The role of technology innovation, R&D, and quality governance in pollution mitigation for EU economies: fresh evidence from method of moment quantile regression

References

• Abdulahi ME, Shu Y, Khan MA. 2019. Resource rents, economic growth, and the role of institutional quality: a panel threshold analysis. Resources Policy. 61:293–303. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abid A, Mehmood U, Tariq S, Haq ZU. 2022. The effect of technological innovation, FDI, and financial development on CO2 emission: evidence from the G8 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29(8):11654–11662. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15993-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adebayo TS, Oladipupo SD, Adeshola I, Rjoub H. 2022. Wavelet analysis of impact of renewable energy consumption and technological innovation on CO2 emissions: evidence from Portugal. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29(16):23887–23904. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-17708-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adewuyi AO, Awodumi OB. 2017. Biomass energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions: fresh evidence from West Africa using a simultaneous equation model. Energy. 119:453–471. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad M, Jiang P, Majeed A, Raza MY. 2020. Does financial development and foreign direct investment improve environmental quality? Evidence from belt and road countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 27(19):23586–23601. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08748-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali EB, Amfo B. 2021. Comparing the values of economic, ecological and population indicators in high- and low-income economies. Economy of Region. 17(1):72–85. doi:10.17059/EKON.REG.2021-1-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali EB, Anufriev VP. 2020. The causal relationship between agricultural production, economic growth, and energy consumption in Ghana. R-Economy. 6(4):231–241. doi:10.15826/recon.2020.6.4.020.
   Google Scholar
• Ali EB, Shayanmehr S, Radmehr R, Amfo B, Awuni JA, Gyamfi BA, Agbozo E. 2022. Exploring the impact of economic growth on environmental pollution in South American countries : how does renewable energy and globalization matter ? Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 0123456789. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-23177-4
   Google Scholar
• Apergis N, Eleftheriou S, Payne JE. 2013. The relationship between international financial reporting standards, carbon emissions, and R&D expenditures: evidence from European manufacturing firms. Ecological Economics. 88:57–66. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan A, Kocoglu M, Banday TP, Tarazkar MH. 2022. Revisiting global energy efficiency and CO2 emission nexus: fresh evidence from the panel quantile regression model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 47502–47515. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-19101-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baloch MA, Wang B. 2019. Analyzing the role of governance in CO2 emissions mitigation: the BRICS experience. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 51:119–125. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2019.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekhet HA, Matar A, Yasmin T. 2017. CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and financial development in GCC countries: dynamic simultaneous equation models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 70:117–132. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekun FV, Alola AA, Sarkodie SA. 2019. Toward a sustainable environment: nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Science of the Total Environment. 657:1023–1029. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder M, Coad A. 2011. From Average Joe’s happiness to Miserable Jane and Cheerful John: using quantile regressions to analyze the full subjective well-being distribution. J Econ Behav Organ. 79(3):275–290. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canay IA. 2011. A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data. Econom J. 14(3):368–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng C, Ren X, Dong K, Dong X, Wang Z. 2021. How does technological innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression. J Environ Manage. 280(December 2020):111818. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111818.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen Y, Lee CC. 2020. Does technological innovation reduce CO2 emissions? Cross-country evidence. J Clean Prod. 263:121550. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen P, Lin C, Lee C. 2019. North American journal of economics and finance financial crises, globalization, and insurer performance: some international evidence. North American Journal of Economics and Finance. 48(August 2017):835–856. doi:10.1016/j.najef.2018.08.015.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Yang F, Liu Y, Usman A. 2022. The asymmetric effect of technology shocks on CO2 emissions : a panel analysis of BRICS economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 27115–27123. 2017. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-18067-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chhabra M, Kumar A, Arya G. 2022. Do technological innovations and trade openness reduce - CO2 emissions? Evidence from selected middle‑income countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29:65723–65738. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-20434-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill SA, Inekwe J, Smyth R, Zhang X. 2019. R&D intensity and carbon emissions in the G7: 1870–2014. Energy Economics. 80:30–37. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2018.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadgara Y, Nazari R. 2017. The impact of good governance on environmental pollution in South West Asian Countries. Iranian Journal of Economic Studies. 5(1):49–63. doi:10.22099/ijes.2017.23649.1292.
