Role of technological innovation and globalization in BRICS economies: policy towards environmental sustainability

References

• Abbas S, Adebayo TS, AbdulKareem HK, Kirikkaleli D, Shah MI. 2022. CO2 behavior amidst the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy development. Renewable Energy. 3(3):23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Abid A, Mehmood U, Tariq S, Haq ZU. 2022. The effect of technological innovation, FDI, and financial development on CO2 emission: evidence from the G8 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 4(2):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Adebayo TS, Agyekum EB, Kamel S, Zawbaa HM, Altuntaş M. 2022. Drivers of environmental degradation in Turkey: designing an SDG framework through advanced quantile approaches. Energy Reports. 1(4):2008–2018. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.020.
   Google Scholar
• Adebayo TS, Kirikkaleli D. 2021. Impact of renewable energy consumption, globalization, and technological innovation on environmental degradation in Japan: application of wavelet tools. Environ Dev Sustain. 2(3):16057–16082. doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01322-2.
   Google Scholar
• Adebayo TS, Udemba EN, Ahmed Z, Kirikkaleli D. 2021. Determinants of consumption-based carbon emissions in Chile: an application of non-linear ARDL. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 6(2):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Afshan S, Yaqoob T. 2022. The potency of eco-innovation, natural resource and financial development on ecological footprint: a quantile-ARDL-based evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 4(2):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Agyekum EB, Altuntaş M, Khudoyqulov S, Zawbaa HM, Adebayo TS, Kamel S. 2022. Does information and communication technology impede environmental degradation? Fresh insights from non-parametric approaches. Heliyon. 12(9):90–107.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed K. 2017. Revisiting the role of financial development for energy-growth-trade nexus in BRICS economies. Energy. 12(8):487–495. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.055.
   Google Scholar
• Akinsola GD, Awosusi AA, Kirikkaleli D, Umarbeyli S, Adeshola I, Adebayo TS. 2022. Ecological footprint, public-private partnership investment in energy, and financial development in Brazil: a gradual shift causality approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 29(7):10077–10090. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15791-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali HS, Zeqiraj V, Lin WL, Law SH, Yusop Z, Bare UAA, Chin L. 2019. Does quality institutions promote environmental quality? Environ Sci Pollut Res. 26(11):10446–10456. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-04670-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alola AA, Adebayo TS, Onifade ST. 2021. Examining the dynamics of ecological footprint in China with spectral Granger causality and quantile-on-quantile approaches. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 5(2):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Anwar A, Chaudhary AR, Malik S, Bassim M. 2021. Modelling the macroeconomic determinants of carbon dioxide emissions in the G-7 countries: the roles of technological innovation and institutional quality improvement. Global Business Review. 5(2):78–89.
   Google Scholar
• Awosusi AA, Adebayo TS, Altuntaş M, Agyekum EB, Zawbaa HM, Kamel S. 2022b. The dynamic impact of biomass and natural resources on ecological footprint in BRICS economies: a quantile regression evidence. Energy Reports. 1(8):79–94. 2022 Nov.
   Google Scholar
• Awosusi AA, Kirikkaleli D, Akinsola GD, Adebayo TS, Mwamba MN. 2021. Can CO2 emissions and energy consumption determine the economic performance of South Korea? A time series analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 1(29):38969–38984.
   Google Scholar
• Ayobamiji AA, Kalmaz DB. 2020. Reinvestigating the determinants of environmental degradation in Nigeria. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies. 13(1):52–71. doi:10.1504/IJEPEE.2020.106680.
   Google Scholar
• Baloch MA, Wang B, Wang B. 2019. Analyzing the role of governance in CO2 emissions mitigation: the BRICS experience. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 51:119–125. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2019.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekun FV, Adebayo TS, Awosusi AA, Altuntaş M. 2021. Coal energy consumption beat renewable energy consumption in South Africa: developing policy framework for sustainable development. Renewable Energy. 175:1012–1024. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghesi S, Vercelli A. 2003. Sustainable globalisation. Ecological Economics. 44(1):77–89. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00222-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canay IA. 2011. A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data. The Econometrics Journal. 14(3):368–386. doi:10.1111/j.1368-423X.2011.00349.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhry IS, Ali S, Bhatti SH, Anser MK, Khan AI, Nazar R. 2021. Dynamic common correlated effects of technological innovations and institutional performance on environmental quality: evidence from East-Asia and Pacific countries. Environmental Science & Policy. 124:313–323. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Hao Y, Li J, Song X. 2018. The impact of environmental regulation, shadow economy, and corruption on environmental quality: theory and empirical evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 195:200–214. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Lee CC. 2020. Does technological innovation reduce CO2 emissions? Cross-country evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2(3):121–134.
   Google Scholar
• Dauvergne P. 2005. Globalization and the environment. Global Political Economy. 2(2):448–478.
   Google Scholar
• Destek MA, Sinha A. 2020. Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. Journal of Cleaner Production. 242:118537. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dincer I. 2000. Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 4(2):157–175. doi:10.1016/S1364-0321(99)00011-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingru L, Ramzan M, Irfan M, Ö G, Isik H, Adebayo TS, Husam R. 2021. The role of renewable energy consumption towards carbon neutrality in BRICS nations: does globalization matter? Frontiers in Environmental Science. 5(9): 338–241.
   Google Scholar
• Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. 2012. Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic modelling 29 (4): 1450–1460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecological footprint Network. 2021. Ecological footprint of countries. Assessed 2022 Jan 12. Available from data.footprintnetwork.org.
   Google Scholar
• Eregha PB, Nathaniel SP, Vo XV. 2022. Economic growth, environmental regulations, energy use, and ecological footprint linkage in the Next-11 countries: implications for environmental sustainability. Energy & Environment. 9(12):502–522.
   Google Scholar
• Fareed Z, Rehman MA, Adebayo TS, Wang Y, Ahmad M, Shahzad F. 2022. Financial inclusion and the environmental deterioration in Eurozone: the moderating role of innovation activity. Technology in Society. 2(6):1100–1121.
   Google Scholar
• Global Innovation Index. 2019. Global Innovation Index 2020. Available from https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/2021/
   Google Scholar
• Grossman GM, Krueger AB. 1995. Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 110(2):353–377. doi:10.2307/2118443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güngör H, Kirikkaleli D, Adebayo TS. 2021. Consumption-based carbon emissions, renewable energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in Chile. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2(4):22–34.
   Google Scholar
• He F, Chang KC, Li M, Li X, Li F. 2020. Bootstrap ARDL test on the relationship among trade, FDI, and CO2 emissions: based on the experience of BRICS countries. Sustainability. 12(3):1060–1076. doi:10.3390/su12031060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He K, Ramzan M, Awosusi AA, Ahmed Z, Ahmad M, Altuntaş M. 2021. Does globalization moderate the effect of economic complexity on CO2 emissions? Evidence from the Top 10 energy transition economies. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2(4):5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahiem DM, Hanafy SA. 2020. Dynamic linkages amongst ecological footprints, fossil fuel energy consumption and globalization: an empirical analysis. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal. 31(6):1549–1568. doi:10.1108/MEQ-02-2020-0029.
   Google Scholar
• Islam M, Khan MK, Tareque M, Jehan N, Dagar V. 2021. Impact of globalization, foreign direct investment, and energy consumption on CO2 emissions in Bangladesh: does institutional quality matter? Environ Sci Pollut Res. 28(35):48851–48871. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-13441-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahanger A, Usman M, Murshed M, Mahmood H, Balsalobre-Lorente D. 2022. The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: the moderating role of technological innovations. Resources Policy. 76:102569. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahanger A, Yang B, Ali M. 2021. Remittance inflows affect the ecological footprint in BICS countries: do technological innovation and financial development matter? Environ Sci Pollut Res. 28(18):23482–23500. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-12400-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan S, Yahong W, Chandio AA. 2022. How does economic complexity affect ecological footprint in G-7 economies: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumptions and testing EKC hypothesis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1(8) : 89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Khattak SI, Ahmad M. 2021. The cyclical impact of green and sustainable technology research on carbon dioxide emissions in BRICS economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 7(12): 34–55.
   Google Scholar
• Khattak SI, Ahmad M. 2022. The cyclical impact of innovation in green and sustainable technologies on carbon dioxide emissions in OECD economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 9(5): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kihombo S, Ahmed Z, Chen S, Adebayo TS, Kirikkalel D. 2021. Linking financial development, economic growth, and ecological footprint: what is the role of technological innovation? Environ Sci Pollut Res. 28(43):61235–61245. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14993-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirikkaleli D, Adebayo TS. 2020. Do renewable energy consumption and financial development matter for environmental sustainability? New global evidence. Sustainable Development. 29(4):583–594. doi:10.1002/sd.2159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirikkaleli D, Adebayo TS, Khan Z, Ali S. 2021. Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 28(11):14009–14017. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11654-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker R. 2004. Quantile regression for longitudinal data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis. 91(1):74–89. doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2004.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kongbuamai N, Bui Q, Nimsai S. 2021. The effects of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption on the ecological footprint: the role of environmental policy in BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 28(22):27885–27899. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-12551-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutlay K, Altuntaş M, Khodjiev B, Awosusi AA, Agyekum EB, Shouran M, Elgbaily M, Kamel S. 2022. A roadmap toward achieving sustainable environment: evaluating the impact of technological innovation and globalization on load capacity factor. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(6):3288. doi:10.3390/ijerph19063288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuznets, S. 1955. Economic growth and income inequality. The American economic review 45 (1): 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster T. 2000. The incidental parameter problem since 1948. Journal of Econometrics. 95(2):391–413. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00044-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Wang X, Wang Q. 2022. Does renewable energy reduce ecological footprint at the expense of economic growth? An empirical analysis of 120 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production. 4(1):23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks DP. 2021. Impacts of climate change on economies, ecosystems, energy, environments, and human equity: a systems perspective. In: The impacts of climate change, Vol: 2. Earth-Science Reviews: Elsevier; p. 50–62.
   Google Scholar
• Majeed A, Wang L, Zhang X, Kirikkaleli D. 2021. Modeling the dynamic links among natural resources, economic globalization, disaggregated energy consumption, and environmental quality: fresh evidence from GCC economies. Resources Policy. 2(4):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• McCoskey S, Kao C. 1998. A residual-based test of the null of cointegration in panel data. Econometric Reviews. 17(1):57–84. doi:10.1080/07474939808800403.
   Google Scholar
• Miao Y, Razzaq A, Adebayo TS, Awosusi AA. 2022. Do renewable energy consumption and financial globalisation contribute to ecological sustainability in newly industrialized countries? Renewable Energy. 5(4):33–48.
   Google Scholar
• Nathaniel SP, Barua S, Ahmed Z. 2021a. What drives ecological footprint in top ten tourist destinations? Evidence from advanced panel techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 28(28):38322–38331. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-13389-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathaniel SP, Yalçiner K, Bekun FV. 2021b. Assessing the environmental sustainability corridor: linking natural resources, renewable energy, human capital, and ecological footprint in BRICS. Resources Policy. 7(3):45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Naudé W, Szirmai A, Lavopa A. 2013. Industrialization lessons from BRICS: a comparative analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2(28):4–20.
   Google Scholar
• Odugbesan JA, Adebayo TS, Akinsola GD, Olanrewaju VO. 2021. Determinants of environmental degradation in Thailand: empirical evidence from ARDL and wavelet coherence approaches. Pollution. 7(1):181–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oladipupo SD, Adeshola I, Rjoub H, Adebayo TS. 2021. Wavelet analysis of impact of renewable energy consumption and technological innovation on CO2 emissions: evidence from Portugal. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 1-18. 18(14):7347.
   Google Scholar
• Olson MJ. 1996. Big bills left on the sidewalk: why some nations are rich, and others poor. Sustainability. 3(2):3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Panayotou T. 1997. Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool. Environment and Development Economics. 2(4):465–484. doi:10.1017/S1355770X97000259.
   Google Scholar
• Pata UK, Balsalobre-Lorente D. 2022. Exploring the impact of tourism and energy consumption on the load capacity factor in Turkey: a novel dynamic ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 4(2):30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Pedroni P. 2004. Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory. 20(3):597–625. doi:10.1017/S0266466604203073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran MH. 2007. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 22(2):265–312. doi:10.1002/jae.951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran MH. 2015. Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econometric Reviews. 34(10):1089–1117. doi:10.1080/07474938.2014.956623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran MH, Yamagata T. 2008. Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics. 142(1):50–93. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramzan M, Iqbal HA, Awosusi AA, Adebayo TS, Akinsola GD. 2021. The environmental sustainability effects of financial development and urbanization in Latin American countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 28(41):57983–57996. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14580-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rjoub H, Adebayo TS, Awosusi AA, Agyekum EB, Kirikkaleli D. 2022. The influence of renewable energy usage on consumption-based carbon emissions in MINT economies. Heliyon. 5(4):101–122.
   Google Scholar
• Sabir, S., & Gorus, M. S. 2019. The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26 (32): 33387–33398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saud S, Chen S, Haseeb A. 2020. The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2(5):64–72.
   Google Scholar
• Shan S, Ahmad M, Tan Z, Adebayo TS, Li RYM, Kirikkaleli D. 2021. The role of energy prices and non-linear fiscal decentralization in limiting carbon emissions: tracking environmental sustainability. Energy. 2(1):33–50.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha A, Sengupta T, Alvarado R. 2020. Interplay between technological innovation and environmental quality: formulating the SDG policies for next 11 economies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2(4):22–40. 1(6):.
   Google Scholar
• Su ZW, Umar M, Kirikkaleli D, Adebayo TS. 2021. Role of political risk to achieve carbon neutrality: evidence from Brazil. Journal of Environmental Management. 2(8):113463–113488. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113463.
   Google Scholar
• Teng JZ, Khan MK, Khan MI, Chishti MZ, Khan MO. 2021. Effect of foreign direct investment on CO2 emission with the role of globalization, institutional quality with pooled mean group panel ARDL. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 28(5):5271–5282. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-10823-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, X., Zhang, M., Devahastin, S., & Yu, D. 2020. Establishment of lower hygroscopicity and adhesion strategy for infrared-freeze-dried blueberries based on pretreatments using CO2 laser in combination with ultrasound. Food and Bioprocess Technology 13 (12): 2043–2053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usman M, Jahanger A. 2021. Heterogeneous effects of remittances and institutional quality in reducing environmental deficit in the presence of EKC hypothesis: a global study with the application of panel quantile regression. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2(28):37292–37310. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-13216-x.
   Google Scholar
• Usman M, Makhdum MSA. 2021. What abates ecological footprint in BRICS-T region? Exploring the influence of renewable energy, non-renewable energy, agriculture, forest area and financial development. Renewable Energy. 1(9):12–28. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.07.014.
   Google Scholar
• Usman M, Makhdum MSA, Kousar R. 2021. Does financial inclusion, renewable and non-renewable energy utilization accelerate ecological footprints and economic growth? Fresh evidence from 15 highest emitting countries. Sustainable Cities and Society. 6(5):10–33.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z. 2019. Does biomass energy consumption help to control environmental pollution? Evidence from BRICS countries. Science of the Total Environment. 6(4):1075–1083.
   Google Scholar
• Westerlund J, Edgerton DL. 2007. A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Economics Letters. 97(3):185–190. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2007.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2017. World Development Indicators. http://data.worldbank.org/country. Accessed 4th January 2017
   Google Scholar
• Xiaosan Z, Qingquan J, Iqbal KS, Manzoor A, Ur RZ. 2021. Achieving sustainability and energy efficiency goals: assessing the impact of hydroelectric and renewable electricity generation on carbon dioxide emission in China. Energy Policy. 1(5):112332–112345. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112332.
   Google Scholar
• Xu D, Salem S, Awosusi AA, Abdurakhmanova G, Altuntaş M, Oluwajana D, Kirikkaleli D, Ojekemi O. 2022. Load capacity factor and financial globalization in Brazil: the role of renewable energy and urbanization. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 6(3):55–72.
   Google Scholar
• Yandle B, Bhattarai M, Vijayaraghavan M. 2004. Environmental Kuznets curves: a review of findings, methods, and policy implications. PERC Research. 3(2):201–223.
   Google Scholar
• Yang X, Li N, Mu H, Zhang M, Pang J, Ahmad M. 2021. Study on the long-term and short-term effects of globalization and population aging on ecological footprint in OECD countries. Ecological Complexity. 4(7):100946–100965. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2021.100946.
   Google Scholar
• Yao X, Yasmeen R, Hussain J, Shah WUH. 2021. The repercussions of financial development and corruption on energy efficiency and ecological footprint: evidence from BRICS and next 11 countries. Energy. 2(23):120063–120084. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.120063.
   Google Scholar
• Yuping L, Ramzan M, Xincheng L, Murshed M, Awosusi AA, Bah SI, Adebayo TS. 2021. Determinants of carbon emissions in Argentina: the roles of renewable energy consumption and globalization. Energy Reports. 1(7):4747–4760. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.065
   Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Wang B, Chen Z. 2020. Has the anti-corruption campaign decreased air pollution in China? Energy Economics. 9(1):104878–104896. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104878.
   Google Scholar