How do visitors’ perceptions differ from the supply of cultural ecosystem services in urban parks? A case study from Beijing

References

• [BMFPB] Beijing Municipal Forestry and Parks Bureau. 2020. Beijing urban green resources. Beijing. [accessed 2021 Jan 11]. In Chinese. http://yllhj.beijing.gov.cn/zwgk/tjxx/202104/P020210423543814847558.pdf
   Google Scholar
• [CUCSYC] China Urban Construction Statistical Yearbook Committee. 2020. China urban construction statistical yearbook. Beijing. [accessed 2022 Jun 12]. In Chinese. https://www.mohurd.gov.cn/gongkai/fdzdgknr/sjfb/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Andersson E, Tengö M, McPhearson T, Kremer P. 2015. Cultural ecosystem services as a gateway for improving urban sustainability. Ecosyst Serv. 12:165–168. doi:10.1016/J.ECOSER.2014.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artmann M, Mueller C, Goetzlich L, Hof A. 2019. Supply and demand concerning urban green spaces for recreation by elderlies living in care facilities: the role of accessibility in an explorative case study in Austria. Front Environ Sci. 7:1–12. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2019.00136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedimo-Rung AL, Mowen AJ, Cohen DA. 2005. The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: a conceptual model. Am J Prev Med. 28(2):159–168. doi:10.1016/J.AMEPRE.2004.10.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell S, Hamilton V, Montarzino A, Rothnie H, Travlou P, Alvez S 2008. Greenspace and quality of life: a critical review. Transform urban spaces. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286782973_Greenspace_and_quality_of_life_A_critical_review
   Google Scholar
• Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett. 12(12):1394–1404. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram C, Rehdanz K. 2015. Preferences for cultural urban ecosystem services: comparing attitudes, perception, and use. Ecosyst Serv. 12:187–199. doi:10.1016/J.ECOSER.2014.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing Z, Qiu Y, Huang H, Chen T, Zhong W, Jiang H. 2021. Spatial distribution of cultural ecosystem services demand and supply in urban and suburban areas: a case study from Shanghai, China. Ecol Indic. 127:107720. doi:10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2021.107720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuste J, Haase D, Elmqvist T. 2013. Urban landscapes and ecosystem services. In: Ecosyst Serv Agric Urban Landscapes. [place unknown]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; pp. 83–104. doi:10.1002/9781118506271.CH6.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell LK, Svendsen ES, Sonti NF, Johnson ML. 2016. A social assessment of urban parkland: analyzing park use and meaning to inform management and resilience planning. Environ Sci Policy. 62:34–44. doi:10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2016.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KMA, Satterfield T, Goldstein J. 2012. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol Econ. 74:8–18. doi:10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2011.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang P, Olafsson AS. 2022. The scale effects of landscape variables on landscape experiences: a multi-scale spatial analysis of social media data in an urban nature park context. Landsc Ecol. 37(5):1271–1291. doi:10.1007/s10980-022-01402-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng X, Van Damme S, Li L, Uyttenhove P. 2019. Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: a review of methods. Ecosyst Serv. 37:100925. doi:10.1016/J.ECOSER.2019.100925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng X, Van Damme S, Li L, Uyttenhove P. 2022. Cultural ecosystem services in an urban park: understanding bundles, trade-offs, and synergies. Landsc Ecol. 3:1–13. doi:10.1007/s10980-022-01434-8.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza R, de Groot R, Braat L, Kubiszewski I, Fioramonti L, Sutton P, Farber S, Grasso M. 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst Serv. 28:1–16. doi:10.1016/J.ECOSER.2017.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dade MC, Mitchell MGE, Brown G, Rhodes JR. 2020. The effects of urban greenspace characteristics and socio-demographics vary among cultural ecosystem services. Urban For Urban Green. 49:126641. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel TC. 2001. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landsc Urban Plan. 54(1–4):267–281. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A, Aznar O, Boyd JW, Chan KMA, Costanza R, Elmqvist T, Flint CG, Gobster PH, et al. 2012. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109(23):8812–8819. doi:10.1073/pnas.1114773109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou Y, Zhen L, De Groot R, Du B, Yu X. 2017. Assessing the importance of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas of Beijing municipality. Ecosyst Serv. 24:79–90. doi:10.1016/J.ECOSER.2017.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebner M, Fontana V, Schirpke U, Tappeiner U. 2022. Stakeholder perspectives on ecosystem services of mountain lakes in the European Alps. Ecosyst Serv. 53:101386. doi:10.1016/J.ECOSER.2021.101386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gai S, Fu J, Rong X, Dai L. 2022. Users’ views on cultural ecosystem services of urban parks: an importance-performance analysis of a case in Beijing, China. Anthropocene. 37:100323. doi:10.1016/J.ANCENE.2022.100323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong L, Mao B, Qi Y, Xu C. 2015. A satisfaction analysis of the infrastructure of country parks in Beijing. Urban For Urban Green. 14(3):480–489. doi:10.1016/J.UFUG.2015.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegetschweiler KT, de Vries S, Arnberger A, Bell S, Brennan M, Siter N, Olafsson AS, Voigt A, Hunziker M. 2017. Linking demand and supply factors in identifying cultural ecosystem services of urban green infrastructures: a review of European studies. Urban For Urban Green. 21:48–59. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ives CD, Oke C, Hehir A, Gordon A, Wang Y, Bekessy SA. 2017. Capturing residents’ values for urban green space: mapping, analysis and guidance for practice. Landsc Urban Plan. 161:32–43. doi:10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2016.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko H, Son Y. 2018. Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services in urban green spaces: a case study in Gwacheon, Republic of Korea. Ecol Indic. 91:299–306. doi:10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2018.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Uyttenhove P, Van Eetvelde V. 2020. Planning green infrastructure to mitigate urban surface water flooding risk – a methodology to identify priority areas applied in the city of Ghent. Landsc Urban Plan. 194:103703. doi:10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2019.103703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Huang Q, Yang H. 2021. Supply-demand spatial patterns of park cultural services in megalopolis area of Shenzhen, China. Ecol Indic. 121:107066. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E, Lomas PL, Montes C. 2009. Effects of spatial and temporal scales on cultural services valuation. null. 90(2):1050–1059. doi:10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2008.03.013.
