A comparative analysis of the circular economy performances for European Union countries

References

• Busu C, Busu M. 2018. Modeling the circular economy processes at the EU level using an evaluation algorithm based on Shannon entropy. Processes. 6(11):225. doi:10.3390/pr6110225
   Google Scholar
• Çakır S. 2018. An integrated approach to machine selection problem using fuzzy SMART-fuzzy weighted axiomatic design. J Intell Manuf. 29(7):1433–1445. doi:10.1007/s10845-015-1189-3
   Google Scholar
• Cayzer S, Griffiths P, Beghetto V. 2017. Design of indicators for measuring product performance in the circular economy. Int J Sustain Eng. 10(4–5):289–298. doi:10.1080/19397038.2017.1333543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C-H. 2020. A novel multi-criteria decision-making model for building material supplier selection based on entropy-AHP weighted TOPSIS. Entropy. 22(2):259. doi:10.3390/e22020259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou S, Chang Y. 2008. A decision support system for supplier selection based on a strategy-aligned fuzzy SMART approach. Expert Syst Appl. 34(4):2241–2253. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corona B, Shen L, Reike D, Rosales Carreón J, Worrell E. 2019. Towards sustainable development through the circular economy—A review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics. Resour Conserv Recycl. 151:104498. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amato D, Korhonen J. 2021. Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability framework. Ecol Econ. 188:107143. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Oliveira CT, Dantas TET, Soares SR. 2021. Nano and micro level circular economy indicators: assisting decision-makers in circularity assessments. Sustain Prod Consum. 26:455–468. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.024
   Google Scholar
• De Pascale A, Arbolino R, Szopik-Depczyńska K, Limosani M, Ioppolo G. 2021. A systematic review for measuring circular economy: the 61 indicators. J Clean Prod. 281:124942. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deniz N. 2020. Cognitive biases in MCDM methods: an embedded filter proposal through sustainable supplier selection problem. J Enterp Inf Manag. 33(5):947–963. doi:10.1108/JEIM-09-2019-0285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Didier B. 2016. Circular economy package: four legislative proposals on waste [Internet] [Accessed 20 January 2022]. European Parliamentary Research Service; https://www.europarl.europa.eu/EPRS/EPRS-Briefing-573936-Circular-economy-package-FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ding L, Lei L, Wang L, Zhang L. 2020. Assessing industrial circular economy performance and its dynamic evolution: an extended Malmquist index based on cooperative game network DEA. Sci Total Environ. 731:139001. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards W. 1971. Engineering Economist, Summer Symposium Series. Vol. 6; p. 119–129.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards W. 1977. How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decisionmaking. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 7(5):326–340. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1977.4309720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards W, Barron H. 1994. SMARTS and SMARTER: improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 60(3):306–325. doi:10.1006/obhd.1994.1087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elia V, Gnoni MG, Tornese F. 2017. Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: a critical analysis. J Clean Prod. 142:2741–2751. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU: 7th Environment Action program. 2013: European Union; [accessed 2022 Jan 23]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32013D1386&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat: Circular economy indicators. 2021b. Statistical office of the European Union. [accessed 2022 Jan 23]. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/circular-economy/indicators/main-tables.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat: Circular economy-Policy context. 2021a. Statistical office of the European Union. [accessed 2022 Jan 23]. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/circular-economy/policy-context
   Google Scholar
• Fogarassy C, Horvath B, Kovacs A, Szoke L, Takacs-Gyorgy K. 2017. A circular evaluation tool for sustainable event management – an olympic case study. Acta Polytech Hung. 14(7):161–177.
