A multiple criteria approach to map ecological-inclusive business models for sustainable development

References

• African Development Bank Group. 2019. Central africa regional integration strategy paper. Accessed Jun 2020. https://www.afdb.org/en/documents/central-africa-regional-integration-strategy-paper-2019-2025
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal N, Chakrabarti R, Brem A, Bocken N. 2018. Market driving at bottom of the pyramid (BoP): an analysis of social enterprises from the healthcare sector. J Bus Res. 86:234–244. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson J, Billou N. 2007. Serving the world’s poor: innovation at the base of the economic pyramid. J Bus Strategy. 28(2):14–21. doi:10.1108/02756660710732611.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Dorado S. 2010. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: the case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad Manag J. 53(6):1419–1440. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.57318391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belacel N. 2000. Multicriteria assignment method PROAFTN: methodology and medical application. Eur J Oper Res. 125(1):175–183. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00192-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisdorff R. 2002. Electre-like clustering from a pairwise fuzzy proximity index. Eur J Oper Res. 138(2):320–331. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00249-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitzer V, Hamann R, Hall M, Griffin-EL EW. 2015. The business of social and environmental innovation. In: Bus soc environ innov new front Africa. Swtizerland: Springer International Publishing; p. 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bocken NMP, Short SW, Rana P, Evans S. 2014. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. J Clean Prod. 65:42–56. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boons F, Lüdeke-Freund F. 2013. Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. J Clean Prod. 45:9–19. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouyssou D. 1990. Building criteria: a prerequisite for MCDA. In: Bana e Costa CA, editor. Readings mult criteria decis aid. Heidelberg: Springer; p. 58–80.
   Google Scholar
• Brueckner M, Paulin S, Davis J, Chatterjee S. 2010. A case for social enterprise: at the bottom of the top of the pyramid. Int J Environ Cult Econ Soc Sustain. 6(2):149–166.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H, Ahern S, Finn M, Guerraz S. 2006. Business models for technology in the developing world: the role of non-governmental organizations. Calif Manage Rev. 48(3):48–61. doi:10.2307/41166349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corazza L, Cisi M, Bruschi F. 2019. Ecological-Inclusive Business Models for Sustainable Development a Case Study on Agro-Food Hybrid Organisations in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: 4th Int Conf New Bus Model New Bus Model Sustain Entrep Innov Transform. Berlin: ESCP Europe; p. 209–238.
   Google Scholar
• Cornforth C. 2014. Understanding and combating mission drift in social enterprises. Soc Enterp J. 10(1):3–20. doi:10.1108/SEJ-09-2013-0036.
   Google Scholar
• Costa AS, Figueira JR, Borbinha J. 2018. A multiple criteria nominal classification method based on the concepts of similarity and dissimilarity. Eur J Oper Res. 271(1):193–209. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.05.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahan NM, Doh JP, Oetzel J, Yaziji M. 2010. Corporate-NGO collaboration: co-creating new business models for developing markets. Long Range Plann. 43(2–3):326–342. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smet Y, Eppe S. 2009. Multicriteria relational clustering: the case of binary outranking matrices. In: Ehrgottm M, Fonseca C, Gandibleux X, Hao J-K, Sevaux M, editors. Int conf evol multi-criterion optim (EMO 2009). Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer; p. 380–392.
   Google Scholar
• De Smet Y, Montano-Guzmán L. 2004. Towards multicriteria clustering: an extension of the k-means algorithm. Eur J Oper Res. 158(2):390–398. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2003.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dembek K, Sivasubramaniam N, Chmielewski DA. 2019. A systematic review of the bottom/base of the pyramid literature: cumulative evidence and future directions. J Bus Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04105-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Correa JE, López-Navarro MA. 2018. Managing sustainable hybrid organisations: A case study in the agricultural sector. Sustainability. 10(9):3010. doi:10.3390/su10093010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke D. 2016. Why don’t BOP ventures solve the environmental problems they initially set out to address? Organ Environ. 29(4):508–528. doi:10.1177/1086026616633271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim A, Battilana J, Mair J. 2014. The governance of social enterprises: mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Res Organ Behav. 34:81–100. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2014.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkington J. 1997. Cannibals with Forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford (UK): Capstone Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, Pölkki T, Utriainen K, Kyngäs H. 2014. Qualitative content analysis: a focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open. 4(1):1. doi:10.1177/2158244014522633.
   Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H. 2008. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 62(1):107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans S, Vladimirova D, Holgado M, Van Fossen K, Yang M, Silva EA, Barlow CY. 2017. Business model innovation for sustainability: towards a unified perspective for creation of sustainable business models. Bus Strateg Environ. 26(5):597–608. doi:10.1002/bse.1939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filardi F, Barros FD, Fischmann AA. 2018. Business strategies for the bottom of the pyramid: multiple case studies of large companies in the pacified communities of Rio de Janeiro. RAUSP Manag J. 53(1):63–73. doi:10.1016/j.rauspm.2017.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebauer H, Haldimann M, Saul CJ. 2017. Business model innovations for overcoming barriers in the base-of-the-pyramid market. Ind Innov. 24(5):543–568. doi:10.1080/13662716.2017.1310033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geissdoerfer M, Bocken NMP, Hultink EJ. 2016. Design thinking to enhance the sustainable business modelling process–A workshop based on a value mapping process. J Clean Prod. 135:1218–1232. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geissdoerfer M, Vladimirova D, Evans S. 2018. Sustainable business model innovation: a review. J Clean Prod. 198:401–416. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genard J-L, Pirlot M. 2002. Multi-criteria decision-aid in a philosophical perspective. In: Boyssou D, Jacquet-Lagrèze E, Perny P, Slowinski R, Vanderpooten DVP, editors. Aiding decision with multi criteria essays honour bernard roy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; p. 89–117.
   Google Scholar
• Goyal S, Sergi BS, Kapoor A. 2014. Significant understanding the key characteristics of an embedded business model for the base of the pyramid markets. ECONOMICS & Sociology. 7(4):26. doi:10.14254/2071-789X.2014/7-4/2.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn R. 2012. Inclusive business, human rights and the dignity of the poor: a glance beyond economic impacts of adapted business models. Bus Ethics A Eur Rev. 21(1):47–63. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2011.01640.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh N, Hoffman AJ. 2011. Hybrid organizations: the next chapter in sustainable business. Organ Dyn. 41(2):126–134. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh N, Walker J, Bacq S, Kickul J. 2015. Hybrid organizations: origins, strategies, impacts, and implications. Calif Manage Rev. 57(3):5–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart S, Sharma S, Halme M. 2016. Poverty, business strategy, and sustainable development. Organ Environ. 29(4):401–415. doi:10.1177/1086026616677170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockerts K. 2015. How hybrid organizations turn antagonistic assets into complementarities. Calif Manage Rev. 57(3):83–106. doi:10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt D, Littlewood D. 2015. Identifying, mapping, and monitoring the impact of hybrid firms. Calif Manage Rev. 57(3):107–125. doi:10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell R, van Beers C, Doorn N. 2018. Value capture and value creation: the role of information technology in business models for frugal innovations in Africa. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 131:227–239. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourula A, Pisani N, Kolk A. 2017. Corporate sustainability and inclusive development: highlights from international business and management research. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 24:14–18. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair J, Schoen O. 2007. Successful social entrepreneurial business models in the context of developing economies: an explorative study. Int J Emerg Mark. 2(1):54–68. doi:10.1108/17468800710718895.
   Google Scholar
• Martí I. 2018. Transformational business models, grand challenges, and social impact. J Bus Ethics. 152(4):965–976. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3824-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morioka SN, Bolis I, Evans S, Carvalho MM. 2018. Transforming sustainability challenges into competitive advantage: multiple case studies kaleidoscope converging into sustainable business models. J Clean Prod. 167:723–738. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Griggs D, Visbeck M. 2016. Policy: map the interactions between sustainable development goals. Nature. 534(7607):320–323. doi:10.1038/534320a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norese MF. 2016. Decision aid in public administration: from evidence-based decision making to organizational learning. In: Zopounidis C, Doumpos M, editors. Mult criteria decis mak appl manage eng. Swtizerland: Springer International Publishing; p. 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Norese MF, Barbiero F, Corazza L, Sacco L. 2019. The monitoring of social innovation projects: an integrated approach. In: Doumpos M, Figueira JR, Greco S, Zopounidis C, editors. New perspect mult criteria decis mak. Cham: Springer International Publishing; p. 331–355.
   Google Scholar
• Norese MF, Meles P, Mollea G. 2001. From a data base to a reference for workplace accident prevention. In: Koksalan M, Zionts S, editors. Mult criteria decis mak new millenn lect notes econ math syst. Vol. 507. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; p. 447–457.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen M, Boxenbaum E. 2009. Bottom-of-the-pyramid: organizational barriers to implementation. Calif Manage Rev. 51(4):100–125. doi:10.2307/41166507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y. 2010. Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Pache AC, Santos F. 2013. Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Acad Manag J. 56(4):972–1001. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansera M, Owen R. 2015. Framing resource-constrained innovation at the ‘bottom of the pyramid’: insights from an ethnographic case study in rural Bangladesh. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 92:300–311. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perny P. 1998. Multicriteria filtering methods based onconcordance and non-discordance principles. Ann Oper Res. 80:137–165. doi:10.1023/A:1018907729570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitta D, Guesalaga R, Marshall P. 2008. The quest for the fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: potential and challenges. J Consum Mark. 25(7):393–401. doi:10.1108/07363760810915608.
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad CK. 2012. Bottom of the pyramid as a source of breakthrough innovations. J Prod Innov Manag. 29(1):6–12. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00874.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramus T, Vaccaro A. 2017. Stakeholders matter: how social enterprises address mission drift. J Bus Ethics. 143(2):307–322. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2353-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reficco E, Márquez P. 2012. Inclusive networks for building BOP markets. Bus Soc. 51(3):512–556. doi:10.1177/0007650309332353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritala P, Huotari P, Bocken N, Albareda L, Puumalainen K. 2018. Sustainable business model adoption among S&P 500 firms: a longitudinal content analysis study. J Clean Prod. 170:216–226. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha C, Dias LC, Dimas I. 2013. Multicriteria classification with unknown categories: a clustering–sorting approach and an application to conflict management. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal. 20(1–2):13–27. doi:10.1002/mcda.1476.
   Google Scholar
• Rosca E, Arnold M, Bendul JC. 2017. Business models for sustainable innovation–an empirical analysis of frugal products and services. J Clean Prod. 162:S133–S145. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy B. 1990. The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. In: Bana E Costa CA, editor. Readings mult criteria decision aid. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; p. 155–184.
   Google Scholar
• Roy B. 1993. Decision science or decision-aid science? Eur J Oper Res. 66(2):184–203. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(93)90312-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy B. 1996. Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Roy B, Bertier P. 1973. La mèthode ELECTRE II - une application au media-planning. In: Ross M, editor. OR’72. Amsterdam: North Holland; p. 291–302.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier V, Medah I, Augsdorfer P, Maduekwe A. 2017. Social business model design and implementation in developing countries: learning from an affordable medicine developed in Burkina Faso. J Manag Dev. 36(1):48–57. doi:10.1108/JMD-03-2015-0041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez P, Ricart JE. 2010. Business model innovation and sources of value creation in low‐income markets. Eur Manag Rev. 7(3):138–154. doi:10.1057/emr.2010.16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaltegger S, Lüdeke-Freund F, Hansen EG. 2012. Business cases for sustainability: the role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. Int J Innov Sustain Dev. 6(2):95–119. doi:10.1504/IJISD.2012.046944.
   Google Scholar
• Schaltegger S, Lüdeke-Freund F, Hansen EG. 2016a. Business models for sustainability: a co-evolutionary analysis of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and transformation. Organ Environ. 29(1):264–289. doi:10.1177/1086026616633272.
   Google Scholar
• Schaltegger S, Hansen EG, Lüdeke-Freund F. 2016b. Business models for sustainability: origins, present research, and future avenues. Organ Environ. 29(1):3–10. doi:10.1177/1086026615599806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seelos C, Mair J. 2007. Profitable business models and market creation in the context of deep poverty: a strategic view. Acad Manag Perspect. 21(4):49–63. doi:10.5465/amp.2007.27895339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN‐DESA. 2017. The sustainable development goals report. United Nation Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Upward A, Jones P. 2016. An ontology for strongly sustainable business models: defining an enterprise framework compatible with natural and social science. Organ Environ. 29(1):97–123. doi:10.1177/1086026615592933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincke P. 1999. Robust solutions and methods in decision‐aid. J Multi-criteria Decis Anal. 8(3):181–187. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199905)8:3<181::AID-MCDA242>3.0.CO;2-P.
   Google Scholar
• Winterhalter S, Zeschky MB, Neumann L, Gassmann O. 2017. Business models for frugal innovation in emerging markets: the case of the medical device and laboratory equipment industry. Technovation. 66:3–13. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2017.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar