Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology Volume 28, 2021 - Issue 1: MCDM/A studies for economic development, social cohesion and environmental sustainability
Submit an article Journal homepage
462
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Collaborative decision-making in sustainable mobility: identifying possible consensuses in the multi-actor multi-criteria analysis based on inverse mixed-integer linear optimization

He Huanga Department of Business Technology and Operations, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, BelgiumCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0291-9988
ORCID Icon,
Yves De Smetb Polytechnic school, Université Libre De Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
,
Cathy Macharisa Department of Business Technology and Operations, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, BelgiumORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0702-0496
ORCID Icon &
Nguyen Anh Vu Doanc Chair of Integrated Systems, Technische Universität München, Munich, GermanyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8156-9025
ORCID Icon
Pages 64-74 | Received 06 May 2020, Accepted 07 Jul 2020, Published online: 22 Jul 2020

References

  • Bana E Costa CA. 2001. The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to support the search for less conflicting policy options in a multi-actor context: case study. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal. 10(2):111–125. doi:10.1002/mcda.292.
  • Brans JP, De Smet Y. 2016. PROMETHEE methods. Multiple criteria decision analysis. New York: Springer; p. 187–219.
  • Brans JP, Vincke P, Mareschal B. 1986. How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur J Oper Res. 24(2):228–238.
  • Bulckaen J, Keseru I, Macharis C. 2016. Sustainability versus stakeholder preferences: searching for synergies in urban and regional mobility measures. Res Transp Econ. 55:40–49.
  • CITYLAB. 2018. D6.2 – minutes of local stakeholder meetings. [accessed Jul Wed Jul 15]. http://www.citylab-project.eu/deliverables/D6_2.pdf. 07:34:29 2020.
  • Clmaco J, Craveirinha J. 2005. Multiple criteria decision analysis – state of the art surveys.New York: Springer.
  • Crals E, Keppens M, Macharis C, Ramboer R, Vereeck L, Vleugels I. 2004. Too many questions and too few options. Results of research into tradable mobility rights. Traffic Specialist. 110:15–18.
  • Doan NAV, De Smet Y. 2018. An alternative weight sensitivity analysis for PROMETHEE II rankings. Omega. 80:166–174.
  • Dyer RF, Forman EH. 1992. Group decision support with the analytic hierarchy process. Decis Support Syst. 8(2):99–124.
  • Freeman RE. 2010. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
  • Jelassi T, Kersten G, Zionts S. 1990. An introduction to group decision and negotiation support. In: Costa CAB, editor. Readings in multiple criteria decision aid. Berlin: Springer; p. 537–568.
  • Kannan G, Murugesan P, Senthil P, Noorul Haq A. 2009. Multicriteria group decision making for the third party reverse logistics service provider in the supply chain model using fuzzy topsis for transportation services. Int J Serv Technol Manage. 11(2):162–181.
  • Keshkamat SS, Looijen JM, Zuidgeest MH. 2009. The formulation and evaluation of transport route planning alternatives: a spatial decision support system for the via Baltica project, Poland. J Transport Geogr. 17(1):54–64.
  • Labbouz S, Roy B, Diab Y, Christen M. 2008. Implementing a public transport line: multi-criteria decision-making methods that facilitate concertation. Oper Res. 8(1):5–31.
  • Leyva-Lopez JC, Fernandez-Gonzalez E. 2003. A new method for group decision support based on Electre III methodology. Eur J Oper Res. 148(1):14–27.
  • Macharis C. 2004. The importance of stakeholder analysis in freight transport. Eur Transport Trasporti Europei. 25-26: 114–126.
  • Macharis C, Baudry G. 2018. Decision-making for sustainable transport and mobility: multi actor multi criteria analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Macharis C, Brans JP, Mareschal B. 1998. The GDSS PROMETHEE procedure. J Decis Syst. 7(4):283–307.
  • Macharis C, De Witte A, Turcksin L. 2010. The multi-actor multi-criteria analysis (MAMCA) application in the flemish long-term decision making process on mobility and logistics. Transport Policy. 17(5):303–311.
  • Macharis C, Turcksin L, Lebeau K. 2012. Multi actor multi criteria analysis (MAMCA) as a tool to support sustainable decisions: state of use. Decis Support Syst. 54(1):610–620.
  • Macharis C, Verbeke A, De Brucker K. 2004. The strategic evaluation of new technologies through multicriteria analysis: the advisors case. Res Transp Econ. 8:443–462.
  • Mareschal B. 1988. Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid. Eur J Oper Res. 33(1):54–64.
  • Mousseau V, Roy B, Sommerlatt I 2001. Development of a decision aiding tool for the evolution of public transport ticket pricing in the Paris region. A-MCD-A aide multicritère à la décision—multiple criteria decision aiding: 213–230.
  • Nijkamp P, Rietveld P, Voogd H. 2013. Multicriteria evaluation in physical planning.  North Holland: Elsevier.
  • Pareto V. 1964. Cours d’économie politique. Vol. 1. Geneva: Librairie Droz.
  • Purvis B, Mao Y, Robinson D. 2019. Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Sci. 14(3):681–695.
  • Sun H, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Li L, Sheng Y. 2015. A social stakeholder support assessment of low-carbon transport policy based on multi-actor multi-criteria analysis: the case of Tianjin. Transport Policy. 41:103–116.
  • Vermote L, Macharis C, Hollevoet J, Putman K. 2014. Participatory evaluation of regional light rail scenarios: a flemish case on sustainable mobility and land-use. Environ Sci Policy. 37:101–120.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.