology: socio-hydrologic modeling: tradeoffs, hypothesis testing, and validation. Water Resources Research. 51(6):4806–4814. doi:10.1002/2015WR017046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner LB, Tidwell V, Fernald A, Rivera AJ, Rodriguez S, Guldan S, Ochoa C, Hurd B, Boykin K, Cibils A. 2016. Modeling acequia irrigation systems using system dynamics: model development, evaluation, and sensitivity analyses to investigate effects of socio-economic and biophysical feedbacks. Sustainability. 8(10). doi:10.3390/su8101019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. 2017. Revised list of global sustainable development goal indicators. New York:United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• White GF. 1945. Human adjustments to floods. Chicago: Department of Geography, The University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Wicaksono A, Kang D. 2019. Nationwide simulation of water, energy, and food nexus: case study in South Korea and Indonesia. Journal of Hydro-environment Research. 22:70–87. doi:10.1016/j.jher.2018.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilby RL, Vaughan K. 2011. Hallmarks of organisations that are adapting to climate change. Water and Environment Journal. 25:271–281. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.2010.00220.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue J, Gui D, Lei J, Zeng F, Mao D, Zhang Z. 2017. Model development of a participatory Bayesian network for coupling ecosystem services into integrated water resources management. Journal of Hydrology. 554:50–65. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.08.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu DJ, Sangwan N, Sung K, Chen X, Merwade V. 2017. Incorporating institutions and collective action into a sociohydrological model of flood resilience. Water Resources Research. 53(2):1336–1353. doi:10.1002/2016WR019746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Edmunds M, Lora-Wainwright A, Thomas D. 2014. From principles to localized implementation: villagers’ experiences of IWRM in the Shiyang River basin, Northwest China. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 30(3):588–604. doi:10.1080/07900627.2014.917949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Chen X, Li Y, Ding W, Fu G. 2018. Water-energy-food nexus: concepts, questions and methodologies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 195:625–639. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Vesselinov VV. 2017. Integrated modeling approach for optimal management of water, energy and food security nexus. Advances in Water Resources. 101:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.12.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zölch T, Wamsler C, Pauleit S. 2018. Integrating the ecosystem-based approach into municipal climate adaptation strategies: the case of Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production. 170:966–977. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar