Impact of sustainability-focused learning intervention on teachers’ agency to teach for sustainable development

References

• A C M, Creech H, Swayze N, P M K, Buckler C, Rempel K. 2012. Measuring knowledge, attitudes and behaviours concerning sustainable development among tenth grade students in Manitoba. Soc Indic Res. 106(2):213–238. doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9809-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APA. 2010. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Appelbaum M, Harris C, Rex K, Evan MW, Arthur N, Stephen R. 2018. Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: the APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist. 73(1):3. doi:10.1037/amp0000191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. 2001. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Ann Rev Psychol. 52(1):1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth M. 2015. Implementing Sustainability in Higher Education: learning in an Age of Transformation, Routledge Studies in Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biasutti M, Frate S. 2017. A validity and reliability study of the attitudes toward sustainable development scale. Environmental Education Research. 23(2):214–230. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1146660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta G, Priestley M, Robinson S. 2015. The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching. 21(6):624–640. doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta G, Tedder M. 2007. Agency and learning in the lifecourse: towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults. 39(2):132–149. doi:10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545.
   Google Scholar
• Bodzin AM. 2008. Integrating instructional technologies in a local watershed investigation with urban elementary learners. J Environ Educ. 39(2):47–58. doi:10.3200/JOEE.39.2.47-58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt JO, Bürgener L, Barth M, Redman A. 2019. Becoming a competent teacher in education for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 20(4):630–653. doi:10.1108/IJSHE-10-2018-0183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown AL. 1992. Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2(2):141–178. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2.
   Google Scholar
• Buckler C, Creech H 2014. Shaping the future we want: UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development; final report. UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Bürgener L, Barth M. 2018. Sustainability competencies in teacher education: making teacher education count in everyday school practice. J Clean Prod. 174:821–826. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong IP‐A. 2005. Educating pre‐service teachers for a sustainable environment. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. 33(1):97–110. doi:10.1080/1359866052000341151.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 20(1):37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Collins A. 1992. Toward a design science of education. In: Scanlon E, O'Shea T, editors. New directions in educational technology. Berlin: Springer; p. 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Commission B. 1998. Re-inventing undergraduate education: A Blueprint for America’s Research Universities (Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University). New York: Stony Brook, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Undergraduate Research. 2005. Retrieved 2016 Jan 2, from Council on Undergraduate Research: http://www.cur.org/
   Google Scholar
• Cutter-Mackenzie A, Tilbury D. 2002. Meeting Commitments for a Sustainable Future: Environmental Education in PreService Teacher Education. In: Knight BA, editor. Reconceptualising Learning in the Knowledge Society. Flaxton: Post Pressed; p. 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz T, Rosa EA. 2002. Human dimensions of global environmental change. In: Dunlap R,  Michelson W, editors. Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Westport, CT: Greenwood; p. 370–406.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M, Mische A. 1998. What is agency? American Journal of Sociology. 103(4):962–1023. doi:10.1086/231294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans N. 2019. Teacher Education and Education for Sustainability. In: Ferreira J-A, Evans N, Davis JM, Stevenson R, editors. In learning to embed sustainability in teacher education. Singapore: Springer; p. 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira JA, Ryan L, Tilbury D. 2007. Mainstreaming education for sustainable development in initial teacher education in Australia: a review of existing professional development models. Journal of Education for Teaching 33. 2(2):225–239. doi:10.1080/02607470701259515.
   Google Scholar
• Fien J, Maclean R. 2000. Teacher education for sustainability. In: Wheeler KA, Bijur AP, editors. Education for a sustainable future. Boston: Springer; p. 91–111.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens A. 1991. Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey M, Jenkins A. 2009. Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Hung HT. 2011. Design‐based research: designing a multimedia environment to support language learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 48(2):159–169. doi:10.1080/14703297.2011.564011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inden R. 1990. Imagining India. Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jo-Anne. F. 2019. The Embedding Change Model. In: Ferreira J, Evans N, Davis JM, Stevenson R, editors. Learning to Embed Sustainability in Teacher Education. Singapore: Springer; p. 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kalsoom Q, Khanam A. 2017. Inquiry into sustainability issues by preservice teachers: A pedagogy to enhance sustainability consciousness. J Clean Prod. 164:1301–1311. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalsoom Q, Khanam A, Quraishi U. 2017. Sustainability consciousness of pre-service teachers in Pakistan. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 8(7):1090–1107. doi:10.1108/IJSHE-11-2016-0218.
   Google Scholar
• Karpudewan M, Ismail Z, Roth WM. 2012. Ensuring sustainability of tomorrow through green chemistry integrated with sustainable development concepts (SDCs). Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 13(2):120–127. doi:10.1039/C1RP90066H.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennelly J, Taylor N. 2007. Education for sustainability for the K-6 curriculum: A unit of work for pre-service primary teachers in NSW. Australian Journal of Environmental Education. 23(3–12):3–12. doi:10.1017/S0814062600000665.
   Google Scholar
• Kennelly J, Taylor N, Maxwell T. 2008. A student teacher’s personal pathway to education for sustainability. Australian Journal of Environmental Education. 24:23–33. doi:10.1017/S0814062600000550.
   Google Scholar
• Kibria AS, Behie A, Costanza R, Groves C, Farrell T. 2020. Potentials of community-based-ecotourism to improve human wellbeing in Cambodia: an application of millennium ecosystem assessment framework. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 1–12. doi:10.1080/13504509.2020.1855606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasky S. 2005. A sociological approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education. 21(8):899–916. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeman Y, Wardekker W. 2014. Teacher research and the aims of education. Teachers and Teaching. 20(1):45–58. doi:10.1080/13540602.2013.848516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotz-Sisitka H, Fien J, Ketlhoilwe M. 2013. Traditions and new niches; An overview of environmental education curriculum and learning research. In: Stevenson R, Brody M, Dillon J, Wals A, editors. International handbook of research on environmental education. New York: Routledge; p. 194–205.
   Google Scholar
• McKeown R. 2002. Education for sustainable development toolkit. http://www.esdtoolkit.org..
   Google Scholar
• Merritt E, Hale A, Archambault L. 2019. Changes in pre-service teachers’ values, sense of agency, motivation and consumption practices: A case study of an education for sustainability course. Sustainability. 11(1):155. doi:10.3390/su11010155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles R, Harrison L, Cutter-Mackenzie A. 2006. Teacher education: A diluted environmental education experience. Australian Journal of Environmental Education. 22(1):49–59. doi:10.1017/S0814062600001658.
   Google Scholar
• Miller H. 2016. Undergraduates in a sustainability semester: models of social change for sustainability. J Environ Educ. 47(1):52–67. doi:10.1080/00958964.2015.1072703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolet V. 2013. Teacher education and ESD in the United States: the vision, challenges, and implementation. In: McKeown R, Nolet V, editors. Schooling for sustainable development in Canada and the United States. Dordrecht (The Netherlands): Springer; p. 53–67.
   Google Scholar
• Orr D. 1992. Ecological literacy: education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paige K, Lloyd D, Chartres M. 2008. Moving towards transdisciplinarity: an ecological sustainable focus for science and mathematics pre‐service education in the primary/middle years. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. 36(1):19–33. doi:10.1080/13598660701793350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park HM 2009. Comparing group means: t-tests and one-way ANOVA using Stata, SAS, R, and SPSS. Accesed on March 3, 2020. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2022/19735/T-tests_and_One-way_ANOVA_Using%20Stata_SAS_R_SPSS.pdf;sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Plonsky L, Oswald FL. 2014. How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Lang Learn. 64(4):878–912. doi:10.1111/lang.12079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley M, Edwards R, Priestley A, Miller K. 2012. Teacher agency in curriculum making: agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry. 42(2):191–214. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter BW, De Sousa LO. 2019. The implementation of environmental education to promote sustainability: an overview of the processes and challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 26(8):721–731. doi:10.1080/13504509.2019.1672220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robottom I. 2012. Socio-scientific issues in education: innovative practices and contending epistemologies. Research in Science Education. 42(1):95–107. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9258-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulla K, Filho WL, Lardjane S, Sommer JH, Borgemeister C. 2020. Sustainable development education in the context of the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 27(1–11):458–468. doi:10.1080/13504509.2020.1721378.
   Google Scholar
• Sim J, Wright CC. 2005. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 85(3):257–268. doi:10.1093/ptj/85.3.257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon Rampasso I, Luiz Gonçalves QO, Anholon R, Silva LE, Ávil TP, Matsutani L, Yparraguirre, ITR. 2020. Preparing future professionals to act towards sustainable development: an analysis of undergraduate students’ motivations towards voluntary activities. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology:1–9. doi:10.1080/13504509.2020.1804478
   Google Scholar
• Sterling S. 2011. Transformative learning and sustainability: sketching the conceptual ground. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. 5(11):17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Svanström M, Lozano‐García FJ, Rowe D. 2008. Learning outcomes for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 9(3):339–351. doi:10.1108/14676370810885925.
   Google Scholar
• Tedesco JC, Opertti R, Amadio M. 2014. The curriculum debate: why it is important today. Prospects. 44(4):527–546. doi:10.1007/s11125-014-9326-x.
   Google Scholar
• Temel S. 2014. The effects of problem-based learning on pre-service teachers’ critical thinking dispositions and perceptions of problem-solving ability. South African Journal of Education. 34(1):1. doi:10.15700/201412120936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilbury D. 2011. Education for sustainable development: an expert review of processes and learning. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Tomas L, Girgenti S, Jackson C. 2017. Pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward education for sustainability and its relevance to their learning: implications for pedagogical practice. Environmental Education Research. 23(3):324–347. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1109065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNECE. 2011. Learning for the Future. Competences in Education for Sustainable Development. Available online. Geneva (Switzerland): UNECE. https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/esd/ESD_Publications/Competences_Publication.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2005. Guidelines and recommendations for reorienting teacher education to address sustainability. Education for Sustainable Development in Action Technical Paper.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2019. Framework for the Implementation of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) beyond 2019. Paris:France.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhulst J, Beling AE. 2014. Buenvivir: emergent discourse within or beyond sustainable development? Ecological Economics. 101:54–63. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vare P, Arro G, De Hamer A, Del Gobbo G, De Vries G, Farioli F, Nijdam C, Kangur M, Mayer M, Millican R. 2019. Devising a competence-based training program for educators of sustainable development: lessons learned. Sustainability. 11(7):1890. doi:10.3390/su11071890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vare P, Scott W. 2007. Learning for a change: exploring the relationship between education and sustainable development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development. 1(2):191–198. doi:10.1177/097340820700100209.
   Google Scholar
• Weitze CL. 2017. Designing pedagogical innovation for collaborating teacher teams. Journal of Education for Teaching. 43(3):361–373. doi:10.1080/02607476.2017.1319511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu M, Fralick D, Zheng JZ, Wang B, Tu XM, Feng C. 2017. The differences and similarities between two-sample t-test and paired t-test. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry. 29(3):184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang H, Clarke M. 2018. Spaces of agency within contextual constraints: a case study of teacher’s response to EFL reform in a Chinese university. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. 38(2):187–201. doi:10.1080/02188791.2018.1460252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar