Facilitating place-based environmental education through bird studies: an action research investigation

References

• Adams, P., and A. Gynnild. 2013. “Environmental Messages in Online Media: The Role of Place.” Environmental Communication 7 (1): 113–130. doi:10.1080/17524032.2012.754777.
   Google Scholar
• Ateşkan, A., and J. Lane. 2016. “Promoting Field Trip Confidence: Teachers Providing Insights for Pre-service Education.” European Journal of Teacher Education 39 (2): 190–201. doi:10.1080/02619768.2015.1113252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, S. A. 2009. “Place-based Education and Teaching about Marin County Birds: Curriculum Development for Teachers.” Unpublished master’s thesis, Dominican University of California, San Rafael, CA. http://scholar.dominican.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1149andcontext=masters-theses.
   Google Scholar
• Braus, J. A., and D. Wood. 1993. Environmental Education in the Schools: Creating a Program That Works. Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Broda, H. W. 2007. Schoolyard-enhanced Learning: Using the Outdoors as an Instructional Tool, K–8. Portland, ME: Stenhouse. http://www.stenhouse.com/html/schoolyard-enhanced-learning.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Brossard, D., B. Lewenstein, and R. Bonney. 2005. “Scientific Knowledge and Attitude Change: The Impact of a Citizen Science Project.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (9): 1099–1121. doi:10.1080/09500690500069483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardiff, S. 2012. “Critical and Creative Reflective Inquiry: Surfacing Narratives to Enable Learning and Inform Action.” Educational Action Research 20 (4): 605–622. doi:10.1080/09650792.2012.727653.
   Google Scholar
• CEE (Council for Environmental Education) 2004. Project Wild: A Summary of Research Findings 1983–1995 and 1996–2003. Huston, TX: CEE. http://www.projectwild.org/documents/ProjectWILDSummaryofResearchFindings1983-1995and1996-2003_000.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, K., H. Smith, and J. Dyment. 2014. “Pedagogical Approaches to Exploring Theory–Practice Relationships in an Outdoor Education Teacher Education Programme.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 42 (2): 167–185. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2014.894494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. 1978. Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Dinçer, Z. 2012. “A Comparison of Selected Elementary Curricula in Regard to an Action Based Environmental Curriculum for Elementary Schools in Turkey.” Unpublished master’s thesis, Bilkent University, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Dyment, J. E. 2005. “Green School Grounds as Sites for Outdoor Learning: Barriers and Opportunities.” International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 14 (1): 28–45.10.1080/09500790508668328
   Google Scholar
• Erdoğan, M. 2011. "The Effects of Ecology-Based Summer Nature Education Program on Primary School Students’ Environmental Knowledge, Environmental Affect and Responsible Environmental Behavior." [Ekoloji temelli yaz doğa eğitimi programının ilköğretim öğrencilerinin çevreye yönelik bilgi, duyuşsal eğilimler ve sorumlu davranışlarına etkisi] Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 11(4): 2223–2237
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan, M., T. Marchinowski, and A. Ok. 2009. “Content Analysis of Selected Features of K-8 Environmental Education Research Studies in Turkey.” Environmental Education Research 15 (5): 525–548.10.1080/13504620903085776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, M., M. Uşak, and M. Bahar. 2013. “A Review of Research on Environmental Education in Non-traditional Settings in Turkey, 2000 and 2011.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 8 (1): 37–57.
   Google Scholar
• Estes, C. 2003. Developing, Evaluating, and Disseminating an Energy Education Resource Trunk. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2002. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gillchrist, S. 2004. Getting Bird Conservation Education into Wisconsin Schools: A Summary of Telephone Interviews with Teachers. Bureau of Integrated Science Services, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 52, Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Glowinski, S., and F. Moore. 2014. “The Role of Recreational Motivation in the Birding Participation–Environmental Concern Relationship.” Human Dimensions of Wildlife 19 (3): 219–233. doi:10.1080/10871209.2014.878966.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, J. J. 2007. “Citizens, Science and Bird Conservation.” Journal of Ornithology 148 (S1): 77–124.10.1007/s10336-007-0239-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. D., D. Noble, R. Field, J. Marchant, M. Raven, and D. W. Gibbons. 2003. “Using Birds as Indicators of Biodiversity.” Ornis Hungarica 12 (13): 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gruenewald, D. A., and G. A. Smith, eds. 2014. Place-based Education in the Global Age: Local Diversity. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Güler, T. 2009. “The Effects of an Ecology Based Environmental Education on Teachers’ Opinions about Environmental Education.” Education and Science 34 (151): 30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham, S. H., and D. R. Sewing. 1988. “Barriers to Environmental Education.” Journal of Environmental Education 19 (2): 17–24.10.1080/00958964.1988.9942751
   Google Scholar
• Jegede, O., M. Taplin, and S. L. Chan. 2000. “Trainee Teachers’ Perception of Their Knowledge about Expert Teaching.” Educational Research 42 (3): 287–308.10.1080/001318800440614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, C. E. 2005. “The ‘I-Thou’ Relationship, Place-based Education, and Aldo Leopold.” Journal of Experiential Education 27 (3): 277–285.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, A. C., and J. C. Lee. 2003. “Teachers’ Perceptions of Teaching Environmental Issues within the Science Curriculum: A Hong Kong Perspective.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 12 (3): 187–204.10.1023/A:1025094122118
   Google Scholar
• Köşker, N., and S. Karabağ. 2012. “Coğrafya eğitiminde yer temelli öğretim yaklaşımına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri.” [Teacher Opinions on Place-based Education Approach in Geography Education.] Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 16 (3): 123–137.
   Google Scholar
• Krasny, M. E., and K. G. Tidball. 2009. “Community Gardens as Contexts for Science, Stewardship, and Civic Action Learning.” Cities and the Environment 2 (1): 1–18.10.15365/cate
   Google Scholar
• Lane, J., R. Wilke, R. Champeau, and D. Sivek. 1994. “Environmental Education in Wisconsin: A Teacher Survey.” The Journal of Environmental Education 25 (4): 9–17.10.1080/00958964.1994.9941959
   Google Scholar
• Larson, L. R., G. T. Green, and H. K. Cordell. 2011. “Children’s Time Outdoors: Results and Implications of the National Kids Survey.” Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 29 (2): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Louv, R. 2005. Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-deficit Disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magpiong, D. 2007. This Class is for the Birds. Fledging Birders Institute. http://www.fledgingbirders.org/teachers.html.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., and B. G. Rossman. 1999. Designing Qualitative Research. http://pages.cmns.sfu.ca/danielahadi/files/2013/01/Marshall_Rossman.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McAteer, M. 2013. Action Research in Education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McCrea, E. J. 2006. Flying Wild Program Evaluation Report. http://www.flyingwild.org/aboutus/documents/2006McCreaProgramEvaluation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• MEB (Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı) 2009. The reasons of renewal of curriculum and the differences between behaviourist and conctructivist approach. [Öğretim programlarının yenilenme gerekçeleri ve davranışçı yaklaşım ile yapılandırmacı yaklaşım arasındaki farklar] Ankara: Ministry of National Education. Yazar.
   Google Scholar
• Meydan, A., R. Bozyiğit, and M. Karakurt. 2012. “The level of participants' expectations about the ecology based environment projects.” [Ekoloji temelli doğa eğitimi projelerinin katılımcı beklentilerini karşılama düzeyleri] Marmara Geography Journal [ Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi] 25: 238–255.
   Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, V. 1995. “Professional Development of In‐service Primary Teachers in Environmental Education: An Action Research Approach.” Environmental Education Research 1 (1): 85–97.10.1080/1350462950010107
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 1999. “Enhancing the Quality and Credibility of Qualitative Analysis.” HSR: Health Services Research 34 (5): 1189–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEEC (Place-based Education Evaluation Collaborative) 2010. The Benefits of Place-based Education: A Report from the Place-based Education Evaluation Collaborative. 2nd ed. http://tinyurl.com/PEECBrochure.
   Google Scholar
• Petrova, S., M. Garcia, and S. Bouzarovski. 2016. “Using Action Research to Enhance Learning on End-use Energy Demand: Lessons from Reflective Practice.” Environmental Education Research. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1144177.
   Google Scholar
• Ragland, B. 2006. “Positioning the Practitioner Researcher: Five Ways of Looking at Practice.” Action Research 4 (2): 165–182. doi:10.1177/1476750306063990.
   Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M., J. Dillon, K. Teamey, M. Morris, M. Y. Choi, D. Sanders, and P. Benefield. 2004. A Review of Research on Outdoor Learning. Shrewsbury: National Foundation for Educational Research and King’s College London.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., L. Spencer, and W. O’Conner. 2003. “Carrying out Qualitative Analysis.” In Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, edited by J. Ritchie and J. Lewis, 219–262. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Robelia, B. A., C. Greenhow, and L. Burton. 2011. “Environmental Learning in Online Social Networks: Adopting Environmentally Responsible Behaviors.” Environmental Education Research 17 (4): 553–575.10.1080/13504622.2011.565118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, M. 2008. “For the Birds! Seeing, Being, and Creating the Bird World.” Young Children 63 (1): 26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Shenton, A. K. 2004. “Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects.” Education for Information 22: 63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–23. http://people.ucsc.edu/~ktellez/shulman.pdf. 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, D. 1998. “Using Natural Settings for Environmental Education: Perceived Benefits and Barriers.” The Journal of Environmental Education 29 (3): 23–31.10.1080/00958969809599115
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. A. 2007. “Place-based Education: Breaking through the Constraining Regularities of Public School.” Environmental Education Research 13 (2): 189–207.10.1080/13504620701285180
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, D. 2004. Place-based Education: Connecting Classrooms and Communities. Barrington, MA: The Orion Society.
   Google Scholar
• Spartz, J. T., and B. R. Shaw. 2011. “Place meanings surrounding an urban natural area: A qualitative inquiry.” Journal of environmental psychology 31 (4): 344–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511557842
   Google Scholar
• Telli, S., P. Brok, C. Tekkaya, and J. Çakıroğlu. 2009. “Turkish Students’ Perceptions of Their Biology Learning Environments: The Effects of Gender and Grade Level.” Asian Journal of Educational Research and Synergy 1 (1): 110–124.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. 2004. “A Typology of Approaches to Facilitator Education.” Journal of Experiential Education 27 (2): 123–140.10.1177/105382590402700202
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. J. 2005. “Dimensions of Facilitator Education.” In The IAF Handbook of Group Facilitation: Best Practices from the Leading Organisation in Facilitation, edited by S. Schuman, 525–541. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. 2008. “Facilitate First Thyself: The Person-centered Dimension of Facilitator Education.” Journal of Experiential Education 31 (2): 168–188.10.5193/JEE.31.2.168
   Google Scholar
• Tuncer, G., H. Ertepinar, C. Tekkaya, and S. Sungur. 2005. “Environmental Attitudes of Young People in Turkey: Effects of School Type and Gender.” Environmental Education Research 11 (2): 215–233.10.1080/1350462042000338379
   Google Scholar
• Ürey, M., and S. Çepni. 2014. “The evaluation of the science based interdisciplinary school garden program's effect on students' attitudes towards science and technolgy lesson according to the different variables.” [Fen temelli ve disiplinlerarasi okul bahçesi programinin öğrencilerin fen ve teknoloji dersine yönelik tutumlari üzerine etkisinin farkli değişkenler açisindan değerlendirilmesi] OMU Education Faculty Journal [ OMÜ Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi] 33 (2): 537–548.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhouse, J. L., and C. E. Knapp. 2000. “Place-based Curriculum and Instruction: Outdoor and Environmental Education Approaches.” Thresholds in Education 27 (3/4): 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Yılmaz, O., and O. H. Andersen. 2004. “Views of Elementary and Middle School Turkish Students toward Environmental Issues.” International Journal of Science Education 26 (12): 1527–1546.10.1080/0950069042000177280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar