181
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Assessment of China’s green governance performance based on integrative perspective of technology utilization and actor management

, , &
Pages 827-839 | Received 13 May 2022, Accepted 25 Jul 2022, Published online: 31 Jul 2022

References

  • Andersen P, Petersen N 1993. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci. 39(6):1261–1264.
  • Assani S, Jiang J, Cao R, Yang F. 2018. Most productive scale size decomposition for multi-stage systems in data envelopment analysis. Comput Ind Eng. 120:279–287. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2018.04.043
  • Bhattacharya A, and Pal M. 2021. Fifth sustainable development goal gender equality in India: analysis by mathematics of uncertainty and covering of fuzzy graphs. Neural Comput Appl. 33(21): 15027–15057
  • Bostian M, Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lundgren T, Weber WL. 2018. Time substitution for environmental performance: the case of Swedish manufacturing. Empir Econ. 54(1):129–152. doi:10.1007/s00181-016-1180-7.
  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Golany B, Seiford L, Stutz J. 1985. Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. J Econom. 30(1–2):91–107. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(85)90133-2.
  • Chen X, Liu X, Gong Z, and Xie J. 2021a. Three-stage super-efficiency DEA models based on the cooperative game and its application on the R&D green innovation of the Chinese high-tech industry. Comput Ind Eng. 156:107234. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2021.107234
  • Chen Y, Wong CW, Yang R, and Miao X. 2021b. Optimal structure adjustment strategy, emission reduction potential and utilization efficiency of fossil energies in China. Energy. 237:121623. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.121623
  • Chen Y, Yang R, Wong CW, Ji J, Miao X. 2022. Efficiency and productivity of air pollution control in Chinese cities. Sustainable Cities Soc. 76:103423. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103423
  • Cheng X, Long R, Chen H, Li Q. 2019. Coupling coordination degree and spatial dynamic evolution of a regional green competitiveness system–a case study from China. Ecol Indic. 104:489–500. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.003.
  • Chi M, and Gao X. 2019. The national economy’s 2018 report card GDP exceeded 90 trillion for the first time. People Net. [Accessed 08 July 2022]. http://bj.people.com.cn/n2/2019/0122/c82840-32561730.html.
  • Dieng B, Pesqueux Y. 2017. On ‘green governance’. Int J Sustainable Dev. 20(1–2):111–123. doi:10.1504/IJSD.2017.083485.
  • Feng YJ, Li CH. 1995. Secondary relative benefit-a new indicator to measure the economic benefit of enterprises (in Chinese). China Soft Sci. 7:30–37.
  • Feng YJ, Gao X, Wei SX. 2001. Production effectiveness and management effectiveness (in Chinese). J Ind Eng Eng Manage. 3:27–29+32.
  • Fu RM, Chang B, Miao XL. 2008. Study on performance evaluation of the general transfer payment of province-to-county in China: the binary relative effective model based on the data envelopment analysis (DEA) (in Chinese). Economic Res J. 43(11):62–73.
  • Gastineau P, Mossay P, Taugourdeau E. 2021. Ecological compensation: how much and where? Ecol Econ. 190:107191. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107191.
  • Guo CL, Tang ZF. 2020. Research on performance evaluation of financial support for agriculture fund integration - a case study of 51 counties (prefectures) in Hunan Province (in Chinese). Sub Nat Fiscal Res. 5:40–47.
  • Hessevik A. 2021. Network‐led advocacy for a green shipping transformation: a case study of governance networks in the Norwegian maritime sector. Regul Governance. [Accessed 22 Jul 2022] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/rego.12386.
  • Ibrahim A, Bartsch K, Sharifi E. 2020. Green infrastructure needs green governance: lessons from Australia’s largest integrated stormwater management project, the River Torrens Linear Park. J Clean Prod. 261:121202. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121202.
  • Kao C, Hwang SN. 2008. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. Eur J Oper Res. 185(1):418–429. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.041.
  • Kusis J, Brokane L, Miltovica B. 2017. Green governance principles in the development of environmental education infrastructure. Economic Science for Rural Development Conference Proceedings. 44: 256–266.
  • Li Z, Ouyang X, Du K, Zhao Y. 2017. Does government transparency contribute to improved eco-efficiency performance? An empirical study of 262 cities in China. Energy Policy. 110:79–89. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.001.
  • Liang L, Cook WD, Zhu J. 2008. DEA models for two‐stage processes: game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Res Logistics. 55(7):643–653. doi:10.1002/nav.20308.
  • Liang X, Zhang W, Chen L, Deng F. 2016. Sustainable urban development capacity measure—A case study in Jiangsu Province, China. Sustainability. 8(3):270. doi:10.3390/su8030270.
  • Lin F, Lin SW, Lu WM. 2019. Dynamic eco-efficiency evaluation of the semiconductor industry: a sustainable development perspective. Environ Monit Assess. 191(7):1–16. doi:10.1007/s10661-019-7598-6.
  • Liu Y, Yao C, Wang G, Bao S. 2011. An integrated sustainable development approach to modeling the eco-environmental effects from urbanization. Ecol Indic. 11(6):1599–1608. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.004.
  • Liu Z, Zhang H, Zhang YJ, Zhu TT. 2020. How does industrial policy affect the eco-efficiency of industrial sector? Evidence from China. Appl Energy. 272:115206. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115206
  • Mahmood M, Orazalin N. 2017. Green governance and sustainability reporting in Kazakhstan’s oil, gas, and mining sector: evidence from a former USSR emerging economy. J Clean Prod. 164:389–397. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.203.
  • Mavi RK, Fathi A, Saen RF, Mavi NK. 2019. Eco-innovation in transportation industry: a double frontier common weights analysis with ideal point method for Malmquist productivity index. Resources, Conservation Recycling. 147:39–48. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.017.
  • Miao X, Tang Y, Wong CW, Zang H. 2015. The latent causal chain of industrial water pollution in China. Environ Pollut. 196:473–477. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2014.11.010
  • Pane H, Oyler JD, Humphreys JH 2009. Historical, practical, and theoretical perspectives on green management: an exploratory analysis. Manage Decis. 7:1041–1055. doi:10.1108/00251740910978287.
  • Qin Q, Jiao Y, Gan X, Liu Y. 2020. Environmental efficiency and market segmentation: an empirical analysis of China’s thermal power industry. J Clean Prod. 242:118560. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118560
  • Rashidi K, Saen RF. 2015. Measuring eco-efficiency based on green indicators and potentials in energy saving and undesirable output abatement. Energy Economics. 50:18–26. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.04.018
  • Seiford LM, Zhu J. 1999. Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Manage Sci. 45(9):1270–1288. doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.9.1270.
  • Shao L, Yu X, Feng C. 2019. Evaluating the eco-efficiency of China’s industrial sectors: a two-stage network data envelopment analysis. J Environ Manage. 247:551–560. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.099.
  • Tachizawa EM, Wong CY. 2015. The performance of green supply chain management governance mechanisms: a supply network and complexity perspective. J Supply Chain Manage. 51(3):18–32. doi:10.1111/jscm.12072.
  • Tang Y, Yang R, Chen Y, Du M, Yang Y, Miao X. 2020. Greenwashing of local government: the human-caused risks in the process of environmental information disclosure in China. Sustainability. 12(16):6329. doi:10.3390/su12166329.
  • Tang Y, Chen Y, Yang R, Miao X. 2020. The unified efficiency evaluation of China’s industrial waste gas considering pollution prevention and end-of-pipe treatment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17(16):5724. doi:10.3390/ijerph17165724.
  • Tian XL, Guo QG, Han C, Ahmad N. 2016. Different extent of environmental information disclosure across Chinese cities: contributing factors and correlation with local pollution. Global Environ Change. 39:244–257. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.014.
  • Tian N, Tang S, Che A, Wu P. 2020. Measuring regional transport sustainability using super-efficiency SBM-DEA with weighting preference. J Clean Prod. 242:118474. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118474
  • Trinks A, Mulder M, Scholtens B. 2020. An efficiency perspective on carbon emissions and financial performance. Ecol Econ. 175:106632. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106632.
  • Wang X, Ding H, Liu L. 2019. Eco-efficiency measurement of industrial sectors in China: a hybrid super-efficiency DEA analysis. J Clean Prod. 229:53–64. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.014.
  • Wang M, Feng C. 2020. Regional total-factor productivity and environmental governance efficiency of China’s industrial sectors: a two-stage network-based super DEA approach. J Clean Prod. 273:123110.
  • Wang D, Du Z, and Wu H. 2020a. Ranking global cities based on economic performance and climate change mitigation. Sustainable Cities Soc. 62:102395. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102395.
  • Wang F, Wang R, and Wang J. 2020b. Measurement of China’s green GDP and its dynamic variation based on industrial perspective. Environ Sci Poll Res. 27(35):43813–43828. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-10236-x.
  • Wang F, Lu Y, Li J, Ni J. 2021. Evaluating environmentally sustainable development based on the PSR framework and variable weigh analytic hierarchy process. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18(6):2836. doi:10.3390/ijerph18062836.
  • Wong CWY, Miao X, Cui S, Tang Y. 2018. Impact of corporate environmental responsibility on operating income: moderating role of regional disparities in China. J Bus Ethics. 149(2):363–382. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3092-z.
  • Yale University. 2018. Environmental performance Indicator. City of New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, Yale University.
  • Yang G, Fukuyama H, Chen K. 2018. Investigating the regional sustainable performance of the Chinese real estate industry: a slack-based DEA approach. Omega. 84:141–159. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2018.04.009.
  • Yang R, Wong CW, Miao X. 2021a. Evaluation of the coordinated development of economic, urbanization and environmental systems: a case study of China. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 23(2):685–708. doi:10.1007/s10098-020-01999-5.
  • Yang R, Miao X, Wong CW, Wang T, Du M. 2021b. Assessment on the interaction between technology innovation and eco-environmental systems in China. Environ Sci Poll Res. 28(44):63127–63149. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15149-x.
  • Yang R, Wong CW, Miao X. 2021c. Analysis of the trend in the knowledge of environmental responsibility research. J Clean Prod. 278:123402. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123402.
  • Yu S, Liu J, Li L. 2020. Evaluating provincial eco-efficiency in China: an improved network data envelopment analysis model with undesirable output. Environmental Science and. Poll Res. 27(7):6886–6903. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123402.
  • Zhang W, Zhang X, Zhang M, Li W. 2020. How to coordinate economic, logistics and ecological environment? Evidences from 30 provinces and cities in China. Sustainability. 12(3):1058. doi:10.3390/su12031058.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.