How much is an urban stream worth? Using land senses and economic assessment of an urban stream restoration

References

• Alam K. 2008. Cost–benefit analysis of restoring Buriganga river, Bangladesh. Water Resour Dev. 24(4):593–607. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620802224486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelopoulos NV, Cowx IG, Buijse AD. 2017. Integrated planning framework for successful river restoration projects: upscaling lessons learnt from European case studies. Environ Sci Policy. 76:12–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyrou A, Hummels H. 2019. Legal personality and economic livelihood of the Whanganui river: a call for community entrepreneurship. Water Int. 44(6–7):752–768. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2019.1643525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PP, Leamer EE, Radner R, Schuman H. 1993. Report of the national oceanic and atmospheric administration panelon contingent valuation. Fed Register. 58:4602–4614.
   Google Scholar
• Arthington ÁH, Naiman RJ, Mcclain ME, Nilsson C. 2010. Preserving the biodiversity and ecological services of rivers: new challenges and research opportunities. Freshw Biol. 55(1):1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02340.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak B, Katz D. 2015. Valuing instream and riparian aspects of stream restoration–A willingness to tax approach. Land Use Policy. 45:204–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman IJ 2011. Economic values from ecosystems UK national ecosystem assessment: Understanding nature’s value to society (technical report). Cambridge: United Nations Environment Program World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC). p. 1067–1152.
   Google Scholar
• Becker N. 2019. How much is the designation of a new biosphere reserve worth? Landsenses ecology valuation evidence from Israel. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 27(3): 224–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker N, Friedler E. 2013. Integrated hydro-economic assessment of restoration of the Alexander-Zeimar river (Israel-Palestinian authority). Reg Environ Change. 13(1):103–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-012-0318-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker N, Greenfeld A, Zemah Shamir S. 2018. Cost–benefit analysis of full and partial river restoration: the Kishon river in Israel. Int J Water Resour Dev. 35(5): 871–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker N, Helgeson J, Katz D. 2014. Once there was a river: a benefit–cost analysis of rehabilitation of the Jordan River. Reg Environ Change. 14(4):1303–1314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0578-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom JC, Loomis JB. 2017. Economic valuation of river restoration: an analysis of the valuation literature and its uses in decision-making. Water Resour Econ. 17:9–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2016.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boatman N, Willis K, Garrod G, Powe N 2010. Estimating the wildlife and landscape benefits of environmental stewardship. Report to The food and environment research agency (FERA).
   Google Scholar
• Boon PJ, Calow P, Petts GE. 1992. Essential elements in the case for river conservation. In: Unknown host publication title. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Braat LC, De Groot R. 2012. The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosyst Serv. 1(1):4–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauman KA, Van Der Meulen S, Brils J. 2014. Ecosystem services and river basin management. In: Brils, J., Brack, W., Müller-Grabherr, D., Négrel, P., Vermaat, J.E. (Eds.). Risk-informed management of European river basins. Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer; p. 265–294.
   Google Scholar
• Carson R. 2012. Contingent valuation: a comprehensive bibliography and history. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Carson RT, Mitchell RC. 1993. The value of clean water: the public’s willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable quality water. Water Resour Res. 29(7):2445–2454. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR00495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen A, Abramson A, Becker N, Megdal SB. 2015. A tale of two rivers: pathways for improving water management in the Jordan and Colorado River basins. J Arid Environ. 112:109–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.05.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins AR, Rosenberger RS. 2007. Protest adjustments in the valuation of watershed restoration using payment card data. Agr Resour Econ Rev. 36(2):321–335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500007127.
   Google Scholar
• Daily GC. 2000. Management objectives for the protection of ecosystem services. Environ Sci Policy. 3(6):333–339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(00)00102-7.
   Google Scholar
• Dallimer M, Davies Z, Irvine K, Maltby L, Warren P, Gaston K, Armsworth P. 2014. What personal and environmental factors determine frequency of urban greenspace use? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 11(8):7977–7992. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110807977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas AJ, Taylor JG. 1999. The economic value of Trinity river water. Water Resour Dev. 15(3):309–322. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07900629948835.
   Google Scholar
• Everard M, Moggridge HL. 2012. Rediscovering the value of urban rivers. Urban Ecosyst. 15(2):293–314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0174-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia X, Corominas L, Pargament D, Acuña V. 2016. Is river rehabilitation economically viable in water-scarce basins? Environ Sci Policy. 61:154–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia X, Pargament D. 2015. Rehabilitating rivers and enhancing ecosystem services in awater-scarcity context: the Yarqon river. Int J Water Resour Dev. 31(1):73–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2014.911147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould RK, Klain SC, Ardoin NM, Satterfield T, Woodside U, Hannahs N, … Chan KM. 2015. A protocol for eliciting nonmaterial values through a cultural ecosystem services frame. Conserv Biol. 29(2):575–586. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimarães MH, Sousa C, Garcia T, Dentinho T, Boski T. 2011. The value of improved water quality in Guadiana estuary—a transborder application of contingent valuation methodology. Lett Spatial Resour Sci. 4(1):31–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-011-0052-1.
   Google Scholar
• Haab TC, McConnell KE. 2002. Valuing environmental and natural resources: the econometrics of non-market valuation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Halstead JM, Lindsay BE, Brown CM. 1991. Use of the Tobit model in contingent valuation: experimental evidence from the pemigewasset wilderness area. J Environ Manage. 33(1):79–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(05)80049-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley N, Schläpfer F, Spurgeon J. 2003. Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: distance-decay functions for use and non-use values. J Environ Manage. 68(3):297–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00084-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu GJ, Li WY. 1990. Application of the contingent valuation method to the Keelung river, Taipei. Int J Water Resour Dev. 6(3):218–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07900629008722474.
   Google Scholar
• Imandoust SB, Gadam SN. 2007. Are people willing to pay for river water quality, contingent valuation. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 4(3):401–408. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jim CY, Chen WY. 2006. Recreation–amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China. Landsc Urban Plan. 75(1–2):81–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan M, Rozner Y, Haklahi R, &Admor L. 2011. The river and the city went together. ministry of environmental protection and Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies. Technical report. North Carolina (USA).
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan R 1977. Down by the riverside: informational factors in waterscape preference. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC (USA).
   Google Scholar
• Kataria M. 2009. Willingness to pay for environmental improvements in hydropower regulated rivers. Energy Econ. 31(1):69–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan I, Zhao M, Khan SU. 2018. Ecological degradation of an inland river basin and an evaluation of the spatial and distance effect on willingness to pay for its improvement. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 25(31):31474–31485. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3058-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoll M, Lubken U, Schott D, Eds. 2017. Rivers lost, rivers regained: rethinking city-river relations. Pittsburgh, USA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kondolf GM, Micheli ER. 1995. Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environ Manage. 19(1):1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer RA, Eisen-Hecht JI. 2002. Estimating the economic value of water quality protection in the Catawba River basin. Water Resour Res. 38(9):1182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magat WA, Huber J, Viscusi WK, Bell J. 2000. An iterative choice approach to valuing clean lakes, rivers, and streams. J Risk Uncertain. 21(1):7–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026565225801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maller C, Townsend M, Pryor A, Brown P, St Leger L. 2006. Healthy nature healthy people:‘contact with nature’as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promot Int. 21(1):45–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dai032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell RC, Carson RT. 1995. Current issues in the design, administration, and analysis of contingent valuation survey. In: Johansson PO, Kristrom B, M¨aller KG, editors. Current issues in environmental economics. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, p. 10–34.
   Google Scholar
• Morison PJ, Brown RR. 2011. Understanding the nature of publics and local policy commitment to water sensitive urban design. Landsc Urban Plan. 99(2):83–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navrud S, Pruckner GJ. 1997. Environmental valuation–to use or not to use?A comparative study of the United States and Europe. Environ Resour Econ. 10(1):1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026449715284.
   Google Scholar
• Negev M, Sagie H, Orenstein DE, Shamir SZ, Hassan Y, Amasha H, … Wittenberg L. 2019. Using the ecosystem services framework for defining diverse human-nature relationships in a multi-ethnic biosphere reserve. Ecosyst Serv. 39:100989. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls S, Crompton JL. 2017. The effect of rivers, streams, and canals on property values. River Res Appl. 33(9):1377–1386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedroli B, De Blust G, Van Looy K, Van Rooij S. 2002. Setting targets in strategies for river restoration. Landsc Ecol. 17(1):5–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015221425315.
   Google Scholar
• Postel S, Richter B. 2012. Rivers for life: managing water for people and nature. Washington DC, USA: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan RL. 1998. Local perceptions and values for a midwestern river corridor. Landsc Urban Plan. 42(2–4):225–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00089-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagie H, Morris A, Rofè Y, Orenstein DE, Groner E. 2013. Cross-cultural perceptions of ecosystem services: a social inquiry on both sides of the Israeli Jordanian border of the Southern Arava Valley desert. J Arid Environ. 97:38–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuman JR. 1995. Environmental considerations for assessing dam removal alternatives for river restoration. Regulated Rivers Res Manage. 11(3‐4):249–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/rrr.3450110302.
   Google Scholar
• Stedman RC. 2002. Toward a social psychology of place: predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environ Behav. 34(5):561–581. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034005001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kaźmierczak A, Niemela J, James P. 2007. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc Urban Plan. 81(3):167–178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, He J, Kim Y, Kamata T. 2013. Willingness-to-pay for water quality improvements in Chinese rivers: an empirical test on the ordering effects of multiple-bounded discrete choices. J Environ Manage. 131:256–269. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Dong X, Liu H, Wei H, Fan W, Lu N, … Xing K. 2017. Linking land use change, ecosystem services and human well-being: a case study of the Manas River Basin of Xinjiang, China. Ecosyst Ser. 27:113–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber MA, Berrens RP. 2006. Value of instream recreation in the Sonoran desert. J Water Resour Plann Manage. 132(1):53–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:1(53).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson EO. 1984. Biophilia, The human bond with other species. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press; p. 157 p.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf KL, Robbins AS. 2015. Metro nature, environmental health, and economic value. Environ Health Perspect. 123(5):390–398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worldbank data, urban population (percent of total). 2019. [Accessed 2020 Dec 1] https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/sp.urb.totl.in.zs
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Liu X, Dong R, Shao G. 2016. Landsenses ecology and ecological planning toward sustainable development. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 23(4):293–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1119215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Yan Y, Deng H, Liu G, Dai L, Tang L, Shi L, Shao G. 2020. Remarks about landsenses ecology and ecosystem services. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 27(3):196–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1718795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žlender V, Gemin S. 2020. Testing urban dwellers’ sense of place towards leisure and recreational peri-urban green open spaces in two European cities. Cities. 98:102579. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar