A posthuman approach to human-animal relationships: advocating critical pluralism

References

• Alaimo, S., and S. Hekman. 2008. Introduction: Emerging Models of Materiality in Feminist Theory. In Material Feminisms, edited by S. Alaimo, 1–19. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R., A. Froggatt, and L. Wellesley. 2014. Livestock – Climate Change’s Forgotten Sector. Global Public Opinion on Meat and Dairy Consumption. Chatham House: The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter”. Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831. The University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, I., C. Lindblom, G. Åbacka, C. Bengs, and A. Hörnell. 2015. “‘He Just Has to Like Ham’ – The Centrality of Meat in Home and Consumer Studies.” Appetite 95: 101–112. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.06.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2011. Nomadic Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Calarco, M. 2004. “Deconstruction is not Vegetarianism: Humanism, Subjectivity, and Animal Ethics.” Continental Philosophical Review 37 (2): 175–201. doi:10.1007/s11007-005-3925-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callicott, J. B. 1990. “The Case against Moral Pluralism.” Environmental Ethics 12 (2): 99–124. doi:10.5840/enviroethics199012220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callicott, J. B. 2002. Envrionmental ethics. In, Encylopedia of Global Environmental Change (Vol. Ed.), edited by P. Timmerman, 231–242. Toronto, ON: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ceballos, G., P. R. Ehrlich, A. D. Barnosky, A. García, R. M. Pringle, and T. M. Palmer. 2015. “Accelerated Modern Human-Induced Species Losses: Entering the Sixth Mass Extinction.” Science Advances 1 (5): 1–5. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1400253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. A. G., and J. Mcphie. 2015. “From Places to Paths: Learning for Sustainability, Teacher Education and a Philosophy of Becoming”. Environmental Education Research 22 (7): 1002–1024. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2015.1057554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. 2002. Understanding Deleuze. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Corman, L., and T. Vandrovcová. 2014. “Radical Humility: Toward a More Holistic Critical Animal Studies Pedagogy.” In Defining Critical Animal Studies: An Introduction to an Intersectional Social Justice Approach to Animal Liberation, edited by A. Nocella II, J. Sorenson, K. Socha and A. Matsuoka, 135–157. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers, R., and M. Monk. 2005. “The First Cut is the Deepest: Reflections on the State of Animal Dissection in Biology Education.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 37 (5): 583–600. doi:10.1080/00220270500041523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1983. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 2004. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated and edited by B. Massumi. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2014. The National Curriculum in England: Key Stages 3 and 4 framework document. Accessed December, 6 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-secondary-curriculum
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 2008. The Animal That Therefore: I Am. L’Animal que donc je suis. Edited by M-L. Mallet, Translated by D. Wills. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, C. [1978] 2001. “Att Äta Kött och att Äta Människor”. [Eating Meat and Eating People.] In Moralfilosofiska essäer. Translated and edited by J. Backström and G. Torrkulla. Stockholm: Thales.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, J., and C. Adams, eds. 2007. The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics. Ney york: Columbia University Press
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. 2002. “Environmental Pragmatism, Ecocentrism and Deliberative Democracy: Between Problem-Solving and Fundamental Critique”. In Democracy and the Claims of Nature, ed. B. Pepperman Taylor and B. Minteer, 49–69. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. 2004. The Green State Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evernden, N. 1988. “Nature Industrial Society.” In Cultural Politics in Contemporary America, edited by S. Jhally and I. Angus, 151–164. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, L. 2013. “Three Degrees of Separation: Accounting for Naturecultures in Environmental Education Research.” In International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education, edited by R. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, and A. Wals, 409–417. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, E., and R. Parry. 2015. “Prestigious high school ends feline dissection after anatomy students make dead cats 'dance' to 'Meow Mix' theme song and post the video online”. Daily Mail, June 4. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3111455/School-ends-feline-dissection-anatomy-students-make-dead-cats-dance-Meow-Mix-theme-song-post-video-online.html
   Google Scholar
• Gannon, S. 2015. “Saving squawk? Animal and Human Entanglement at the Edge of The Lagoon.” Environmental Education Research 23 (1): 91–110. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2015.1101752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, N. 2015. “Undoing Anthropocentrism in Educational Inquiry: a Phildickian Space Odyssey?” In Posthumanism and Educational Research, edited by N. Snaza and J. Weaver, 151–166. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” In Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, L. 2007. “Subjecting Cows to Robots. Farming Technologies and the Making of Animal Subjects.” Environment and Planning. Society and Space 25: 1041–1060. doi:10.1068/d77j.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jickling, B., and A. Wals. 2008. “Globalization and Environmental Education: Looking Beyond Sustainable Development.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 40 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1080/00220270701684667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopnina, H., and B. Cherniak. 2015. “Cultivating a Value for Non-Human Interests through the Convergence of Animal Welfare, Animal Rights, and Deep Ecology in Environmental Education.” Education Sciences 5: 363–379. doi:10.3390/educsci5040363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloro-Bidart, T. 2017a. “A Feminist Posthumanist Political Ecology of Education for Theorizing Human-animal Relations/Relationships.” Environmental Education Research 23 (1): 111–130. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1135419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloro-Bidart, T. 2017b. “Neoliberal and Disciplinary Environmentality and ‘Sustainable Seafood’ Consumption: Storying Environmentally Responsible Action.” Environmental Education Research 23 (8): 1182–1199. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1105198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorimer, J. 2015. Wildlife in the Anthropocene: Conservation after Nature. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.10.5749/minnesota/9780816681075.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lundegård, I., and P. O. Wickman. 2012. “It Takes Two to Tango: Studying how Students Constitute Political Subjects in Discourses on Sustainable Development.” Environmental Education Research. 18 (2): 153–169. doi:10.1080/13504622.2011.590895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, C. A. 1989. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, K. 2016. “Reconsidering Children’s Encounters With Nature and Place Using Posthumanism”. Australian Journal of Environmental Education 32(1): 42–56, 2016 42 doi:10.1017/aee.2015.48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannion, G., A. Fenwick, and J. Lynch. 2013. “Place-responsive Pedagogy: Learning from Teachers’ Experiences of Excursions in Nature.” Environmental Education Research 19 (6): 792–809. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.749980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCance, D. 2013. “Feminist Contributions to Critical Animal Studies.” In Studies, An Introduction, edited by Critical Animal, 87–104. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milton, K. 2002. Loving Nature: Towards an Ecology of Emotion. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2009. “Climate Changed: People Displaced. A Thematic Report from the Norwegian Refugee Council.” Gamlebyen Grafiske. Accessed October 7, 2010. www.nrc.no
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J. 2006. “Who Speaks for Nature?” In How Nature Speaks: The Dynamics of the Human Ecological Condition, edited by Y. Haila, C. Dyke, 261–278. Durham,  NC: Duke University Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, J. 2009. “Under the Knife: Animal Dissection as a Contested School Science Activity.” Journal for Activist Science & Technology Education 1 (2): 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, J. 2008. “Environmental Ethics and Democratic Responsibility: A Pluralistic Approach to ESD.” In Values and Democracy in Education for Sustainable Development: Contributions from Swedish Research, edited by J. Öhman, 17–32. Malmö: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, J., and L. Östman. 2008. “Clarifying the Ethical Tendency in Education for Sustainable Development Practice: A Wittgenstein-inspired Approach.” Canadian Journal of Environmental Education 13 (1): 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., and F. Nxumalo. 2015. “Nature/Culture Divides in a Childcare Centre.” Environmental Humanities 7 (1): 151–168.10.1215/22011919-3616380
   Google Scholar
• Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., and F. Nxumalo. 2017. “Staying with the Trouble' in Child-insect-educator Common Worlds.” Environmental Education Research. http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/13504622.2017.1325447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. 2007. “The School and the Animal Other. An Ethnography of Human – Animal Relations in Education.” PhD diss., Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. 2010. “Is 'the Posthuman' Educable? On the Convergence of Educational Philosophy, Animal Studies and Posthumanist Theory.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural. Politics of Education 31 (2): 237–250. doi:10.1080/01596301003679750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. 2011. “Release the Moths: Critical Animal Studies and the Posthumanist Impulse.” Culture, Theory and Critique 52 (1): 65–81. doi:10.1080/14735784.2011.621663.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. 2013. “Parasatic Pedagogies and Materialities of Affect in Vetrinary Education”. Emotion, Space and Society: 50–56.
   Google Scholar
• Philo, C., and C. Wilbert. 2000. “Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: An introduction.” In Beastly Places: New geographies of Human-Animal Relations, edited by Animal Spaces, 1–34. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. 2002. Environmental Culture, the Ecological Crisis of Reason. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rautio, P. 2013. “Being Nature: Interspecies Articulation as a Species-specific Practice of Relating to Environment.” Environmental Education Research 19 (4): 445–457. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.700698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravilious, K. 2009. “How Green is Your Pet?” New Scientist. 204: 46–47. doi:10.1016/S0262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, T. 2004. The Case for Animal Rights. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, B. 2016. “Challenging Anthropocentrism in Education: Posthumanist Intersectionality and Eating Animals as Gastro-Aesthetic Pedagogy.” In The Educational Significance of Human and Non-human Animal Interactions, edited by S. Rice and A. Rud, 31–49. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, B., and S. Rocha. 2015. “School Lunch is Not a Meal: Posthuman Eating as Folk Phenomenology.” Educational Studies 51 (6): 482–496. doi:10.1080/00131946.2015.1098643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. 2017. “‘Everything has to die One day:’ Children’s Explorations of the Meanings of Death in Human-Animal-Nature Relationships.” Environmental Education Research 23 (1): 75–90. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1144175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, C. L., and K. Semenko. 2016. “We Take ‘Cow’ and Compliment: Fattenting Humane, Environmental, and Social Justice Education.” In The Fat Pedagogy Reader: Challenging Weight-Based Oppression Through Critical Pedagogy, edited by E. Cameron and C. Russell, 211–220. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D. 2005. Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism: The Challenge of Difference for Environmentalism. Oxford: Oxford University press.
   Google Scholar
• Selby, D. 1995. Earthkind: A teacher’s handbook on humane education. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.
   Google Scholar
• Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Wissenschaft. 2012. Rahmenlehrpläne kompakt: Themen und Inhalte des Berliner Unterrichts in der Grundschule. Berlin: Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Wissenschaft [Department for Education, Youth and Science: Comprehensive Teaching Plans in Berlin: Topics and Contents of Lessons in Berlin Primary Schools].
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. 1975. Animal Liberation. New York: Avon.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. 1996. Praktisk Etik – Andra Upplagan. Original title, Practical Ethics- 2nd ed. Translated by J. Josefsson. Stockholm:Thales.
   Google Scholar
• Snaza, N., and J. Weaver. 2015. “Education and the Posthumanist Turn.” In Posthumanism and Educational Research, edited by N. Snaza and J. Weaver, 1–16. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spannring, R. 2017. “Animals in Environmental Education Research.” Environmental Education Research 23 (1): 63–74. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1188058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, K. S., R. A. Carter, T. P. Yount, J. Aretz, and P. R. Buff. 2013. “Nutritional Sustainability of Pet Foods.” Advances in Nutrition 4 (2): 141–150. doi:10.3945/an.112.003335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. 2011. Curriculum for the Compulsory School, Preschool Class and the Recreation Centre. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, D. 2014. “LRF om kött: Det är Särskilt Viktigt för Tjejer som Växer och Ska Bli Snygga.” Dagens Media, January 29. http://www.dagensmedia.se/nyheter/pr/article3801249.ece
   Google Scholar
• Undervisningsministeriet. 2009. Læseplan for Faget Biologi [Curriculum for the Subject Biology]. http://www.uvm.dk/folkeskolen/fag-timetal-og-overgange/faelles-maal/historisk/historiske-faelles-maal-2009.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver-Hightower, M. B. 2011. “Why Educational Researchers Should take School Food Seriously.” Educational Researcher 40 (1): 15–21.10.3102/0013189X10397043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar