Landsenses ecology approach for comprehensive assessment of cultural ecosystem services: preferences of students at Ankara University of Turkey

References

• Aaron RF, Witt PA. 2011. Urban students’ definitions and perceptions of nature. Child Youth Environ. 21(2):145–167.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson E, Tengö M, McPhearson T, Kremer P. 2015. Cultural ecosystem services as a gateway for improving urban sustainability. Ecosyst Serv. 12:165–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batuman B. 2013. Political encampment and the architecture of public space: TEKEL resistance in Ankara. Int J Islamic Archit. 2(1):77–100.
   Google Scholar
• Bieling C. 2014. Cultural ecosystem services as revealed through short stories from residents of the Swabian Alb (Germany). Ecosyst Serv. 8:207–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgmanis G. 2011. The adolescents’ use of city center in post-socialist city: the case of Riga. Hum Resour. 5:56–68.
   Google Scholar
• Cabana D, Ryfield F, Crowe TP, Brannigan J. 2020. Evaluating and communicating cultural ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv. 42:101085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai F, Lee C, Zhang X. 2001. GIS-based geo-environmental evaluation for urban land-use planning: a case study. Eng Geol. 61(4):257–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson DC, Hobbs RJ. 2017. Cultural ecosystem services: characteristics, challenges and lessons for urban green space research. Ecosyst Serv. 25:179–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEA. 2021. EEA. European Environment Agency [Internet]. [accessed 2021 Feb 6]. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/urban-atlas
   Google Scholar
• Emmons KM. 1997. Perceptions of the environment while exploring the outdoors: a case study in Belize. Environ Educ Res. 3(3):327–344.
   Google Scholar
• ESRI. 2021. How kernel density works—help | arcGIS for desktop [Internet]. [accessed 2021 Feb 7]. https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/tools/spatial-analyst-toolbox/how-kernel-density-works.htm#GUID-3BCBF5CA-CAC7-4547-A3CF-B5E30FDE584E
   Google Scholar
• Havinga I, Bogaart PW, Hein L, Tuia D. 2020. Defining and spatially modelling cultural ecosystem services using crowdsourced data. Ecosyst Serv. 43:101091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Morcillo M, Plieninger T, Bieling C. 2013. An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators. Ecol Indic. 29:434–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaymaz I, Müftüoğlu V 2016. Ankara: kayıp Başkent (Ankara: the Lost Capital). In: Proceedings of 4th International Congress on Urban and Environmental Issues and Policies. İstanbul; p. 57–70.
   Google Scholar
• Ko H, Son Y. 2018. Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services in urban green spaces: a case study in Gwacheon, Republic of Korea. Ecol Indic. 91:299–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEA. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being. Synthesis.
   Google Scholar
• Önder HG 2019. Mimarlık Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Gözünden Kent Merkezi Kullanımında Mesleki Algının Ve Memnuniyetin Ölçülmesi. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi.:298–313.
   Google Scholar
• Pauleit S, Duhme F. 2000. Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning. Landsc Urban Plan. 52(1):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauleit S, Ennos R, Golding Y. 2005. Modeling the environmental impacts of urban land use and land cover change—a study in Merseyside, UK. Landsc Urban Plan. 71(2–4):295–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plieninger T, Dijks S, Oteros-Rozas E, Bieling C. 2013. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy. 33:118–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rall E, Bieling C, Zytynska S, Haase D. 2017. Exploring city-wide patterns of cultural ecosystem service perceptions and use. Ecol Indic. 77:80–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid WV, Mooney HA, Cropper A, Capistrano D, Carpenter SR, Chopra K, Dasgupta P, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Hassan R. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being-synthesis: a report of the millennium ecosystem assessment. Island Press. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Reyers B, Biggs R, Cumming GS, Elmqvist T, Hejnowicz AP, Polasky S. 2013. Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social–ecological approach. Front Ecol Environ. 11(5):268–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridding LE, Redhead JW, Oliver TH, Schmucki R, McGinlay J, Graves AR, Morris J, Bradbury RB, King H, Bullock JM. 2018. The importance of landscape characteristics for the delivery of cultural ecosystem services. J Environ Manage. 206:1145–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riechers M, Barkmann J, Tscharntke T. 2018. Diverging perceptions by social groups on cultural ecosystem services provided by urban green. Landsc Urban Plan. 175:161–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riechers M, Strack M, Barkmann J, Tscharntke T. 2019. Cultural ecosystem services provided by urban green change along an urban-periurban gradient. Sustainability. 11(3):645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogan J, Chen D. 2004. Remote sensing technology for mapping and monitoring land-cover and land-use change. Prog Plann. 61(4):301–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman BW. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall. London.
   Google Scholar
• Tekindal M. 2017. The position of the youth in political participation. Sosyal Politika Çalismalari Dergisi. 39: 119–140. (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• THEC. 2021. Council of Higher Education of Turkey Statistics Database [Internet]. [accessed 2021 Apr 13]. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/
   Google Scholar
• Thorns DC. 2002. The transformation of cities: urban theory and urban life. Houndmills (Balsingstoke, Hampshire; New York): Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Tin T, Fleming ZL, Hughes KA, Ainley D, Convey P, Moreno C, Pfeiffer S, Scott J, Snape I. 2009. Impacts of local human activities on the Antarctic environment. Antarct Sci. 21(1):3–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TSI. 2021. Turkish Statistical Institute Population and Demographics Data [Internet]. [accessed 2021 Apr 13]. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=nufus-ve-demografi-109&dil=1
   Google Scholar
• Tuncer G. 2008. University students’ perception on sustainable development: a case study from Turkey. Int Res Geog Environ Educ. 17(3):212–226.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Liu X, Dong R, Shao G. 2016. Landsenses ecology and ecological planning toward sustainable development.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Yan Y, Deng H, Liu G, Dai L, Tang L, Shi L, Shao G. 2020. Remarks about landsenses ecology and ecosystem services. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 27(3):196–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoderer BM, Tasser E, Erb K-H, Stanghellini PSL, Tappeiner U. 2016. Identifying and mapping the tourists perception of cultural ecosystem services: a case study from an alpine region. Land Use Policy. 56:251–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar