Nature as relationship partner: an old frame revisited

References

• Abram, D. 1996. The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-than-Human World. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Acerbi, A., V. Lampos, P. Garnett, and R. A. Bentley. 2013. “The Expression of Emotions in 20th Century Books.” PLoS ONE 8 (3): e59030. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antal, M., and L. Balogh. 2009. “Modeling Belief Systems with Scale-free Networks.” Neural Networks 22: 1359–1371. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2009.04.001.10.1016/j.neunet.2009.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antal, M., and J. Hukkinen. 2010. “The Art of the Cognitive War to Save the Planet.” Ecological Economics 69: 937–943. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.01.002.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnocky, S., M. Stroink, and T. DeCicco. 2007. “Self-construal Predicts Environmental Concern, Cooperation, and Conservation.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 27: 255–264. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.005.10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthus-Bertrand, Y. 2009. Home. Directed by Yann Arthus-Bertrand. Europa Corp. Accessed July 31, 2013. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqxENMKaeCU
   Google Scholar
• Baldick, J. 2000. Animal and Shaman: Ancient Religions of Central Asia. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bamberg, S. 2003. “How Does Environmental Concern Influence Specific Environmentally Related Behaviors? A New Answer to an Old Question.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 23: 21–32. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00078-6.10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00078-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beddoe, R., R. Constanza, J. Farley, E. Garza, J. Kent, I. Kubiszewski, L. Martinez, et al. 2009. “Overcoming Systemic Roadblocks to Sustainability: The Evolutionary Redesign of Worldviews, Institutions, and Technologies.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 2483–2489. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812570106.10.1073/pnas.0812570106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D. R. 2005. “Environmental Learning, Metaphors and Natural Capital.” Environmental Education Research 11: 53–69.10.1080/1350462042000328749
   Google Scholar
• Boulding, K. E. 1966. “The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth.” In Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy, edited by H. Jarrett, 3–14. Baltimore, MD: Resources for the Future/Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, C. 2001. “How Language Limits Our Understanding of Environmental Education.” Environmental Education Research 7: 141–151.10.1080/13504620120043144
   Google Scholar
• Bragg, E. A. 1996. “Towards Ecological Self: Deep Ecology Meets Constructionist Self-theory.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 16: 93–108. doi:10.1006/jevp.1996.0008.10.1006/jevp.1996.0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. R., and K. Gross. 2005. “Values, Framing, and Citizens’ Thoughts about Policy Issues: Effects on Content and Quantity.” Political Psychology 26: 929–948. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00451.x.10.1111/pops.2005.26.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L. R. 2011. World on the Edge: How to Prevent Environmental and Economic Collapse. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Cachelin, A., R. Norvell, and A. Darling. 2010. “Language Fouls in Teaching Ecology: Why Traditional Metaphors Undermine Conservation Literacy.” Conservation Biology 24: 669–674.10.1111/cbi.2010.24.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cachelin, A., and E. Ruddell. 2013. “Framing for Sustainability: The Impact of Language Choice on Educational Outcomes.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 3: 306–315.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Research on Environmental Decisions. 2009. The Psychology of Climate Change Communication: A Guide for Scientists, Journalists, Educators, Political Aides, and the Interested Public. New York. Accessed July 31, 2013. http://www.csc.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/_/pdf/CRED_Psychology_Climate_Change_Communication.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, T. 2010. Common Cause: The Case for Working with Our Cultural Values. WWF. Accessed July 31, 2013. http://assets.wwf.org.uk/downloads/common_cause_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. L., J. D. Green, and A. Reed. 2009. “Interdependence with the Environment: Commitment, Interconnectedness, and Environmental Behavior.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 29: 173–180. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.001.10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Descola, P. 2006. “Beyond Nature and Culture.” Proceedings of the British Academy 139: 137–155. doi:10.1017/S0269889700001988.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. 2001. “On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?” Journal of Politics 63: 1041–1066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. 2011. “What’s It All about?: Framing in Political Science.” In Perspectives on Framing, edited by Gideon Keren, 279–302. New York: Psychology Press/Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Dutcher, D. D., J. C. Finley, A. E. Luloff, and J. B. Johnson. 2007. “Connectivity with Nature as a Measure of Environmental Values.” Environment and Behavior 39: 474–493. doi:10.1177/0013916506298794.10.1177/0013916506298794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. “Biodiversity Campaign.” Accessed July 31, 2013. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/biodiversity/campaign/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J. 2005. “Making Sense of Stewardship: Metaphorical Thinking and the Environment.” Environmental Education Research 11: 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, A. 2001. “The Hunger for Meaning.” Futures 33: 171–180. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(00)00062-8.10.1016/S0016-3287(00)00062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. 1983. “Structure-mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy.” Cognitive Science 7: 155–170. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(83)80009-3.10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., and S. Goldin-Meadow. 2003. Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1999. “Risk and Responsibility.” Modern Law Review 62: 1–10. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00188.10.1111/mlr.1999.62.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Gooding, P. 2013. “Mass Digitization and the Garbage Dump: The Conflicting Needs of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods.” Lit Linguist Computing 28: 425–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, S., W. Scott, and A. Stables. 2000. “Beyond O’Riordan: Balancing Anthropocentrism and Ecocentrism.” International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 9: 36–47.10.1080/10382040008667628
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, P. M. 2013. “The Changing Psychology of Culture from 1800 through 2000.” Psychological Science 24: 1722–1731. doi:10.1177/0956797613479387.10.1177/0956797613479387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansla, A., A. Gamble, A. Juliusson, and T. Gärling. 2008. “The Relationships between Awareness of Consequences, Environmental Concern, and Value Orientations.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 28: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.004.10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh, J. B. 2010. “Personality and Environmental Concern.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 30: 245–248. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.004.10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earthvalues Institute. 2013. “Putting the Capital Back in Nature.” Accessed July 29, 2014. http://www.earthvalues.org/en/programs/capital-n
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2014. “Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability.” Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmenta Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F. G., M. Ranney, T. Hartig, and P. A. Bowler. 1999. “Ecological Behavior, Environmental Attitude, and Feelings of Responsibility for the Environment.” European Psychologist 4: 59–74. doi:10.1027//1016-9040.4.2.59.10.1027//1016-9040.4.2.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kals, E., D. Schumacher, and L. Montada. 1999. “Emotional Affinity toward Nature as a Motivational Basis to Protect Nature.” Environment and Behavior 31: 178–202. doi:10.1177/00139169921972056.10.1177/00139169921972056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasser, T., and A. Ahuvia. 2002. “Materialistic Values and Well-being in Business Students.” European Journal of Social Psychology 32: 137–146. doi:10.1002/ejsp.85.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilbourne, W. E., S. C. Beckmann, and E. Thelen. 2002. “The Role of the Dominant Social Paradigm in Environmental Attitudes: A Multinational Examination.” Journal of Business Research 55: 193–204. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00141-7.10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00141-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., and J. Agyeman. 2002. “Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-environmental Behavior?” Environmental Education Research 8: 239–260.10.1080/13504620220145401
   Google Scholar
• Korfiatis, K. J., A. G. Stamou, and S. Paraskevopoulos. 2004. “Images of Nature in Greek Primary School Textbooks.” Science & Education 88: 72–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. 2010. “Why It Matters How We Frame the Environment.” Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture 4: 70–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R., and M. Schlesinger. 2005. “Policy Frames, Metaphorical Reasoning, and Support for Public Policies.” Political Psychology 26: 77–114. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00410.x.10.1111/pops.2005.26.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., C. de Vreese, and R. Slothuus. 2009. “Issue Importance as a Moderator of Framing Effects.” Communication Research 36: 400–425. doi:10.1177/0093650209333028.10.1177/0093650209333028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. W. S., and N. Schwarz. 2014. “Framing Love: When It Hurts to Think We Were Made for Each Other.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 54: 61–67. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.007.10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, C. 1963. Totemism Today. Translated by Rodney Needham. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A. 2000. “What is an Ecological Identity?” Environmental Politics 9: 59–81. doi:10.1080/09644010008414551.10.1080/09644010008414551
   Google Scholar
• Martin, P., and G. Thomas. 2000. “Interpersonal Relationships as a Metaphor for Human–Nature Relationships.” Australian Journal of Outdoor Education 5: 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, F. S., and C. M. Frantz. 2004. “The Connectedness to Nature Scale: A Measure of Individuals’ Feeling in Community with Nature.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 24: 503–515. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001.10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWilliam, C. L., M. Stewart, J. B. Brown, S. McNair, K. Desai, M. L. Patterson, N. DelMaestro, and B. J. Pittman. 1997. “Creating Empowering Meaning: An Interactive Process of Promoting Health with Chronically Ill Older Canadians.” Health Promotion International 12: 111–123.10.1093/heapro/12.2.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, C. 2003. Reinventing Eden. The Fate of Nature in Wester Culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, J.-B., Y. K. Shen, A. P. Aiden, A. Veres, M. K. Gray, The Google Books Team, J. P. Pickett, et al. 2010. “Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books.” Science 331: 176–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milstein, T. 2011. “Nature Identification: The Power of Pointing and Naming.” Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture 5: 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. W., O. J. Sheldon, D. R. Ames, and M. J. Young. 2007. “Metaphors and the Market: Consequences and Preconditions of Agent and Object Metaphors in Stock Market Commentary.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 102: 174–192. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.03.001.10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouhot, J.-F. 2011. “Past Connections and Present Similarities in Slave Ownership and Fossil Fuel Usage.” Climatic Change 105: 329–355. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9982-7.10.1007/s10584-010-9982-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouhot, J.-F. 2014. “Author Response to ‘Slave Ownership and Fossil Fuel Usage – A Commentary’ by Klas Rönnbäck.” Climatic Change 122: 11–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir, S. 1994. “The Web and the Spaceship: Metaphors of the Environment.” ETC: A Review of General Semantics 51: 145–152.
   Google Scholar
• Naess, A. 1988. “Self Realization: An Ecological Approach to Being in the World.” In Thinking like a Mountain: Towards a Council of All Beings, edited by J. Seed, J. Macy, P. Fleming, and A. Naess, 19–30. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Namka, L., ed. 2011. Defense Mechanisms That Affect Relationships. ByRegion.Net. Accessed July 31, 2013. http://www.byregion.net/articles-healers/Defense_Mechanisms.html
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., S. Lecheler, A. R. T. Schuck, and C. H. De Vreese. 2012. “Framing Effects on Values, Emotions, and Attitudes.” Paper Prepared for Presentation at the 2012 Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Portland, OR, March 22–24. Accessed September 15, 2012. http://wpsa.research.pdx.edu/meet/2012/nelsonthomas.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., and Z. M. Oxley. 1999. “Issue Framing Effects on Belief Importance and Opinion.” The Journal of Politics 61: 1040–1067. doi:10.2307/2647553.10.2307/2647553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., Z. M. Oxley, and R. A. Clawson. 1997. “Towards a Psychology of Framing Effects.” Political Behavior 19: 221–246. doi:10.1023/A:1024834831093.10.1023/A:1024834831093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, N. 2012. “Long-term Changes in the Usage of Climate and Weather Words.” Weather 67: 171–174.10.1002/wea.1924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E. K., J. M. Zelenski, and S. A. Murphy. 2011. “Happiness is in Our Nature: Exploring Nature Relatedness as a Contributor to Subjective Well-being.” Journal of Happiness Studies 12: 303–322. doi:10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7.10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orwant, J. 2012. Ngram Viewer 2.0. googleresearch.blogspot.com. Accessed July 31, 2013. http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2012/10/ngram-viewer-20.html
   Google Scholar
• Papworth, S. K., J. Rist, L. Coad, and E. J. Milner-Gulland. 2009. “Evidence for Shifting Baseline Syndrome in Conservation.” Conservation Letters 2: 93–100. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00049.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, H. E. 2010. “Measuring Love and Care for Nature.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 30: 455–463. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.004.10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. 2002. Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A. 2005. “Editorial.” Environmental Education Research 11: 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A., and W. Scott. 2013. “Identifying Needs in Environmental Education Research.” In International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education, edited by R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, and A. E. J. Wals, 518–528. London: AERA & Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, D. R. 2013. “The Content of Historical Books as an Indicator of past Interest in Environmental Issues.” Biodiversity and Conservation 22: 2795–2803.10.1007/s10531-013-0555-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnbäck, K. 2014. “Slave Ownership and Fossil Fuel Usage: A Commentary.” Climatic Change 122: 1–9.10.1007/s10584-013-0998-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D., D. James, and C. Watson. 2003. Indigenous Kinship with the Natural World in New South Wales. Hurstville: Fineline Print & Copy Service Pty.
   Google Scholar
• Roszak, T. 2002. The Voice of the Earth: An Exploration of Ecopsychology. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Phanes Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarason, S. B. 1974. The Psychological Sense of Community: Prospects for a Community Psychology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffer, M., and S. R. Carpenter. 2003. “Catastrophic Regime Shifts in Ecosystems: Linking Theory to Observation.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 648–656. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, H. W. 1994. “Wild Metaphors: Nature as Machine or Person?” The Futurist 28: 64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W. 2000. “Empathizing with Nature: The Effects of Perspective Taking on Concern for Environmental Issues.” Journal of Social Issues 56: 391–406. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00174.10.1111/0022-4537.00174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W. 2001. “The Structure of Environmental Concern: Concern for Self, other People, and the Biosphere.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 21: 327–339. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0227.10.1006/jevp.2001.0227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W., V. V. Gouveia, L. D. Cameron, G. Tankha, P. Schmuck, and M. Franěk. 2005. “Values and Their Relationship to Environmental Concern and Conservation Behavior.” Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 36: 457–475. doi:10.1177/0022022105275962.10.1177/0022022105275962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W., C. Shriver, J. J. Tabanico, and A. M. Khazian. 2004. “Implicit Connections with Nature.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 24: 31–42. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7.10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. 1992. “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, edited by M. Zanna, 1–65. Orlando, FI: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, Dhavan V., David Domke, and Daniel B. Wackman. 1996. “‘To Thine Own Self Be True’: Values, Framing, and Voter Decision-making Strategies.” Communication Research 23: 509–560. doi:10.1177/009365096023005001.10.1177/009365096023005001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, K. M., and H. A. McGregor. 2000. “Extrinsic Value Orientation and ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’.” Journal of Personality 68: 383–411. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00101.10.1111/1467-6494.00101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, F., and H. H. Edwards. 2005. “Economic Individualism, Humanitarianism, and Welfare Reform: A Value-based Account of Framing Effects.” Journal of Communication 55: 795–809. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03023.x.10.1111/jcom.2005.55.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slothuus, R. 2008. “More than Weighting Cognitive Importance: A Dual-process Model of Issue Framing Effects.” Political Psychology 29: 1–28. doi:10.1111/j.14679221.2007.00610.x.10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00610.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. 2011. “Editorial: Terrible Economics, Ecosystems and Banking.” Environmental Values 20: 141–145. doi:10.3197/096327111X12997574391562.10.3197/096327111X12997574391562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stables, A. 2001. “Language and Meaning in Environmental Education: An Overview.” Environmental Education Research 7: 121–128.10.1080/13504620123688
   Google Scholar
• Steg, L., and C. Vlek. 2009. “Encouraging pro-Environmental Behaviour: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 29: 309–317.10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., T. Dietz, T. Abel, G. A. Guagnano, and L. Kalof. 1999. “A Value–Belief–Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism.” Human Ecology Review 6: 81–97. doi:10.2307/2083693.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, K.-P., S.-L. Lee, and M. M. Chao. 2013. “Saving Mr. Nature: Anthropomorphism Enhances Connectedness to and Protectiveness toward Nature.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49: 514–521.10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibodeau, P. H., and L. Boroditsky. 2011. “Metaphors We Think with: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning.” PLoS ONE 6: e16782. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016782.10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomashow, M. 1996. Ecological Identity: Becoming a Reflective Environmentalist. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timmerman, N., and J. Ostertag. 2011. “Too Many Monkeys Jumping in Their Heads: Animal Lessons within Young Children’s Media.” Canadian Journal of Environmental Education 16: 59–75.
   Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. M., W. K. Campbell, and B. Gentile. 2012. “Changes in Pronoun Use in American Books and the Rise of Individualism, 1960–2008.” Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 44: 406–415. doi:10.1177/0022022112455100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhagen, F. C. 2008. “Worldviews and Metaphors in the Human–Nature Relationship: An Ecolinguistic Exploration through the Ages.” Language & Ecology 2: 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., J. T. Cacioppo, and N. Epley. 2010. “Who Sees Human? The Stability and Importance of Individual Differences in Anthropomorphism.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 5: 219–232.10.1177/1745691610369336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. 1992. The Diversity of Life. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, D. D. N., and S. M. Koger. 2004. The Psychology of Environmental Problems. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• WWF (World Wildlife Fund). 2009. Because We’re All Connected. Directed by Celyn Brazier. Nexus Productions. Accessed July 31, 2013. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjGe-_OYWQQ&feature=channel_page
   Google Scholar
• WWF (World Wildlife Fund). 2011. We Are All Connected. Directed by Mato Atom. Troublemakers.tv. Accessed July 31, 2013. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4gLIXnlw2I
   Google Scholar