   Google Scholar
• García-Sánchez I-M, Somohano-Rodríguez F-M, Amor-Esteban V, Frías-Aceituno J-V. 2021. Which region and which sector leads the circular economy? CEBIX, a multivariant index based on business actions. J Environ Manage. 297:113299. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113299
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghisellini P, Cialani C, Ulgiati S. 2016. A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J Clean Prod. 114:11–32. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannakitsidou O, Giannikos I, Chondrou A. 2020. Ranking European countries on the basis of their environmental and circular economy performance: a DEA application in MSW. Waste Manag. 109:181–191. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giaveri S, Schmitt AM, Roset Julià L, Scamarcio V, Murello A, Cheng S, Menin L, Ortiz D, Patiny L, Bolisetty S, et al. 2021. Nature‐inspired circular‐economy recycling for proteins: proof of concept. Adv Mater. 33(44):2104581. doi:10.1002/adma.202104581
   Google Scholar
• Guo B, Geng Y, Ren J, Zhu L, Liu Y, Sterr T. 2017. Comparative assessment of circular economy development in China’s four megacities: the case of Beijing, Chongqing, Shanghai and Urumqi. J Clean Prod. 162:234–246. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo-gang J. 2011. Empirical analysis of regional circular economy development–study based on Jiangsu, Heilongjiang, Qinghai Province. Energy Procedia. 5:125–129. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.023
   Google Scholar
• Heshmati A, Rashidghalam M. 2021. Assessment of the urban circular economy in Sweden. J Clean Prod. 310:127475. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homrich AS, Galvão G, Abadia LG, Carvalho MM. 2018. The circular economy umbrella: trends and gaps on integrating pathways. J Clean Prod. 175:525–543. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshavarz Ghorabaee M, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J. 2016. A new Combinative Distance-Based Assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Econ Comput Econ Cybern Stud Res. 50(3):25–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchherr J, Reike D, Hekkert M. 2017. Conceptualizing the circular economy: an analysis of 114 definitions. Resour Conserv Recycl. 127:221–232. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen HS, Mosgaard MA. 2020. A review of micro level indicators for a circular economy – moving away from the three dimensions of sustainability? J Clean Prod. 243(118531). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118531
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwong CK, Ip WH, Chan JWK. 2002. Combining scoring method and fuzzy expert systems approach to supplier assessment: a case study. Integr Manuf Syst. 13(7):512–519. doi:10.1108/09576060210442671
   Google Scholar
• Marino A, Pariso P. 2020. Comparing European countries’ performances in the transition towards the circular economy. Sci Total Environ. 729:138142. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur-Wierzbicka E. 2021. Towards circular economy—A comparative analysis of the countries of the European Union. Resources. 10(5):49. doi:10.3390/resources10050049
   Google Scholar
• Melnik-Leroy GA, Dzemyda G. 2021. How to influence the results of MCDM?—Evidence of the impact of cognitive biases. Mathematics. 9(2):121. doi:10.3390/math9020121
   Google Scholar
• Montibeller G, von Winterfeldt D. 2015. Cognitive and motivational biases in decision and risk analysis: biases in decision and risk analysis. Risk Anal. 35(7):1230–1251. doi:10.1111/risa.12360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray A, Skene K, Haynes K. 2017. The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. J Bus Ethics. 140(3):369–380. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura S, Kondo Y, Nakajima K, Ohno H, Pauliuk S. 2017. Quantifying recycling and losses of Cr and Ni in steel throughout multiple life cycles using matrace-alloy. Environ Sci Technol. 51(17):9469–9476. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b01683
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearce DW, Turner RK, Turner PRK. 1990. Economics of natural resources and the environment. [place unknown]: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabiee M, Aslani B, Rezaei J. 2021. A decision support system for detecting and handling biased decision-makers in multi criteria group decision-making problems. Expert Syst Appl. 171:114597. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Anton JM, Rubio-Andrada L, Celemín-Pedroche MS, Alonso-Almeida MDM. 2019. Analysis of the relations between circular economy and sustainable development goals. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 26(8):708–720. doi:10.1080/13504509.2019.1666754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauvé S, Bernard S, Sloan P. 2016. Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research. Environ Dev. 17:48–56. doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder P, Lemille A, Desmond P. 2020. Making the circular economy work for human development. Resour Conserv Recycl. 156:104686. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestri F, Spigarelli F, Tassinari M. 2020. Regional development of circular economy in the European Union: a multidimensional analysis. J Clean Prod. 255:120218. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120218
   Google Scholar
• Škrinjarić T. 2020. Empirical assessment of the circular economy of selected European countries. J Clean Prod. 255:120246. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120246
   Google Scholar
• Ūsas J, Balezentis T, Streimikiene D. 2021. Development and integrated assessment of the circular economy in the European Union: the outranking approach [Internet]. J Enterp Inf Manag. [accessed 2021 Dec 20]. doi:10.1108/JEIM-11-2020-0440. ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).
   Google Scholar
• Vinante C, Sacco P, Orzes G, Borgianni Y. 2021. Circular economy metrics: literature review and company-level classification framework. J Clean Prod. 288:125090. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125090
   Google Scholar
• Wang N, Lee JCK, Zhang J, Chen H, Li H. 2018. Evaluation of Urban circular economy development: an empirical research of 40 cities in China. J Clean Prod. 180:876–887. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeni FB, Özçelik G. 2019. Interval-valued atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy CODAS method for multi criteria group decision making problems. Group Decis Negot. 28(2):433–452. doi:10.1007/s10726-018-9603-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yetton P, Bottger P. 1983. The relationships among group size, member ability, social decision schemes, and performance. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 32(2):145–159. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(83)
   Google Scholar
• Zielińska A. 2019. Comparative analysis of circular economy implementation in Poland and other European Union Countries. J Int Stud. 12(4):337–347. doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2019/12-4/22
   Google Scholar