Development of the International Ocean Literacy Survey: measuring knowledge across the world.

References

• Ballantyne, R. 2004. “Young Students’ Conceptions of the Marine Environment and Their Role in the Development of Aquaria Exhibits.” GeoJournal 60 (2): 159–163.10.1023/B:GEJO.0000033579.19277.ff
   Google Scholar
• Brody, M. J. 1996. “An Assessment of 4th-, 8th-, and 11th-Grade Students’ Environmental Science Knowledge Related to Oregon’s Marine Resources.” The Journal of Environmental Education 27 (3): 21–27.10.1080/00958964.1996.9941463
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. 2015. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cava, F., S. Schoedinger, C. Strang, and P. Tuddenham. 2005. “Science Content and Standards for Ocean Literacy: A Report on Ocean Literacy.” Accessed October 13, 2017. http://www.cosee.net/files/coseeca/OLit04-05FinalReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-F., and H. Jiao. 2014. “Exploring the Utility of Background and Cognitive Variables in Explaining Latent Differential Item Functioning: An Example of the PISA 2009 Reading Assessment.” Educational Assessment 19: 77–96.10.1080/10627197.2014.903650
   Google Scholar
• DeVries, T., M. Holzer, and F. Primeau. 2017. “Recent Increase in Oceanic Carbon Uptake Driven by Weaker Upper-Ocean Overturning.” Nature 542: 215–218.10.1038/nature21068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dromgool, Regan C., N. Burke, and B. Allard. 2015. “Ocean Literacy Knowledge Questionnaire for Teachers – Evaluating Your Knowledge about the Ocean.” Explorers Planning Guide For Primary School Teachers, Explorers Education Programme, Marine Institute, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Eddy, T. D. 2014. “One Hundred-Fold Difference between Perceived and Actual Levels of Marine Protection in New Zealand.” Marine Policy 46: 61–67.10.1016/j.marpol.2014.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embreston, S. E., and S. P. Reise. 2000. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Fauville, G. 2017. “Digital Technologies as Support for Learning about the Marine Environment: Steps toward Ocean Literacy.” PhD diss., University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Fauville, G., P. McHugh, C. Domegan, Å. Mäkitalo, L. Friis Møller, M. Papathanassiou, C. Alvarez Chicote, et al. Forthcoming. “Using Collective Intelligence to Identify Barriers to Teaching 12–19 Year Olds about the Ocean in Europe.” Marine Policy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortner, R. W., and V. J. Mayer. 1991. “Repeated Measures of Students’ Marine and Great Lakes Awareness.” The Journal of Environmental Education 23: 30–35.10.1080/00958964.1991.9943067
   Google Scholar
• Greely, T. 2008. “Ocean Literacy and Reasoning about Ocean Issues: The Influence of Content, Experience and Morality.” PhD diss., University of South Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, H. 2013. “Connecting Value and Knowledge of Marine Environmental Issues: A Social Survey in Coastal Nova Scotia.” Honours Thesis, Dalhousie University.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, H., H. K. Lotze, and D. Wallace. 2015. “Youth and the Sea: Ocean Literacy in Nova Scotia, Canada.” Marine Policy 58: 98–107.10.1016/j.marpol.2015.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K., H. Swaminathan, and H. J. Rogers. 1991. Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M., D. Martos, and D. Barstow. 2007. Revolutionizing Earth System Science Education for the 21st Century, Report and Recommendations from a 50-State Analysis of Earth Science Education Standards. Cambridge, MA: TERC.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, P. W., and D. T. Thayer. 1988. “Differential Item Functioning and the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure.” In Test Validity, edited by H. Wainer and H. I. Braun, 129–145. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling 6: 1–55.10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kania, J., and M. Kramer. 2011. “Collective Impact.” Stanford Social Innovation Review Winter 2011 36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. 2002. “What Do Infit and Outfit, Mean-Square and Standardized Mean.” Rasch Measurement Transactions 16: 878.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P., and R. Hatzinger. 2007. “Extended Rasch Modeling: The ERm Package for the Application of IRT Models in R.” Journal of Statistical Software 20: 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantel, N., and W. Haenszel. 1959. “Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data from Retrospective Studies of Disease.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute 22: 719–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Geographic Society, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Centers for Ocean Sciences Education Excellence, and National Marine Educators Association and College of Exploration. 2005. Ocean Literacy: The Essential Principles of Ocean Sciences K-12. Silver Spring, MD: NOAA.
   Google Scholar
• National Marine Educators Association. 2010. “Ocean Literacy Scope and Sequence for Grades K-12, Published in the National Marine Educators Association Special Report #3.” In The Ocean Literacy Campaign Featuring the Ocean Literacy Scope & Sequence for Grades K-12. NMEA.
   Google Scholar
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2013. Ocean Literacy: The Essential Principles of Ocean Sciences for Learners of All Ages: Version 2: March 2013. Accessed October 13, 2017. http://www.coexploration.org/oceanliteracy/documents/OceanLitChart.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2010. NOAA’s Education Program: Review and Critique. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NAAEE (North American Association For Environmental Education). 2011. Developing a Framework for Assessing Environmental Literacy: Executive Summary. Washington, DC: NAAEE.
   Google Scholar
• Dupont, S., and G. Fauville. 2017. “Ocean Literacy as a Key toward Sustainable Development and Ocean Governance.” In Handbook on the Economics and Management of Sustainable Oceans, edited by P. Nunes, L. E. Svensson and A. Markandya, 519–537. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers & UNEP.10.4337/9781786430724
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2016. The Ocean Economy in 2030. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Penfield, R. D. 2005. “DIFAS: Differential Item Functioning Analysis System.” Applied Psychological Measurement 29: 150–151.10.1177/0146621603260686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pörtner, H. O., D. M. Karl, P. W. Boyd, W. W. L. Cheung, S. E. Lluch-Cota, Y. Nojiri, D. N. Schmidt, et al. 2014. “Ocean Systems.” In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part a: Global and Sectoral Spects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, et al., 411–484. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Accessed October 13, 2017. http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. [1960] 1980. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. 2017. Psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. W. D., and M. Sardo. 2015. “Making a Splash - the Development and Pilot of a Formal Measure of Public Ocean Literacy.” Master thesis, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F. S. Chapin, E. F. Lambin, T. M. Lenton, et al. 2009. “A Safe Operating Space for Humanity.” Nature 461: 472–475.10.1038/461472a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoedinger, S., L. U. Tran, and L. Whitley. 2010. “From the Principles to the Scope and Sequence : A Brief History of the Ocean Literacy Campaign.” Current: The Journal of Marine Education, Special Report #3 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, C., S. Schoedinger, and A. de Charon. 2007. ““Can You Be Science Literate without Being Ocean Literate?” Current: The Journal of Marine.” Education 23 (1): 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (United Nations of Education Scientific and Cultural Organisation). 1975. The International Workshop on Environmental Education Final Report, Belgrade, Yugoslavia. Paris: UNESCO/UNEP.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (United Nations of Education Scientific and Cultural Organisation). 2005. Aspects of Literacy Assessment: Topics and Issues from the UNESCO Expert Meeting. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. 1991. “Sociocultural Setting and the Zone of Proximal Development: The Problem of Text-Based Realities.” In Culture, Schooling, and Psychological Development, edited by L. Tolchinsky Landsmann, 71–86. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2012. “Availability and Consumption of Fish.” Accessed October 13, 2017. http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/3_foodconsumption/en/index5.html
   Google Scholar
• Yves, R. 2012. “Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of Statistical Software 48 (2): 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zieky, M. 1993. “Practical Questions in the Use of DIF Statistics in Item Development.” In Differential Item Functioning, edited by P. W. Holland and H. Wainer, 337–364. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zumbo, B. D., A. M. Gadermann, and C. Zeisser. 2007. “Ordinal Versions of Coefficients Alpha and Theta for Likert Rating Scales.” Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 6: 21–29.10.22237/jmasm/1177992180
   Google Scholar