Can user reviews on online shopping websites contribute to user-involved green product innovation: a case study of household refrigerators

References

• Arenas Márquez FJ, Martinez Torres R, Toral S. 2021. Convolutional neural encoding of online reviews for the identification of travel group type topics on TripAdvisor. Inf Process Manage. 58(5):102645. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binbasioglu H. 2020. Comparison of online customer ratings between the eco-labelled and non-eco-labelled hotels of Oslo. Int J Entrepreneurship Innov Manage. 24(4–5):358–373. doi:10.1504/IJEIM.2020.108250.
   Google Scholar
• Book LA, Tanford S, Chang W. 2018. Customer reviews are not always informative: the impact of effortful versus heuristic processing. J Retail Consum Serv. 41:272–280. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch-Sijtsema P, Bosch J. 2015. User involvement throughout the innovation process in high-tech industries[J]. J Prod Innov Manage. 32(5):793–807. doi:10.1111/jpim.12233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazytė K, Weber F, Schaffner D. 2017. Sustainability management of hotels: how do customers respond in online reviews? J Qual Assur Hosp Tourism. 18(3):282–307. doi:10.1080/1528008X.2016.1230033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camacho Otero J, Boks C, Pettersen IN. 2019. User acceptance and adoption of circular offerings in the fashion sector: insights from user-generated online reviews. J Cleaner Prod. 231:928–939. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang NJ, Fong CM. 2010. Green product quality, green corporate image, green customer satisfaction, and green customer loyalty. Afr J Bus Manage. 4(13):2836–2844.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Liu L. 2019. Customer participation, and green product innovation in SMEs: the mediating role of opportunity recognition and exploitation. J Bus Res. 119:151–162. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui AS, Wu F. 2017. The impact of customer involvement on new product development: contingent and substitutive effects[J]. J Prod Innov Manage. 34(1):60–80. doi:10.1111/jpim.12326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Acunto D, Tuan A, Dalli D, Viglia G, Okumus F. 2020. Do consumers care about CSR in their online reviews? An empirical analysis. Int J Hosp Manag. 85:102342. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai J, Cantor DE, Montabon FL. 2015. How environmental management competitive pressure affects a focal firm’s environmental innovation activities: a green supply chain perspective. J Bus Logist. 36(3):242–259. doi:10.1111/jbl.12094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangelico RM. 2016. Green product innovation: where we are and where we are going. Bus Strateg Environ. 25(8):560–576. doi:10.1002/bse.1886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangelico RM, Pujari D. 2010. Mainstreaming green product innovation: why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. J Bus Ethics. 95(3):471–486. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du L, Zhang Z, Feng T. 2018. Linking green customer and supplier integration with green innovation performance: the role of internal integration. Bus Strateg Environ. 27(8):1583–1595. doi:10.1002/bse.2223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Dehaibi N, Goodman ND, MacDonald EF. 2019. Extracting customer perceptions of product sustainability from online reviews. J Mech Des. 141(12):121103. doi:10.1115/1.4044522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genc Nayebi N, Abran A. 2017. A systematic literature review: opinion mining studies from mobile app store user reviews. J Syst Softw. 125:207–219. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2016.11.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdt SO, Wagner E, Schewe G. 2019. The relationship between sustainability and customer satisfaction in hospitality: an explorative investigation using eWOM as a data source. Tourism Manage. 74:155–172. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2019.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemzadeh K, Bortoluzzi G, Yordanova Z. 2022. Collaborating with users to innovate: a systematic literature review[J]. Technovation. 116:102487. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta H, Barua MK. 2018. A framework to overcome barriers to green innovation in SMEs using BWM and Fuzzy TOPSIS. Sci Total Environ. 633:122–139. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin J, Ji P, Gu R. 2016. Identifying comparative customer requirements from product online reviews for competitor analysis. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 49:61–73. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2015.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kausar MA, Dhaka VS, Singh SK. 2013. Web crawler: a review. Int J Comput Applications. 63(2):31–36. doi:10.5120/10440-5125.
   Google Scholar
• Kim Y 2014. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP); Doha, Qatar:Association for Computational Linguistics. p. 1746–1751.
   Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Hlee S, Joun Y. 2016. Green practices of the hotel industry: analysis through the windows of smart tourism system. Int J Inf Manage. 36(6):1340–1349. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim EJ, Tanford S, Book LA. 2020. The effect of priming and customer reviews on sustainable travel behaviors. J Travel Res. 60(1):86–101. doi:10.1177/0047287519894069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee BC. 2014. Critical decisions in new product launch: pricing and advertising strategies on consumer adoption of green product innovation. Asian J Technol Innov. 22(1):16–32. doi:10.1080/19761597.2014.907862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee T. 2020. A Study on analysis of topic modeling using customer reviews based on sharing economy: focusing on sharing parking. J Korea Ind Inf Syst Res. 25(3):39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Lin YC, Chang CCA. 2012. Double standard: the role of environmental consciousness in green product usage. J Mark. 76(5):125–134. doi:10.1509/jm.11.0264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu QS, Miller R. 2019. How social media communications combine with customer loyalty management to boost green retail sales. J Interact Mark. 46:87–100. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2018.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyu F, Choi J. 2020. The forecasting sales volume and satisfaction of organic products through text mining on web customer reviews. Sustainability. 12(11):4383. doi:10.3390/su12114383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melander L. 2017. Achieving sustainable development by collaborating in green product innovation. Bus Strateg Environ. 26(8):1095–1109. doi:10.1002/bse.1970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melander L. 2018. Customer and supplier collaboration in green product innovation: external and internal capabilities. Bus Strateg Environ. 27(6):677–693. doi:10.1002/bse.2024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidoo P, Ramseook Munhurrun P, Li J. 2018. Scuba diving experience and sustainability: an assessment of online travel reviews. J Tourism Hosp. 9:43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Nilashi M, Mardani A, Liao H, Ahmadi H, Manaf AA, Almukadi W. 2019. A hybrid method with TOPSIS and machine learning techniques for sustainable development of green hotels considering online reviews. Sustainability. 11(21):6013. doi:10.3390/su11216013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmedilla M, Martínez Torres MR, Toral S. 2022. Prediction and modelling online reviews helpfulness using 1D convolutional neural networks. Expert Syst Appl. 198:116787. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson EL. 2013. It’s not easy being green: the effects of attribute tradeoffs on green product preference and choice. J Acad Mark Sci. 41(2):171–184. doi:10.1007/s11747-012-0305-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottosson S, Sterten J. 2014. User participation is not always an easy thing when developing an innovation. In: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2014 13th International Design Conference; May 19-22; Dubrovnik, Croatia. p. 579–588.
   Google Scholar
• Park YJ. 2018. Predicting the helpfulness of online customer reviews across different product types. Sustainability. 10(6):1735. doi:10.3390/su10061735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park EO, Chae BK, Kwon J, Kim WH. 2020a. The effects of green restaurant attributes on customer satisfaction using the structural topic model on online customer reviews. Sustainability. 12(7):2843. doi:10.3390/su12072843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park EO, Kim WH, Kwon J. 2020b. Understanding the relationship between green restaurant certification programs and a green restaurant image: the case of TripAdvisor reviews. Kybernetes. 50(6):1689–1703. doi:10.1108/K-02-2020-0112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramayah T, Lee JWC, Mohamad O. 2010. Green product purchase intention: some insights from a developing country. Resour Conserv Recycl. 54(12):1419–1427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saura JR, Reyes Menendez A, Alvarez Alonso C. 2018. Do online comments affect environmental management? Identifying factors related to environmental management and sustainability of hotels. Sustainability. 10(9):3016. doi:10.3390/su10093016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuitema G, De Groot JI. 2015. Green consumerism: the influence of product attributes and values on purchasing intentions. J Consum Behav. 14(1):57–69. doi:10.1002/cb.1501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki T. 2019. What hampers green product innovation: the effect of experience. Ind Innov. 26(10):1242–1270. doi:10.1080/13662716.2019.1611417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suki NM. 2016. Green product purchase intention: impact of green brands, attitude, and knowledge. Br Food J. 118(12):2893–2910. doi:10.1108/BFJ-06-2016-0295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suki NM. 2017. Green products usage: structural relationships on customer satisfaction and loyalty. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 24(1):88–95. doi:10.1080/13504509.2016.1169563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suki NM, Mohd Suki N. 2015. Consumption values and consumer environmental concern regarding green products. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 22(3):269–278. doi:10.1080/13504509.2015.1013074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suryadi D, Kim HM. 2019. A data-driven approach to product usage context identification from online customer reviews. J Mech Des. 141(12):121104. doi:10.1115/1.4044523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu K, Liao SS, Li J, Song Y. 2011. Mining comparative opinions from customer reviews for competitive intelligence. Decis Support Syst. 50(4):743–754. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang B, Liu Y, Liang Y, Tang M. 2019. Exploiting user experience from online customer reviews for product design. Int J Inf Manage. 46:173–186. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Li X, Jai TMC. 2017. The impact of green experience on customer satisfaction: evidence from TripAdvisor. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 29(5):1340–1361. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-07-2015-0371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Fan B, Zhang N, Wang W, Fan W. 2021. Mining product innovation ideas from online reviews. Inf Process Manage. 58(1):102389. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Gu F, Guo J. 2019. Can smart factories bring environmental benefits to its products? A case study of household refrigerators. J Ind Ecol. 23(6):1381–1395. doi:10.1111/jiec.12928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Zeng W, Tse YK, Wang Y, Smart P. 2020. Examining the antecedents and consequences of green product innovation. Ind Mark Manage. 93(413–427).
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Feng T, Shi H. 2018. External involvement and green product innovation: the moderating role of environmental uncertainty. Bus Strateg Environ. 27(8):1167–1180. doi:10.1002/bse.2060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Peng Z. 2019. Shared short-term rentals for sustainable tourism in the social-network age: the impact of online reviews on users’ purchase decisions. Sustainability. 11(15):4064. doi:10.3390/su11154064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar