Sociocultural vitality versus regulation policy and tourism development in preservation of traditional rural landscape: a case from Guizhou, China

References

• Altman I, Low SM. 1992. Place attachment. Human Behav Environ, 12:2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Andereck KL, Valentine KM, Knopf RC, Vogt CA. 2005. Residents’ perceptions of community tourism impacts. Ann Tourism Res. 32(4):1056–1076. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2005.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anton CE, Lawrence C. 2014. Home is where the heart is: the effect of place of residence on place attachment and community participation. J Environ Psychol. 40:451–461. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antrop M. 2005. Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landsc Urban Plan. 70(1–2):0–34. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batman ZP, Özer P, Ayaz E. 2019. The evaluation of ecology-based tourism potential in coastal villages in accordance with landscape values and user demands: the Bursa-Mudanya-Kumyaka case. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 26(2):166–178. doi:10.1080/13504509.2018.1508525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackie I. 2019. The impact of wildlife hunting prohibition on the rural livelihoods of local communities in Ngamiland and Chobe District Areas, Botswana. Cogent Soc Sci. 5(1):1558716. doi:10.1080/23311886.2018.1558716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobiec A, Podlaski R, Ortyl B, Korol M. 2019. Top-down segregated policies undermine the maintenance of traditional wooded landscapes: evidence from oaks at the European Union’s eastern border. Landsc Urban Plan. 189. 247–259.
   Google Scholar
• Brown GG, Reed P, Harris CC. 2002. Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: an Alaska case study. Appl Geogr. 22(1):49–76. doi:10.1016/S0143-6228(01)00019-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger J. 2000. Landscapes, tourism, and conservation. Sci Total Environ. 249(1–3):0–49. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00509-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare S, Hickey G. 2019. Assessing the potential of community-based forestry programs in Panama. For Policy Econ. 1(104):81–92. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2019.04.004.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen E. 1984. The sociology of tourism: approaches, issues, and findings. Annu Rev Sociol. 10(1):373–392. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.10.080184.002105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doǧan HZ. 1989. Forms of adjustment: sociocultural impacts of tourism. Ann Tourism Res. 16(2):216–236. doi:10.1016/0160-7383(89)90069-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du J, Hua C, Yu Y. 2017. Research on spatial evolution of traditional settlements: the case study of Qianzhong Tunpu. Urban Dev Stud. 24(2):47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Eeman M. 1984. Tourism as ethnic preservation: theCajuns of Louisiana. Ann Tourism Res. 3(11):451–467.
   Google Scholar
• Ge RL. 2014. The production of landscape: tourism development and social changes in a Tunpu Village. Beijing: Peking University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gu X, Li T. 2016. The Italian experience of conservation and rehabilitation for the vernacular dwellings of traditional villages: A case study of regione Piemonte. Urban Plann Int. 31(4):110–115. doi:10.22217/upi.2015.585.
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo MC, Hernández B. 2001. Place attachment: conceptual and empirical questions. J Environ Psychol. 21(3):273–281. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang ZJ2014. The research of analyzing and inheriting of characteristics of traditional education in Tunpu community in the central of Guizhou. Guizhou Ethnic Stud. 28(5):455–460.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS. 1999. Charter on the Built Vernacular Heritage. ICOMOS General Assembly, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Jiao Y. 2002. Civil society in the protection of British historical and cultural heritage. Planners. 05:79–83.
   Google Scholar
• Jones N, Malesios C, Aloupi M, Proikaki M, Tsalis T, Hatziantoniou M, Stasinakis AS. 2019. Exploring the role of local community perceptions in sustainability measurements. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 26(6):471–483. doi:10.1080/13504509.2019.1638330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajembe GC, Luoga EJ, Kijazi MS, Mwaipopo CS. 2003. The role of traditional institutions in the conservation of forest resources in East Usambara, Tanzania. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 10(2):101–107. doi:10.1080/13504500309469789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasemets K, Rammo A, Palang H. 2019. Turning a landscape into a suburban community and the realization of a sense of place. Cities. 88:37–47. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiwango WA, Komakech HC, Tarimo TM, Martz L. 2018. Levels of community participation and satisfaction with decentralized wildlife management in Idodi-Pawaga Wildlife Management Area, Tanzania. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 25(3):238–248. doi:10.1080/13504509.2017.1378750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuai Y. 2016. Research on traditional villages’ protection system in China. Mod Urban Res. 01:2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kyle G, Graefe A, Manning R. 2005. Testing the dimensionality of place attachment in recreational settings. Environ Behav. 37:153–177. doi:10.1177/0013916504269654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle G, Theodori GL, Absher JD, Jun J. 2010. The influence of home and community attachment on firewise behaviour. Soc Nat Resour. 23:1–18. doi:10.1080/08941920902724974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Krishnamurthy S, Roders AP, van Wesemael P. 2020. Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices. Cities. 96. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Wang Q, Ryan C. 2012. The impacts of tourism on traditional villages: A case study of Mt.Qiyun, Anhui Province. Tourism Tribune. 27(4):57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Westlund H, Liu Y. 2019. Why some rural areas decline while some others not: an overview of rural evolution in the world. J Rural Stud. 68:135–143. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Liu Y. 2010. Progress and prospect on the study of rural hollowing in China. Geog Res. 29(1):35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lokocz E, Ryan RL, Sadler AJ. 2010. Motivations for land protection and stewardship: exploring place attachment and rural landscape character in Massachusetts. Landsc Urban Plan. 99(2):65–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long H. 2014. Land consolidation: an indispensable way of spatial restructuring in rural China. J Geog Sci. 24(2):211–225. doi:10.1007/s11442-014-1083-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long H, Liu Y. 2016. Rural restructuring in China. J Rural Stud. 47(47):387–391. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.028.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, Patrick. 2012. Local narrative and outsider imagination in a Chinese landscape: materiality, sense, and agenda. Focaal. 2012(64):69–83. doi:10.3167/fcl.2012.640107.
   Google Scholar
• Matarrita-Cascante D, Sene-Harper A, Ruyle L. 2019. A holistic framework for participatory conservation approaches. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 26(6):484–494. doi:10.1080/13504509.2019.1619105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montana M, Mlambo D. 2019. Environmental awareness and biodiversity conservation among resettled communal farmers in Gwayi Valley conservation Area, Zimbabwe. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 3(26):242–250.
   Google Scholar
• Moscardo G. 1996. Mindful visitors: heritage and tourism. Ann Tourism Res. 23(2):376–397. doi:10.1016/0160-7383(95)00068-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley M. 1997. New directions in rural community development. Built Environ. 23:201–209.
   Google Scholar
• Murat T, Tas N. 2009. A participatory governance pattern for the sustainable development of cumalikizik, a heritage site in turkey. Environ Urban. 1(21):161–184.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy JW. 2014. Community-Based Interventions: philosophy and Action. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nakagawa TR, Nakagawa A. 2020. Floating island as ecological flood alleviation. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 1–11. doi:10.1080/13504509.2020.1740898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oranje M, van Huyssteen E, Maritz J. 2020. Rapid urbanisation to non-metropolitan urban South Africa: A call for Accrediting credible ‘informal’ life-enhancing responses and institutions. Cities. 96. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou TM. 2007. Tunpu remodeling: cultural tourism and social changes in Guizhou Province. Guiyang: Guizhou Nationalities Press; p. 34.
   Google Scholar
• Ray C. 2000. Editorial. the eu leader programme: rural development laboratory. Sociol Ruralis. 40(2):9. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond CM, Brown G, Weber D. 2010. The measurement of place attachment: personal, community, and environmental connections. J Environ Psychol. 30(4):422–434. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao J, Qiu Q, Qian Y, Tang L. 2020. Optimal visual perception in land-use planning and design based on landsenses ecology. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 27(3):233–239. doi:10.1080/13504509.2020.1727990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan LR, Ritchie JRB. 2005. Destination stakeholders exploring identity and salience. Ann Tourism Res. 32(3):711–734. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2004.10.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shucksmith M. 2002. Endogenous development, social capital and social inclusion: perspectives from LEADER in the UK. Sociol Ruralis. 40(2):208–218. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shucksmith M, Brown D, Vergunst J. 2012. Constructing the rural-urban interface: place still matters in a highly mobile society. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sun J. 2010. Impact of tourism on ethnic identity of destination community: A case analysis based on different effects of tourism. J Sun Yat-sen Univ. 50(1):170–177.
   Google Scholar
• Sun Z. 2004. The features of villager society in Tunpu. J Minzu Univ China. 1:49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Sun Z. 2005. Tunpu township society. Beijng: Beijing Social Sciences Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tang W. 2011a. The Characteristics of place attachment of ancient village residents—— a case study of Xidi, Hongcun and Nanping villages, southern Anhui. Human Geog. 26(3):51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Tang W. 2011b. The characteristics of urban residents’ place attachment to recreational block: A case study of Nanjing Confucius temple block. Scientia Geographica Sinica. 31(10):1202–1207.
   Google Scholar
• Tang W, Zhang J, Luo H, Lu S, Yang X. 2008. Relationship between the place attachment of ancient village residents and their attitude towards resource protection- a case study of Xidi, Hongcun and Nanping villages. Tourism Tribune. 10:87–92.
   Google Scholar
• Tarsitano E, Posca C, Giannoccaro RA, Borghi C, Trentadue C, Romanazzi G, Colao M. 2020. A “Park to Live” between environmental education and social inclusion through a landsense ecology approach. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 1–13. doi:10.1080/13504509.2020.1765042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Techera EJ. 2011. Safeguarding cultural heritage: law and policy in Fiji. J Cult Heritage. 12(3):329–334. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2011.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukahirwa JT, Mol APJ, Oosterveer P. 2013. Comparing urban sanitation and solid waste management in East African metropolises: the role of civil society organizations. Cities. 30. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2012.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. 1992. United nations sustainable development, Agenda 21.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
   Google Scholar
• Vaske JJ, CKobrin K. 2001. Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. J Environ Educ. 4(32):16–21. doi:10.1080/00958960109598658.
   Google Scholar
• Wang W, Ding G. 2010. A research on evolution and features of rural development experiments in China. Urban Plann Forum. 2:83–89.
   Google Scholar
• Ward N, Atterton J, Kim TY, Lowe P, Phillipson J, Thompson N. 2005. Universities, the knowledge economy and neo-endogenous rural development. Newcastle: Newcastle University.
   Google Scholar
• Wen J, Wen H. 2013. Research on basic issues of new-type urbanization: A case study of urbanization and rural landscape conservation in South Jiangsu. Mod Urban Res. 6:11–21.
   Google Scholar
• Williams DR, Patterson ME, Roggenbuck JW, Watson AE. 1992. Beyond the commodity metaphor: examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sci. 14(1):29–46. doi:10.1080/01490409209513155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Shen J, Xu L. 2011. The mechanism of the investigation in “the preservation district of historical buildings” in Japan and its inspiration for China. Urban Plann Int. 26(1):77–81.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong Y, Yang L, Wang X, Liu J. 2020. Mediating effect on landscape experience in scenic area: a case study in Gulangyu Island, Xiamen City. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 27(3):276–283. doi:10.1080/13504509.2020.1725919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan R, Zhang L, Yan L, Zhao M. 2020. Analysis on site determination and spatial layout of ancient house, fortress-village, town and city in China based on landsenses ecology: ——a case study of Yu County, Hebei Province, China. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 27(3):284–291. doi:10.1080/13504509.2020.1729273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan Y, Wang C, Quan Y, Wu G, Zhao J. 2018. Urban sustainable development efficiency towards the balance between nature and human well-being: connotation, measurement, and assessment. J Clean Prod. 178:67–75. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X. 2016. The exploration of values in the rural revitalization in Japan: A case study of Noto’s Satoyama and Satoumi. Urban Plann Int. 31(5):115–120. doi:10.22217/upi.2014.217.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y. 2017. Study on legal system of traditional village relics protection. Chongqing: Chongqing University.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Bao J. 2009. Tourism development and rural vicissitudes: the hypothesis of “origin-dynamics”. Tourism Tribune. 24(6):19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Liu X, Dong R, Shao G. 2016. Landsenses ecology and ecological planning toward sustainable development. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 23(4):293–297. doi:10.1080/13504509.2015.1119215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Yan Y, Deng H, Liu G, Dai L, Tang L, Shi L, Shao G. 2020. Remarks about landsenses ecology and ecosystem services. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 27(3):196–201. doi:10.1080/13504509.2020.1718795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong S, Zhang J, Sun J. 2015. The diversified development of historic towns based on the integrated evaluation system of heritage conservation and tourism development in Jiangsu. Geog Res. 34(7):1380–1393.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu W. 2008. Construction and generation: A study of Tunpu culture and geography. Nanning: Guangxi Normal University Press.
   Google Scholar