   Google Scholar
• Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C 2012. Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model. 29(4):1450–1460. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eltayeb K, Zeeshan E, Dervis K, Naveed K. 2022. On the nexus between industrialization and carbon emissions: evidence from ASEAN + 3 economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 31476–31485. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-18560-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eren BM, Taspinar N, Gokmenoglu KK. 2019. The impact of financial development and economic growth on renewable energy consumption: empirical analysis of India. Science of the Total Environment. 663:189–197. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essandoh OK, Islam M, Kakinaka M. 2020. Linking international trade and foreign direct investment to CO2 emissions: any differences between developed and developing countries? Science of the Total Environment. 712:136437. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021. Sustainable development in the European Union: monitoring report on progress towards the SDGs in an EU context — 2021 edition. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-statistical-books/-/ks-03-21-096.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2019. Smarter, greener, more inclusive? indicators to support the Europe 2020 the Europe 2020 strategy. In Smarter, greener, more inclusive.
   Google Scholar
• Farooq U. 2022. Foreign direct investment, foreign aid, and CO2 emissions in Asian economies: does governance matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29(5):7532–7547. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-16115-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatai F, Adewale A, Victor F. 2020. An assessment of environmental sustainability corridor : the role of economic expansion and research and development in EU countries. Science of the Total Environment. 713:136726. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández YF, López MF, Blanco BO. 2018. Innovation for sustainability: the impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions. J Clean Prod. 172:3459–3467. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer C, Newell RG. 2008. Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. J Environ Econ Manage. 55(2):142–162. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2007.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrone P, Grilli L. 2010. Is there a relationship between public expenditures in energy R&D and carbon emissions per GDP? An empirical investigation. Energy Policy. 38(10):5600–5613. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge M, Kannaiah D, Li J, Khan N, Shahzad M, Kanwal S, Mosab B. 2022. Does foreign private investment affect the clean industrial environment ? Nexus among foreign private investment, CO2 emissions, energy consumption, trade openness, and sustainable economic growth. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29: 26182–26189. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-18814-x.
   Google Scholar
• Godil DI, Yu Z, Sharif A, Usman R, Khan SAR. 2021. Investigate the role of technology innovation and renewable energy in reducing transport sector CO2 emission in China: a path toward sustainable development. Sustainable Development. 29(4):694–707. doi:10.1002/sd.2167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güney T. 2022. Solar energy, governance and CO2 emissions. Renewable Energy. 184:791–798. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyamfi BA, Bein MA, Bekun FV. 2020. Investigating the nexus between hydroelectricity energy, renewable energy, nonrenewable energy consumption on output: evidence from E7 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 27:25327–25339. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08909-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halkos GE, Tzeremes NG. 2013. Carbon dioxide emissions and governance: a nonparametric analysis for the G-20. Energy Economics. 40:110–118. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2013.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzer D. 2022. The impact on domestic CO2 emissions of domestic government-funded clean energy R&D and of spillovers from foreign government-funded clean energy R&D. Energy Policy. 168:113126. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamil B, Yaping S, Ud Din N, Nazneen S, Mushtaq A. 2021. Do governance indicators interact with technological innovation and income inequality in mitigating CO2 emissions in Belt and Road Initiative countries? Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28(37):51278–51296. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14096-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahouli B. 2018. The causality link between energy electricity consumption, CO2 emissions, R&D stocks and economic growth in Mediterranean countries (MCs). Energy. 145:388–399. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao C. 1999. Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J Econom. 90:1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan I, Lei H, Shah AA, Khan I, Baz K, Koondhar MA. 2022. Environmental quality and the asymmetrical nonlinear consequences of energy consumption, trade openness and economic development: prospects for environmental management and carbon neutrality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29:14654–14664. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-16612-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koçak E, Ulucak ZŞ. 2019. The effect of energy R&D expenditures on CO2 emission reduction: estimation of the STIRPAT model for OECD countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 26(14):14328–14338. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-04712-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker R. 2004. Quantile regression for longitudinal data. J Multivar Anal. 91(1):74–89. doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2004.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohansal MR, Shayanmehr S. 2016. The interplay between energy consumption, economic growth and environmental pollution. Application of Spatial Panel simultaneous-equations Model. 5(19):179–216. doi:10.22054/JIEE.2017.7308.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakwa PA. 2022. The effect of industrialization, militarization, and government expenditure on carbon dioxide emissions in Ghana. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 0123456789. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-21187-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantz V, Feng Q. 2006. Assessing income, population, and technology impacts on CO2 emissions in Canada: where’s the EKC? Ecological Economics. 57(2):229–238. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HS, Moseykin YN, Chernikov SU. 2021. Sustainable relationship between FDI, R&D, and CO2 emissions in emerging markets: an empirical analysis of BRICS countries. Russian Journal of Economics. 7(4):297–312.
   Google Scholar
• Li B, Haneklaus N. 2022a. Reducing CO2 emissions in G7 countries: the role of clean energy consumption, trade openness and urbanization. Energy Reports. 8:704–713. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Haneklaus N. 2022b. The role of clean energy, fossil fuel consumption and trade openness for carbon neutrality in China. Energy Reports. 8:1090–1098. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.02.092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Latif K, Latif Z, Li N. 2020. Relationship between economic growth and CO2 emissions: does governance matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 27(14):17221–17228. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08142-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado JA, Silva JS. 2019. Quantiles via moments. J Econom. 213(1):145–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehmood U. 2022. Renewable energy and foreign direct investment : does the governance matter for CO2 emissions ? Application of CS ‑ARDL. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 19816–19822. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-17222-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mensah CN, Long X, Boamah KB, Bediako IA, Dauda L, Salman M. 2018. The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 25(29):29678–29698. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-2968-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mentel U, Eshov M, Salahodjaev R. 2022. Industrialization and CO2 Emissions in Sub-Saharan Africa: the mitigating role of renewable electricity. Energies. 15(3):946. doi:10.3390/en15030946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirziyoyeva Z, Salahodjaev R. 2022. Renewable energy and CO2 emissions intensity in the top carbon intense countries. Renewable Energy. 192:507–512. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mughal N, Arif A, Jain V, Chupradit S, Shabbir MS, Ramos-Meza CS, Zhanbayev R. 2022. The role of technological innovation in environmental pollution, energy consumption and sustainable economic growth: Evidence from South Asian economies. Energy Strategy Reviews. 39:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2021.100745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammad G, Alam MA, Mofijur M, Jahirul MI, Lv Y, Xiong W, Xu J. 2021. Modern developmental aspects in the field of economical harvesting and biodiesel production from microalgae biomass. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 135:110209. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nchofoung TN, Asongu SA. 2022. Effects of infrastructures on environmental quality contingent on trade openness and governance dynamics in Africa. Renewable Energy. 189:152–163. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.02.114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwaka ID, Nwogu MU, Uma KE, Ike GN. 2020. Agricultural production and CO2 emissions from two sources in the ECOWAS region: new insights from quantile regression and decomposition analysis. Science of the Total Environment. 748:141329. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwani C, Adewale A, Chimobi A, Omoke P. 2022. Responding to the environmental effects of remittances and trade liberalization in net ‑ importing economies: the role of renewable energy in Sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Change and Restructuring. doi:10.1007/s10644-022-09403-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obobisa ES, Chen H, Mensah IA. 2022. The impact of green technological innovation and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in African countries. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 180:121670. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omri A, Kahia M, Kahouli B. 2021. Does good governance moderate the financial development-CO2 emissions relationship? Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28(34):47503–47516. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14014-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omri A, Nguyen DK, Rault C. 2014. Causal interactions between CO2 emissions, FDI, and economic growth: evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equation models. Econ Model. 42:382–389. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paramati SR, Alam MS, Hammoudeh S, Hafeez K. 2021. Long‐run relationship between R&D investment and environmental sustainability: evidence from the European Union member countries. International Journal of Finance & Economics. 26(4):5775–5792. doi:10.1002/ijfe.2093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radmehr R, Henneberry SR, Shayanmehr S. 2021. Renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth nexus: a simultaneity spatial modeling analysis of EU countries. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 57:13–27. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2021.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radmehr R, Shayanmehr S, Ali EB, Ofori EK. 2022. Exploring the nexus of renewable energy, ecological footprint, and economic growth through globalization and human capital in g7 economics. Sustainability. 14:12227. doi:10.3390/su141912227
   Google Scholar
• Rahman MM, Alam K. 2022. Impact of industrialization and non-renewable energy on environmental pollution in Australia : do renewable energy and fi nancial development play a mitigating role ? Renewable Energy. 195. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanguinet ER, Azzoni CR, Alvim AM. 2022. Resource-Based Industries and CO2 emissions embedded in value chains: a Regional Analysis for Selected Countries in Latin America. Atmosphere. 13(856). doi:10.3390/atmos13060856.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkodie SA, Strezov V. 2019. Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Science of the Total Environment. 646:862–871. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarpong SY, Bein MA. 2020. The relationship between good governance and CO2 emissions in oil-and non-oil-producing countries: a dynamic panel study of sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 27(17):21986–22003. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08680-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Abbas F, Anis O. 2015. Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries? Energy Economics. 51:275–287. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahbaz M, Raghutla C, Song M, Zameer H, Jiao Z. 2020. Public-private partnerships investment in energy as new determinant of CO2 emissions: the role of technological innovations in China. Energy Economics. 86:104664. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simionescu M, Szeles MR, Gavurova B, Mentel U. 2021. The Impact of Quality of Governance, renewable energy and foreign direct investment on sustainable development in cee countries. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 9:1–15. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2021.765927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suki NM, Suki NM, Afshan S, Sharif A, Meo MS. 2022. The paradigms of technological innovation and renewables as a panacea for sustainable development: a pathway of going green. Renewable Energy. 181:1431–1439. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.09.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC. 2009. Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy. 37(1):246–253. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Mirza N, Vasbieva DG, Abbas Q, Xiong D. 2020. The nexus of carbon emissions, financial development, renewable energy consumption, and technological innovation: what should be the priorities in light of COP 21 Agreements? J Environ Manage. 271(June):111027. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111027.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang Z, Yin F, Zhang Y, Zhang X. 2012. An empirical research on the influencing factors of regional CO2 emissions: evidence from Beijing city, China. Appl Energy. 100:277–284. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.05.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Zeng J, Liu X. 2019. Examining the multiple impacts of technological progress on CO2 emissions in China: a panel quantile regression approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 103(December 2018):140–150. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.046.
   Google Scholar
• Xie Z, Wu R, Wang S. 2021. How technological progress affects the carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from national panel quantile regression. J Clean Prod. 307:127133. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Liu B, Qiu L, Liu X, Lin W, Liu B. 2022. Does the new energy demonstration cities construction reduce CO2 emission? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 1:1–9. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-19436-z
   Google Scholar
• Yang S. 2022. How globalization is reshaping the environmental quality in G7 economies in the presence of renewable energy initiatives? Renewable Energy. 193:128–135. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.006.Yao
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Du Y. 2019. Impact of technological innovation on CO2 emissions and emissions trend prediction on ‘New Normal’economy in China. Atmos Pollut Res. 10(1):152–161. doi:10.1016/j.apr.2018.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Mohsin M, Taghizadeh-Hesary F. 2022. Does green finance counteract the climate change mitigation: asymmetric effect of renewable energy investment and R&D. Energy Economics. (113):106183. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106183.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Zhao T. 2019. Identifying major influencing factors of CO2 emissions in China: regional disparities analysis based on STIRPAT model from 1996 to 2015. Atmos Environ. 207:136–147. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Shahbaz M, Dong X, Dong K. 2021. How does financial risk affect global CO2 emissions? The role of technological innovation. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 168:120751. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubair M, Sinha A. 2022. Do the shocks in technological and financial innovation influence the environmental quality ? Evidence from BRICS economies. Technol Soc. 68(November 2021):101828. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101828.
   Google Scholar