323
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Impact of economic growth, natural resources and trade on ecological footprint: do education and longevity promote sustainable development in Algeria?

ORCID Icon
Pages 875-887 | Received 12 May 2022, Accepted 08 Aug 2022, Published online: 22 Aug 2022

References

  • Ahmed Z, Asghar MM, Malik MN, Nawaz K. 2020. Moving towards a sustainable environment: the dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resources Policy. 67:101677. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101677.
  • Ahmed Z, Zhang B, Cary M. 2021. Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecol Indic. 121:107060. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107060.
  • Ali S, Yusop Z, Kaliappan SR, Chin L. 2020. Dynamic common correlated effects of trade openness, FDI, and institutional performance on environmental quality: evidence from OIC countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 27(11):11671–11682. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-07768-7.
  • Altıntaş H, Kassouri K. 2020. Is the environmental Kuznets Curve in Europe related to the per-capita ecological footprint or CO2 emissions? Ecol Indic. 113:106187. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106187.
  • Amri F. 2017. Carbon dioxide emissions, output, and energy consumption categories in Algeria. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 24(17):14567–14578. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-8984-7.
  • Ansari MA, Haider S, Khan NA. 2020. Environmental Kuznets curve revisited: an analysis using ecological and material footprint. Ecol Indic. 115:106416. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106416.
  • Banerjee A, Dolado J, Mestre R. 1998. Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. J Time Ser Anal. 19(3):267–283. doi:10.1111/1467-9892.00091.
  • Bayer C, Hanck C. 2013. Combining non-cointegration tests. J Time Ser Anal. 34(1):83–95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.2012.00814.x.
  • Bello MO, Solarin SA, Yen YY. 2018. The impact of electricity consumption on CO2 emission, carbon footprint, water footprint and ecological footprint: the role of hydropower in an emerging economy. J Environ Manag. 219:218–230. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.101.
  • Bloom DE, Canning D. 1999. Economic development and the demographic transition: the role of cumulative causality. Cambridge: Harvard University; p. 1–32.
  • Boswijk HP. 1994. Testing for an unstable root in conditional and structural error correction models. J Econom. 63(1):37–60. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(93)01560-9.
  • Boukhelkhal A, Bengana I. 2018. Cointegration and causality among electricity consumption, economic, climatic and environmental factors: evidence from North –Africa region. Energy. 163:1193–1206. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.163.
  • Bouznit M, Pablo-Romero Md P. 2016. CO2 emission and economic growth in Algeria. Energy Policy. 96:93–104. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.036.
  • Britch Petroleum BP. 2020. Statistical review of world energy 2020. London: White house Associates. http://www.bp.com/statisticalreview (Accessed on 12 November 2021)
  • Brown RL, Durbin J, Evans JM. 1975. Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. J R Stat Soc. 37:149–192.
  • Charfeddine L, Mrabet Z. 2017. The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: a panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 76:138–154. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.031.
  • Clemente J, Montanes A, Reyes M. 1998. Testing for a unit root in variables with a double change in the mean. Econ Lett. 59(2):175–182. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(98)00052-4.
  • Costa D, Jesus J, Branco D, Danko, A, Fiúza, A . 2017. Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010–2015). Environ Sci Pollut Res. 24(17):14579–14594. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-8970-0.
  • Danish HS, Baloch MA, Mahmood N, Zhang JW, Zhang J. 2019. Linking economic growth and ecological footprint through human capital and biocapacity. Sustain Cities Soc. 47:101516. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101516.
  • Dickey DA, Fuller WA. 1979. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc. 74:427–431.
  • Dickey DA, Fuller WA. 1981. Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Economics. 49:1057–1072.
  • Dogan E, Ulucak R, Kocak E, Isik C. 2020. The use of ecological footprint in estimating the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for BRICST by considering cross-section dependence and heterogeneity. Sci Total Environ. 723:138063. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138063.
  • [EIA] U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2014. Country Analysis Brief: Algeria (Accessed on 10 December 2021). https://www.eia.gov/international/content/analysis/countries_long/Algeria/archive/pdf/algeria_2014.pdf
  • Engle R, Granger C. 1987. Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica. 55(2):251–276. doi:10.2307/1913236.
  • Erdogan S, Cakar ND, Ulucak R, Danish KY, Kassouri Y. 2020. The role of natural resources abundance and dependence in achieving environmental sustainability: evidence from resource-based economies. Sustain Dev. 29(1):143–154. doi:10.1002/sd.2137.
  • Farhani S, Chaibi A, Rault C. 2014. CO2 emissions, output, energy consumption, and trade in Tunisia. Econ.Model. 38:426–434. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2014.01.025.
  • Furuoka F. 2015. The CO2 emissions–development nexus revisited. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 51:1256–1275. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.049.
  • Global Footprint Network. 2021. (Accessed on 10 October 2021). https://data.footprintnetwork.org
  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB. 1991. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. Natl Bur Econ Res. 3914:1–57.
  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB. 1995. Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ. 110(2):353–377. doi:10.2307/2118443.
  • Harris R, Sollis R. 2003. Applied time series modelling and forecasting. England (UK): Chiche- ster.
  • Hasanov FJ, Hunt LC, Mikayilov JI. 2021. Estimating different order polynomial logarithmic environmental Kuznets curves. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 28(31):41965–41987. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-13463-y.
  • Hassan ST, Xia E, Khan NH, Shah SMA. 2019. Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 26(3):2929–2938. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3803-3.
  • Human Development Report. 2020. (Accessed on 20 November 2021). http://hdr.undp.org/en/data
  • Johansen S. 1991. Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica. 59(6):1551–1580. doi:10.2307/2938278.
  • Johansen S, Juselius K. 1990. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ Stat. 52(2):169–210. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x.
  • Khan I, Hou F, Le HP. 2021. The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: fresh evidence from the United States of America. Sci Total Environ. 754:142222. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142222.
  • Lacheheb M, Rahim ASA, Sirag A. 2015. Economic growth and CO2 emissions: investigating the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in Algeria. Int J Energy Econ Policy. 5(4):1125–1132.
  • Langnel Z, Amegavi GB. 2020. Globalization, electricity consumption and ecological footprint: an autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) approach. Sustain Cities Soc. 63:102482. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102482.
  • Li JX, Chen YN, Xu CC, Li Z. 2019. Evaluation and analysis of ecological security in arid areas of Central Asia based on the emergy ecological footprint (EEF) model. J Clean Prod. 235:664–677. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.005.
  • Mariani F, Perez-Barahona A, Raffin N. 2010. Life expectancy and the environment. J Econ Dyn Control. 34(4):798–815. doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2009.11.007.
  • Mrabet Z, Alsamara M. 2017. Testing the Kuznets Curve hypothesis for Qatar: a comparison between carbon dioxide and ecological footprint. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 70:1366–1375. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.039.
  • Mrabet Z, Alsamara M, Mimouni K, Mnasri A. 2021. Can human development and political stability improve environmental quality? New evidence from the MENA region. Econ Model. 94:28–44. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2020.09.021.
  • Nathaniel SP. 2021. Ecological footprint, energy use, trade, and urbanization linkage in Indonesia. GeoJournal. 86(5):2057–2070. doi:10.1007/s10708-020-10175-7.
  • Nathaniel S, Anyanwu O, Shah M. 2020. Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint in the Middle East and North Africa region. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 27(13):14601–14613. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08017-7.
  • Nathaniel SP, Iheonu CO. 2019. Carbon dioxide abatement in Africa: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption. Sci Total Environ. 679:337–345. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.011.
  • Nathaniel S, Nwodo O, Adediran A, Sharma G, Shah M, Adeleye N. 2019. Ecological footprint, urbanization, and energy consumption in South Africa: including the excluded. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 26(6):27168–27179. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-05924-2.
  • Pan H, Zhuang M, Geng Y, Wu F, Dong H. 2019. Emergy-based ecological footprint analysis for a mega-city: the dynamic changes of Shanghai. J Clean Prod. 210:552–562. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.064.
  • Pata UK, Caglar AE. 2021. Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break. Energy. 216:119220. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.119220.
  • Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ. 2001. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econom. 16(3):289–326. doi:10.1002/jae.616.
  • Phillips PCB, Perron P. 1988. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika. 75(2):335–346. doi:10.1093/biomet/75.2.335.
  • Ramzan M, Raza SA, Usman M, Sharma GD, Iqbal HA. 2022. Environmental cost of non-renewable energy and economic progress: do ICT and financial development mitigate some burden? J Clean Prod. 333(2022):130066. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130066.
  • Shahbaz M, Lean HH, Shabbir MS. 2012. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: cointegration and Granger causality. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 16(5):2947–2953. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.015.
  • Shahbaz M, Mahalik MK, Shahzad SJH, Hammoudeh S. 2019. Testing the globalization-driven carbon emissions hypothesis: international evidence. Int Econ. 158:25–38. doi:10.1016/j.inteco.2019.02.002.
  • Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Ozturk I. 2016. Environmental kuznets curve hypothesis and the role of globalization in selected African countries. Ecol Indic. 67:623–636. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.024.
  • Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Sbia R, Bibi S. 2015. Does energy intensity contribute to CO2emissions? A trivariate analysis in selected African countries. Ecol Indic. 50:215–224. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.007.
  • Shokoohi Z, Dehbidi NK, Tarazkar MH. 2022. Energy intensity, economic growth and environmental quality in populous Middle East countries. Energy. 239:122164. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.122164.
  • Sultan ZA, Alkhateeb TTY. 2019. Energy consumption and economic growth: the evidence from India. Int J Energy Econ Policy. 9(5):142. doi:10.32479/ijeep.8030.
  • Świąder M, Szewrański S, Kazak JK. 2020. Environmental Carrying Capacity Assessment—the Policy Instrument and Tool for Sustainable Spatial Management. Front Environ Sci. 8:579838. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2020.579838
  • Tang CF, Abosedra S, Naghavi N. 2021. Does the quality of institutions and education strengthen the quality of the environment? Evidence from a global perspective. Energy. 218:119303. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.119303.
  • Ullah A, Ahmed M, Raza SA, Ali S. 2021. A threshold approach to sustainable development: nonlinear relationship between renewable energy consumption, natural resource rent, and ecological footprint Journal of Environmental Management. Journal of Environmental Management. 295:113073. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113073.
  • Ulucak R, Bilgili F. 2018. A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod. 188:144e157. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.191.
  • Usman M, Makhdum MSA, Kousar R. 2021. Does financial inclusion, renewable and non-renewable energy utilization accelerate ecological footprints and economic growth? Fresh evidence from 15 highest emitting countries. Sustain Cities Soc. 65:102590. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102590.
  • Wang Z, Asghar MM, Zaidi SAH, Nawaz K, Wang B, Zhao W, Xu F . 2020. The dynamic relationship between economic growth and life expectancy: contradictory role of energy consumption and financial development in Pakistan. Struct Chang Econ Dyn. 53:257–266. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2020.03.004.
  • World Bank. World Development Indicators. 2020 (Accessed on 10 December 2021). http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators
  • Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Khan NR, Mirza FM, Hou F, Kirmani SAA. 2019. The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States. Res Policy. 63:101428. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101428.
  • Zivot E, Andrews D. 1992. Further evidence of great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat. 10:251–270.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.