   Google Scholar
• MEA. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: ecosystem services and human well-being: synthsis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC. 1978. Psychometric Theory. New York: InMcGraw-Hill. p. 701.
   Google Scholar
• Peng W, Liu W, Cai W, Wang X, Huang Z, Wu C. 2019. Evaluation of ecosystem cultural services of urban protected areas based on public participation GIS (PPGIS): a case study of Gongqing forest park in Shanghai, China. Chinese J Appl Ecol. 30(2):439–448.
   Google Scholar
• Plieninger T, Torralba M, Hartel T, Fagerholm N. 2019. Perceived ecosystem services synergies, trade-offs, and bundles in European high nature value farming landscapes. Landsc Ecol. 34(7):1565–1581. doi:10.1007/s10980-019-00775-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potschin-Young M, Haines-Young R, Görg C, Heink U, Jax K, Schleyer C. 2018. Understanding the role of conceptual frameworks: reading the ecosystem service cascade. Ecosyst Serv. 29:428–440. doi:10.1016/J.ECOSER.2017.05.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford KG, James P. 2013. Changes in the value of ecosystem services along a rural–urban gradient. Landsc Urban Plan. 109(1):117–127. doi:10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2012.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rall E, Bieling C, Zytynska S, Haase D. 2017. Exploring city-wide patterns of cultural ecosystem service perceptions and use. Ecol Indic. 77:80–95. doi:10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2017.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridding LE, Redhead JW, Oliver TH, Schmucki R, McGinlay J, Graves AR, Morris J, Bradbury RB, King H, Bullock JM. 2018. The importance of landscape characteristics for the delivery of cultural ecosystem services. null. 206:1145–1154. doi:10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2017.11.066.
   Google Scholar
• Riechers M, Barkmann J, Tscharntke T. 2016. Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services from urban green. Ecosyst Serv. 17:33–39. doi:10.1016/J.ECOSER.2015.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty RW. 1987. The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Math Model. 9(3–5):161–176. doi:10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Q, Chen H, Liang X, Zhang H, Liu D. 2020. Cultural ecosystem services valuation and its multilevel drivers: a case study of Gaoqu Township in Shaanxi Province, China. Ecosyst Serv. 41:101052. doi:10.1016/J.ECOSER.2019.101052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su TH, Lin CS, Lu SY, Lin JC, Wang HH, Liu CP. 2022. Effect of air quality improvement by urban parks on mitigating PM2.5 and its associated heavy metals: a mobile-monitoring field study. null. 323:116283. doi:10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2022.116283.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian D, Jana A. 2019. Evaluating the cultural ecosystem services of India: comparison of budget allocations to improve the use value of recreational open spaces. Ecosyst Serv. 38:100960. doi:10.1016/J.ECOSER.2019.100960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun R, Li F, Chen L. 2019. A demand index for recreational ecosystem services associated with urban parks in Beijing, China. null. 251:109612. doi:10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2019.109612.
   Google Scholar
• Swanwick C. 2009. Society’s attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land Use Policy. 26(SUPPL. 1):S62–75. doi:10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2009.08.025.
   Google Scholar
• TEEB. 2010. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Geneva, Switzerland. doi:10.1007/BF02331707
   Google Scholar
• Tzoulas K, James P. 2010. Peoples’ use of, and concerns about, green space networks: a case study of Birchwood, Warrington New Town, UK. Urban For Urban Green. 9(2):121–128. doi:10.1016/J.UFUG.2009.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallés-Planells M, Galiana F, Van Eetvelde V. 2014. A classification of landscape services to support local landscape planning. Ecol Soc. 19(1). doi:10.5751/ES-06251-190144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Chang Q, Fan P, Shi X. 2022. From urban greenspace to health behaviors: an ecosystem services-mediated perspective. Environ Res. 213:113664. doi:10.1016/J.ENVRES.2022.113664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Shi X, Cheng K, Zhang J, Chang Q. 2022. How do urban park features affect cultural ecosystem services: quantified evidence for design practices. Urban For Urban Green. 76:127713. doi:10.1016/J.UFUG.2022.127713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Miao Y, Xu M, Zhu Z, Qureshi S, Chang Q. 2021. Revealing the differences of urban parks’ services to human wellbeing based upon social media data. Urban For Urban Green. 63:127233. doi:10.1016/J.UFUG.2021.127233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Jin X, Wang H, Feng Z. 2022. Evaluating the supply-demand balance of cultural ecosystem services with budget expectation in Shenzhen, China. Ecol Indic. 142:109165. doi:10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2022.109165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin C, Sylvie VD, Luyuan L, Pieter U. 2020. Taking “social relations” as a cultural ecosystem service: a triangulation approach. Urban For Urban Green. 55:126790. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Wang Z, Lin G. Performance assessment indicators for comparing recreational services of urban parks. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(7):3337. doi:10.3390/IJERPH18073337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou T, Koomen E, van Leeuwen ES. 2018. Residents’ preferences for cultural services of the landscape along the urban–rural gradient. Urban For Urban Green. 29:131–141. doi:10.1016/J.UFUG.2017.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar