Integrating ecosystem service importance and ecological sensitivity to identify priority areas for ecological conservation and restoration in Miyun Reservoir Basin

References

• Bonheur N, Lane BD. 2002. Natural resources management for human security in Cambodia’s tonle sap biosphere reserve. Environ Science & Policy. 5(1):33–41. doi: 10.1016/S1462-9011(02)00024-2.
   Google Scholar
• Chang H, Yang W, Shi L, Liu Y, Qiu X, Yin F, Sun H. 2021. Spatial and temporal changes of carbon sequestration and soil conservation based on land-use in the farming pastoral ecotone of north China. J Agr Resour Environ. 38:484–493.
   Google Scholar
• Chen N, Kang S, Zhao Y, Zhou Y, Yan J, Lu Y. 2021. Construction of ecological network in Qinling mountains of Shaanxi, China based on MSPA and MCR model. Chin J Appl Ecol. 32:1545–1553.
   Google Scholar
• Chen M, Liu W, Lu D. 2016. Challenges and the way forward in China’s new-type urbanization. Land Use Policy. 55:334–339. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Wang S, Zou Y. 2022. Construction of an ecological security pattern based on ecosystem sensitivity and the importance of ecological services: a case study of the Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration. China Ecol Indic. 136:108688. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong J, Jian P, Yanxu L, Sijing Q, Yinan H. 2020. Integrating spatial continuous wavelet transform and kernel density estimation to identify ecological corridors in megacities. Landscape Urban Plan. 199:103815. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Wang J, Huang L, Zhai T. 2020. Determining and identifying key areas of ecosystem preservation and restoration for territorial spatial planning based on ecological security patterns: a case study of Yantai city. Int J Sust Dev World. 35:190–203. doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200116.
   Google Scholar
• Fan Q, Yang X, Zhang C. 2022. A review of ecosystem services research focusing on china against the background of urbanization. Int J Env Res Pub He. 19(14):8271. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Z, Ma Y, Luo M, Lu Z. 2019. Research progress on the theory and technology of ecological protection and restoration abroad. Acta Ecol Sin. 39:9008–9021．.
   Google Scholar
• Gong S, Xiao Y, Zheng H, Xiao X, Ouyang Z. 2017. Spatial patterns of ecosystem water conservation in China and its impact factors analysis. Acta Ecol Sin. 37:2455–2462.
   Google Scholar
• Guan FJ, Liu LH, Liu JW, Fu Y, Wang LY, Wang F, Li YF, Yu XD, Che N, Xiao Y. 2021. Systematically promoting the construction of natural ecological protection and governance capacity: experts comments on master plan for major projects of National Important Ecosystem Protection and Restoration (2021-2035). J Nat Resour. 36:290–299. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210202.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD, Lovejoy TE, Sexton JO, Austin MP, Collins CD, et al. 2015. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv. 1(2):1–9. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huck M, Jędrzejewski W, Borowik T, Jędrzejewska B, Nowak S, Mysłajek RW. 2011. Analyses of least cost paths for determining effects of habitat types on landscape permeability: wolves in Poland. Acta Theriol (Warsz). 56(1):91–101. doi: 10.1007/s13364-010-0006-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jin X, Wei L, Wang Y, Lu Y. 2021. Construction of ecological security pattern based on the importance of ecosystem service functions and ecological sensitivity assessment: a case study in Fengxian County of Jiangsu Province, China. Environ Dev Sustain. 23(1):563–590. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-00596-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen D. 2013. Ecological restoration in the convention on biological diversity targets. Biodivers Conserv. 22(12):2977–2982. doi: 10.1007/s10531-013-0550-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang J, Zhang X, Zhu X, Zhang B. 2021. Ecological security pattern: a new idea for balancing regional development and ecological protection. A case study of the Jiaodong Peninsula, China. Glob Ecol Conserv. 26:e01472. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong L, Zheng H, Ouyang Z. 2019. Ecological protection and restoration of forest, wetland, grassland and cropland based on the perspective of ecosystem services: a case study in Dongting Lake Watershed. Acta Ecol Sin. 39:8903–8910.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhao X, Guo X, Zhou B, Huang X, Yi D, Ding H. 2021. Optimization of ecological red line in the hilly region of Southern China based on InVEST and MCR model. J Nat Resour. 36(11):2980–2994. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20211119.
   Google Scholar
• MacMillan RA, Moon DE, Coupé RA. 2007. Automated predictive ecological mapping in a Forest Region of B.C., Canada, 2001-2005. Geoderma. 140:353–373. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.04.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang X, Tang L, Wei X, Li Y. 2021. Spatial interaction between urbanization and ecosystem services in Chinese urban agglomerations. Land Use Policy. 109:105587. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan M, Chen T, Huang L, Cao W. 2020. Spatial and temporal variations in ecosystem services and its driving factors analysis in Jing-Jin-Ji region. Acta Ecol Sin. 40:5151–5167.
   Google Scholar
• Rao Y, Dai J, Dai D, He Q, Wang H. 2021. Effect of compactness of urban growth on regional landscape ecological security. Land. 10(8):848. doi: 10.3390/land10080848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Liu Y, Yu C, Liu X. 2021. Research progress on the arrangement of territorial ecological restoration. prog Phys Geogr. 40(11):1925–1941. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.11.011.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Zhao P, Long Y, Song W, Liu X. 2022. Identification of key areas of land space ecological protection and restoration based on the pattern of ecological security in Guangdong, Hong Kong and Maca. Acta Ecol Sin. 42:450–461. doi: 10.5846/stxb202011072848.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Meng J. 2022. Quantifying the spatial pattern for the importance of natural resource ecosystem services in China. J Nat Resour. 37(1):17–33. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20220102.
   Google Scholar
• Xu W, Xiao Y, Zhang J, Yang W, Zhang L, Hull V, Wang Z, Zheng H, Liu J, Polasky S. 2017. Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 114:1601–1606. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620503114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi X, Bai CQ, Liang LW, Zhao ZC, Song WX, Zhang Y. 2020. The evolution and frontier development of land ecological restoration research. J Nat Resour. 35:37–52. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200105.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Wang Z, Zhang F, Liu L, Feng L. 2022. Zoning of ecological protection and restoration for territorial space based on importance-vulnerability analysis framework. Geogr Geo-Inf Sci. 38:84–94.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Yan Y, Deng H, Liu G, Dai L, Tang L, Shi L, Shao G. 2020. Remarks about landsenses ecology and ecosystem services. Int J Sust Dev World. 27(3):196–201. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2020.1718795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar